Solution to Task 1
The present discussion considers the published report on 29 June, 2018 on “Changes to the Australian Accounting Standard AASB 16 affecting franchisees & franchisors: Bringing leases onto your balance sheet” by Andrew Grima. The article deals with the changes in the Australian standard of AASB 16 those impacts the franchisees and franchisors (Nobes, 2014). The change in the standard has led to change in the structure of balance sheet. The innovation has added enables the heading of leases in the balance sheet of the companies.
The article has clearly evaluated the benefits of the new trends of the accounting standard. The author has pointed out that the changes will bring significant changes in the way business is conducted between the franchisee and the franchiser (Jin, Shan & Taylor, 2015). The franchisee is the independent entrepreneurs who take franchise stores of known existing brands and then in their own place, using their own money and utilizing the brand name and technical knowhow of the franchiser they conduct business. Common example can be given like Gelatissimo, Gutter-Vac, Mad Mex, Poolwerx, Roll’d, Coffee club, and Battery world. All these are the names of the Franchisers who allow the business and brand to be used by the Franchisee units (Sutherland, 2017). It is very important for both the franchisee and franchiser to follow standard accounting practices of the land because the business may become very complicated, especially for the franchiser. The franchiser is to have calculations about plenty of franchisees and whatever goods are sold to them. The government is always vigilant about whether any business activities that are going on are beyond the permission (Bodle, Cybinski & Monem, 2016). Therefore the Australian government has formed the Australian Board of Accounting Standards which is a direct agency of the government that creates and keeps up budgetary reporting principles material to elements in the private and open businesses of the Australian economy. Every country has their own dedicated agencies to take care that the standards of financial practice within the country is regulated and standardized (Bond, Govendir and Wells, 2016). The said agency the Australian Accounting Standards Board (AASB) is expected to start the new “a new leasing standard (AASB 16) requiring Australian businesses to bring operating leases onto their balance sheets.” (Grima, 2018). The new standards means that the leases especially the ones that were kept off the balance sheet previously is now is expected to be accounted for which it is usually known in the following term “right of use asset and lease liability.”
The author has stated the new action may affect all or at least most of the Australian businessmen to some extent. Therefore it is necessary for all the entrepreneurs, business men and everyone else to be properly reviewing the New Leasing Standards or the AASB 16 by the Australian Accounting Standards Board (AASB) ( Joubert, Garvie & Parle, 2017). The author has also stated that the risks in the financial reporting may increase because of the introduction of the said leasing standards. It is the imperative of the business entities to ensure that there are no irregularities happening within the financial reporting of the company.
As per the author in his news article, AASB 16 is the single lessee model of accounting that includes a lessee for recognising of the liabilities and assets and for all the leases with a time span of more than in year, until the asset underlying has a lesser value (Xu, Davidson & Cheong, 2017). The lessee is needed to recognise a right-of-use asset showing its right to use the underlying leased liability and asset showing its obligations to make payments of lease On the other hand the AASB 16 substantially includes the lessor for the accounting requirements. As per the standard the lessor continues to distinguish its leases as finance leases or operating leases and account for those two measures the leases separately (Lowe & Campbell, 2017).
In the article Grima Firstly mentions the best thing to do for the Australian companies in order to understand the new standard of AASB 16. It is important to consult the accounting professionals regarding the upcoming standards. This is due to their effective knowledge of the extent of impact the business would have, along with the specialized know-how for appliying the changes in the accounting process that would result in the changes in the balance sheet structure (Morris, 2017). However the business administration, as advised by the author must make a detailed observation of the accounting systems. This would help in the confirmation that the business is being able to record and capture more financial data.
In addition to that the author Grima in this article has also highlighted the importance of noting down changes that may well result in the structure of balance sheet. The article specifically argues that the financial statement may be represented as much “less healthy” than it looked like previously before the amendment (Dakis, 2016). The businesses have to consider the way this will impact on the financial KPI's set by the bank, and the other financiers with whom the business organisation are involved.
The article by Grima is an ideal guideline for the can be business owners that would help them to adapt the new financial amendment of the Australian accounting standard. The author has advised the businesses to make a notable observation of the technique in which the negotiations of rental structures of payment in AASB 16 should operate (Bohusova & Svoboda, 2017). This would be of great importance for the business owners as this would help them question the accountants regarding the new standard in an effective manner. In the question whether turnover of rent is under the new requirement or not (Grima, 2018).
The question may also include whether turnover rent falls within the new requirements or not.
