Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Sino Australia Oil and Gas Limited (provliqapptd) [2016] FCA 42 is a case that deals with duties of directors of an Australian corporation and the remuneration owed to company administrators whose appointments were subsequently deemed void. Sino was the holding counterpart of a Chinese corporation that transacted in drilling services for the oil and gas industry. Sino was listed with the Australian Securities Exchange and raised capital worth $13.6 million through its initial public offer. The Australian Securities and Investment Commission alleged that Sino and its chairperson were in breach of their statutory disclosure duties which warranted continuous disclosures from the company. There were further allegations relating to the director’s duty of care and diligence provided for by theact and a substantial breach of the same by the chairperson by not making continuous disclosures as prescribed by the act. The Chairperson of Sino Mr. Tianpeng Shao attempted to transfer approximately $7.5 Million from Sino’s funds to accounts in China (which consisted of almost all of Sino’s cash reserves in Australia) in March 2014. The Australian Securities and Investment Commission construed this as an undisclosed transfer (which it was as the purpose of the same was not stated) and applied for an injunction restraining the company from making such a transfer. The injunction was granted by the court. Subsequently on the application of the Australian Securities and Investment Commission a liquidator was appointed for the company by the court.
As per ASIC’s allegations the provisions of the Corporations Act, 2001 that were breached by Sino are enumerated below:
The allegations against the Chairperson Mr.Tianpeng Shao comprised of contravention of the following sections:
The determination of the breaches by the company and its chairman are set out in seriatim below:
The company:
These omissions are a failure to observe their continuous disclosure obligations under Section 674 (2), Section 728 (1) (a) (b) and (c) and Section 1014H of the Corporations Act, 2001. Thus the company was in breach of specific provisions of the act due to their inability to observe duties to act in the best interests of its shareholders.
The Chairman of the Board of directors:
Thus the above facts sufficiently establish a breach of the provisions of the Corporations Act, 2001 by the Chairman of the Board of Directors of Sino.
The judge Justice Davis upheld all allegations made by the ASIC and affirmed their claims in light of the braches committed by Sino and it chairman. Justice Davis further observed that the Chairman of the board was tasked with approving all disclosure documents by attesting them with his signature. These documents were published in English and the chairman did not speak or understand English and yet he continued to give approvals without having the faintest idea regarding the contents of the disclosure documents. This was a direct breach of his duties under the act and he failed to observe due care and diligence in approving all these disclosure documents without knowing the contents of the same. Thus this was the most substantial breach of Section 180 (1) of the Corporations Act, 2001. A loan cannot be granted to a subsidiary unless its recovery is imminent when grating the loan. In this case after granting the loan the company would effectively be bankrupt and would go into liquidation. In such a case the shareholders and creditors of the company would face the repercussions for the acts while the board would be absolved of all responsibility. This would effectively lead to a loss only for the shareholders and creditors. Furthermore, granting such a loan which is will bankrupt the company is not an act that is in the best interests of the company and hence is a conspicuous breach of the chairman’s statutory duties when such a loan is approved. Thus Justice Davis held that the company and its chairperson had breached their duties under the Corporations Act, 2001. The court however did not observe that the grant of such a loan could be construed as a conflict of interest and a breach of the director’s obligation to act in good faith and in the best interests of the company as provided for in Section 181 of the Corporations Act, 2001 and thus is for the financial self-interests of the chairman. The court also failed to observe that the act of the chairman of the board in approving all disclosure documents and the approval of such an irrecoverable loan would be a misuse of position that caused detriment to the company and is a substantial breach of the director’s duties under Section 182 of the Corporations Act, 2001. These braches should also be ideally accounted for when attributing liability to a director for a breach of his statutory breach under the act. It would also follow that equivalent common law duties have also been breached by the directors of the company and it would ideally follow that the applicable damages for the same must also be awarded by the court. Finally, the information regarding these transactions and omissions of disclosure were known to the chairman of the board and this was thus use of information which lead to a detriment for the company and the same would also have to be considered by the court as it is embodied in Section 183 of the Corporations Act, 2001. Thus there were other substantial breaches which the ASIC did not legally pursue and the same was not taken into account by the court. The judgment delivered by Justice Davis however was accurate in its findings and has attributed adequate liabilities on the Chairman and the Board.
