In “The Meritocracy Myth”, McNamee and Miller identify several ‘non-merit’ factors which “suppress, neutralize, or even negate the effects of merit and create barriers to individual mobility”. Discuss the argument that meritocracy is a myth in relation to the education system in Australia. In doing so, explain the ‘non-merit factors’ which can influence a student’s educational outcomes. Use research to support your discussion. For an understanding of McNamee and Millers’ work, please use the articles provided by the teacher for this purpose. These articles will be uploaded on the Portal under “assessment 3”. Marking Criteria: Max. in category Your points Word count, readability, and structure. 10/100 In-text references, reference list and correct use of referencing style 10/100 Theoretical discussion 20/100 Answering the question and responding to the topic - evidence, relevant and effective use of illustrations and case studies. 40/100 Critical evaluation of the views of the authors 20/100 Total: 100/100 Percentage: 30/30%

Read less