Question 1
Financial statement disclosures
One of the projects that the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) is currently undertaking is the Disclosure Initiative project, with the aim of improving communication in financial reports.
The IASB has identified three main concerns about disclosures in financial statements, namely: there is not enough relevant information in the notes, there is irrelevant information in the notes, and there is ineffective communication of the information provided.
The IASB released a discussion paper in March 2017, DP 2017/1 ‘Disclosure Initiative – Principles of Disclosure’ and is currently seeking feedback on the disclosure issues identified and on the Board’s preliminary views on how to address them.
You are an investor who, for years, has struggled to work through and understand all of the note disclosures when analysing and comparing the financial reports of companies that you are considering investing in.
You are currently considering investing in either Westpac Group or ANZ. After reviewing and comparing the note disclosures provided in their 2016 annual reports, you plan to make a submission in response to the IASB’s discussion paper. In your submission, you plan to provide feedback in response to ‘Section 2 – Principles of Effective Communication’ of the discussion paper, given the difficulties that you have faced due to ineffective communication in financial reports.
In section 2 of the Discussion Paper, the IASB has proposed that a set of principles of effective
communication be developed. The seven principles identified in the Discussion Paper are that information in the financial reports should be:
- Entity specific;
- Clear and simple;
- Organised to highlight important matters;
- Linked to related information;
- Free from unnecessary duplication;
- Comparable; and
- In an appropriate format.
The IASB is also of the preliminary view that it should develop non-mandatory guidance on the use of formatting in the financial statements. The IASB suggests that this guidance could help to improve the effectiveness of information communicated in the notes.
Required:
Download and the Discussion Paper DP 2017/1 ‘Disclosure Initiative – Principles of Disclosure’.
Download the 2016 annual reports for Westpac Group and ANZ. Review and compare the notes that form part of each entity’s financial reports.
Prepare a letter to the IASB. In your letter:
- Discuss which of the seven principles of effective communication you feel are lacking the most in the note disclosures contained in the 2016 financial reports of Westpac and ANZ (and hence which principles you think that the IASB needs to put the most work into, in order to make significant improvements to communication in financial reports).
- State whether you think that the guidance on the use of formatting in the financial statements (as discussed in section 2.16 – 2.22 of the Discussion Paper) should be developed, and whether you think that it would improve the effectiveness of information communicated in the notes. Explain why or why not.
Marking Guide - Question 1
|
Max. marks awarded
|
Discussion re Westpac and ANZ’s note disclosures and the effective communication principles that are currently lacking
|
10
|
Discussion re the proposed guidance on the use of formatting in financial statements
|
4
|
Presentation and writing style
|
2
|
Question 2
Accounting for share issues
The constitution of Harriette Ltd indicates that the company is able to issue up to 5,000,000 ordinary shares and 1,000,000 preference shares. Prospectuses are published on 1 January 2017, offering 1,000,000 preference shares at $2.00 payable in full on application by 31 March 2017, and 2,000,000 ordinary shares at $5.00 with $3.00 due on application by 31 March 2017, $1.50 due within one month of allotment, and $0.50 due on a call to be made by the directors at a later date.
By 31 March 2017, the company has received applications for 800,000 preference shares and applications for 2,200,000 ordinary shares. On 15 April 2017, the ordinary and preference shares are allotted. The ordinary shares are allotted to applicants on a pro-rata basis, and the excess application money is retained and credited against amounts due on allotment. All allotment money is received by 15 May 2017.
The directors make the call on the ordinary shares on 1 August 2017, with amounts due by 1 September. By this date, amounts due on 1,950,000 ordinary shares have been received. On 15 September 2017, the shares on which call money has not been received are forfeited and sold as fully paid. An amount of $4.20 is received for each share sold. Costs of the forfeiture and reissue amount to $7,500, and are paid. The constitution does not provide for refund of any balance in the forfeited shares account after reissue to former shareholders.
Required:
Prepare the journal entries to record the transactions of Harriette Ltd up to and including that which took place on 15 September 2017. Show all relevant dates, narrations and workings.
