$20 Bonus + 25% OFF
Securing Higher Grades Costing Your Pocket? Book Your Assignment at The Lowest Price Now!


Write aboout the Contract Dispute Case Study. 




The primary purpose of the law of contract is to oversee that people keep the promises that they make to each other. The law recognizes that when two persons enter into an agreement, the have an implied duty to act in good faith. The failure of one party to perform its obligation will resort to damages on the side of the other party. And since neither the court nor the law forces people to create agreements, the law must come when any of the parties invites it for two reasons. It either comes to force the breaching party to fulfill its promises or to make the other party compensate the innocent party the losses it underwent due to the breach. This paper will be an examination of the application of contract law using a case between of Hopwood Investments Ltd and GastroFood Ltd.  

Case Study: Hopwood Investments Ltd and GastroFood Ltd

In the first place, this paper would   To start, the law of contract requires that a valid agreement to have an offer to coming from the offeror. From that point, it also requires that the offeree respond with acceptance. An offer establishes three components. The common law directs that the offeror should confirm its full intention to making an agreement. Additionally, the offeror must communicate the offer to the offeree, plus the offer should maintain lawful consideration.[1] In simple, the offeror has to exert a degree of earnest and sensible purpose to a legitimate offer.

The main method of determining the intention to whether the offeror had the intention to create an offer is basing the situation in a reasonable man's perspective, given all the ground that the offeror would have. For this reason, the offeror would create an invalid offer when acting on his/her anger, excitement or duress while creating the offer.[2] For example, the alleged offer "I'll pay them a $1 million" was not an offer but a statement of excitement that the defendant said.[3] In this case, the defendant was an attorney in a capital murder trial. In a heated interview, the defendant (lawyer) stated that he would give $1 million to anyone who can challenge him by providing the facts that his client accused was the one who had committed the murder. The plaintiff took the challenge and decided to claim the  $1 million from the defendant.

Another rule for an offer is that it should have a lawful consideration. Consideration was explained as; “Some right, interest, profit, or benefit accruing to the one party, or some forbearance, detriment, loss, or responsibility, given, suffered or undertaken by the other. "[4] Another explanation of consideration is the "price that one to a contract pays for the promise or the performance of the other party."[5] In analyzing the case for Hopwood Investments Ltd and GastroFood Ltd, it’s well clear that the statement "Can offer latest 'Speedy Rice Cookers' at $100 each" was a valid offer with both intention and consideration.


After an offeror presents its offer to the offeree,  the offeree should reply with an acceptance to create a valid agreement. Like an offer, a valid acceptance requires some elements. These are the willingness to accept, and it should be unconditional.[6] In addition, the law of contract states that acceptance must be definite or unequivocal. Plus, the offeree needs to communicate its assent to the offeror. If the offeree replies with a condition, the condition terminates the offer through a counter-offer. The effects of a counter-offer were explained as;

“At common law, the mirror image rule requires that the offeree’s acceptance match the offeror’s offer exactly. In other words, the terms of the acceptance must “mirror” those of the offer. If the acceptance materially changes or adds to the terms of the original offer, it will be considered not an acceptance but a counteroffer— which, of course, need not be accepted. The original offeror can, however, accept the terms of the counteroffer and create a valid contract.”[7]

Following this explanation, Hopwood Investments Ltd terminated the offer through a counter offer by stating that, "Will have fifty. Need delivery by November 1, 2015." On the other hand, this came back to GastroFood Ltd as an offer which it could choose to accept or reject. Like explained above, the reply form GastroFood saying "thank you for your email which is receiving our attention" was a reply from Hopwood Investments Ltd terminated the offer counter offer  "Will have fifty. Need delivery by November 1, 2015." This construes that GastroFood accepted the offer, and this resulted to a conclusion of their agreement. Now, it was upon each party to perform its obligation in good faith. GastroFood was to deliver by the stated date, and Hopwood was to pay $50 on delivery.

However, before the date of delivery, Hopwood decided to forfeit its obligation. It’s a good point to know that parties are not allowed to back from the deal after making a contract. In simple terms, the execution expected of the parties acting under contract os sales involves the obligations that each party owes under their terms as asserted in the contract.”[8] This means that both companies were supposed to carry out their obligation. However, Hopwood called GastroFoods and clearly communicated that it was not willing to perform its part. When one party backs from the sale of goods deal, it leads to an anticipatory breach of repudiation.  An anticipatory repudiation is the cancellation of one party's performance just sometimes before the actual performance occurs.  It may occur expressly when that party communicates of the annulment to the innocent party informing it that it's impossible to perform as per the agreement.  If this anticipatory repudiation causes the innocent party some damages, that party can elect the following actions. For one, it can choose to wait and hope that the breaching party may change its mind and execute the performance. Secondly, it may opt to end the contract and claim for damages.”[9]

