Select an organisation (most probably the one that you are most familiar with) and that has undergone some form of strategic re-alignment. This can be public, private-sector or third sector and the changes might include restructuring, implementation of new IT systems or business practices, entry into a new market, outsourcing etc. Make your selection carefully and with a consideration to the accessibility of internal and external data. Produce an individual report that includes an analysis of strategic options and recommended actions. It is anticipated that some theoretical frameworks do not fit well with some sectors, as they tend to be private sector focused; but you should nevertheless attempt to refer to academic theory or use frameworks that best fit your organisation. Appropriate and well cited theories that have not been taught on this module are also welcome. Academic theory should be referenced to APA Standard. Your report should be structured round the following four tasks: 1. With reference to appropriate Macro & Micro frameworks analyse and evaluate the environment of your organisation from the perspective of the external context within which it operates. Summarise your findings by drawing attention to the key drivers for change, major economic trends and their implications in the global economy (20 marks) 2. Using appropriate theoretical frameworks identify and discuss where value is added throughout the organisation and where appropriate how your organisation sustains it’s position/advantage in its sector or market (30 marks) 3. Identify a process of strategic change in the organisation and using appropriate change management models identify the blockages and facilitators of change, ensuring that you evaluate the role of organisational culture in this process (30 marks) 4. Consider whether your organisation’s business objectives are appropriate and achievable and critique the implementation process that resulted in the change (20 marks) Total Word Count @ 3,500 plus appendices  years plan for the objectives of company (2012 – 2018) 2. Change is already started in 2012 and undergone. 3. Question No. 1,2,3,4 are relevant and use the same company. 4. Choose SG Company and must be same company for the whole assignment. 5. CreateOne Change andFour Objectivesrelated to Marketing/Business Objectives. 6. Selected company is Ademco (Far East) Pte Ltd. (www.ademcosecurity.com) for Security Solutions Industry. 7. They made a changein 2012 which is Cloud-based framework structure for Software-as-a-Service solutions.(e.g. VerifCloud Time Attendance System with Fingerprint devices) 8. There is Vision which will not be changed. 9. Mission may change depends on the existing progress. 10. Need to mention the existing status whether success or fail to meet 2018 Objectives 11. Recommend for improvements which is relevant to 2012 Change. No. 1 and No.2 12. Micro and Macro Framework 13. Porter’s 5 Forces for Micro and PESTLE for Macro 14. ProvideImplications & Outcomes 15. ProvideALL 5 Forces (Porter’s 5 Forces) by justifying High or Low (Note: NO Medium) 16. Provide Three Opportunities and Three Threats which are the most significant. 17. Provide Value Change Template 18. Provide weaknesses of the organization. (Note: Weakness is Things which your competitors have and those are better than you.) 19. No.1 is potential, No.2 is existence and No.2 is important than No.1. No. 3 20. Change Management 21. Evolutionary and Revolutionary (Short Term) 22. Process Change/Culture Change What change process is using in the organization? (E.g. Some kind of resource limitation (blockage)) 23. Organization is in which stages of Implementation? 24. Kotter’s 8 steps change model for the process. 25. Model is template and how we are going to change the process. No. 4 26. One of the model used by some company is SAFE Model. S – Suitability (external) A – Acceptability (Whose/Key Stakeholders) F - Feasibility (Workable/Outcomes) E – Evaluation 27. Consider for 4 to 5 key stakeholders 28. User SAFE Analysis 29. Provide analysis, changes, suggestions, recommendations and discussions

Read less