The judgment delivered in Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Sino Australia Oil and Gas Limited (provliqapptd) [2016] FCA 42 clearly illustrates the essence of the duties of a director of a corporation. From Justice Davis’ observation regarding the approval of disclosure documents without the Chairman having understood the same is a conspicuous breach of a director’s duty to observe due care and diligence when acting on behalf of the company as prescribed by the Corporations Act, 2001 and as mandated by common law. As a director the individual is placed at the apex position in the organizational structure in order to responsibly administrate the affairs of the company. The directors of a corporation are thus conferred a wide range of powers and must act on behalf of the company in ways that do not have detrimental effects on the company. Additionally a director of a company must not use his position or any information he may have gained by virtue of such position to cause detriment to the company as prescribed by the act. Here the company had acted in ways that would have detrimental effects on the interests of the stakeholders and had failed to make adequate disclosures as required by law and the Chairman of the board used his powers arbitrarily by approving disclosure documents without comprehending the implications of the same. This judgment is thus an ardent reminder of the duties of due care and diligence when acting on behalf of the company. This judgment also reiterates that a failure to safeguard the interests of the shareholders and other stakeholders is a failure to observe the duties of the directors as prescribed by the Corporations Act, 2001.
To conclude Sino’s failure to make continuous disclosures that would ideally affect shareholder’s interests was a major failure on the part of the company as far as its obligations towards its stakeholders is concerned. The board of directors, especially the Chairman of the board, could be held liable for the breaches committed by the company as they were responsible for the decision making process which aided in the respective breaches.
Statues
Corporations Act, 2001.
Articles
Bottomley, Stephen. The constitutional corporation: Rethinking corporate governance. Routledge, 2016.
Bushee, Brian J., Mary Ellen Carter, and Joseph Gerakos."Institutional investor preferences for corporate governance mechanisms." Journal of Management Accounting Research26.2 (2013): 123-149.
Cheffins, Brian R. The history of corporate governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.
Davies, Adrian. Best practice in corporate governance: Building reputation and sustainable success. Routledge, 2016
Dhaliwal, Dan, et al. "Corporate social responsibility disclosure and the cost of equity capital: The roles of stakeholder orientation and financial transparency." Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 33.4 (2014): 328-355.
Du Plessis, Jean Jacques, Anil Hargovan, and Jason Harris. Principles of contemporary corporate governance.Cambridge University Press, 2018.
Filatotchev, Igor, Gregory Jackson, and Chizu Nakajima. "Corporate governance and national institutions: A review and emerging research agenda." Asia Pacific Journal of Management 30.4 (2013): 965-986.
Klettner, Alice, Thomas Clarke, and MartijnBoersma. "The governance of corporate sustainability: Empirical insights into the development, leadership and implementation of responsible business strategy." Journal of Business Ethics122.1 (2014): 145-165.
Kraakman, Reinier, and Henry Hansmann."The end of history for corporate law." Corporate Governance.Gower, 2017.49-78.
Larcker, David, and Brian Tayan. Corporate governance matters: A closer look at organizational choices and their consequences. Pearson Education, 2015.
Richardson, Grant, Grantley Taylor, and Roman Lanis. "The impact of board of director oversight characteristics on corporate tax aggressiveness: An empirical analysis." Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 32.3 (2013): 68-88.
Schwartz, Mark S. Corporate social responsibility.Routledge, 2017.
Tao, Ngoc Bich, and Marion Hutchinson. "Corporate governance and risk management: The role of risk management and compensation committees." Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics 9.1 (2013): 83-99.
Tricker, RI Bob, and Robert Ian Tricker. Corporate governance: Principles, policies, and practices. Oxford University Press, USA, 2015.
Whincop, Michael J. Corporate governance in government corporations.Routledge, 2017.
To export a reference to this article please select a referencing stye below:
My Assignment Help. (2020). Business And Corporations Law. Retrieved from https://myassignmenthelp.com/free-samples/commlaw-7012-business-and-corporations-law/product-disclosure.html.
"Business And Corporations Law." My Assignment Help, 2020, https://myassignmenthelp.com/free-samples/commlaw-7012-business-and-corporations-law/product-disclosure.html.