This explanation clarifies the fact that GastroFood can end the contract and Sue for anticipatory damages. To clarify, a mirror case to GastroFood’s situation was ruled in Hochster v De la Tour.[10] In this case, the defendant had an agreement with the claimant for a service of a courierThe claimant was to begin work on June 1st, 1852. After the contract, the respondent wrote to the plaintiff on May 11th  asserting that he didn't require the assistance of the plaintiff. Also, he refused to repay the compensation. Subsequently, the claimant obtained another contract, but he could not start working until the July 4th of that year.  Appropriately, the plaintiff filed a suit against the defendant on May 22nd for a breach of their contract. On the other hand, the defendant refused breach claiming that it was just 22nd May and yet the contract was commencing June 1st. However, the court ruled that the claimant need not wait since the defendant had already communicated that he wouldn't perform. Similarly, Gastrofood can decide to take action against Hopwood for a breach of contract.

Notably, Gastro cannot ask the court to force Hopwood to accept the rice cooker. That would be an equitable remedy for specific performance. This remedy is not available when damages are an adequate remedy.[11]


The law of contract enforceable people’s agreement to make sure that they perform as they had agreed. When one party fails, the law will always come in either to enforce the agreement, or to issue damages for the breach. Therefore, it is paramount that people should enter into the agreements that they are sure they would perform. This paper was a study for formation of agreement and their breach.  



Goldman, Arnold J, and William D Sigismond. 2013. Business Law. 9th ed. Mason, OH: South-Western Cengage Learning. Pg 140

Roger LeRoy Miller.,2013. Essentials Of The Legal Environment, 4th ed. [. Mason, Ohio [u.a:]:Cengage Learning

Mann, Richard A., and Barry S. Roberts. 2015. Essentials Of Business Law And The Legal Environment. 11th ed. Cengage Learning.

Miller, R. and Jentz, G. 2010. Business law today. 9th ed. Mason, Ohio [u.a.]: South-Western Cengage Learning.

Meiners, R.E., Ringleb A.H., Frances L., & Edwards F.E.,2016. Legal environment of business. 13th ed. [. Mason, Ohio [u.a.]: Cengage Learning.


Currie v Misa (1875) LR 10 Ex 153

Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Co Ltd v Selfridge & Co Ltd [1915] UKHL 1

Hochster v De la Tour (1853) 2 E & B 678

Kolodziej v. Mason, 774 F.3d 736 (11th Cir. 2014).

Download Sample

Get 100% money back after download, simply upload your unique content* of similar no. of pages or more. We verify your content and once successfully verified 100% value credited to your wallet within 7 days.

Upload Unique Document

Document Under Evaluation

Get Credits into Your Wallet

*The content must not be available online or in our existing Database to qualify as unique.

Cite This Work

To export a reference to this article please select a referencing stye below:

My Assignment Help. (2018). Contract Dispute Case Study. Retrieved from

"Contract Dispute Case Study." My Assignment Help, 2018,

My Assignment Help (2018) Contract Dispute Case Study [Online]. Available from:
[Accessed 05 July 2020].

My Assignment Help. 'Contract Dispute Case Study' (My Assignment Help, 2018) <> accessed 05 July 2020.

My Assignment Help. Contract Dispute Case Study [Internet]. My Assignment Help. 2018 [cited 05 July 2020]. Available from:

With time, has become one of the best college essay writing services. Our all rounded services give students the confidence to overcome assignment related issues. Our services are fast enough to meet most urgent deadlines. We are capable of delivering fast essay writing services with the help of our specially designed provisions and writers' teams. Our urgent essay help services guarantee most rapid delivery of assignment solutions. Some of our most popular essay services are application essay help, exploratory essay help, literary review essay help and argumentative essay help.

Latest Business Law Samples

HI6027 Business And Corporate Law 5

Download : 0 | Pages : 6

Answers: 1 A sole trader is considered as an individual or any entity who practices a business alone. It is measured as the easiest method of occupation and the inexpensive procedure of the commerce where other than the sole trader no other person or entity shall be obligated for the profits incurred and the losses in the business. A Company is mentioned  as any body or organization that is devouring a separate individuality separately f...

Read More arrow Tags: Australia Rozelle 8 business and corporations law Holmes Institute 

HA2022 Business Law 4

Download : 0 | Pages : 7

Answer: 1: The national sporting organizations in the territory have maintained various rules or laws to maintain their organization. There are several sporting organizations such as the Australian Football League, National Rugby League and many others. The Directory of the Sports of Australia has restricted the particulars of these organizations, in addition to it is recognized the people of the organizations who are concerned in the improve...