Marking Guide
|
Max. marks awarded
|
Journal entries
|
13
|
Dates
|
1
|
Workings
|
2
|
Question 3
Accounting for income tax
Snowstorm Ltd, a ski/snowboard sales and hire business, commenced operations on 1 July 2016 and presents its first Statement of Profit or Loss and Other Comprehensive Income, and first Statement of Financial Position on 30 June 2017. The statements are prepared before considering taxation. The following information is available:
Extract from statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income for the year ended 30 June 2017
|
$
|
$
|
Sales revenue - snow/ski equipment
|
686,000
|
|
Hire revenue - snow/ski equipment
|
140,000
|
|
Government grant (exempt income)
|
20,000
|
846,000
|
Expenses:
|
|
|
Cost of sales
|
250,000
|
|
Administration expenses
|
104,000
|
|
Doubtful debts expense
|
5,000
|
|
Salaries
|
260,000
|
|
Annual leave
|
23,000
|
|
Warranty expenses
|
12,000
|
|
Depreciation expense - equipment
|
60,000
|
|
Rent expense
|
26,000
|
|
Insurance
|
40,000
|
780,000
|
Accounting profit before tax
|
|
66,000
|
The draft statement of financial position at 30 June 2017 contained the following assets and liabilities:
|
$
|
Assets:
|
|
Cash
|
10,000
|
Inventory
|
60,000
|
Trade receivables
|
125,000
|
Less Allowance for doubtful debts
|
(4,000)
|
Prepaid insurance
|
10,000
|
Goodwill
|
20,000
|
Equipment - cost
|
300,000
|
Less Accumulated depreciation
|
(60,000)
|
Liabilities:
|
|
Trade payables
|
35,000
|
Provision for annual leave
|
20,000
|
Provision for warranties
|
10,000
|
Loan payable
|
90,000
|
Additional information:
- All administration, rent and salaries expenses incurred have been paid as at year end.
- Tax deductions for annual leave, warranties and insurance are available when the amounts are paid, and not as amounts are accrued.
- Tax deductions are not available for doubtful debts. Tax deductions are only available when bad debts are written off.
- Amounts received from sales, including those on credit terms, are taxed at the time the sale is made.
- The equipment is depreciated over five years for accounting purposes, but over six years for taxation purposes (straight-line method, and with an estimated residual value of nil).
- The tax rate is 30%.
Required:
- i) Determine the balance of any current tax liability and deferred tax assets and liabilities as at 30 June 2017, in accordance with AASB 112. Use appropriate worksheets and show all necessary workings.
- ii) Prepare the journal entries to record the current tax liability, and deferred tax asset and liability balances at 30 June 2017.
iii) Now assume that ‘Sales revenue – snow/ski equipment’ is actually $576,000 (instead of $686,000), and hence accounting profit/(loss) before tax is ($44,000). In addition, ‘Trade receivables’ is actually $15,000 (instead of $125,000). Determine the balance of any current tax liability and deferred tax assets and liabilities as at 30 June 2017 in this scenario, in accordance with AASB 112. Use appropriate worksheets and show all necessary workings.
Marking Guide – Question 3
|
Max. marks awarded
|
i) Determination of taxable income and current tax liability
|
6
|
i) Determination of deferred tax assets and liabilities in deferred tax worksheet
|
5
|
ii) Journal entries
|
2
|
iii) Determination of taxable income, current tax liability and deferred tax assets and liabilities
|
4
|
Question 4
Revaluation of property, plant and equipment
Snowy Ltd commences operations on 1 July 2015, and on this date, acquires two items of plant:
- Plant A: $150,000
- Plant B: $250,000
Both assets are depreciated on a straight-line basis. Plant A has an estimated useful life of 10 years, and an estimated residual value of $30,000. Plant B has an estimated useful life of 5 years, and an estimated residual value of $0.
At 30 June 2016, Snowy Ltd decides to use the revaluation model for the plant. The fair value of Plant A is $120,000, and the fair value of Plant B is $235,000. The remaining useful life of each item is 9 years for Plant A, and 4 years for Plant B. The estimated residual values remain unchanged.
At 30 June 2017, the fair value of Plant A is $115,000, and the fair value of Plant B is $130,000.
Assume a tax rate of 30%.
Required:
Prepare journal entries for Snowy Ltd at 1 July 2015, 30 June 2016 and 30 June 2017 to record the above (including entries for acquisitions, depreciation, and all revaluation entries). Show narrations and all relevant workings.
