The case revolves around Adler who was a non-executive director of HIH. On the other hand, Williams held the position of the director and the chief executive officer and Dominic Federa maintained the position of the director and financial controller. However, Adler made some requisition and Williams together with Fodera made some arrangements of the advance of ten million dollars from a subsidiary of HIH. Adler was the officer of Santow J to the Pacific Eagle Equity Pty Limited a newly formed organization by him. The purpose was to make profitable trades and investments for HIHC. Moreover, on the next period the company purchased the HIH shares that amounted to the value of three point nine million dollars. The ASIC came to the conclusion that Adler’s main intention was to purchase the shares in order to support the HIH share cost for his benefit of his personal HIH shareholding. In addition to that, the Australian Equities Unit Trust was established and PEE was made the trustee. The units of several classes got issued to the HIHC and the Adler organization that was controlled by Adler. The investment of HIHC of ten million dollars that included the HIH shares got purchased with it and later on became part of the trust.
Moreover, the HIH shares were later sold at a loss of two point one million dollars on the month of September the year 2000. From August to September the year 2000, Adler made AEUT to buy from his company various investments that were not listed in technology and other internet corporations. The AEUT lost the three investments that amounted to more than three million point dollars. From July to November the year 2000, Adler made PEE to make various unsecured loans that totaled to two million dollars to the organizations that were associated with him. The ASIC had alleged that it was disadvantageous to the AEUT’S corporation. However, the ASIC brought various proceedings against Adler, Williams, and Fodera as they alleged the contravention of the associated party transaction. The financial status assistance and the duty provisions of the Directors regarding the Corporation Act were also contravened (Clarke et al, 2003).
The case highly reminds the directors of their duties and responsibilities while within the organization. The directors of the company did not act according to their expected ways as outlined by the law. The arising issues were the payment of the ten million dollars that was carried out by an HIH subsidiary to a corporation that Adler was the sole director. All the transactions were carried out without any board member approval and also no disclosure was done to the investment committee of HIH. There was also no documentation of the loans being issued or any form of security that was laid out. The payment was done and it never came to the attention of the other HIH directors who had to be notified of any transaction. Adler had contravened various sections of the Act that stipulated the director’s duties. The duties and responsibilities breached include the duty to always act with care and diligence. The directors are supposed to comply with section 180 of the act. They should make the business decisions in good faith and for the best purposes without any personal interest. Adler had made the decisions for his benefit and that of his newly formed company (Bevans, 2007).
Secondly, they were supposed to act in good faith and for a better purpose to the organization. The section 181 was breached by the directors and Adler failed to make the appropriate disclosure of where the cash was intended to be directed. He made sure that his personal interest of protecting his shareholding of HIH that was in conflict with the interests of the enterprise. On the other hand, Adler had also breached his duty of acquiring the three unlisted technology investments to PEE and the unsecured loans from AEUT. Thirdly, the duty not to improperly use position was also breached. The section 182 of the act states that any officer, director or employee of any institution should not at any given time improperly use their positions for their advantage. Adler breached the conduct by supporting the cost of shares for his benefit. Williams also misused his position by authorizing the ten million dollars payment without following the correct procedures (El & Vault, 2003).
Lastly, there was improper use of the information that regarded the company. The section 183 states any member of an organization should not misuse the information they have obtained so as to gain advantage for themselves or other individuals. Moreover, it should not cause any detriment to the company. Adler breached the section by using the information for his advantage and that of his corporation. It concerned the investment committee procedures and investing guidelines. He made sure that the HIH invested the money in the proper way that would lead to him gaining more advantage and profits. The directors breached the act by taking part in actions that are prohibited. It is their role to act according to the act as stipulated by the law and for the smooth running of the corporation.
The tribunal decision was to ban Adler acting as director of any company for twenty years a she had violate the legislation outlined in the act. He breached various sections of the act that were supposed to be followed by the directors, employees and other members of the company. Breaching the Corporations Act had to be penalized as it was against the law and the people had to follow it as required. Williams and Adler had contravened the sections of the act that had outlined the duties and responsibilities of the directors in a particular company. The Supreme Court ruled out that Williams was disqualified to being a director of any corporation for a period of ten years. Williams was found guilty of breaching the section 180 and 182 of the Corporation Act and other convictions were entered against the associates. The decision of the court was important to ensure that other persons with similar motives do not breach the act. It was to set an example to other directors of various organizations and also caution them on the consequences of not following the act. They should respect the Corporation Act and run the organization as expected without any favor or self-interest. The court of law ensures that all the individuals follow the law and those that violate are dealt with and heavy penalties imposed on them (Hill & McDonnell, 2012).
In conclusion, Adler used his position by ensuring that the ten million dollars was paid to his newly formed company for his interest. He took advantage of the HIH was investing in conservative ways and gave them an option that would be advantageous to him. On the other hand, Williams authorized the payment without the correct procedures or following up to know the exact truth of the matter. The misuse of the information was also seen as Adler used his knowledge to acquire the funds and increase his shareholding in the HIH. The issue later caused deterioration in the company as there were no interests gained. The HIH was supposed to invest and acquire favorable interests that would help them gain profits. The Supreme Court penalized the directors and imposed heavy penalties for violating the Corporations Act. Adler was banned being a director for twenty years while Williams was disqualified for ten years. It was important for them to get punished for their mistakes and neglecting their duties and responsibilities in the organization.
Wheelen, T. L., & Hunger, J. D. (2002). Strategic management and business policy. Reading, Mass. [u.a.: Addison-Wesley.