My Assignment Help (2020) Business And Corporations Law [Online]. Available from: https://myassignmenthelp.com/free-samples/commlaw-7012-business-and-corporations-law/product-disclosure.html
[Accessed 27 January 2021].
My Assignment Help. 'Business And Corporations Law' (My Assignment Help, 2020) <https://myassignmenthelp.com/free-samples/commlaw-7012-business-and-corporations-law/product-disclosure.html> accessed 27 January 2021.
My Assignment Help. Business And Corporations Law [Internet]. My Assignment Help. 2020 [cited 27 January 2021]. Available from: https://myassignmenthelp.com/free-samples/commlaw-7012-business-and-corporations-law/product-disclosure.html.
It is time that you end your struggle with the referencing styles. You just have to visit our website to get authentic results regarding Harvard referencing, APA referencing etc. The service is free of cost and provides immediate result. You simply type in the required author name, book name and other essential data, and the Harvard reference generator will provide you with the desired result. Thus, you do not have to waste time searching for Harvard or APA referencing guide on the Internet. The service is tailor-made to serve your purpose.
Answer: In the modern stressful environment, different mood disorders are common leading to a major issue in behavioral patterns of individuals. Depression is a disorder which is tough to diagnose as it has no physical symptoms apart from a few behavioral changes (Segal, Williams and Teasdale 2018). Therefore it is normally assumed that a person suffers from depression if they lose interest in their daily life and routine for two weeks having ...
Read MoreAnswer: Culture can be described as the lifeblood of a vibrant society which can be expressed in different ways by which individuals tell their stories, remember their past as well as entertain themselves and imagine the future (Raman et al., 2017). The creative expression of the individuals help in defining what they are, how they should see the world through the eyes of the others. Along with the intrinsic values, culture is also seen to pr...
Read MoreAnswer: The above statement states that Money and Financial rewards are an important part that focuses on maintaining the relations of the employees. It is one of the major factors that help to motivate the employees in the workplace. It can be evaluated that the main focus of the employees is on money or the salary which is offered by the company. In motivating the employees, money is one of the factors that also give impact on the overall pr...
Read MoreAnswer: Introduction: Unlike the multinational, global and international strategies, the transnational strategy enables the firms to achieve local flexibility with rapid absorbing and differing innovation of parent company. The transnational strategy implies seeks global integration with operational efficiency and performance on a continued basis (Ambler, 2015). The choice is about global strategies where business firms can locate the d...
Read MoreAnswer: Introduction Financial Reporting is regarded as one of the major part in the financial operations of the companies and it is needed for the business organizations to follow all the required regulations and principles at the time of the development and presentation of the financial statements. The Conceptual Framework for financial reporting is an essential aspect for the business entities as it provides the companies with all the requ...
Read MoreJust share requirement and get customized Solution.
Orders
Overall Rating
Experts
Our writers make sure that all orders are submitted, prior to the deadline.
Using reliable plagiarism detection software, Turnitin.com.We only provide customized 100 percent original papers.
Feel free to contact our assignment writing services any time via phone, email or live chat. If you are unable to calculate word count online, ask our customer executives.
Our writers can provide you professional writing assistance on any subject at any level.
Our best price guarantee ensures that the features we offer cannot be matched by any of the competitors.
Get all your documents checked for plagiarism or duplicacy with us.
Get different kinds of essays typed in minutes with clicks.
Calculate your semester grades and cumulative GPa with our GPA Calculator.
Balance any chemical equation in minutes just by entering the formula.
Calculate the number of words and number of pages of all your academic documents.
Our Mission Client Satisfaction
Thanks for doing it on time...great work...fingers crossed for the grades...i hope i get good grades...its a great website to do assignments and all the exams
Australia
Satisfied with the writing style. The writer responded immediately for the revisions which were requested.
Australia
did not have time to start on my assignment and randomly googled for people to do it for me. To my surprise, i found myassignmenthelp and they did it for me just on time for my submission with even time to spare. My first time, but definitely not my ...
Australia
Thank you, thank you, thank you very much. It is one of the most beautiful and highest levels of the solution that I have seen in my life. In all honesty, the expert is very distinguished and he was at the heart of the solution to answer all the poin...
Australia