Marking Guide
|
Max. marks awarded
|
Journal entries
|
13
|
Workings
|
3
|
Question 5
Impairment of assets
Blizzard Ltd has a division that represents a separate cash generating unit. At 30 June 2017, the carrying amounts of the assets of the division, valued pursuant to the cost model, are as follows:
Assets:
|
$
|
Cash
|
32,000
|
Motor vehicles
|
300,000
|
Less: accumulated depreciation
|
(120,000)
|
Plant and equipment
|
200,000
|
Less: accumulated depreciation
|
(50,000)
|
Land
|
600,000
|
Inventory
|
5,000
|
Accounts receivable
|
13,000
|
Patent
|
60,000
|
Goodwill
|
15,000
|
Carrying amount of cash generating unit
|
1,055,000
|
The receivables were regarded as collectable, and the inventory is measured at the lower of cost and net realisable value. The patent has a fair value less costs to sell of $50,000, and the land has a fair value less costs to sell of $520,000.
The directors of Blizzard estimate that, at 30 June 2017, the fair value less costs to sell of the division amounts to $820,000, while the value in use of the division is $900,000.
Required:
Determine how Blizzard Ltd should account for the results of the impairment test at 30 June 2017, and prepare any necessary journal entries. Show all workings, explanations and provide references to the relevant accounting standard to support your answer.
Marking Guide
|
Max. marks awarded
|
Application of the impairment test and allocation of impairment losses where necessary, with explanations, workings and references
|
12
|
Journal entries
|
3
|
Rationale
This assessment task is designed to assess your understanding of topics 3 to 7, and your progress towards being able to:
- prepare basic financial statements for reporting entities;
- explain the form and content of financial statements; and
- interpret and apply generally accepted accounting principles and specific financial reporting standards relating to concepts of recognition, measurement, disclosure, revaluation and impairment of key financial statement elements.
Answers:
Answer to Question 1:
To,
Chairperson
International Standard Accounting Board
30 Cannon Street, London- EC4M 6XH, United Kingdom
Date: 15th September, 2017
Subject: Recommendation and guidance for the improvement of the effectiveness of the communication as well as the information in the fiscal report
Sir,
I intend to make some plans as an investor, concerning the proposition of the IASB, regarding the effectiveness of the information that has been collected in the fiscal report. Undertaking the investments in the two different organisations, that are listed on the ASX which comprise the Westpac and also ANZ have been considered by me. In relation to this, the review and the comparison of the annual report of both the companies at present times have been performed by me. The preparation of the fiscal report is often considered to be a difficult task by the individuals who prepare it. It is also felt that, the information have not been appropriately depicted. There has been somewhat betterment in the nature of the financial reporting even though there exist opportunities for making further improvement. During the proper study of the report I have been able to discover that certain areas can be improved for better presentation as well as for the disclosure of the significant information. The creation of the good link of information in the report is much beyond the explanation of the linkage nature and the highlight of the connection of place of related disclosure.
Sometimes it happens that the investors do not understand the important information which is contained in the annual report. This occurs due to the poor presentation of the fiscal data. It is essential for me, to ascertain the need for making the suitable communication of the information after the annual report of the ANZ bank as well as Westpac. Thus it can be said that sometimes there are certain differences which exist in the information presentation of both the organisations. It has been shared that the preparation of the fiscal report as well as the disclosure of information, there is a requirement of standardisation. I have also familiarised myself with the set of seven rules which are stated in the section 2 of the discussion paper, that involves the clear as well as comparable format which are free from the unnecessary duplication and also organised for highlighting the important matter. It can be said that after the proper analysis of the annual report of both the companies which complies with very few of the principles and also lacks the majority of the parts (Tokar, 2015).
