Development of Society Business Operations Toyota Australia

Assessment type: Case Study Report - individual assignment (2,000 words) Purpose: This assessment will allow students to demonstrate that they can identify, assess and analyse the situation provided in a case study. This assessment contributes to learning outcomes b, c and d. Value: 15% Due Date: Week 10 Topic: Based on the case study, students need to write a report on one of the following topics as per the last digit of their student ID. Task Details: Case study: Toyota Australia Since its fo undation in 1937, globally, Toyota has strived continuously to contribute to the sustainable development of society and the planet through its business operations. Their principle that they have continued since Toyota Australia started in 1963 and has leading automotive company. Motor vehicles greatly expand the freedom of mobility, however, they recognised that they can also have an effect on the society and the environment. With this in mind, they listen ed carefully to their stakeholders as they pursued a business that works towards harmony with people, society, and the global environment. They are continuously innovating to develop vehicles that meet the needs of the market both now and into the future. Their research focuses on vehicles powered by a range of alternative fuels and vehicles with the potential for automated driving. They continue to work towards vehicles that are safe for everyone, and that maintain the standards of durability and reliabili ty that people expect from the Toyota brand. Based on the above case study, students need to write a report on one of the following topics as per the last digit of their student ID at KOI: My topic: 3. Intellectual Property (IP) rules and processes important for conducting high - tech business at Toyota. Please discuss how IP rules and processes are important for conducting high tech business at Toyota. You need to state the key definitions used in this essay (IP, High tech business) and clearly highli ght their importance using examples. Use a consistent referencing style - Harvard Assessment 5 Marking Rubric: Case Study Report Value 15% Criteria Fail Pass Credit Distinction High Distinction Weighting (0 - 49%) (50 - 64%) (65 - 74%) (75 - 84%) (85 - 100%) % Evidence of research Less than 6 relevant titles read. At least 6 - 8 relevant titles read. At least 8 - 12 relevant titles read. More than 12 relevant titles read. More than 15 relevant titles read. 15 Relevance of content: Incomplete analysis and no clear identification of relevant ethical issues. Recommendations incomplete or irrelevant. Satisfactory analysis and identification of some relevant ethical issues. Some sound recommendations made. Accurate analysis and identification of mo st relevant ethical issues. Sound recommendations made. Accurate analysis and identification of al l relevant ethical issues. Logical recommendations made. Accurate analysis and identification of all relevant ethical issues. Logical and comprehensive recommendations made. 25 Application of concepts and principles: Analysis and recommendations are not supported. Assumptions made are not noted. Analysis and recommendations minimally supported. Assumptions made are not all noted. Analysis and recommendations well supported. All assumptions made are noted. Analysis and recommendations very well supported All assumptions made are noted. Analysis and recommendations extremely well supported. All assumptions made are noted and explained. 25 Clarity of Structure: The structure of the report is unclear and not logical. It does not address the brief. Use of headings unsatisfactory. The structure of the report is logical in parts. It addresses most of the assignment brief. Use of headings satisfactory. Report structure is easy to read and logical, directly addressing assignment brief. Suitable headings used. Report structure is easy to read and logical, directly addressing assignment brief. Clear headings used throughout. Report structure is easy to read and compelling, directly addressing assignment brief. Relevant headings used throughout. 10 Writing A large number of spelling, punctuation or Grammatical errors. Several spelling, punctuation or grammatical errors. Some spelling, punctuation or grammatical errors. Minor spelling, punctuation or grammatical errors. No spelling, punctuation or grammatical errors. 10 Correct Referencing: Referencing not done to standard. Overuse of direct quotes. Range of sources used is not relevant and/or not documented. No more than 4 errors. Direct quotes over - used. Sources documented. No more than 2 referencing errors. Direct quotes used sparingly. Sources documented. No referencing errors. Direct quotes used sparingly. Sources documented. No referencing errors. Direct quotes used sparingly and only when needed. Sources documented. 15