In this article the author has talked about implementation of the AASB 16b in the Australian accounting standard from 1st of January 2019. As of 1 January 2019, the Australian Accounting Standards Board (AASB) will start a new standard for leasing that is AASB 16 that would enable the Australian businesses to represent the operating leases in their balance sheets. According to him the benefit of the Change would means that the certain leases that had been recognised off a balance sheet of the business previously will now have to be accounted for, in what is known as a right of use asset and lease liability (Dunbar, and Laing, 2017). The change in this new idea would help in ensuring that there is greater transparency and therefore would give a more accurate representation with respect to financial commitments of the enterprise that includes the lease liabilities.
However, as pointed out by Grim, this new arrangement can lead to become a significant liability, The author has said that the change is likely to impact almost all the Australian businesses to some extent(Bond, Govendir and Wells, 2016). Sadly, considering the complexities and issues that are likely to arise following the implementation of the AASB 16, the 2019 changes are set to increase the potential risks associated with financial and commercial reporting.
Lastly, the author overall mentions in this article that the main motive of writing this article was not to give a definitive accounting advice to the business owners, he has put more stress on the importance and process of consulting to the accountants for the incoming changes that are to be faced by this Australian Accounting Standard of AASB 16 for leases (Bohusova & Svoboda 2017).
Solution to Task 2
In the following paper, the discussion deals with crucial analysis of the several proposals as mentioned in the FASB or Financial Accounting Standards Board. The proposals are regarding the payment method of share based system for the several workers that are linked with the stock based compensation system. The selected head number 718 that is under the change of the standard of accounting that deals with stock compensation is analysed in the discussion. The proposed update is basically on the up gradation of the “Nonemployee Share Based systems of accounting and payment”. In this context, four respondents are taken who give their feed backs on the updates in the form of exposure draft. The primary purpose of the discussion is to conduct a wide analysis of the excess tax benefit and recognition of the deficit in the various income statement heads.
A brief overview
The present proposal is dealing with the segment that involves in the regulations in accounting as per the standards and updates on invoice compensation in the topic number 718. The accounting standard includes improvements in the share based payments of the non-employees (Beatty & Liao, 2014). In this context, the improvement guidelines is compulsory for the reduction of the complexity and the overall cost of development and maintenance of the data efficiencies as mentioned in the financial statements(Proposed Accounting Standards Updated on stock Compensation (refereeing no 718): The advancement of Share-Based Payment of Nonemployee Accounting, 2017). In the discussion four residents are there to give the feedback for the proposals. The collections of the responses are taken from the accounting board’s official websites. The analytical review of the responses from the several respondents would help in understanding the issues of the proposal and effectiveness of its implementation (Brown, Preiato & Tarca, 2014). In addition to that the objective of the whole process is to systematically comprehend the implementation of this accounting standard improvement (Proposed Accounting Standards Updated on stock Compensation (refereeing no 718): The advancement of Share-Based Payment of Nonemployee Accounting, 2017).
The components of the proposal
The current segment elaborates the process of payments of the non-employee share accounting. In this context, the proposal that is mentioned is vital for the various emotions, opinions and sentiments of the various non-workers of the organisations. As stated by (), a sound organisation and a proper bond between workforces and its business can positively enhance the business environment. Therefore, it can be stated that several types of payment procedure development is essential.
In essence the accounting standard shows several types of ideas with elaborated impacts and information of the businesses from several sections and industries (Christensen, Lee, Walker Zeng, 2015). This may affect the businesses to unite with the process of giving their responses. With the aid if this process, it can be identified that the feedback that is required can be gotten on the proposed improvement proposals of the accounting regulations and standards. In this manner, additionally the interests of the public can be satisfied in a process that is more efficient. In simpler terms, the questions on the matters of transformations are also said in the Standards Board for Financial Accounting. It can be identified as accountability business management is to give response reply and solutions to the various queries as exposure draft. They also discuss about the various negative responses. The approval and disapproval therefore helps the users to understand the suitability and acceptance of the various proposals of the regulations enforcers. This includes the (Suggested Standards of Accounting Updated on Stock Compensation (Topic 718) mentioning regarding the advancement of Share-Based Payment arrangement for Nonemployee). Moreover, the various queries mentioned in the exposure draft along with the answers are shown since response of the several organisations can essentially help in serving public interest (Dumitru, Dyduch, Gu?e & Krasodomska, 2017). Therefore, it can be stated that undoubtedly the questions are needed to be replied in the context of public interest.