Since the banks are financial institutions, they are required to make the clear disclosure of the risks of liquidity as well as the credit risks. The reputed as well as renowned banks, should disclose the information properly. It should be done in a way that the a clear picture is given of the financial health at a glance which is obtained by the adoption of the principles of effectiveness that are lacking. While Westpac performs segmental analysis with consistently defining segments there is no segmental analysis done by the ANZ banks. The strengthening of the banking industry regulation requires the Basel incorporation. It is nothing but an inclusive set of reformative measures. It has been studied by me that there are separate disclosures of requirements of Basel in the fiscal report. Little information connected to the credit as well as the liquidity risks was mentioned in the notes of the economic statements. Regarding the situation of Westpac, there have been suitable disclosures of the requirements as well as the information regarding Basel and the risk information of the banking industry. Westpac has proper information about Tiers, however the annual reports of the ANZ bank do not have any such information. The divisional performance of the Westpac has been properly presented in the annual report in comparison to the bank. The specific areas which require consideration are not disclosed.
It is good for the economic institutions to utilize graphical representations for the presentation of the fiscal data in their annual reports. This are also useful for helping investors in the performance analysis. Utilisation of the graphs would be the best despite the use of any form of the narrative disclosure. This is because; use of any sort of narrative disclosure causes the information to get redundant. After the analysis of annual report, consideration of all the facts related to the disclosure, requires considerable improvement. The most of the IASB required to put to the most to work can make it comparable as well as specific with respect to entities.
Organisations should incorporate the information regarding the forward looking information as well as the quantitative targets for the measurement of the performance against a set of strategic objectives. Thus to ensure the communication target if the organisations sometimes consider the combinations of investors. Core product range is also helpful as also the development of the particular segment. In addition to this the fiscal information presented and other relevant information can also make the necessary comparison between the different times of reporting that should not compromise on the quality of the decision making (Baxter, 2014).
The effectiveness of the communication of the information can be improved by use of the proper formatting which is based on the perception of several stakeholders. Numerous reports have been published by the financial institutions based on the use of the graphs as well as the financial support.
I can recommend the effective use of formatting, for the effective communication of information. The investors would not face any problems in the effective communication of information if they can analyse as well as make the proper comparison of the data. This is related to the financial performance of the different time periods.
Finally I would like to recommend that, as an investor some principles of aiming the proper communication should be incorporated by the organisations. Only after the proper analysis of the economic report of both the companies, some of the most effective principle which should be incorporated as the entity specificity as well as the utilisation of the proper formatting.
Question 2
In the books of Harriette Ltd.
|
Journal Entries
|
|
|
Dr.
|
Cr.
|
Particulars
|
Amount
|
Amount
|
Cash trust A/c.
|
Dr.
|
$8,200,000
|
|
To.
|
Preference Share Application A/c.
|
|
$1,600,000
|
To.
|
Ordinary Share Application A/c.
|
|
$6,600,000
|
(Being application money received for 2,000,000 ordinary shares and 1,000,000 preference shares)
|
|
|
Preference Share Application A/c.
|
Dr.
|
$1,600,000
|
|
To.
|
Preference Share Capital A/c.
|
|
$1,600,000
|
(Being application money received for pf. Shares transferred to Pf. Share capital)
|
|
|
Ordinary Share Application A/c.
|
Dr.
|
$6,600,000
|
|
To.
|
Ordinary Share Capital A/c.
|
|
$6,000,000
|
To.
|
Ordinary Share Allotment A/c.
|
|
$600,000
|
(Being application money received for ordinary share capital transferred to ordinary share capital and excess amount adjusted with due allotment)
|
|
|
Ordinary Share Allotment A/c.
|
Dr.
|
$3,000,000
|
|
To.
|
Ordinary Share Capital A/c.
|
|
$3,000,000
|
(Being allotment money due on alloted shares)
|
|
|
Cash trust A/c.
|
Dr.
|
$2,400,000
|
|
To.
|
Ordinary Share Allotment A/c.
|
|
$2,400,000
|
(Being due allotment money received)
|
|
|
Ordinary Share Call A/c.
|
Dr.
|
$1,000,000
|
|
To.
|
Ordinary Share Capital A/c.
|
|
$1,000,000
|
(Being call money due on alloted shares)
|
|
|
Cash trust A/c.
|
Dr.
|
$975,000
|
|
Calls-in-Arrear A/c.
|
Dr.
|
$25,000
|
|
To.
|
Ordinary Share Call A/c.
|
|
$1,000,000
|
(Being due call money received except for 50000 shares)
|
|
|
Ordinary Share Capital A/c.
|
Dr.
|
$250,000
|
|
To.
