Critically evaluate and discuss two academic leadership models then apply those models to two known public leaders that work in organisations.
Demonstrate clearly that you really understand the key issues in the question.
Demonstrate thorough grasp of relevant concepts and issues.
Ensure you adopt a very critical approach to your own work and the work of others.
In-depth application of theories, concepts and models properly.
Logic and relevance of conclusions and recommendations.
Creativity in your assessment of and suggestions.
Breadth and depth of relevant readings and out of class references.
The references you use have to be academically valid. Please note that Wikipedia and other student study/notes related websites are not acceptable as academic references. Using this type of sources will result in deduction from your mark.
- Autocratic leadership (Mahathir Mohamad, 4th and longest serving PM of Malaysia)
- Participative leadership (Najib Razak, 6th and current PM of Malaysia)
-Please define clearly each of the leadership (105 words each) using 2-3 valid academic sources for each side.
-Please briefly describe the leaders chosen and explain the organisation involved (cabinet/government of Malaysia in both cases). Allocate around 50 words for each individual with the organisation.
-application of the leadership models to the leaders. About 300 words for each leader. When discussing the second leader, make comparisons to the first leader. Please include 5-6 valid academic articles/journals.