New User? Start here.
Error goes here
The content (or coverage of the topic) and analysis of your answer are assessed according to two general assessment criteria for legal analysis. These are:
Accidents happen every day, people get injured, and property spoiled. In many cases when an accident occurs the common question is always who caused it. Such questions can be addressed by the concept of comparative and contributory negligence. As the term mean, an accident can be contributed by an individual or one can be comparatively neglectful for his or her harm. This paper examines the case between a defendant Keith and a plaintiff Ruth. Keith used substandard materials when replacing Ruth's wooden stair tread. After a short while, the tread broke down. Because, Ruth did not know about the faulty, she carried some obscure equipment that made her not to see the fault. She fell down and dislocated her knee. Because of this accident, she got admitted to the hospital and recovered after two months. Additionally, she resigned from her paid employment and stayed for twelve months before seeking for alternative employment. As a result, Ruth intends to sue Keith for Negligence and claim for 12 months in lost income and punitive damages to punish him for his incompetence. This paper, therefore, intends to provide legal advice and remedies that Ruth has against Keith.
From the evidence provided in this case, it is clearly that the accident was as a result of negligence. Negligence is a conduct that develops an insensible risk of injury to others. When one is reckless and his recklessness causes harm to another person, then he or she is liable for paying damages (Gifford & Robinet, 2014). For a plaintiff to claim for negligence against defendant, he or she must prove that:
The idea of contributory negligence is applied in characterizing behavior that creates an insensible risk to another person. The concept is that there is a need for one to act reasonably when performing a duty. If a person fails to act reasonable and injury happens, he or she may be held liable either partially or entirely for the outcome harm, even if another person got involved in the accident (Gifford & Robinet, 2014). In other words, the appellant contributed to her own injuries due to her actions or omissions. Therefore, in this case, Ruth could have caused her accident. It is because if Ruth could have acted reasonably, she could not have carried an obscure item that blocked her from seeing broken tread, which made her slip and fell down causing her to dislocate her knee. On the other hand, under Australian Law, the burden of proof for the contributory negligence is on the shoulders of the defendant who needs to prove to the court that the appellant also contributed to his or her own accident due to being negligent ('Presumptions, Burden Of Proof, And The Conflict Of Laws', 1930).
Consequently, to determine whether or not the contributory negligence exist on the part of the appellant, the court applies the same principle of care as in the other types of negligence. For example, did the defendant do all that any other reasonable person could have done if was to be in the same situation? (Jewoo, 2014). Any failure to act on the part of the appellant that is regarded as the proximate cause of the appellant's damages results to contributory negligence.
Because the principles of an act depend on what one could expect would happen due to an act, the responsibility to act reasonably was derived from foreseeability. Because of this, courts relied on the foreseeability (Harder, S 2014). If the defendant could predict the harm of a claimant, then the defendant owed the claimant a duty to act with reasonable care.
The Australian Law Reform Commission Chapter 12.63 recommends that contributory negligence should not get incorporated as a factor to be considered by a court to decrease an award of damages. A court may decrease an award for damages based on the state apportionment law in some claims to the extent that plaintiff was liable (Terry,1915). However, it is applicable only where the defense of contributory negligence would have been treated absolutely as the defence at a common law. Conversely, at common law, a contributory negligence is not treated as a defence to international torts. The apportionment legislation for that reason does not apply to such claims. Moreover, chapter 12.64 of the ALRC adding contributory negligence as a factor in the evaluation of damages would not be consistent with the liability element of the proposed legal cause of action that restricts liability to reckless behavior. Referring to the issue of apportionment of responsibility, the court will put into consideration the complete conduct of both parties in connection with the circumstances of an accident after, which it will compare between their own exits from their responsibilities.
For an injured person get compensated for the damages, he or she must show that there was a negligence on the part of the other person. Claims for damages from negligence sometimes proceeds up to Supreme Court, but in many cases, they are issued in the Magistrate Court. What determines the court to which the case will be held is the seriousness of the injury and a number of damages caused. The two aspects of the damages arising from negligence are: (1) the appellant must be able to find fault on the part of the defendant by providing evidence, and (2) Once the responsibility has been established the court must then evaluate the amount suitable for damages (Goudkamp & Klar, 2016).