|
Calls-in-Arrear A/c.
|
|
$25,000
|
To.
|
Ordinary Share Forfeiture A/c.
|
|
$225,000
|
(Being the 50000 shares, for which call money is due, forfeited accordingly)
|
|
|
Cash trust A/c.
|
Dr.
|
$210,000
|
|
Ordinary Share Forfeiture A/c.
|
Dr.
|
$40,000
|
|
To.
|
Ordinary Share Capital A/c.
|
|
$250,000
|
(Being the forfeited shares reissued for $4.20 per shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of Forfeiture & Reissue A/c.
|
Dr.
|
$7,500
|
|
To.
|
Cash trust A/c.
|
|
$7,500
|
(Being cost of forfeiture and reissue of shares paid)
|
|
|
Ordinary Share Forfeiture A/c.
|
Dr.
|
$185,000
|
|
To.
|
Cost of Forfeiture & Reissue A/c.
|
|
$7,500
|
To.
|
Capital Reserve A/c.
|
|
$177,500
|
(Being the balance of share forfeiture a/c. after adjusting with cost of forfeiture and reissue transferred to capital reserve)
|
|
|
Answer to Question 3:
Requirement i:
Worksheet for Current Tax Liability/(Refundable):
|
Particulars
|
Amount
|
Amount
|
Accounting profit before tax
|
|
$66,000
|
Add:
|
|
|
Doubtful Debt Expense
|
$5,000
|
|
Annual Leave
|
$23,000
|
|
Warranty Expense
|
$12,000
|
|
Depreciation Expense for accounting purpose
|
$60,000
|
|
Insurance
|
$40,000
|
$140,000
|
|
|
$206,000
|
Less:
|
|
|
Government Grant
|
$20,000
|
|
Bad debt expense
|
$1,000
|
|
Annual Leave Paid
|
$3,000
|
|
Insurance Paid
|
$50,000
|
|
Warranty Expense Paid
|
$2,000
|
|
Depreciation Expense for Tax Purpose
|
$50,000
|
$126,000
|
Taxable income
|
|
$80,000
|
Tax on taxable income @30%
|
|
$24,000
|
Less: 30% Tax paid on Sales Revenue
|
|
$205,800
|
Income Tax Refundable
|
|
($181,800)
|
Deferred Tax Worksheet:
|
Particulars
|
Carrying Amount
|
Tax Base
|
Taxable Temp’y Diffs
|
Deductible Temp’y Diffs
|
|
$
|
$
|
$
|
$
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
$10,000
|
$10,000
|
|
|
Trade Receivables
|
$125,000
|
$125,000
|
|
|
Allowance for Doubtful Debts
|
($4,000)
|
$0
|
|
$4,000
|
Inventories
|
$60,000
|
$60,000
|
|
|
Prepaid Insurance
|
$10,000
|
|
$10,000
|
|
Goodwill
|
$20,000
|
$20,000
|
|
|
Equipment
|
$300,000
|
$300,000
|
|
|
Accumulated Depreciation
|
($60,000)
|
($50,000)
|
|
$10,000
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
Trade Payables
|
$35,000
|
$35,000
|
|
|
Provision for Warranties
|
$10,000
|
|
|
$10,000
|
Provision for Annual Leave
|
$20,000
|
|
|
$20,000
|
Loan Payable
|
$90,000
|
$90,000
|
|
|
Total Temporary differences
|
|
|
$10,000
|
$44,000
|
Deferred tax liability (30%)
|
|
|
$3,000
|
|
Deferred tax asset (30%)
|
|
|
|
$13,200
|
Requirement ii:
|
|
|
Dr.
|
Cr.
|
Date
|
Particulars
|
Amount
|
Amount
|
30/06/2017
|
Income Tax Expense A/c.
|
Dr.
|
$24,000
|
|
|
Income Tax Refundable A/c.
|
Dr.
|
$181,800
|
|
|
To,
|
Advance Tax Paid A/c.
|
|
$205,800
|
|
(Being Income tax expenses adjusted with advance tax paid and income tax refundable recorded)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$13,200
|
|
|
Deferred Tax Assets A/c.
|
Dr.
|
|
$3,000
|
|
To,
|
Deferred Tax Liability A/c.
