Task back to top Further background Refer to the Project Vision Document submitted in Assessment Item 1 regarding Auto-Parts Warehouse Management System. In this assignment, you are required to prepare a report that describes the detailed architecture and design of the proposed system. Complete the Following Please refer to the marking guide when preparing your response to see what criteria and standards will be used to assess your work and your progress. Amongst the information sought are answers to the following questions: 1. Identify and briefly describe the functional and non-functional requirements for the proposed system. (2 pages, times new roman, size 12) 2. Identify use cases and draw use case diagrams for the proposed system that show major use cases and actors. 3. Draw domain model class diagrams for the proposed system. Be as specific and accurate as possible, if needed information is not given, make realistic assumptions. 4. Develop an event-partitioned system model encompassing all the use cases you identified in question 2. Assume that the classes and associations in question 3 correspond to entities and relationships from similar entity relationship diagrams. Rationale back to top This assessment task will assess the following learning outcome/s: be able to compare and contrast the different methodologies of systems analysis and evaluate their appropriateness for different and complex situations. be able to distinguish between requirement gathering techniques and combine these appropriately to apply to a real scenario. be able to formulate and justify system requirement models based on evaluation of given situations. be able to assemble the components of a requirements model using the tools and techniques of object oriented or structured systems modelling. Marking criteria and standards back to top Criteria High Distinction (HD) Distinction (DI) Credit (CR) Pass (PS) Fail (FL) 1. Identify and briefly describe the functional and non-functional requirements. 4 Marks Functional requirements: all nine major business rules are identified and briefly described; Non-functional requirements: seven possible system characteristics are identified and briefly described. Functional requirements: seven major business rules are identified and briefly described; Non-functional requirements: five possible system characteristics are identified and briefly described. Functional requirements: five major business rules are identified and briefly described; Non-functional requirements: four possible system characteristics are identified and briefly described. Functional requirements: three major business rules are identified and briefly described; Non-functional requirements: three possible system characteristics are identified and briefly described. Identified functional and non-functional requirements are wrong and no or little description. 2. Identify use cases and draw use case diagrams 5 Marks Major use cases are identified with accurate use case diagrams for the proposed system that show major use cases and actors. Major use cases are identified with mostly accurate use case diagrams for proposed system that show major use cases and actors. Some of the major use cases are identified with mostly accurate use case diagrams for proposed system that show some use cases and actors. Few use cases are identified with use case diagrams for few proposed system that show few use cases and actors. Use cases and use case diagrams are wrong. 3. Draw domain model class diagrams. 8 Marks Domain model class diagrams are accurate for the proposed system; identified all possible domain classes and some attributes, showing logical relationships among all domain classes. Domain model class diagram are mainly accurate for the proposed system; identified all possible domain classes and some attributes, showing logical relationships among all domain classes. Some omissions. Domain model class diagrams are accurate for the proposed system; however, domain classes and their attributes are not always accurate, logical relationships have some errors among domain classes. Domain model class diagrams are not always accurate for the proposed system; domain classes and their attributes are not always accurate, logical relationships have some errors among domain classes. Domain model class diagrams have major omissions. 4. Develop an event-partitioned system model encompassing all the use cases you identified in question 2. 5 Marks Event-partitioned system model is accurate for the proposed system; identified all possible processes, agents, and data entities, showing logical relationships among all items. Event-partitioned system model is mostly accurate for the proposed system; identified most of processes, agents, and data entities, showing logical relationships among most of the items. Event-partitioned system model is mostly accurate for the proposed system; identified most of the possible processes, agents, and data entities, showing logical relationships among all items. Some omissions. Event-partitioned system models is not always accurate for the proposed system; identified only some processes, agents, and data entities, showing logical relationships among some items. Event-partitioned system model is wrong. Presentation and clarity (accuracy, spelling, grammar, punctuation, figures) 2 Marks Fluent writing style appropriate to the assignment with accurate grammar and spelling, and high-quality figures drawn using some tools and figures have some captions. Mostly fluent writing style appropriate to assignment with accurate grammar and spelling, and good-quality figures drawn using some tools and figures have some captions. Mostly fluent writing style appropriate to the assignment with mostly accurate grammar and spelling. Minor omissions only. Some-quality figures drawn using some tools and figures have some captions. Writing style not always fluent or well organised and grammar and spelling contain errors. Poor-quality figures drawn using some tools and figures have some captions. Writing style not fluent or well-organised, and many grammatical and spelling mistakes. Very bad quality figures, copied from others work, no captions. Referencing and Citation 1 Marks Referencing is mainly accurate and according to the APA standard. All references are cited in the text. Referencing is mainly accurate and according to the APA standard. Most of the references are cited in the text. Some attempt at referencing and according to the APA standard. Few references are cited in the text. Attempt at referencing but not exactly according to APA standard and only few references are cited in the text. Referencing is absent/ unsystematic. Presentation back to top Only task 1 about to identify and briefly describe the functional and non-functional requirements should be 2 pages long, font times new roman, size 12. For other tasks in this assignment, please follow marking criteria and standard. All figures must have suitable caption and cited (if required) within text using APA standard. Requirements back to top If any references are required, ensure to use APA referencing to acknowledge the sources that you have used in preparing your assessment. Please refer to the CSU referencing guide http://student.csu.edu.au/study/referencing-at-csu. In addition a very useful tool for you to use that demonstrates how to correctly use in text referencing and the correct way to cite the reference in your reference list can be found at https://apps.csu.edu.au/reftool/apa-6

Read less