refer to LEO for more comprehensive information on this assessment task Due date: Monday 14 September Weighting: Ungraded. PASS (PS) /FAIL (NN). Length and/or format: 1000 words Purpose: The assessment task is to assist the student to develop an understanding and knowledge of a medication relevant to mental health and to develop their critical thinking. Learning outcomes assessed: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 How to submit: Students are to submit the following via Turnitin Case Study submission folder as one document: -Assignment -Reference List (adhering to APA style) Return of assignment: Results for the assessment will be published on LEO. Marked assessments will be available online via Turnitin. Assessment criteria: Case study submission will be returned to students online via LEO. This assessment task will be graded against a standardised criterion referenced rubric. Please follow these criteria closely during the planning and development of your assignment. NRSG262 Clinical Integration – Mental Health, Semester 2 2015 Page 20 of 22 Assessment Task - Professional Portfolio C. Case Study: Medication Management Marking Guide ** Please note that this assessment is pass/fail only. The rubric has been developed to give students feedback on the quality of the work and not an actual grade. ** Elements (Weighting) Expected (HD) Standard Expected (D) Standard Expected (CR) Standard Expected (P) Standard Expected (F) Standard (No attempt made) Reasoning (20 marks) Student has: - highlighted in detail all the relevant significant factors for this task - Explained and analysed the concepts and or issues and their importance. - Referred to relevant theory and literature to support their reasoning. - Considered different perspectives – (e.g. theoretical or ethical) in relation to the concepts or issues. Student has: - highlighted in detail all the relevant significant factors for this task - Explained and analysed the concepts and or issues and their importance. - Referred to relevant theory and literature to support their reasoning. Student has: - highlighted most of the relevant significant factors for this task. Explained and analysed the concepts and or issues and their importance on most occasions. Student has: - highlighted some relevant significant factors for this task. -Limited explanation and analyses of the concepts and or issues. Student has: - highlighted minimal significant factors for this task. -Little explanation and analysis of the concepts and or issues - Student has: - no significant factors for this task. -no explanation and analysis of concepts and or issues Reflection (20 marks) - Critically reflected on the main points for discussion and elaborated on what might work and why (hypothesised possible outcomes). - Made use of reflection and integrated all aspects of reflection into the discussion Integration and reflection. ‘ - Used mental health terminology throughout the discussion and within context. Emphasised the importance of consumer perspectives throughout the discussion. - Made use of reflection and integrated most aspects of reflection into the discussion. Integration and reflection. ‘ - Used mental health terminology throughout most the discussion and within context. Emphasised the importance of consumer perspectives throughout most of the discussion. - Made use of reflection and integrated some aspects of reflection into the discussion. Used mental health terminology on occasion and within context of the discussion Emphasised the importance of consumer perspectives throughout some of the discussion. -Limited use of reflection and minimal integration of reflection into the discussion -Minimal use of mental health terminology and within context. -Some emphasis on the importance of consumer perspective throughout the discussion. no evidence of the use of reflection - Little use of mental health terminology and not used within context. -no emphasis of consumer perspective . - no use of reflection -no use of mental health terminology -no emphasis on consumer perspectives Sources and Referencing (5 marks) Credible and relevant references are used. Accurate use of APA referencing style on most occasions. Accurate use of in-text citations. Credible and relevant references are used. Accurate use of APA referencing style on most occasions. Mostly accurate use of in-text citations. Credible and relevant references are used. Accurate use of APA referencing style on most occasions. Most references are credible and relevant. Accurate use of APA referencing style on most occasions. Accurate use of in-text citations on most occasions. Not all references are credible and/or relevant. Many inaccuracies with the APA referencing style. Too many direct quotations There are no references used. Sentence and Paragraph Structure/Intelligibility (2.5 marks) The writing is organised into paragraphs, and the information is organised appropriately within the paragraph. Each paragraph relates to a discrete idea. There are clear linking sentences that link each paragraph to the next. The writing is organised into paragraphs, and the information is mostly organised appropriately within the paragraph. Most paragraphs relates to a discrete idea. There are clear linking sentences that link most paragraphs to the next. The writing is organised into paragraphs, and the information is mostly organised appropriately within the paragraph. Most paragraphs relates to a discrete idea. The paragraphs mostly link to one another. The writing is organised into paragraphs, and the information is mostly organised appropriately within the paragraph. Most paragraphs relates to a discrete idea. The writing is organised into paragraphs, and the information is mostly organised appropriately within the paragraph. However, most paragraphs don't relate to a discrete idea, or link to one another. There is no evidence of paragraphs. Mechanics: Grammar, Spelling and Punctuation (2.5 marks) There are no errors with grammar, spelling and punctuation that impact readability, and the meaning is easily discernible. There are minimal errors with grammar, spelling and punctuation that impact readability, and the meaning is easily discernible. There are some errors with grammar, spelling and punctuation that impact readability. However, the meaning is readily discernible. There are substantial errors with grammar, spelling and punctuation that impact readability. The errors detract significantly, but the meaning is discernible. There are substantial errors with grammar, spelling and punctuation that impact readability. The errors detract significantly, but the meaning is discernible with some effort. Grammar, spelling and punctuation are such that the reader cannot mak