|
|
$10,200
|
|
To,
|
Income Tax Expense A/c.
|
|
|
|
(Being deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities recorded)
|
|
|
|
Profit & loss A/c.
|
|
$21,000
|
|
|
To,
|
Income Tax Expense A/c.
|
|
$21,000
|
|
(Being income tax expense transferred to P/L A/c.)
|
|
|
Requirement iii:
Worksheet for Current Tax Liability/(Refundable):
|
Particulars
|
Amount
|
Amount
|
Accounting profit before tax
|
|
($44,000)
|
Add:
|
|
|
Doubtful Debt Expense
|
$5,000
|
|
Annual Leave
|
$23,000
|
|
Warranty Expense
|
$12,000
|
|
Depreciation Expense for accounting purpose
|
$60,000
|
|
Insurance
|
$40,000
|
$140,000
|
|
|
$96,000
|
Less:
|
|
|
Government Grant
|
$20,000
|
|
Bad debt expense
|
$1,000
|
|
Annual Leave Paid
|
$3,000
|
|
Insurance Paid
|
$50,000
|
|
Warranty Expense Paid
|
$2,000
|
|
Depreciation Expense for Tax Purpose
|
$50,000
|
$126,000
|
Taxable income
|
|
($30,000)
|
Tax on taxable income @30%
|
|
$0
|
Less: 30% Tax paid on Sales Revenue
|
|
$172,800
|
Income Tax Refundable
|
|
($172,800)
|
Deferred Tax Worksheet:
|
Particulars
|
Carrying Amount
|
Tax Base
|
Taxable Temp’y Diffs
|
Deductible Temp’y Diffs
|
|
$
|
$
|
$
|
$
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
$10,000
|
$10,000
|
|
|
Trade Receivables
|
$125,000
|
$125,000
|
|
|
Allowance for Doubtful Debts
|
($4,000)
|
$0
|
|
$4,000
|
Inventories
|
$60,000
|
$60,000
|
|
|
Prepaid Insurance
|
$10,000
|
$0
|
$10,000
|
|
Goodwill
|
$20,000
|
$20,000
|
|
|
Equipment (Net)
|
$300,000
|
$300,000
|
|
|
Accumulated Depreciation
|
($60,000)
|
($50,000)
|
|
$10,000
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
Trade Payables
|
$35,000
|
$35,000
|
|
|
Provision for Warranties
|
$10,000
|
$0
|
|
$10,000
|
Provision for Annual Leave
|
$20,000
|
$0
|
|
$20,000
|
Loan Payable
|
$90,000
|
$90,000
|
|
|
Total Temporary differences
|
|
|
$10,000
|
$44,000
|
Deferred tax liability (30%)
|
|
|
$3,000
|
|
Deferred tax asset (30%)
|
|
|
|
$13,200
|
Workings:
|
Base
|
Particulars
|
Accounting
|
Tax
|
Equipment-at Cost
|
$300,000
|
$300,000
|
Useful Life (in years)
|
5
|
6
|
Depreciation Expenses p.a.
|
$60,000
|
$50,000
|
Period of Utilization (in years)
|
1
|
1
|
Accumulated Depreciation
|
$60,000
|
$50,000
|
Equipment (net Value)
|
$240,000
|
$250,000
|
Particulars
|
Amount
|
|
Doubtful Debt Expense
|
$5,000
|
|
Less: Prov. For Doubtful debt
|
$4,000
|
|
Bad Debt Expense
|
$1,000
|
|
Annual Leave Expense
|
$23,000
|
|
Less: Prov. For Annual Leave
|
$20,000
|
|
Annual Leave Paid
|
$3,000
|
|
Warranty Expense
|
$12,000
|
|
Less: Prov. For Warranty
|
$10,000
|
|
Warranty Expense Paid
|
$2,000
|
|
Insurance Expense
|
$40,000
|
|
Add: Prepaid Insurance
|
$10,000
|
|
Insurance Paid
|
$50,000
|
|
Answer to Question 4:
In the books of Snowy Ltd.
|
Journal Entries
|
|
|
|
Dr.
|
Cr
|
Date
|
Particulars
|
Amount
|
Amount
|
1/7/2015
|
Plant-A A/c.
