refer to LEO for more comprehensive information on this assessment task
Due date: Monday 14 September
Weighting: Ungraded. PASS (PS) /FAIL (NN).
Length and/or format: 1000 words
Purpose: The assessment task is to assist the student to develop an
understanding and knowledge of a medication relevant to mental
health and to develop their critical thinking.
Learning outcomes assessed: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8
How to submit: Students are to submit the following via Turnitin Case Study
submission folder as one document:
-Assignment
-Reference List (adhering to APA style)
Return of assignment: Results for the assessment will be published on LEO.
Marked assessments will be available online via Turnitin.
Assessment criteria: Case study submission will be returned to students online via
LEO. This assessment task will be graded against a
standardised criterion referenced rubric. Please follow these
criteria closely during the planning and development of your
assignment.
NRSG262 Clinical Integration – Mental Health, Semester 2 2015 Page 20 of 22
Assessment Task - Professional Portfolio C. Case Study: Medication Management Marking Guide
** Please note that this assessment is pass/fail only. The rubric has been developed to give students feedback on the quality of the work and not an actual grade. **
Elements
(Weighting)
Expected (HD)
Standard
Expected (D)
Standard Expected (CR)
Standard
Expected (P)
Standard
Expected (F)
Standard (No attempt made)
Reasoning (20 marks)
Student has:
- highlighted in detail all the relevant
significant factors for this task
- Explained and analysed the concepts and
or issues and their importance.
- Referred to relevant theory and literature
to support their reasoning.
- Considered different perspectives – (e.g.
theoretical or ethical) in relation to the
concepts or issues.
Student has:
- highlighted in detail all the
relevant significant factors for
this task
- Explained and analysed the
concepts and or issues and
their importance.
- Referred to relevant theory
and literature to support their
reasoning.
Student has:
- highlighted most of the
relevant significant factors for
this task.
Explained and analysed the
concepts and or issues and
their importance on most
occasions.
Student has:
- highlighted some relevant
significant factors for this task.
-Limited explanation and
analyses of the concepts and or
issues.
Student has:
- highlighted minimal
significant factors for this
task.
-Little explanation and
analysis of the concepts and
or issues
-
Student has:
- no significant factors for this
task.
-no explanation and analysis of
concepts and or issues
Reflection (20 marks)
- Critically reflected on the main points for
discussion and elaborated on what might
work and why (hypothesised possible
outcomes).
- Made use of reflection and integrated all
aspects of reflection into the discussion
Integration and reflection. ‘
- Used mental health terminology
throughout the discussion and within
context.
Emphasised the importance of consumer
perspectives throughout the discussion.
- Made use of reflection and
integrated most aspects of
reflection into the discussion.
Integration and reflection. ‘
- Used mental health
terminology throughout most
the discussion and within
context.
Emphasised the importance of
consumer perspectives
throughout most of the
discussion.
- Made use of reflection and
integrated some aspects of
reflection into the discussion.
Used mental health
terminology on occasion and
within context of the
discussion
Emphasised the importance of
consumer perspectives
throughout some of the
discussion.
-Limited use of reflection and
minimal integration of
reflection into the discussion
-Minimal use of mental health
terminology and within
context.
-Some emphasis on the
importance of consumer
perspective throughout the
discussion.
no evidence of the use of
reflection
- Little use of mental health
terminology and not used
within context.
-no emphasis of consumer
perspective
.
- no use of reflection
-no use of mental health
terminology
-no emphasis on consumer
perspectives
Sources and
Referencing
(5 marks)
Credible and relevant references are used.
Accurate use of APA referencing style on
most occasions.
Accurate use of in-text citations.
Credible and relevant
references are used. Accurate
use of APA referencing style on
most occasions.
Mostly accurate use of in-text
citations.
Credible and relevant
references are used. Accurate
use of APA referencing style on
most occasions.
Most references are credible
and relevant. Accurate use of
APA referencing style on most
occasions.
Accurate use of in-text
citations on most occasions.
Not all references are
credible and/or relevant.
Many inaccuracies with the
APA referencing style.
Too many direct quotations
There are no references used.
Sentence and
Paragraph
Structure/Intelligibility
(2.5 marks)
The writing is organised into paragraphs,
and the information is organised
appropriately within the paragraph. Each
paragraph relates to a discrete idea. There
are clear linking sentences that link each
paragraph to the next.
The writing is organised into
paragraphs, and the
information is mostly
organised appropriately within
the paragraph. Most
paragraphs relates to a
discrete idea. There are clear
linking sentences that link most
paragraphs to the next.
The writing is organised into
paragraphs, and the
information is mostly
organised appropriately within
the paragraph. Most
paragraphs relates to a
discrete idea. The paragraphs
mostly link to one another.
The writing is organised into
paragraphs, and the
information is mostly
organised appropriately within
the paragraph. Most
paragraphs relates to a
discrete idea.
The writing is organised into
paragraphs, and the
information is mostly
organised appropriately
within the paragraph.
However, most paragraphs
don't relate to a discrete
idea, or link to one another.
There is no evidence of
paragraphs.
Mechanics: Grammar,
Spelling and
Punctuation (2.5
marks)
There are no errors with grammar, spelling
and punctuation that impact readability,
and the meaning is easily discernible.
There are minimal errors with
grammar, spelling and
punctuation that impact
readability, and the meaning is
easily discernible.
There are some errors with
grammar, spelling and
punctuation that impact
readability. However, the
meaning is readily discernible.
There are substantial errors
with grammar, spelling and
punctuation that impact
readability. The errors detract
significantly, but the meaning
is discernible.
There are substantial errors
with grammar, spelling and
punctuation that impact
readability. The errors
detract significantly, but the
meaning is discernible with
some effort.
Grammar, spelling and
punctuation are such that the
reader cannot mak