Read More arrow Tags: Australia 8 business law Holmes Institute 

5R7Z0058 International Corporate And Global Consequences

Download : 0 | Pages : 15
  • Course Code: 5R7Z0058
  • University: National Center For Biotechnology Information
  • Country: United States

Answer: Introduction: The Volkswagen emissions scandal is also known as "emissionsgate" or "dieselgate", and this scandal is initiated in September 2015, when notice is issued by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) German automaker Volkswagen Group for the contravention of provisions of Clean Air Act. Agency further stated that group used program named as Volkswagen had intentionally programmed turbocharged direct injectio...

Read More arrow Tags: United Kingdom Manchester Management smo  University of London 

M001CRB Marking Criteria

Download : 0 | Pages : 15
  • Course Code: M001CRB
  • University: Coventry University
  • Country: United Kingdom

Answer: Introduction Strategic management and leadership are two basic components of an organization to gain competitive advantages and manage the human resources properly. Strategic management allows an organization to bring the resources and utilize the resources (Moutinho and Vargas-Sanchez 2018). However, manpower, financial marketing, capital and organizational functions are the major components of an organization to meet the organizatio...

Read More arrow Tags: Australia Ragunan Management Case Study  University of New South Wales 

HI6027 Business And Corporate Law 2

Download : 1 | Pages : 9

Answers: Week 1 The major three sections amongst which the Australian Constitutional powers are divided include the Exclusive powers, Concurrent powers as well as the Residual powers. Exclusive powers include the powers held by the Commonwealth in order to construct a legislation that has to be regulated by all the states and the territories as well. No state has such power to do so in respect with a certain areas. An instance of Exclusive po...

Read More arrow Tags: Australia 8 business and corporate law Holmes Institute 

Save Time & improve Grade

Just share Requriment and get customize Solution.

We will use e-mail only for:

arrow Communication regarding your orders

arrow To send you invoices, and other billing info

arrow To provide you with information of offers and other benefits




Overall Rating



Our Amazing Features


On Time Delivery

Our writers make sure that all orders are submitted, prior to the deadline.


Plagiarism Free Work

Using reliable plagiarism detection software, only provide customized 100 percent original papers.


24 X 7 Live Help

Feel free to contact our assignment writing services any time via phone, email or live chat.


Services For All Subjects

Our writers can provide you professional writing assistance on any subject at any level.


Best Price Guarantee

Our best price guarantee ensures that the features we offer cannot be matched by any of the competitors.

Our Experts

Assignment writing guide
student rating student rating student rating student rating student rating 5/5

134 Order Completed

95% Response Time

Thomas Nelson

MS in Information Systems Technology with Specialization in Database Administration

New Jersey, United States

Hire Me
Assignment writing guide
student rating student rating student rating student rating student rating 5/5

285 Order Completed

99% Response Time

Eugene Baranowski

MBA in Supply Chain

London, United Kingdom

Hire Me
Assignment writing guide
student rating student rating student rating student rating student rating 5/5

610 Order Completed

100% Response Time

Cheryl Zhao

PhD in Statistics

Singapore, Singapore

Hire Me
Assignment writing guide
student rating student rating student rating student rating student rating 5/5

2279 Order Completed

97% Response Time

Zachary Perez

PhD in Computer Science and Information System

Washington, United States

Hire Me

FREE Tools


Plagiarism Checker

Get all your documents checked for plagiarism or duplicacy with us.


Essay Typer

Get different kinds of essays typed in minutes with clicks.


GPA Calculator

Calculate your semester grades and cumulative GPa with our GPA Calculator.


Chemical Equation Balancer

Balance any chemical equation in minutes just by entering the formula.


Word Counter & Page Calculator

Calculate the number of words and number of pages of all your academic documents.

Refer Just 5 Friends to Earn More than $2000

Check your estimated earning as per your ability




Your Approx Earning

Live Review

Our Mission Client Satisfaction

Very pleased with the work I get back from the assignment help. Thank you for the work provided.


User Id: 455661 - 05 Jul 2020


student rating student rating student rating student rating student rating

Awesome fantastically ] perfect I loved his work right on time loved it thank you


User Id: 452319 - 05 Jul 2020


student rating student rating student rating student rating student rating

I wasn’t impressed. I had to do a lot of editing and the writing is just not impressive


User Id: 447023 - 05 Jul 2020


student rating student rating student rating student rating student rating

Quick turn-around. Easy to understand. All requirements covered. I will be using MAH again!


User Id: 383727 - 04 Jul 2020


student rating student rating student rating student rating student rating
callback request mobile
Have any Query?