|
|
$150,000
|
|
|
Plant-B A/c.
|
|
$250,000
|
|
|
|
Bank A/c.
|
|
$400,000
|
|
(Being Plant A and Plant B acquired for cash)
|
|
|
30/6/2016
|
Depreciation Expense A/c.
|
|
65000
|
|
|
|
Accum. Dep. - Plant A A/c.
|
|
15000
|
|
|
Accum. Dep. - Plant B A/c.
|
|
50000
|
|
(Being depreciation charged on Plant A & Plant B)
|
|
|
|
Accum. Dep. - Plant A A/c.
|
|
15000
|
|
|
Loss on Revaluation A/c.
|
|
$15,000
|
|
|
|
Plant A A/c.
|
|
$30,000
|
|
(Being Plant A revalued at fair value and loss on revaluation recorded)
|
|
|
|
Accum. Dep. - Plant B A/c.
|
|
50000
|
|
|
|
Gain on Revaluation A/c.
|
|
$35,000
|
|
|
Plant B A/c.
|
|
$15,000
|
|
(Being Plant B revalued at fair value and gain on revaluation recorded)
|
|
|
|
Gain on Revaluation A/c.
|
|
$35,000
|
|
|
|
Loss on Revaluation A/c.
|
|
15000
|
|
|
Asset Revaluation Reserve A/c.
|
|
$20,000
|
|
(Being the gain and loss of revaluation transferred to asset revaluation reserve)
|
|
|
|
Deferred Tax Assets A/c.
|
|
$10,500
|
|
|
|
Deferred Tax Liabilities A/c.
|
|
$4,500
|
|
|
Income Tax Expense A/c.
|
|
$6,000
|
|
(Being deferred tax recorded for the asset revaluation)
|
|
|
30/06/2017
|
Depreciation Expense A/c.
|
|
72083
|
|
|
|
Accum. Dep. - Plant A A/c.
|
|
13333
|
|
|
Accum. Dep. - Plant B A/c.
|
|
58750
|
|
(Being depreciation charged on Plant A & Plant B)
|
|
|
|
Accum. Dep. - Plant A A/c.
|
|
13333
|
|
|
|
Gain on Revaluation A/c.
|
|
$8,333
|
|
|
Plant A A/c.
|
|
$5,000
|
|
(Being Plant A revalued at fair value and gain on revaluation recorded)
|
|
|
|
Accum. Dep. - Plant B A/c.
|
|
58750
|
|
|
Loss on Revaluation A/c.
|
|
$46,250
|
|
|
|
Plant B A/c.
|
|
$105,000
|
|
(Being Plant B revalued at fair value and loss on revaluation recorded)
|
|
|
|
Gain on Revaluation A/c.
|
|
$8,333
|
|
|
Asset Revaluation Reserve A/c.
|
|
$37,917
|
|
|
|
Loss on Revaluation A/c.
|
|
$46,250
|
|
(Being the gain and loss of revaluation transferred to asset revaluation reserve)
|
|
|
|
Deferred Tax Assets A/c.
|
|
$2,500
|
|
|
Income Tax Expense A/c.
|
|
$11,375
|
|
|
|
Deferred Tax Liabilities A/c.
|
|
$13,875
|
|
(Being deferred tax recorded for the asset revaluation)
|
|
|
Workings:
Computation of Revaluation Gain/(Loss) & Deferred Tax:
|
Year
|
Opening Balance
|
Estimated Life (in years)
|
Residual Value
|
Depreciation p.a.
