The Global Aviation System Management Skills

1 Week 12 Name Institution Date 2 Topic 1 RE: Factors For choosing amixed methods design Hey Matthew Bragen It was good reading your post for this on factors to consider when choosing the mixed methods design. The six factors that should be considered when choosing the mixed methods have helped determine the excellent approach for the design methods. From the study of pilot fatigue, Ibet that you have come up with factors used in the quantitative data compared to the jumpsuit and interviews carried out. As you have compared the pilot fatigue and the accidents in quantitative data, ithelps determine how pilots experience fatigue when they see accidents happening. We learn about the pilot's schedule like the sleep, work situations, and fatigue, which contribute to similar info that is measured. The six factors you have stated from the Creswell which are considered when choosing the mixed method design include data collection timing, data integration, expected outcomes, adesign that suits the field, database emphasis, and research team (Caldwell, 2012) .From those factors, they help in shaping the design results when using the mixed-method approach. As the factors are well suited, they help research the pilot fatigue with the causes and the results if they are similar and not identical. It's good how you realized that building quantitative data is not the best way to suit the topic. It's good to realize that interviewing and getting first data can help make sure that you uncover exciting things that are not found in the quantitative data. With the primary goal of comparing and contrasting the data, qualitative and quantitative data will have similar significance and emphasis. The mixed- methods design for this method will uncover interesting facts and give out meaningful 3 conclusions. The researcher needs to find asuitable method to help uncover the results that are needed for the study. Reference Caldwell, S. (2012). Crew schedules, sleep deprivation, and aviation performance. Current Directions in the Psychology Science ,85-89. Topic 2 RE: mixed methods experimental design Hey Michael Stein It was interesting reading your post for this week on mixed methods experimental design. This is adesign that helps in testing and discovering how could improve the current methods. You have stated that mixed methods design involves collecting and analyzing the qualitative and quantitative data, which helps integrate the information within the intervention trials. For this task, Iagree with you that the mixed methods experimental design will be an excellent tactic that can help test how to develop the new technology for the pilots. Within this study, the usage of mixed-method research is not anew idea to the aviation industry, as itis the most commonly used when researching aviation, and Iagree with that. During the exploratory sequential core design stage, we can develop and understand what advances in technology apilot could utilize for better improvement of the piloting. Also, there is participant recruitment for study at this stage and develop pre and post-test measures to understand the improvement better. This all happens before the experiment begins. Also, at this stage, the interactive approach uses the interactive approach, which is used for the iterative collection of data and analysis, which could lead to some changes like the procedures used for the data collection. From observation and data 4 recording, the new technology affects the pilots and their ability to fly the aircraft. While observing and collecting this data, we can also discover any potential mediating and moderating factors. The qualitative data are collected and analyzed second in the sequence and help explain or elaborate on the quantitative results obtained in the first phase". During this last phase of the experimental design, we can infer why the results occurred. This is avital portion of any research study. Using the explanatory sequential core design allows for examining the numeric data and interviewing participants for additional data (Creswell & Creswell, 2018) .Ithink this would be most beneficial for developing new aviation technology. We want to discover that it provides better results for flying, but if itbenefits the pilots. Reference Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Los Angeles: SAGE. Topic 3 RE: Mixed Methods Research Strategy Hey Christine Sperduto It was exciting reading your post for this week on mixed methods research strategy. This is a strategy used in collecting and analyzing the quantitative data used in building the first research phase and secondary research for the qualitative data. From your research, Ialso agree on the process which starts with data collection. This first procedure is very challenging due to the noise impacts surrounding airports; Iwill conduct sound trials surrounding amajor metropolitan airport. Essential considerations for collecting data include instrumentation to be used, collecting the data, organization of data received, and outliers. From the study, it's essential to determine 5 quantitatively where the sound is the loudest, and for the most extended periods, Ican begin with the qualitative research. It is also important to contact the interviews where some may be impacted negatively due to the noise's interactions. Due to that, there is allowance when determining the most impactful –short but loud noise impacts; ambient noise heard all day, or a combination thereof (Creamer, 2018) .Once the qualitative data is received, Iwill need to transform the data to understand how itrelates to the quantitative data. The assignment will indeed have great significance if the data will be correct, validated by other studies and both the study's aspects, making this study successful. It's true that when the data collection process is complete, the information will need to be organized for the report. Typically, sequential studies organize the data first by quantitative methods and data, then qualitative methods and data, then conclusions and interpretation. The interpretation is where the researcher can outline how to qualitative findings helped the quantitative aspects of the research. For this approach's advocates, Ican also value using qualitative and quantitative data in one place. Reference Creamer, E. G. (2018). Striving for Methodological Integrity in Mixed Methods Research: The difference between Mixed Methods and Mixed ‐Up Methods. Journal of Engineering Education ,526-530. Topic 4 RE: Mixed Method Designs