The issue of this case study determines whether Kate, William, Harry and George can constitute as partners.
As per the Partnership Act, the term Partnership defines a situation where there must be a relationship between those individuals who have accepted the conditions on sharing the profits of a business that is executed by everyone. Therefore, a partnership arises due to five necessary elements as per section 51 of the Australian Partnership Act, 1958. Firstly, partnership is considered to be an outcome of a contract. It does not arise from any process of law. For instance, at the time of the father’s death, who was a partner of that particular company, the son has the power to inherit or claim the share in the partnership property but he will fail to become a partner unless he enters into a contract with the concerned persons. Correspondingly, individuals carrying on a family business cannot be known as partners since the link did not arise from any contract. As a result, a contract is a mandatory ingredient in forming partnership. Secondly, minimum of two persons are required to constitute a partnership since that is the result of a contract. Individuals who are eligible to contract can enter into a contract of partnership. Persons entering into the contract can be either artificial or natural. In the case of Griffiths CJ in Land v James Morrison & Co Ltd (1911), it stated that when a partnership firms enter into contracts of partnership with another partnership individual, the members of the firm become partners in their own capacity. Thirdly, the parties should agree to carry on the business. If a handful number of individuals agree to share the income of a specific property for dividing goods that were purchased in bulk against them, then there will be no partnership. Such individuals cannot be called partners. The work must be divided equally among the partners. Fourthly, it states that an agreement should carry on its business with the purpose of sharing profits among all the partners. Therefore, partnership will not exist if the business is carried on with a motive and not for obtaining profits. For a partnership to arise, it is not mandatory that the partners will agree to share and distribute the losses. There must be a partnership deed, which will state in which manner the profits, and losses should be distributed. Lastly, all the partners should carry on the businesses or any of them acting for them which means that it must be a mutual agency. Each partners are said to be both an agent and principal the rest of the other partners and himself.
Kate, William, Harry and George will not be considered to be partners as the business ‘Tall Oaks’ ran by them was not registered as a business name. Hence, they cannot be called as partners of the company. Without the company being registered, the individuals will not be treated as partners. Unless these terms and methods are applied, a business cannot be formed into a partnership. Hence, all four of them will not be treated as partners as well. Kate, William, Harry and George needs to register their business first otherwise, which it will not be considered to be a proper company.
It can be concluded from the given case study that without getting the company registered, four of them will not be treated as partners.
The issue in the given scenario deals with a situation of who will be liable to pay for the designer dress worth $7000, which Kate bought in credit.
According to the law of agency, it is referred to an area of commercial law that is associated with a set of contractual and non-contractual fiduciary relationships that includes a person who is known as an agent. The work of an agent is to act on behalf of another in forming legal relations with another third party as described under section 64 of the mentioned Act.. If Kate does not pay the credit amount of the designer dress then all the other members will be liable to clear the credit. From then onwards the rest will have to compensate and clear off the debt of Kate. The other members will act as the agents of Kate since they are the remaining owners of their business stud business. Agency Law can help her to clear the debts for buying an expensive dress worth $7000. It has been proved in the case of Pioneer Concrete Services v Galli.
In this given scenario, it can be stated that only Kate will be liable to pay this debt for buying the dress on credit. However, she did not discuss about the purchase with any of the members. William, Kate, George and Harry own the business. Therefore, all four own the business them equally since Edna Barcoo their grandmother had divided her estate equally to four of them. The liability authority rests with all the four existing members of the business but since Kate got the dress for a cocktail party that she organized, she herself will be liable for it and not others. All four of them equal share of Edna’s estate. Even if the other three members pay the debt of the dress, Kate can keep the partnership binding.
It can be concluded that being one of the owners of the business of the stud Kate will have the authority to bind the partnership by using the Agency law
The issue of this question deals with whether Harry will be able to advance the money to partnership for acquiring a new breeding horse.
As per section 32 of the Partnership Act 1958, it has been observed that a partner can lend money for the benefit of the company. Operating agreements is a contract that exists between two or more partners in a company as seen in the case of Checker Taxicab Ltd v Stone. However, Kate, William, George and Harry are not considered to be as partners since their business is not registered. To buy the new breeding horse, if they require the money they have to create a contract with Harry since he will be lending an interest rate of 15% per annum. If there is no agreement created referring the issue then they have to create the contract.
In the given case scenario, borrowing money from Harry at an interest of 15% will be allowed since if an agreement is made between them regarding this. The Authority and power will be vested with Harry since he is the one lending the money to the other members of the business for the beneficial of the business. Although the rights and powers lies with other members as they are a part of the contract but he upper hand is vested with Harry.
It can be concluded in this scenario, that as per the Partnership Act, 1963 Harry will be able to advance money to the partnership as per the agreement.
The issue in this given case scenario deals whether Section 12 of the Partnership Act, 1963 will come into action if George leave the stud.
As per the Partnership Act, 1958 the section 12 will be applicable if George wants to leave the stud. He wants to ensure that he is not liable for any debts that is being incurred before and after he leaves. George can protect his interests and take out the money based on Section 12 of the Act as seen the case study of Re Fisher and Sons. Therefore, in case of on going partners the general rule states that if the debt or liability has been incurred after the partner has left the business then that partner will not be liable for the same reason. Correspondingly, if the partner has created any debt or liability before leaving the company, then that individual will be liable. An agreement of novation must be formed between the parties. The partner at the time of the contract, creditor of the partnership comes into existence with the creditor and an incoming party. By a novation agreement, a creditor can agree on the fact that the liability of a partner who is leaving or a previous partner has to finish and a new partner should be taken up.