For a plaintiff to be able to establish liability under the common law, he or she must find that a defendant owed him or her duty of care. For many years the law has been requiring people to conduct their duties in a standard manner so that to protect other from unreasonable risks. The court considers what a reasonable person could have done after considering all the facts surrounding the incidents that resulted in harm to the appellant. The court will as questions such as:
In case the defendants did something that a reasonable person would not have done, the law says there has been negligence (Gifford & Robinet, 2014). However, it does not mean that the plaintiff should be paid the damages. The plaintiff must also show that there has been actual harm. For example, Ruth must show her dislocated knee as evidence. Additionally, she must also show that there is a sensible relation between the conduct of the defendant and the injuries she got. The damage must also be closely related to the wrong conduct. However, the harmful conduct should not be the only cause of the injury.
Consequently, the defense of consent to the injury gets applied if the defendant has evidence to show that the plaintiff knew about the risk of harm to themselves, but voluntarily ignored the liability ensuing from the danger. For example, an appellant might have been hurt from a collision when traveling by car whose driver identified to be drunk. If this defence becomes successful, it will totally defeat the appellant’s claim for damages, even though the appellant was also negligent (Gifford & Robinet, 2014). However, if the defendant can prove that the appellant also contributed to the harm he or she got, this will decrease the appellant’s claim for compensation by the percentage realized by the Judge. For example, if the jury finds that Ruth was 15 percent to be liable for her own injuries because of carrying an obscure at the time of the accident, the amount of compensation to her will reduce by 15 percent.
Moreover, for the court to decide whether the defendant was reckless, a judge may consider whether the defendant has violated any of the statutory duty (Ashley, 2004). For example in an accident where the defendant was in a vehicle where the driver had failed to stop when the traffic light was red in accordance with traffic rules. Such a violation is an evidence of negligence because the driver has breached the common law of duty to take care. Breach of statutory duty has also been used by the courts as being negligent, especially where the law fails to offer criminal punishment for the breach of the statute.
After the court has found that the defendant has been neglectful, it then proceeded to evaluate the damages. The assessment of damages gets done in the basis of once and for all. Such evaluation completes the rights of the affected party and it becomes final evaluation without any further come back to the same assessment. Conversely, the court is still allowed under the Wrongs Act 1958 (Vic) to create an arrangement for a structured payment by the use of periodic settlement financed by an annuity (Bohlen, 1908). The total amount gets assessed by totaling different amounts evaluated under the number of the damages a party has caused. The court differentiates the special damages from general damages. Special damages small expenses such as medical expenses, for example, ambulance fees, money spent up to the trial date among others. Such damages are easily quantified because of their nature (Gwilliam, 1987). On the other hand, general damages cover expenses like loss of future earning ability, loss of life enjoyment, pain and suffering, and deformity. These are damages that are not easily quantifiable because of their inability nature. In such circumstances, the court examines the individual aspects of general damages then evaluates the right amount of money, which is reasonable and fair to the defendant to pay the plaintiff's damages. Under the Civil Liability Act, an obligatory decrease of the appellant’s damages is set in certain situations. Especially, in circumstances where an appellant got injured, in situations where either the defendants or the appellant, both, are under the influence that has led to the defendant’s breach of the duty (Schofield, 1890.
Moreover, section 10 of the Law Reform Act 1995(Qid) provides the court with authority to reduce damages by a percentage, which is considered fair and same being that the extent has been awarded to share of the plaintiff responsibility for the injury (Goudkamp & Klar, 2016). Additionally, section 24 of the Civil Liability Act provides that a court might decrease the appellant’s damage by a hundred percent on the account of contributory negligence if it considers it fair and reasonable to do so (Gifford & Robinet, 2014).