Hey Sho Mehring 6 Your post for this week on mixed-method design has been interesting when reading it. It provides the qualitative and quantitative mixture, which can be developed for the research's main conclusion. Within developing amixed-method experiment, the researcher must establish set boundaries so that the readers understand what is going on. You have given behold that these methods are not well known to the human and social science compared to the distinct approach. That's why it's essential to convey the basic description and approach definition for the proposal section method. Some of the textbook factors indeed create asuccessful mixed method experiment as itprovides the reader with aclearer understanding of the type of experiment and how the experiment is conducted differently with regards to quantitative and qualitative experiments. Experiment: An experiment Iwould like to design is to analyze the effects of multi-cultural learning on an individual's ability to learn and conclude whether itprovides amore significant benefit to their overall academic development (Mantiri, 2013) . Design: The concurrent mixed method design best suits this experiment due to its ability to simultaneously collect qualitative and quantitative data. For this assignment, the examination of the cultural effects on learning is required and the qualitative data to be collected and compared to the quantitative data, which would ultimately be the participants' academic results. Rational and factors: there are three factors which include definition, terminology, and background of methodology. These are relatively straightforward to explain to the reader as they appear in most research papers regardless of the type of experiment being conducted. Many of these factors exist either in the abstract or the research paper's introduction, providing readers with an immediate understanding of what to expect throughout the research paper. It's correct that when all the factors are managed well, the experiment should produce data that points to a 7 multi-cultural background assisting students in becoming better learners that will hopefully benefit them further on in their life and career. Reference Mantiri, O. (2013). The Influence of Culture on Learning Styles. ssrn. Topic 5 RE: Mixed methods Hey Nathan Hinds It's great reading your post on Mixed methods, which Ithink you did an excellent job on. It's good to address your ideas on aparticipatory-social justice design well-suited to any field of study, and aviation is no exception. From your analysis, it's clear how you had "To identify and understand the causes underlying female underrepresentation in the industry." You also considering the prevalence of sexual harassment in the workplace for pilots. Unfortunately, the issue remains prevalent as you have addressed the study on human resource issues in the industry that acommon theme is "the lack of respect and outright sexual harassment experienced by women working in the airline industry." The study seems to have asignificant study on how to support groups of victims of workplace sexual harassment, including "feedback" and a continuous open dialogue "with community stakeholders" for question three, you have explained well how the mixed methods intervention design offers the researcher the multifaceted nature of qualitative research combined with the experimental nature of the quantitative design. That helps determine the barriers between the participant's and facilitator's experiences on trial and how the participants experience the treatment (Onwuegbuzie & Johnson, 2006) . 8 In most cases, the design produces numerous threats to validity, leading to several threats to validity for mixed-method studies in general. Many of those mentioned apply to the design presented. From the study, both the observer and the participants are indeed being scrutinized; striking abalance between the two entities can pose achallenge. It is also important to note the balance between qualitative and quantitative aspects. The results must be interpreted based on all of the data acquired regarding the mixed-method intervention types, rather than relying heavily on the empirical results or the interview phase. Reference Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Johnson, R. B. (2006). The validity issue in mixed research. .research in the Schools ,48-63. Topic 6 RE: Mixed method design Hey Yohanna Enders It's great reading your post on Mixed method design which Ithink you did an excellent job on it. It's clear how you have arranged your ideas that focus more on aviation environmental factors and the effects on communities. From your research, three variables like air pollutants, noise pollutants, and water pollutants, will be considered, which Ithink will give good results. When choosing the mixed-method case study design, the researcher uses one or more of the design styles to be any grouping of convergent, explanatory, sequential, or exploratory sequential. The three pollutants in the research study that will be examined and what causes them one first examine air pollutants. Using quantitative and qualitative research methods to gather data is essential in the data within aviation to ensure the safety of those around communities. Air 9 pollutants cause by engine emissions put out into the air (Koryak & Stafford, 1998) .Other air pollutants that the aviation industry produces are from ground equipment. The second pollutant caused by aviation will be noise pollution from engines and other aviation equipment that affect surrounding communities of airports. The last pollutant is water pollution caused by deicing fluid and other fluids such as oil and gas. The relationship on mixed methods design one needs to take aquantitative survey which can be done by taking noise pollutant survey from surrounding communities on taking all the information about the drainage engineers in the field of aviation can take the data and develop new areas that will be adequate in the drainage of dicing fluids. On the engine test with those that design and develop engine while the surrounding water areas can measure the water pollution, pollutants can disperse into around airports. The engineers took the landscape and information based on runoff from ramp spaces to develop drainage under the airport's concourses that separated clean and contaminated runoff into ponds. Reference Koryak, M., & Stafford, L. J. (1998). The impact of Airport Deicing Runoff on Water Quality and Aquatic Life in Pennsylvania Stream. Journal of Freshwater Ecology ,288-298.