Kit is a permanent resident of Australia. He took birth in Chile and is still retaining the citizenship of Chile. He is spending most of his time in the coast of Indonesia as he had been recruited for a job by a United States based company in Australia. He had signed the contract with the company in Australia. Wife of Kit had been living in Australia with their two children. They had purchased a house in Australia three years back. Kit is having a joint account with his wife in Westpac bank. The salary of Kit is directly deposited in this account. The other investment income of family including share portfolio dividend income remains in the city of Chile. Kit is getting one month off from his job in every third month and on these holidays he comes to meet his family in Australia or in Chile.
Regulations related to the case
As per the provisions of Australian taxation office, there are various types of test which help in testing the residential status of the person: 
First of all primary test is taken into consideration for the purpose of checking the residential status. The primary test of residency is also called the residency test. As per the provisions of this test, the person who is residing in Australia will be considered as the resident of Australia depending on the following considerations:
Intention of residing in Australia: the assessee must have attention to live in Australia for a longer period and is not just living there for a shorter period. 
Ties with family and the employment: the person is considered as the resident of Australia if his family and children are living in Australia and he is also having long term ties with employer in Australia.
The location of assets: the person is considered as the resident of Australia if he is having a house, bank accounts and other assets in Australia.
Arrangement with the society: the behavior of the person must include the social arrangement in Australia that is admitting their children in the local schools of Australia.
The domicile test is the second test which provides that the person will be considered as the resident of Australia if the permanent place of business of the concerned person is Australia no matter the person is actually residing in Australia or not. 
183 days test
This test provides that the person will be considered as the resident of Australia if the person had lived in Australia for a period of 183 days or more. The counting of 183 days includes the days spent with breaks and without breaks both. 
This test is applicable on the government employees that are currently working in Australia and other persons that are covered in the eligible superannuation scheme. Hence the person covered under the above scheme will be considered as the resident of Australia. 
Application of the relevant provision on the case
The primary test of residency is not applicable on the above case as he is not presently residing in Australia. He is working in United States and he is hired under a contract by the United States based company. He had also not fulfilled the 183 days test as he had not lived in Australia for the minimum period thus he will also not be covered under the 183 days. He will also not be covered under the superannuation test as he is not the government employee of Australia and is also not covered under the superannuation scheme. Thus he will be covered under the domicile test as the person is not living in Australia but the principal place remains in Australia. Kit had left Australia for a temporary period only to complete his contract and he will come back to Australia after the specified period. Kit does not set up the permanent home in United States and his wife and children are already living in a house which was acquired in Australia. The salary of his job from United States also comes in bank account of Australia thus he had not made any arrangements for permanent living in United States thus this shows he will not be residing permanently in United states. Thus he will be considered as the resident of Australia for the purpose of taxation and his world wide income will be taxable in Australia. 
Kit will be considered as the resident of Australia as he is covered under the definition of domicile test and had duly passed the test. Thus he is the resident of Australia for the taxation purposes. The worldwide income of the resident is taxable in the country to which the person belongs as the resident. Hence in this case, the worldwide income of Kit will be taxable in Australia. The taxability of the person depends on various factors such as social factors etc. The various types of income such as the employment income, rental income, pension and annuities and the capital gain of the Australian resident will be taxable as per the provision of Australian taxation. Thus the investment income and salary of Kit will be taxable as per the Australian taxation. Though the investment income is received in Chile but he is considered as the resident of Australia thus it will be taxable in Australia. The salary comes in the bank account of Australia thus it will be taxable in Australia. But Kit will be eligible to claim foreign tax credit of the tax that had been deducted at source in various countries such as Chile and United States.
The above case is identified with the offer of the capital asset and the treatment of the gain that is received on sale of the property will be dealt with as the ordinary or the capital nature. As indicated by this case, the court had given the decision that when the investments are sold by the proprietor at a value more than the cost of securing then the profit won't be considered as ordinary income yet there is an exemption that if the sale of the asset is not made only with the end goal of progress and it is identified with the normal operations of the business then it will be dealt with as income of ordinary nature. Consequently in the above case, the land was sold in connection to the typical operations of the business in this way the benefit gotten discounted of land will be dealt with as the ordinary income. 