To conclude with, damages for contributory negligence depend on the duty of care, breach of the duty of care, causation, and remoteness. A duty of care comes in by a reason of deciding to do a particular activity. People who will get affected by such activities will be able to complain about the breach of care. Once a duty of care has been realized by the courts, the court will consider the principles that are required of the party owing the duty of care. The court determines this by taking into consideration what a sensible person would have done if was in the same position of the party owing duty of care. Moreover, once a breach has been identified, the evidence harm that came out of the negligence act must be shown. It might be found that both parties contributed towards the injury, therefore, the damage may be apportioned in relations to individual’s liability. Lastly, once causation has been identified, it should get considered whether the damaged incurred was foreseeable, and if so, then the defendant has the burden of proof in his defense.
Ashley, RC 2004, 'The Fifth Element of Negligence', Critical Care Nurse, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 80-81.
Bohlen, FH 1908, 'Contributory Negligence', Harvard Law Review, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 233-260.
Gifford, DG, & Robinet, CJ 2014, 'Special Feature: Apportioning Liability In Maryland Tort Cases: Time To End Contributory Negligence And Joint Several Liability', Maryland Law Review, vol. 73, no. 3, pp. 701-769.
Goudkamp, J, & Klar, L 2016, 'Apportionment of Damages for Contributory Negligence: The Causal Potency Criterion', Alberta Law Review, 53, 4, pp. 849-862.
Goudkamp, J, & Nolan, D 2016, 'Contributory Negligence in the Twenty-First Century: An Empirical Study of First Instance Decisions', Modern Law Review, 79, 4, pp. 575-622.
Gwilliam, DR 1987, 'The Auditor, Third Parties and Contributory Negligence', Accounting & Business Research (Wolters Kluwer UK), vol. 18, no. 69, pp. 25-35.
Harder, S 2014, 'Contributory Negligence in Contract and Equity', Otago Law Review, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 307-332.
Jewoo, L 2014, 'Two Defining Features of Russian Tort Law: Their Rationale and Legal Effect', Review of Central & East European Law, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 109-143.
'Presumptions, Burden Of Proof, And The Conflict Of Laws', 1930, Harvard Law Review, vol. 43, no. 7, pp. 1134-1137.
Schofield, W 1890, 'Davies v. Mann: Theory of Contributory Negligence', Harvard Law Review, 3, 6, pp. 263-277.
Terry, HT 1915, 'Negligence', Harvard Law Review, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 40-54.
To View this & another 50000+ free samples. Please put
your valid email id.
Earn back the money you have spent on the downloaded sample by uploading a unique assignment/study material/research material you have. After we assess the authenticity of the uploaded content, you will get 100% money back in your wallet within 7 days.
Get Moneyinto Your Wallet
Total 9 pages, 1 USD Per Page
*The content must not be available online or in our existing Database to qualify as
To export a reference to this article please select a referencing stye below:
My Assignment Help. (2021). Principles Of Commercial Law. Retrieved from https://myassignmenthelp.com/free-samples/bus503-principles-of-commercial-law/contributory-negligence.html.
"Principles Of Commercial Law." My Assignment Help, 2021, https://myassignmenthelp.com/free-samples/bus503-principles-of-commercial-law/contributory-negligence.html.
My Assignment Help (2021) Principles Of Commercial Law [Online]. Available from: https://myassignmenthelp.com/free-samples/bus503-principles-of-commercial-law/contributory-negligence.html[Accessed 19 September 2021].
My Assignment Help. 'Principles Of Commercial Law' (My Assignment Help, 2021) <https://myassignmenthelp.com/free-samples/bus503-principles-of-commercial-law/contributory-negligence.html> accessed 19 September 2021.
My Assignment Help. Principles Of Commercial Law [Internet]. My Assignment Help. 2021 [cited 19 September 2021]. Available from: https://myassignmenthelp.com/free-samples/bus503-principles-of-commercial-law/contributory-negligence.html.
The respective sample has been mail to your register email id
* $5 to be used on order value more than $50. Valid for
We have sent login details on your registered email.
