Case Law Discussion

Runninghead:CASELAWDISCUSSION CaselawDiscussion Studentsname Universityname Authorsnote 1CASELAWDISCUSSION TableofContents Question1:..................................................................................................................................2 Discussedissue......................................................................................................................2 Judgments...............................................................................................................................2 Question2:.................................................................................................................................3 Appropriatenessofthedecision.............................................................................................3 Question3:.................................................................................................................................4 ImplicationsofHRpractitioners............................................................................................4 Recommendation...................................................................................................................4 Referencelist.............................................................................................................................5 2CASELAWDISCUSSION Question1: Discussedissue Thissectionofthestudyaimstoidentifytheultimateissuediscussedinthearticle"R vBrown,2021ABCA(CanLII)".Thearticlehasdiscussedtheextremeintoxicationissues amongthecitizensofCanada(Silver,2021).Itisoneofthegrowingconcernsofthesocieties addressedundersection33.1,thecriminalcodeofconduct.Theactaddressedintoxicationas acapacityissuealongwithmentaldisordersandautism.Accordingtothelegalauthorities, peoplewithintoxicationissueshavethethoughtprocessthattheymustdoitnotbasedon theircapacitybutbasedontheirmentaldesiresordisorders.Thepresenceoftheissueswithin thecommunitiesinfluencescasesofsexualharassmentandviolenceforotherpeopleoutside theworldofintoxication. Judgments Thejudgmentsregardingtheissueshavebeenposedbythreetop-ratedjudgesof AlbertCourt.Accordingtothecourt,apersonwhocommitsacrimeintentionallyisrequired tobepunishedmorebrutallycomparedtoapersonwhocommitsacrimeunintentionally.The previouslyformulatedcriminalcodeslackedhumantouchtowardstheaccusedpersons. Concerningthoselackinganewregulationwasformulatedbymaintainingeffectivehuman touchtowardstheassailants.Accordingtothenewregulation,apersoninanintoxication stateormentaldisorderhasnotthecapacitytomakedecisionslegally(Silver,2021).Insuch circumstances,theaccusedcannotbepunishedunderamorallyblameworthysituation. Additionally,thephysicalstateoftheaccusedwillalsobejudgedthroughscientific interventions.Furthermore,thedecision-makingprocessofthelegalauthoritieswillalsobe processedthroughathree-stageevolutionarymodel.Thestagesincludedintheprocessare, 3CASELAWDISCUSSION understandingthephysicalandmentalstate,reasoningthementalorphysicalstate,andthen makingjudgmentsbasedontheobservations.Additionally,thelegalauthoritiescannotmake thejudgmentbasedontheoffenses.Thejudgmentneedstobeformulatedbasedonthe voluntaryconsumptionorthementalhealthstateoftheaccused. Question2: Appropriatenessofthedecision Thedecisionmadebythelegalauthoritiescanbeconsideredasanethicallymade decisionasitincludesthehumantouchwithinthelegalregulations.Accordingtohuman psychology,criminalmind-setscanbedirectedpositivelybyshowinghumanity(Patnaik, 2021).Inthisnewregulationlegalauthoritieswilljudgethementalhealthstateoftheperson fordictatingthepunishment.Throughthismeasurement,theinnocentswithapastcriminal recordcanbedirectedinanobjective-orientedlifestyle.Soultimatelyinmypersonalopinion, Ifullyagreewiththedecision.Thereasonforsupportingthedecisionistheincorporationof humantouchintheprocessofformulatinglegaldecisions. Theconceptofchapter13consistedofthetopthreeregimesofemploymentlaw. Amongthoseconceptsofthesignificantoneistheprivacyrightsofemployers.Theright statesthatemployershavethelegalauthoritytoobservethemovementsofemployeeswithin theirworkplace(Brown,2017).Ontheotherhand,thelawalsolimitsthemonitoring authorityofemployersoveremployees.Inthiscasescenario,thelegalauthoritiesofCanada includehumantouchinthewayoftheirformulateddecisionsagainsttheaccusedperson. Concerningthisdecision,itcanbesuggestedthatemployersarealsorequiredtoinclude humantouchintermsoftakinganyextremelegalstepagainsttheaccusedemployee.Before formulatingthedecisiontheemployersarealsorequiredtoidentifywhetheritisan 4CASELAWDISCUSSION intentionalcrimeoranunintentionalcrime.Throughthismeasurement,innocentemployees canbereleasedfromanyseriousregulatoryobligation. Question3: ImplicationsofHRpractitioners HRpractitionersarethemostsignificanthumanresourcesofanorganizationinterms ofmaintainingemployeewellbeingwithinthecorporation.TheformulateddecisionbyHR managementhasasignificantimpactontheperformancemeasurementforboththe employeesandtheorganization.Concerningtheformulateddecisionagainstintoxicant peoplesofCanada,itcanbestatedthatHRpractitionersarealsorequiredtoincludehuman touchintheirformulateddecision(Fenech,Baguant&Ivanov,2019).Moreover,thelegal regulationsandguidelinesalsoneedtobeformulatedinsuchamannersothattheycan impactthementalhealthstateoftheemployees.Furthermore,theextremelegalstepsofthe HRpractitionersagainstanemployeealsoneedtobejudgedbothethicallyandwithhuman touches. Recommendation Thereisnosuchkindofflawobtainedintheformulatedregulationbythelegal authoritiesofCanada.Thepublicpolicysectionundersection33.1needstobechangeda littlebit.Underthissection,thecapacityissueoftheintoxicantpeoplesarebeingincluded. Thesecapacityissuescanberegulatedunderthecriminalcodeforabetterdecision-making process.Moreover,thecomplexitiesoftheregulationcanalsobeobligatedeffectively throughthisincorporation. 5CASELAWDISCUSSION Referencelist Brown,M.(2017).Privacyconcernsoveremployeraccesstoemployeesocial media.MonashUniversityLawReview,43(3),796-827. Fenech,R.,Baguant,P.,&Ivanov,D.(2019).Thechangingroleofhumanresource managementinaneraofdigitaltransformation.JournalofManagementInformation andDecisionSciences,22(2),1-10. Patnaik,G.(2021).PositivePsychologyforImprovingMentalHealth&Well-Being.Notion Press. Silver,L.(2021).WhoisResponsibleforExtremeIntoxication?|CanLIIConnects. Retrieved11October2021,fromhttps://canliiconnects.org/en/commentaries/75352