The above case is identified with the organization that had procured certain real estate parcel so it can do mining work however it was not effective henceforth it thought about a thought to subdivide the land and after that the subdivided land were sold to various individuals at profits. In any case, the organization battled that it is having mining business and is not simply offering land. The court had given that according to the provisions of subsection 1 of section 25 of ITAA 1936, profit by sale of land will be incorporated into the assessable income. In the above case, land was sold after subdivision and in this way the subdivision was done ordinarily which led to repetition of operations and giving a feeling that it was basically a business of land improvement in this way the profits will be recorded as the ordinary income. 
In the above case, subdivision of land was done Whit fords and they had sold the land with the feeling that it will be dealt with as the capital gain. The high court had given that the salary earned by them will be dealt with as ordinary income as it is being surveyed under section 25(1) of the ITAA 1936 and the domestic land had been changed over to the land utilized for transaction of business nature. In this manner the court had additionally extended meaning of isolated transaction and had given that individual transaction are likewise considered as ordinary transaction relying on the nature. In this manner the benefit received marked down of land will be normal income. 
In the above case, the land sold had initially been acquired keeping in mind the end goal to do cultivating operations by the perished individual and the land was given to a few individuals from the family and they had subdivided the land and after that sold the land. Accordingly the evaluates needed to consider the profits as the income of capital nature yet the chief needed to consider them as the regular income. In any case, the court had given the reasult that it will be considered as the ordinary income as they are doing cultivating business as opposed to land offering business. 
In the above case, child got arrive from the father in connection to conveying the cultivating business however his business was not effective hence he subdivided the land and had sold the land yet had held some piece of the land with a specific end goal to complete the cultivating operations. Consequently the government court had given the judgment that the profit made on special of land won't be covered under section 25(1), as it is not conveying any operations to sale the land but rather had quite recently sold the land for realization of cash thus it won't be considered as income of ordinary nature. 
The organization had procured land in the above case keeping in mind the end goal to sale the sand ashore however a letter was received from the administration which provided that they require the land to complete the mining operations and organization had questioned the land. In any case, after some time the land was sold by the organization and the organization fought that it won't be considered as ordinary income. However, the court had given the judgment that the organization needed to earn profit at a sale of land thus it turned into a critical action and it is not a pre prerequisite that profit earning ought to be the sole motivation behind any action subsequently the profit will be considered as a component of the ordinary income. 
The above case comprises of the rancher which had acquired 5 squares of land keeping in mind the end goal to do the cultivating yet it had subdivided the land after a few years and the sold the pieces of land. The court had given the judgment that the profit will be taken as ordinary income as the agriculturist realized that it can do cultivating for a few years just and after that it will sle the land in necessity of the funds. Subsequently the offer of land was plan and accordingly it will be ordinary income. 
The above case gave that a man had obtained an as of now built house yet had damaged the old house and had developed three new houses and he had likewise given different notices for sale of house. but due to any reason the sqale of house did not happen so they themselves utilized two houses for their private reason and had sold the third house at a gain of $150000 yet after some time they acquired new land keeping in mind the end goal to build house and had sold the new house as well. In this case the court had given the judgment that the sale of house was a business and repeating movement in this way the profit from sale of business will be considered as the ordinary income. 
To export a reference to this article please select a referencing stye below:
My Assignment Help. (2018). Australian Taxation Residency Source And Ordinary Income. Retrieved from https://myassignmenthelp.com/free-samples/australian-taxation-residency-source-and-ordinary-income.
"Australian Taxation Residency Source And Ordinary Income." My Assignment Help, 2018, https://myassignmenthelp.com/free-samples/australian-taxation-residency-source-and-ordinary-income.
