4. Final Report (Milestone 4: Submission Due to 24Sep018 NB if you ask for an extension, you will be required to submit the material for the above milestones first) Start writing your draft, as you do your research project. (Put it all together) Write an executive summary of the report (Purpose, Scope, Technologies, Annotated Bibliography, Recommendations, Future Research and Conclusion) Write the Introduction from Milestone 2 Write a Review of Literature based on past and current work in your topic (no more than 3 pages) Briefly explain each technique/solution/issue used in the past and present (5 or more) Explain the technology/technique/solution which best suits your application/problem, based on various factors with proper justifications. This literature review can be one of the above technologies or applications or Issues or a combination of more than one. Annotated Bibliography of a minimum of 5 papers from journals or articles for guidelines) Include tables and graphs to support your justification and argument. Discuss your research findings with a conclusion. Referencing must be in CSU APA6 format. Rationale back to top This assessment task will assess the following learning outcome/s: be able to explain and demonstrate various components of Internet of Things (IoT). be able to analyse the role and importance of IoT in the modern world. be able to investigate and propose various requirements of IoT for real world applications. be able to evaluate a variety of existing and developing architecture technologies for IoT. be able to describe and evaluate different applications of the IoT. Marking criteria and standards back to top Criteria HD DI CR PS Marks Abstract Comprehensive and precise description of the executive summary Thorough and clear description of the executive summary Moderate but clear description of the executive summary Most of the parts of executive summary included but some not clear 10 Introduction Thorough explanation of the topics Good explanation of the methodologies Moderate explanation of the methodologies Enough explanation of the methodologies 20 Annotated Bibliography Thorough and comprehensive research of minimum 10 journals and conference papers Good research of minimum 10 journal and conference papers Moderate research of 10 journal and conference papers Enough research of 10 journal and conference papers but not complete 20 Review of Literature Through comparisons of the background topic with minimum 5 parameters Choice of the best methodology to suit the problem Good comparisons of the background topic with minimum 5 parameters the good methodology to suit the problem Some comparison of the background topic with minimum 5 parameters Methodology to suit the problem Few comparisons of the background topic with few parameters Methodology to suit the problem but incomplete 20 Problem Solution or Recommendations or Findings Solution of the problem explained thoroughly Solution of the problem explained well Solution of the problem explained enough Solution of the problem explained incompletely 10 Writing Style and Grammar Correct styles and presentation Correct styles and presentation Correct styles and presentation could be improved. Correct styles and presentation incomplete. 10 Referencing All sections include the APA6 style referencing with in-text Most sections include the APA6 style referencing within text Enough sections include the APA6 style referencing within text Some sections include the APA6 style referencing within text missing 10 Total 100 Presentation back to top Your assessment should be a maximum of 4000 words and submitted in either MS Word or PDF format (PDF usually preserves the formatting, MS Word may not - submit ONLY one). Do not submit your assignment in any other format and also do not submit multiple copies of the assessment. Use A4 page size with Times New Roman/Arial/Calibri font and use font size 11 or 12. Please include a title, your student ID, and name with your submission. Your name should also be included as a footnote, with page numbers in your document. All textual elements within an assessment must be submitted in a format that is readable by Turnitin. Specific exceptions, where an assessment requires the insertion of image-based evidence of workings will be outlined in the context of the assessment. Students that deliberately attempt to insert the content of assessments in a format that is not readable by Turnitin may be subject to Academic Misconduct investigations. References: You MUST use the CSU APA referencing style for all cited material you have used in your work (use in-text citations). You must use primary sources (ie Wikipedia is NOT acceptable, something you thought up yourself because you think you know better, is also unacceptable - unless it has been published and peer-reviewed, but then it would still need to be cited). Do not use direct quotes from sources, all your work must be written in your own words. Copying sections of text from other sources, even if referenced, is plagiarism and is considered Academic Misconduct.