The feedbacks are considered in feature for obtaining the idea regarding approval and disapproval with regard to the proposed amendments in the exposure draft. As a result, the proposed changes from the several respondents are hence illustratively clarified and are hereby mentioned below:
Name of the organisation: Visa Inc
Visa is prestigious organisation that has extensive variety of activities in the domain of advanced and modern technology of online payment. This association has the motivew to set up upgraded payment technique throughout the world through steady innovative work towards change of new, improved and modern developments. In this organisation, it very well may be distinguished that the management of the firm demonstrates their concerns as comments with repect to the recommendation by FASB and prescribe certain things for improvement (Fang, Maffett and Zhang, 2015). Examination of the remark presented by this venture reveals the reacts of the association to different inquiries said in thisexposure draft. Also, this association furthermore rightly says in regards to their agreement to the suggestions and proposition put forth by the FASB which is the regulation authority, contradicting different recommendations of supplementary purposes of tax premium and insufficiency of income statements. Examination of their remark reveals the manner in which that the organization of the association keeps full certainty, trust and confidence in the proposals shown by the FASB (Granof, Khumawala, Calabrese and Smith, 2016). Management of the association considers that this specific suggestion for improvement can help the operational procedure improvising of the business activities by method for diminishing of the obstacles that holds the organizations effective operations. Further, it is said that this proposition upgrade the improvement of augmentation of cost instability connected with the income tax (Henderson, Peirson, Herbohn and Howieson, 2015).
Name of the organisation: Heiskell and MacGillivray and Associates
The association has their business of accounting and auditing in Australia and reports to different inquiries for different bookkeeping directives. Their reaction investigation in the method for comments tells us that they approve the termination framework and closing PIC pool for the accounting motive. In particular, they diminish the enterprises expenditure alongside complexities that are identified with accounting framework. Furthermore, this undertaking additionally favors to different costs for the specific pay system and adaptation of the same in the earnings declaration of the company. This would benefit the tax systems of as the insufficiency can be taken as essential and have the need to be executed effectively (Hodder and Hopkins, 2014). Moreover, the business knows that there must be a limitation of the total delays in the identification technique of the benefits of tax surplus.
Name of the organisation: Raytheon Company
Raytheon is a notable organisation in USA that endeavours its capacities in the locale of improvement, advanced utilizations of innovation and mechanical contributions like the security supplies, resistance and devices, common market programming worldwide (Llena and Talalweh, 2015). From the observation of the remarks the organization responds to questions that are numbered second, third and fifth as in the proposed exposure draft. The association has exhibited perspective that is inverse with regards to the frameworks and procedures proposed for the standard of the tax benefits in terms of tax inadequacy stated in the statement of income (Martin and Roychowdhury, 2015).On the other hand, the organisations management focuses that the FASB needs to maintain a particular framework. Like this, the several advantages and disadvantages in the context of supplementary taxation are shown especially in firms equity.
Name of the organisation: American Bankers Association
The operations of this organisation deals in the banking section in USA. The firm has given a positive approval of the amendments that the FASB body has projected in the context of share based payment arrangement (Wang, 2014). Additionally, the organisation responses to several questions positively but responses contradictally to only to a particular question present in the exposure draft.
The significance of the proposal
The current proposal as reflected in the exposure draft can be said to be a essential in the context of the accounting standard, since the subject area of share based system payment to the employees are covered. Moreover, this accounting scheme is a process that can aid in augmentation of remuneration of executives based on shares (Bassett, Chosak, Driscoll and Zakrajšek 2014). On top of that proposal has a primary motive of improvising the various financial standards and reduces the work pressure of the accountants. Due to this the theme of “Public interest” can be considered in the current discussion and it can give overall theoretical validation for the defined guidelines and can be taken in hand as an efficient premise in this context.
The analysed proposal by FASB in the context of accounting scheme of share based employee payment enables the accounting users to understand the responses of the chosen respondents who are in favour of the new amendment of the recognition of surplus advantages as well as deficiencies of tax in the financial reports. The report also gets the negative feedbacks of the chosen companies in order to analyse critically of the new change in the standards. From the responses of the companies from the exposure draft is can be concluded that this current proposal is not considered as may generate fluctuations in cost in the statement of income. Therefore it can be advised that this development of standard can augment state of affairs related to development of of stock based payment system of accounting.
List of References
Albu, C.N., Albu, N. and Alexander, D., (2014). When global accounting standards meet the local context—Insights from an emerging economy. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 25(6), pp.489-510.
Bassett, W.F., Chosak, M.B., Driscoll, J.C. and Zakrajšek, E., (2014). Changes in bank lending standards and the macroeconomy. Journal of Monetary Economics, 62, pp.23-40.
Beatty, A., & Liao, S. (2014). Financial accounting in the banking industry: A review of the empirical literature. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 58(2-3), 339-383.