Clarke, F. L., Dean, G. W., & Oliver, K. G. (2003). Corporate collapse: Accounting, regulatory and ethical failure. Cambridge [u.a.: Cambridge Univ. Press.
Hill, C. A., & McDonnell, B. H. (2012). Research handbook on the economics of corporate law. Cheltenham, U.K: Edward Elgar.
Bevans, N. R. (2007). Business organizations and corporate law. Clifton Park, NY: Thomson Delmar Learning.
El, K. Z., & Vault (Firm). (2003). Vault guide to corporate law careers. New York: Vault Inc.
Lee, D., Swartz, M., & American Bar Association. (2007). The corporate, securities, and M & A lawyer's job: A survival guide. Chicago: ABA, General Practice, Solo & Small Firm Division.
Bainbridge, S. (2015). Corporate Law. West Academic.
Bainbridge, S. M. (2002). Corporation law and economics. New York, N.Y: Foundation Press.
Tomasic, R., Bottomley, S., & McQueen, R. (2002). Corporations law in Australia. Sydney: Federation Press.
Kraakman, R. H. (2009). The anatomy of corporate law: A comparative and functional approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
To export a reference to this article please select a referencing stye below:
My Assignment Help. (2017). Case Study: Asic Vs Adler. Retrieved from https://myassignmenthelp.com/free-samples/case-study-asic-vs-adler.
"Case Study: Asic Vs Adler." My Assignment Help, 2017, https://myassignmenthelp.com/free-samples/case-study-asic-vs-adler.
My Assignment Help (2017) Case Study: Asic Vs Adler [Online]. Available from: https://myassignmenthelp.com/free-samples/case-study-asic-vs-adler
[Accessed 17 February 2020].
My Assignment Help. 'Case Study: Asic Vs Adler' (My Assignment Help, 2017) <https://myassignmenthelp.com/free-samples/case-study-asic-vs-adler> accessed 17 February 2020.
My Assignment Help. Case Study: Asic Vs Adler [Internet]. My Assignment Help. 2017 [cited 17 February 2020]. Available from: https://myassignmenthelp.com/free-samples/case-study-asic-vs-adler.
MyAssignmenthelp.com has been recognized as the safest dissertation help company in Australia. We conduct a rigorous interview process to select most experienced and talented dissertation experts. This is how, we fulfill students search can someone do my dissertation perfectly or who can write my dissertation plagiarism free and provide them needed academic assistance. Apart from writing help. we also provide dissertation editing services to help students submit perfectly written dissertation.
Answer: Introduction In this report through a case study the contract law is going to be discussed. The concept of agency as par the contract law is going to be the focus of this case. The role of agency in case of making a contract with the third party is going to be discussed in this case. The liabilities and duties of the agent under the contract law have been evaluated. The rights and obligation of the third party as well as the pri...Read More
Answers: 1. Issue There are two issues involved in this case. The primary issue is to determine whether Marlow can resign from Clear Vision Limited and incorporate a new company to conduct the block chain business. The secondary issue is to determine the changes in the advice if their constitution contained a clause identical to Section 194 of the Corporations Act 2001. Rules As a general rule, a director can resign from a company by givin...Read More
Answer: Introduction Criniti's is one of the largest and most popular Italian diners in Australia. Fundamentally, this organization has been providing quality foods to their consumers (Criniti’s Southern Italian Cuisine, 2017). The company was established by Frank & Rima Criniti in the year 2003. In the year 2007, the company started providing delicious and quality Italian foods in Darling Harbour in Australia. After that, the...Read More
Answers: Answer to Question No 1 A contract is an agreement which in intended to be made enforceable by law between the parties and bind them with contractual obligations. The parties must agree to the terms of the contract before entering into the contract (Knapp, Crystal and Prince 2016). Charlie Martin did not understood and agreed to the terms of the contract as the terms that were explained to him prior to enter into the contract, were tot...Read More
Answer: Issue The issue in the case is to check whether the AFS Grocery Wholesalers Co. Pty. Ltd. has any legal right to claim the payment worth $45000 for the delivery of goods to John’s Supermarket. If yes, then what right this is? Rules In the current scenario, where lives are busy, it is very general that people enter into a contract with the help of other. These other people are known as agent and the person to whose behalf they ...Read More
Just share your requirements and get customized solutions on time.
Our writers make sure that all orders are submitted, prior to the deadline.
Using reliable plagiarism detection software, Turnitin.com.We only provide customized 100 percent original papers.
Feel free to contact our assignment writing services any time via phone, email or live chat.
Our writers can provide you professional writing assistance on any subject at any level.
Our best price guarantee ensures that the features we offer cannot be matched by any of the competitors.
Get all your documents checked for plagiarism or duplicacy with us.
Get different kinds of essays typed in minutes with clicks.
Calculate your semester grades and cumulative GPa with our GPA Calculator.
Balance any chemical equation in minutes just by entering the formula.
Calculate the number of words and number of pages of all your academic documents.
Our Mission Client Satisfaction
I had to redo the entire assignment. You didn't even get the # of degree of freedoms correct. I wanted help completing the assignment; I did not want you to simply complete the assignment (incorrectly). I didn't get anything but a headache and wasted...
The paper was spot on. The instructor liked reading it and gave me a good grade.
The assignment is not graded yet. It looks okay but l will get back to you once l get my tutor's feedback.
It is much more understandable, and the words I\'ve highlighted are changed very well into easier words. So thank you for your help, and sorry if I was a little irritating :)