Instructions for the 20% task due week 12
For parts 1,2,3,4 you must the articles
Liao, M. T., & Tseng, C. Y. (2010). Students' Behaviors and Views of Paraphrasing and Inappropriate Textual Borrowing in an EFL Academic Setting.Journal of Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics, 14(2), 187-211.
Rasso, J. T. (2013). Apology Accepted: The Benefits of an Apology for a Deficient Audit Following an Audit Failure. AUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 33(1), 161-176
That are available on moodle.
For part 5 you do a literature review on ANY topic, there are no restrictions on what topic you choose just make sure you demonstrate you know what a literature review is and demonstrate you know what a problem statement is
The task is worth a total of 20%, There are 5 parts, submit all parts as a single document to turnitin
Part 1 , 200-400 words, worth 4% Discuss how both articles review the literature and compare the literature review
Part 2 , 100-200 words ,worth 2% Discuss the ANOVA used in both articles and compare the analysis
Part 3 ,100-300 words , worth 2% Comment on the analysis of how some students answered the open ended question
â€œwhy do students plagiarise assignmentsâ€, (refer to the article on paraphrasing)
Part 4, 100-200 words , worth 2% comment on the students attempt to paraphrase article (refer to page 2 of this document) the
Part 5 , 1000-1500 words worth 10% , Do your own literature review on any topic you want.
More detailed instructions
Make sure you discuss the problem statement when commenting on the literature review
Make sure you mention how the ANOVA analysis helps answer the problem given in the problem statement
just give a summary of the analysis in the journal article, Donâ€™t copy it word for word summarize it
You need to look at the 0% paraphrasing task on moodle before reading the rest of the instructions.
The article on paraphrases demonstrate the problems students have by giving examples of students responses to the paraphrasing task and analysing the results , make similar comments on the following responses to the paraphrasing task,
The conventional ways of child-rearing has been acquitted by a university study which goes to show how much change has occurred in the dominant belief of family life. As long as the traditional ways of child rearing is urged, it is not essential if the principle is imposed by spanking or other disciplinary methods. The answer for who used to be accountable is not evident anymore. Is it really challenging to see where the course of their actions will lead to, and that an undisciplined child is too conceited to cope with the responsibilities and unpredictability of life?
Yet the very certainty that hitting must be absolved by a college study proposes how far abroad we've meandered from what used to be the focal principle of family life: folks in control. At last, it most likely doesn't make a difference whether that precept is upheld by punishing or other restorative measures, inasmuch as it is implemented.
The answer used to be self-evident. It's undeniable no more. What's more, is it so hard to see where that street leads, to comprehend that it is conceivable to be harmed without anyone else's input regard, and that a ruined tyke turns into a conceited grown-up not well outfitted to manage the impulses and inversions of life?
It is hard to raise a child and it is important to do it properly . Seriously injuring children is very wrong. Children are the future and it is important to look after them
You can use the codes used in the paraphrasing article , or you can use your own codes
Part 5 worth 10% 1000-1500 words
Do a literature review using 5 or more articles that all discuss the same narrow topic, make sure you include a related problem statement (research question), that is based on the gap in the literature. Discuss what are the benefits of solving the problem (answering the question), You donâ€™t have to do the research yourself. There are no restrictions on the methods used in the articles, for example they can be all qualitative or all quantitative or some can be qualitative and some can be quantitative.
Some general theory to help with all parts of the assignment and the final exam
*Quantitative methods are deductive , answer close ended questions and the answer is objective because the answer is right or wrong, It cannot answer the important question
â€œWhy do people think or feel a certain wayâ€
*Qualitative methods are inductive , answer open ended questions and the answer is subjective because there are many different good answers, many different OK answers etc, It can answer the important question â€œWhy do people think or feel a certain wayâ€