Explanation can be defined as a theory about something which highlights the reason for happening along with reason behind the choice of one over the other. In other words, justification is a story about the valid reason behind being right. It is all about adopting a single theory instead of one proposal for the action instead of another. Explanation is best as they aim to provide target to the criticism. An explanation can be viewed as an overall encouragement for criticising to a given idea or action. Explicit statement aims to provide good idea behind why people look for start for list of argument that is given for preferences.

Justification does encourage any kind of criticism. Justification aims to highlight conclusion are either correct or may be correct. It merely highlights the things which are not considered to be criticising in nature. Justification aims to encourage people who waste their time with endless things. It aims to highlight particular thing or even course of action at the time of critical view on a given theory. The overall details will make it similar to unpromising in nature. It has been found that explanation is good while justification is nothing but waste of time. In other words, explanation aim to provide the cause behind the happening of a particular fact. On the contrary, justification only aim to reference causes that is appealing to an authority.

Difference between explanation and justification?

Ans: In the cases of explanation, I can take for action for which I have some explanation which goes wrong for any case; then I need to criticise the actions taken so that I can easily explain them. An explanation can be considered to be method of encouraging a criticism for given action. On the contrary, explicit function can be considered to be good idea which invites people so that they can pick up like a start for the given argument.

In case of justification, I will provide an example where I recently encounter a discussion in philosophy where participants are discussing the phrase “to know”. All the given participants are discussing justification until and unless there is something for the people about their knowledge. They just want to justify the change in theories. There were replies like discussion of the meaning of the phrases so that they can understand meaning of “to know” in English. These particular discussions resulted in logic chopping and pointless precision. There were some persons who smoke up against the method of proceeding was found to be right. There was discussion in English concerning the meaning “to know” which is found to be uncritical. But most of them were found to be wrong. A complete wrong way ultimately leads to epistemology. Most of the involved people were trying to highlight the use of ‘to known’ so that they can look up problem for proper details. They aim to spend most of their time working on problem which helps in spending two minutes with dictionary. They aim to neglect their overall time which they spend of solving interesting problems.