|
Closing Value
|
Fair Value
|
Revaluation Gain/(Loss)
|
Deferred Tax Assets/ (Liabilities)
|
|
A
|
B
|
C
|
D=(A-C)/B
|
E=A-D
|
F
|
G=F-E
|
H=Gx30%
|
Plant A:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-16
|
$150,000
|
10
|
$0
|
15000
|
$135,000
|
$120,000
|
($15,000)
|
($4,500)
|
2016-17
|
$120,000
|
9
|
$0
|
13333
|
$106,667
|
$115,000
|
$8,333
|
$2,500
|
Plant B:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-16
|
$250,000
|
5
|
$0
|
50000
|
$200,000
|
$235,000
|
$35,000
|
$10,500
|
2016-17
|
$235,000
|
4
|
$0
|
58750
|
$176,250
|
$130,000
|
($46,250)
|
($13,875)
|
Answer to Question 5:
Calculation of Impairment Loss:
|
|
|
|
Particulars
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value,less, Cost to Sell
|
$820,000
|
|
|
|
Value in Use
|
$900,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recoverable Amount
|
$900,000
|
|
|
|
(Higher of Fair Value & Value in use)
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Carrying Amount of CGU
|
$1,055,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Impairment Gain/(Loss)
|
($155,000)
|
|
|
|
Allocation of Specified Impairment Loss:
|
|
Particulars
|
Carrying Amount
|
Fair Value
|
Impairment Loss
|
|
Total Impairment Loss
|
|
|
$155,000
|
|
Less:
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
$32,000
|
$32,000
|
$0
|
|
Land
|
$600,000
|
$520,000
|
$80,000
|
|
Inventory
|
$5,000
|
$5,000
|
$0
|
|
Accounts Receivable
|
$13,000
|
$13,000
|
$0
|
|
Patent
|
$60,000
|
$50,000
|
$10,000
|
|
Goodwill
|
$15,000
|
$0
|
$15,000
|
|
Balance Impairment Loss
|
|
|
$50,000
|
|
Impairment Loss Allocation as per Weightage:
|
Particulars
|
Carrying Amount
|
Net Carrying Amount
|
Weightage
|
Impairment Loss
|
Balance Impairment Loss
|
|
|
|
$50,000
|
Motor Vehicle
|
$300,000
|
|
|
|
Less: Accum. Depreciation
|
($120,000)
|
$180,000
|
55%
|
$27,273
|
Plant & Equipment
|
$200,000
|
|
|
|
Less: Accum. Depreciation
|
($50,000)
|
$150,000
|
45%
|
$22,727
|
Total
|
$330,000
|
$330,000
|
100%
|
$50,000
|
In the books of Blizzard Ltd.
|
Journal Entries
|
|
|
|
Dr.
|
Cr.
|
Date
|
Particulars
|
Amount
|
Amount
|
30/06/2017
|
Impairment Loss A/c.
|
|
$155,000
|
|
|
|
Land A/c.
|
|
$80,000
|
|
|
Patent A/c.
|
|
$10,000
|
|
|
Goodwill A/c.
|
|
$15,000
|
|
|
Motor Vehicle A/c.
|
|
$27,273
|
|
|
Plant & Equipment A/c.
|
|
$22,727
|
|
(Being assets under the specific cash generating unit impaired)
|
|
|
|
Profit & Loss A/c.
|
|
$155,000
|
|
|
|
Impairment Loss A/c.
|
|
$155,000
|
|
(Being impairment loss transferred to P/L A/c.)
|
|
|
Reference & Bibliography:
Baxter, W. T. (2014). Accounting theory (Vol. 3). Routledge
Bonin, H. (2013). Generational accounting: theory and application. Springer Science & Business Media
Burc?, V., & Cotle?, D. (2014). Considerations on IASB Recent Issued Standards.
Craig, D., & Michaela, R. (2014). Financial Accounting Theory.
Deegan, C. (2013). Financial accounting theory. McGraw-Hill Education Australia.
Edwards, J. R. (2013). A History of Financial Accounting (RLE Accounting) (Vol. 29). Routledge.
Ginesti, G., Macchioni, R., Sannino, G., & Drago, C. (2013). Firms’ Disclosure Compliance with IASB's Management Commentary Framework: An Empirical Investigation.
Henderson, S., Peirson, G., Herbohn, K., & Howieson, B. (2015). Issues in financial accounting. Pearson Higher Education AU.
Picker, R., Clark, K., Dunn, J., Kolitz, D., Livne, G., Loftus, J., & Van der Tas, L. (2016). Applying international financial reporting standards. John Wiley & Sons.
Tokar, M. (2015). What kind of accounting standards should the IASB write?. Journal of Accounting and Management Information Systems, 14(3), 439-452.
Weil, R. L., Schipper, K., & Francis, J. (2013). Financial accounting: an introduction to concepts, methods and uses. Cengage Learning.
Williams, J. (2014). Financial accounting. McGraw-Hill Higher Education.