Bodle, K. A., Cybinski, P. J., & Monem, R. (2016). Effect of IFRS adoption on financial reporting quality: Evidence from bankruptcy prediction. Accounting Research Journal, 29(3), 292-312. Newberry, S., 2015. Public sector accounting: shifting concepts of accountability. Public Money & Management, 35(5), pp.371-376.
Bohusova, H., & Svoboda, P. (2017). Will the amendments to the IAS 16 and IAS 41 influence the value of biological assets?. Agricultural Economics/Zemedelska Ekonomika, 63(2).
Bond, D., Govendir, B. and Wells, P.( 2016). An evaluation of asset impairments by Australian firms and whether they were impacted by AASB 136. Accounting & Finance, 56(1), pp.259-288.
Brown, P., Preiato, J., & Tarca, A. (2014). Measuring country differences in enforcement of accounting standards: An audit and enforcement proxy. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 41(1-2), 1-52.
Christensen, H. B., Lee, E., Walker, M., & Zeng, C. (2015). Incentives or standards: What determines accounting quality changes around IFRS adoption?. European Accounting Review, 24(1), 31-61.
Dakis, G. S. (2016). Upcoming changes to contributions and leasing standards. Governance Directions, 68(2), 99.
Dumitru, M., Dyduch, J., Gu?e, R. G., & Krasodomska, J. (2017). Corporate Reporting Practices in Poland and Romania–An Ex-ante Study to the New Non-financial Reporting European Directive. Accounting in Europe, 14(3), 279-304.
Dunbar, K. and Laing, G.K., (2017). Deconstructing the Accounting Standard AASB 13 Fair Value: Exit vs Entry Price for Assets. Journal of New Business Ideas & Trends, 15(2).
Fang, V. W., Maffett, M., & Zhang, B. (2015). Foreign institutional ownership and the global convergence of financial reporting practices. Journal of Accounting Research, 53(3), 593-631.
Granof, M. H., Khumawala, S. B., Calabrese, T. D., & Smith, D. L. (2016). Government and Not-for-Profit Accounting, Binder Ready Version: Concepts and Practices. John Wiley & Sons.
Grima, A. (2018). Changes to the Australian Accounting Standard Affecting Franchisees & Franchisors. Retrieved from https://www.colemangreig.com.au/News-1120-Changes-to-the-Australian-Accounting-Standard-Affecting-Franchisees-Franchisors-Bringing-Leases-Onto-Your-Balance-Sheet.aspx
Henderson, S., Peirson, G., Herbohn, K., & Howieson, B. (2015). Issues in financial accounting. Pearson Higher Education AU.
Hodder, L. D., & Hopkins, P. E. (2014). Agency problems, accounting slack, and banks’ response to proposed reporting of loan fair values. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 39(2), 117-133.
Jin, K., Shan, Y., & Taylor, S. (2015). Matching between revenues and expenses and the adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 35, 90-107.
Joubert, M., Garvie, L., & Parle, G. (2017). Implications of the New Accounting Standard for Leases AASB 16 (IFRS 16) with the Inclusion of Operating Leases in the Balance Sheet. Journal of New Business Ideas & Trends, 15(2).
Llena, F., & Talalweh, M. (2015). Factors Determining Social and Environmental Performance of Islamic Companies: Analysis of Sustainability Related Reporting Practices. Jordan Journal of Business Administration, 11(4).
Lowe, P., & Campbell, F. (2017). Financial Statements.
Martin, X., & Roychowdhury, S. (2015). Do financial market developments influence accounting practices? Credit default swaps and borrowers? reporting conservatism. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 59(1), 80-104.
Morris, R. D. (2017). Discussion of: The Phoenix Rises: The Australian Accounting Standards Board and IFRS Adoption. Journal of International Accounting Research, 16(2), 155-157.
Nobes, C. (2014). International classification of financial reporting. Routledge.
Proposed Accounting Standards Update—Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Nonemployee Share-Based Payment Accounting. (2017). Fasb.org. Retrieved 9 May 2017, from https://www.fasb.org/cs/ContentServer?c=Document_C&pagename=FASB%2FDocument_C%2FDocumentPage&cid=1176168873667
Sutherland, D. W. (2017). Independent audit report. Newsmonth, 37(3), 19.
Wang, C. (2014). Accounting standards harmonization and financial statement comparability: Evidence from transnational information transfer. Journal of Accounting Research, 52(4), 955-992.
Xu, W., Davidson, R. A., & Cheong, C. S. (2017). Converting financial statements: operating to capitalised leases. Pacific Accounting Review, 29(1), 34-54.