|
Group oral
presentation and visual slides
(Colour, font, design, pictures, graphs, spelling, grammar, punctuation etc)
(Vocal abilities, eye contact, body language, knowledge of the topic, cohesion of the material )
|
/20
|
|
|
Written Assignment:
· Identify the facts of the case
· Explain the relevant law relating to the case
· Discuss the legal arguments raised by the parties in case
· Summarise the judgement of the case.
· llustration the role, purpose and scope of the case in today’s Corporations Law.
|
/10
|
|
|
Written Assignment:
· Grammar
· Spelling
· Referencing
· Language
· Structure
|
/10
|
|
|
SUBJECT TOTAL
|
/40
|
|
|
Criteria
|
High Distinction 80% -
|
Distinction 70%- 79%
|
Credit 60-69%
|
Pass
50-59%
|
Fail
0-49%
|
|
Group oral presentation and visual slides
|
At all times:
1. the group was cohesive and courteous;
2. the oral
|
At all times:
1. the group was cohesive and courteous;
2. the oral
|
Most of the times:
1. the group was cohesive and courteous;
2. the oral
|
Some of the times:
1. the group was cohesive and courteous;
2. the oral
|
At no times:
1. the group was cohesive and courteous;
2. the oral
|
|
|
presentations were
|
presentations were
|
presentations were
|
presentations were
|
presentations were
|
|
|
clear and
|
clear and
|
clear and
|
clear and
|
clear and
|
|
|
understandable;
|
understandable;
|
understandable;
|
understandable;
|
understandable;
|
|
|
3. the oral
|
3. the oral
|
3. the oral
|
3. the oral
|
3. the oral
|
|
|
presentations were
|
presentations were
|
presentations were
|
presentations were
|
presentations were
|
|
|
accurate or precise in
|
accurate or precise in
|
accurate or precise in
|
accurate or precise in
|
accurate or precise in
|
|
|
relation to the details
|
relation to the details
|
relation to the details
|
relation to the details
|
relation to the details
|
|
|
of the case;
|
of the case; and
|
of the case; and
|
of the case; and
|
of the case; and
|
|
|
engaging;
|
4. the presentation
|
4. the presentation
|
4. the presentation
|
4. the presentation
|
|
|
4. the presentation
|
slides were logical and
|
slides were logical
|
slides were logical
|
slides were logical
|
|
|
slides were logical and
|
structured.
|
and structured.
|
and structured.
|
and structured.
|
|
|
structured; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. the oral
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
presentations were
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
interesting and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
engaging.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Written Assignment:
Identify the facts
|
All of the facts are clearly and
accurately detailed with reference to
|
All of the facts are clearly and accurately detailed.
|
All of the relevant law is clearly and
accurately summarised.
|
Some of the facts are clearly and
accurately outlined in brief.
|
The facts are not clearly or accurately outlined.
|
|
of the case
|
cases with similar facts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Written
|
All of the relevant law is clearly and accurately detailed, and the Act and related cases are referenced and discussed.
|
All of the relevant law is clearly and accurately detailed.
|
Most of the relevant law is clearly and accurately summarised.
|
Some of the relevant law is clearly and accurately outlined in brief.
|
The relevant law is not clearly or accurately outlined.
|
|
Assignment:
|
|
Explain the
|
|
relevant law
|
|
relating to the
|
|
case
|
|
Written
|
All the legal arguments are clearly and accurately detailed, and there is a synthesis with the relevant law.
|
All the legal arguments are clearly and accurately detailed.
|
Most of legal arguments are clearly and accurately summarised.
|
Some of the legal arguments are clearly and accurately outlined in brief.
|
The legal arguments are clearly or accurately outlined.
|
|
Assignment:
|
|
Discuss the legal
|
|
arguments
|
|
raised by the
|
|
parties in case
|
|
Written
|
The decision of the judge is accurately detailed with reference to any dissenting judgements or precedents.
|
The decision of the judge is accurately detailed.
|
The decision of the judge is accurately summarised in summary format.
|
The decision of the judge is accurately outlined in brief.
|
The decision of the judge is inaccurate or incomplete.
|
|
Assignment:
|
|
Summarise the
|
|
judgement of the
|
|
case
|
|
Written
|
The role, purpose, and scope of the court or tribunal were perfectly clear, logical, formatted, and grammatically correct.
|
The role, purpose, and scope of the court or tribunal were perfectly clear, logical, formatted, and grammatically correct.
|
The role, purpose, and scope of the court or tribunal were very clear, logical, formatted, and grammatically correct.
|
The role, purpose, and scope of the court or tribunal were fairly clear, logical, formatted, and grammatically correct.
|
The role, purpose, and scope of the court or tribunal were absent.
|
|
Assignment:
|
|
Illustrate the
|
|
role, purpose
|
|
and scope of the
|
|
relevant court,
|
|
or tribunal.
|
|
ASSESSMENT TOTAL
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUBJECT TOTAL
|
|
|
|
|
|