If you require help in understanding how to write an essay on difficult topics, contact Myassignmenthelp.com. No matter how hard the topic may sound, expect nothing but the best paper writing service. MyAssignmenthelp.com is considered the no.1 provider of essay writing service in the UK where you get high-quality and affordable papers. Be it college-level essay or an essay for a secondary school student, MyAssignmenthelp.com has the perfect solution for everyone.
Whether there is an enforceable contract between Tim and Jen, or not?
A contract can be defined as an exchange of promise, for doing or not doing a specified thing, in exchange of a consideration. It can either be drawn verbally or in a written manner. In order to form a contract, it needs to have the requisite elements of the contract, which include offer and acceptance, a consideration, intent, capacity and clari...
1. Legal forms of business
In the present situation there are two friends, Rachel and Monica who are planning to open three beauty salons in Adelaide. In such case the most suitable form of business would be a partnership business. Both of them have limited capital to invest in this case. Thus it would be advisable for them have limited liability where they would share the profits as per the ratio of investment (Graw, 2011). For prote...
The Victorian Supreme Court judge, Justice Robson, handed down the penalty judgment on August 09th, 2012, in the proceedings which were brought against Andrew Lindberg by the ASIC, i.e., the Australian Securities and Investments Commission. Lindberg was the ex-MD, i.e., Managing Director of AWB Limited who was claimed to have breached his directors’ duties. After an agreement was reached to settle the proceedings, ...
Case Study 1:
Based on the facts provided in the case study, the issue that arises here is:
Whether the partnership be bound by this contract?
Can other partners take action against Lance?
Legal Principles and Laws:
According to Section 10 of the Partnership Act, 1892, where any wrong act is committed by any of the partner acting in the ordinary course of the business, or with the authority of the other partners, a...
Australian Securities Exchange
Australian Securities Exchange Ltd, is a public company in Australia, through which Australia’s primary security exchange is operated. The company was known as Australian Stock exchange before the December 2006 and had been brought to existence in the on 1st April 1987. The company has been formed under the statue made by the Australian parliament in order to substitute the ...
Are you confident that you will achieve the grade? Our best Expert will help you improve your grade
BUS5PB Principles Of Business Analytics
LST2BSL Introduction To Business Law And Ethics
HA2022 Business Law
HI6027 Business And Corporation Law
ADBC103 Business Law
BUS200 Law Of Business Organisation
BUS 4403 Business Policy And Strategy
PUB AFRS 5750H Business And Government Relationship
LAW105 Introduction To Business Law
LAW210 Business And Corporate Law
INF701 Management Informatics
ACC506 Accounting Fundamentals
NUR131 Research Foundations For Health Practice
BUS200 Special Elective In Business
MGT601 Dynamic Leadership
MGT704 Global Business Management
ICT700 System Analysis And Design
ICT115 Introduction To Systems Design
MGT600 Managing People And Organisations
BUS702 Economics For Managers
Just refer 5 friends to earn more than $2000.
After the successfull payment you will be redirected to the detail page where you can see download full answer button over blur text.You can also download from there.
Or you can also download from My Library section once you login.Click on the My Library icon
My Library page open there you can see all your purchased sample and you can download from there.
That's our welcome gift for first time visitors
It is too easy to create or access your own library, just enter your email and make your search
MyAssignmenthelp.com stores a huge
COLLECTION OF QUESTIONS AND SAMPLES, which you can refer to any time you want.
Every time you find something useful, you can save that using the bookmark tool. From the next time,
can access that from your personalized library.
With this feature, you get to create your own collection of documents. You get free
choose and bookmark any document you wish.
Accessing the collection of documents is absolutely easy. Once you bookmark a sample,
access its content with a few clicks on your mouse.
This personalized library allows you to get faster access to the necessary documents.
longer need to spend hours to locate the sample you need.
Finding a sample from a list of thousands is nothing less than spotting a needle in a
Personalizing your own library relieves you from that stress.
On APP - grab it while it lasts!
*Offer eligible for first 3 orders ordered through app!
ONLINE TO HELP YOU 24X7
OR GET MONEY BACK!
OUT OF 33845 REVIEWS
Received my assignment before my deadline request, paper was well written. Highly