Before George leaves the business he should clear the debts as much as possible otherwise he has to back out from the business at that very moment. A notice needs to be provided to the other existing members of the company. There has to be an existing Contract between the parties. Every partner has a right to be involved in the process and conduct of the business. Every partner is also bound to focus on his duties in the conduct of the business. Thirdly, as per the Act every partner has a right to have access in inspecting the books and copies of the firm. George have to resign from the partnership deed and take out his share of money and interest out of the business. To make sure that he is not liable for any debts incurred before and after he leaves, he has to form a contract with the other partners as per the rule of the Act
It can be concluded stating that George can clear out the debts and liabilities before leaving the business if he wants to.
Pioneer Concrete Services v Galli  VR 675
Re Fisher and Sons  2 KB 491
Checker Taxicab Ltd v Stone  NZLR 169
Griffiths CJ in Land v James Morrison & Co Ltd (1911) 13 CLR 1
To export a reference to this article please select a referencing stye below:
My Assignment Help. (2019). Australian Partnership Law. Retrieved from https://myassignmenthelp.com/free-samples/australian-partnership-law.
"Australian Partnership Law." My Assignment Help, 2019, https://myassignmenthelp.com/free-samples/australian-partnership-law.
My Assignment Help (2019) Australian Partnership Law [Online]. Available from: https://myassignmenthelp.com/free-samples/australian-partnership-law
[Accessed 28 January 2020].
My Assignment Help. 'Australian Partnership Law' (My Assignment Help, 2019) <https://myassignmenthelp.com/free-samples/australian-partnership-law> accessed 28 January 2020.
My Assignment Help. Australian Partnership Law [Internet]. My Assignment Help. 2019 [cited 28 January 2020]. Available from: https://myassignmenthelp.com/free-samples/australian-partnership-law.
MyAssignmenthelp.com has appointed best assignment experts who are wizards of words. Our writers know every trick of crafting high quality write-ups within a short period. With years of experiences, we have become one of the most prolific assignment help services in the USA. We deliver custom-made help to students with writing different types of assignments. We guarantee total need-based and timely service, and this is why increasing numbers of students prefer to buy assignment online.
Answer: Introduction: In the modern day of business the most practical perspective relating to the strategic partnership is that it turns out to be the association among the two companies through which they agree to work collectively in order to attain the strategic goals (Barkoczy 2014). This is regarded as one of the only main reasons for merging operations. Here for Herbert and Dorothy merging the business into the partnership would help i...Read More
Answer: Question 1 Income tax assessment act 1997 is primarily based in Australia and the companies must follow the same in relation to determination of capital gain taxes. Such capital gains taxes are generally paid by companies when they are to dispose their assets which are under the head capital gains assets. Furthermore, to determine capital losses or capital gains of an asset, the difference betwixt cost base and proceeds from sale of t...Read More
Answers: Introduction The main purpose of this report is to explore the different aspects in the law of taxation in context of the Australian legal consideration. This report also focused on the determination of annual income in case of lottery or jackpot winning. The legal aspects of tax exemption in calculation of annual income are also assessed as per the given cases of situation arises. This report also includes the several types of issue...Read More
Answers: Introduction: Taxable income comprises of the ordinary income and statutory income. The term ordinary income does not has any kind of definition but its meaning is derived from the case law and it is based on the principles that arises from the decisions (Graetz et al. 2015). The taxable income of the taxpayer is subjected to income tax when it is added into the taxable income of the taxpayer. The taxable income creates focus on the ...Read More
Answer: Part 1 A legal advice needs to be extended to Raj and Alana for the given scenarios. Organic Wines Pty Ltd (OW) would be bound with the contract enacted with Seedy Vineyards or not under the following circumstance. Case 1: Priya has enacted a contract with Seedy Vineyards while exceeding her authority for contract formation on behalf of OW Case 2: The breach of objects clause highlighted in the constitution of OW Company has separ...Read More
Just share your requirements and get customized solutions on time.
Our writers make sure that all orders are submitted, prior to the deadline.
Using reliable plagiarism detection software, Turnitin.com.We only provide customized 100 percent original papers.
Feel free to contact our assignment writing services any time via phone, email or live chat.
Our writers can provide you professional writing assistance on any subject at any level.
Our best price guarantee ensures that the features we offer cannot be matched by any of the competitors.
Get all your documents checked for plagiarism or duplicacy with us.
Get different kinds of essays typed in minutes with clicks.
Calculate your semester grades and cumulative GPa with our GPA Calculator.
Balance any chemical equation in minutes just by entering the formula.
Calculate the number of words and number of pages of all your academic documents.
Our Mission Client Satisfaction
Expert provided good service and able to upload the answers within the specified time limit.
Previous feedback was for other order and the website itself, not the writer. This writer did a great job! Very appreciated
this assignment was perfect. i got A i encourage every one to use this website for help
enough information, on time and help me to get the good mark. thanks for your service