My Assignment Help (2018) Australian Taxation Residency Source And Ordinary Income [Online]. Available from: https://myassignmenthelp.com/free-samples/australian-taxation-residency-source-and-ordinary-income
[Accessed 30 March 2020].
My Assignment Help. 'Australian Taxation Residency Source And Ordinary Income' (My Assignment Help, 2018) <https://myassignmenthelp.com/free-samples/australian-taxation-residency-source-and-ordinary-income> accessed 30 March 2020.
My Assignment Help. Australian Taxation Residency Source And Ordinary Income [Internet]. My Assignment Help. 2018 [cited 30 March 2020]. Available from: https://myassignmenthelp.com/free-samples/australian-taxation-residency-source-and-ordinary-income.
MyAssignmenthelp.com has appointed best assignment experts who are wizards of words. Our writers know every trick of crafting high quality write-ups within a short period. With years of experiences, we have become one of the most prolific assignment help services in the USA. We deliver custom-made help to students with writing different types of assignments. We guarantee total need-based and timely service, and this is why increasing numbers of students prefer to buy assignment online.
Answers: Question 1 Provisions The provision related with the determination of the assessable income of the partnership firm is contained in the Pt III of Division 5 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997. Tax is chargeable on the all income which is derived by the firm from the ordinary course of the business activity (Butler, and Giles, 2018). Along with this, normally all the expenses which are incurred for carrying the business acti...Read More
Answer: Introduction The Section 4-15 of the Income Tax Assessment Act, 1997 lays down the way in which taxable income is to be calculated for the income year (1st of July to 30th June), as per this section taxable income = Assessable income – Deductions, Assessable income is as explained in division 6 and the deductions allowable in division 8 where division 35 prevents losses from non-commercial business activities that may ...Read More
Answer: Introduction: The current case study provides the scenario that the Rob has inherited the business that contained the small plot of land. An adjacent plot of land was purchased by Rob so that he can set up the plant of concrete recycling by paying stamp duty and legal fees. Due to the rapid residential development Rob failed to set up the concrete recycling plant. On noticing the current boom in the residential property if Rob takes i...Read More
Answer: Introduction: In the case of “Kishore v Tax Practitioners Board  AATA 764” Mr Kishore became the registered tax agent on 7th March 2011, at the time of working for his employer, Charltons CJC Pty Ltd. The company provided accounting and tax agent services for the clients. In this case, seven preliminary questions originating from the decisions of the board defined that Mr Kishore considered his behaviour in...Read More
Answer: Income Tax Computation Accounting Income tax Gross salary 50,000 50,000 PAYG (3,250) Performance bonus 25,000 25,000 Clothes allowance 4,500 4,500 ICA ANZ annual membership 1,250 1,250 Trip charges (4,650) Taxi expense (4,000) Billed income 45,0...Read More
Just share your requirements and get customized solutions on time.
Our writers make sure that all orders are submitted, prior to the deadline.
Using reliable plagiarism detection software, Turnitin.com.We only provide customized 100 percent original papers.
Feel free to contact our assignment writing services any time via phone, email or live chat.
Our writers can provide you professional writing assistance on any subject at any level.
Our best price guarantee ensures that the features we offer cannot be matched by any of the competitors.
Get all your documents checked for plagiarism or duplicacy with us.
Get different kinds of essays typed in minutes with clicks.
Calculate your semester grades and cumulative GPa with our GPA Calculator.
Balance any chemical equation in minutes just by entering the formula.
Calculate the number of words and number of pages of all your academic documents.
Our Mission Client Satisfaction
Awesome write up for my assignment!!! Worth the money paid!!! Will come back .....
I really appreciate how the editor understood what I really meant to say thus making me feel more confident in submitting my work. I am an extremely happy customer. I will definitely sen un update on my grade.
Excellent work. We got total of 68 marks and we are very satisfied with the score. We gave this assignment near to deadline which is 2 days before due date. The assignment was about 4000 words and they did it well and gave it before 8 hours of submis...
I can\'t complain, speedy service and got the assignment before the deadline and got full mark