Accident Compensation Commission (ACC) and Workplace Safety Management Practice (WSMP) system focuses on keeping workers safe and healthy. The system of accident compensation in New Zealand was established in early days of 1974. The system was the controversial but pioneering societal reform in operations of different organizations (Keenan, 2018). The aim of the system included the idea of creating the fairer system based on the principles of ‘no-fault’ in operations and to be comprehensively available to every individual. The practice set the target of reducing cases of serious fatalities as well as injuries in the workplace. It also establishes the independent taskforce on safety and health of workplace to advise the workers and employers on how such safety measures could be reached. ACC WSMP ensures that there are a strong, consistent, and clearly understood safety rules and worked health and expectations that are broadly adopted nationally to assist in creation of positive safety behaviors (Cheng, Kelly, & Ryan, 2015). ACCC has been working through the consultation process with other business operations with the aim of identifying their needs and concerns in achieving safety performance in an organization. ACC had introduced WSMP program in early days of 2000 as an insurance incentive program that aimed at encouraging medium to large business operation to implement the audited management system of occupational and health safety. The system has remained to be widely in application in country such as New Zealand (Martin & Wachter, 2018). The program is utilized to access the eligibility of different organizations to apply discounts to their levy payments and to promote organizational health and safety management approach. Such systems help in managing different risks and hazards in operations of industries. Therefore, primary objective of this research paperwork is to examine if ACC WSMP system adequately measure safety performance of an organization.
How ACC WSMP measure safety performance
ACC WSMP had the main target of ensuring that every business operating in New Zealand to have a better understanding of the connection between prevention of injury and their levy. It ensured that both products are well designed to encourage continuous improvement, offer access to more “tailored” joined-up services, and connect every levy of business to their health along with safety performance. To achieve effective safety performance measure, ACC WSMP proposed two advanced workplace safety incentive products (Susca, 2018). The products proposed aimed at replacing the workplace safety discount and the workplace safety management practice. The system of ACC measured safety performance of different organizations effectively by simplifying base levy pricing. Here, the system simplified the section of the levy of business based on risk profile as defined by most business activities around marketplaces (Bendickson, Hammer, & Ross, 2018). The system carried potentially huge savings in levies. At the same moment, ACC WSMP system has been able to balance the risk of workers funding their claims and costs of administration. Private Service providers to organizations have then arisen from insurance or broking corporations to enable several companies to manage different claims and payment of entitlements (Adams, 2016). Such management has ensured that payment of workers is well secured in different departments that they offer their services.
ACC WSMP system ensured that there is effective measure of organizational safety performance by enhancing performance rating of business. The system proposed two different options for calculation that include model one and two (Hudon, Hunt, & Ehrmann Feldman, 2018). Model one used by the system is known to be frequency based. Here, calculation of performance rating is based on the contribution of the number of weekly compensation days to check at the number of medical claims and the number of fatalities of the three-year experience period. Furthermore, model two used by this system to measure safety performance is the cost based. In this model, calculations are based on the total sum of all work-related claims charges in the three-year experience duration (Jacobs, Malloy, Tickner, & Edwards, 2016). The other third option in measuring safety performance by ACC WSMP system is lead indicators. The model tends to recognize and to reward the business for the other improvements made on health and safety (Petersen et al., 2016). The system performs measure of safety performance effectively by providing proactive measures undertaken to enhance safety to earn business status points. The system allows business management to poi redeems points with the major purpose of accessing further improvements of health together with safety in businesses. Therefore, by use of ACCC WSMP systems, business operators and managers can then be capable of viewing and sharing their status with the market through the website access. The access of such status in online portal can then offer range of other safety measures devices that include benchmarking, calculator of levy projection, injury log device, and knowledge bank (Leka, Iavicoli, & Di Tecco, 2015). The ACC WSMP plans to introduce all these safety measures to improve safety performance in early days of 2020 effectively.
The use of WSMP can help every business operator to gain rebates off their ACC premiums by enhancing security forms. WSMP does not just need to take care of the wellbeing worry of business laborers, yet additionally their security as they perform their daily operations. WSMP system leads to increasing extensive experience in system design and implementation of business design, discount programs for ACC, and what is needed as the company to attain the high level of safety and health of workers. The system offers consultancy services to business operations to assist them in developing and maintaining their policies and program of health and safety (Camplin, 2011). ACC WSMP systems effectively improve the safety management of organization y assessing the suitability of organization to achieve its strategic goals. The system also helps in auditing their current health and safety practices by utilizing the ACC audit devices as the benchmark in business operations. It also identifies the existing gaps in present system of organizations and recommends for improvement if there is a need (Turner & McIvor, 2017). Moreover, ACC WSMP helps in attain system development and training where necessary to facilitate entry into the aiming at achieving safe operational program in business.
Improving experience rating
ACC WSMP system has focused on the present experience rating program to view what works best and what does not work well in ensuring that every worker is safe. They have ensured that business to concentrate on aiming at rewarding employees in future to reduce cases of injuries and supporting rehabilitation. The major context in improving safety performance is that ACC system sees experience rating as supporting their wider drive to enhance workplace safety and health (Zardo & Collie, 2014). The idea remains to be a clear acknowledgment that experience rating alone cannot reduce claims sustainably as per the business operations. Furthermore, ACC system improves safety of performance by accepting that the organization customers are capable of finding the current rating system complex and that it is not easy to view how claims experience affects their levies. Partly, this perspective is due to the time lag between when negative or positive changes happen, and when they are reflected in the levy paid (Volokh, 2018). It is almost virtually impossible for even mathematically competent individuals to understand the formulas together with adjustments that are utilized. The systems have come up with the discussion document on option for expensive rating (Agnew, Hyten & Sevin, 2017). In it, A CC WSMP systems have published two differently Conceptual Designs for consideration. These include the experience rating system that emphasizes responsiveness and experience rating system that emphasizes transparency and responsiveness.
The experience of rating system that emphasizes on responsiveness plays essential tasks on improving safety performance in an organization. It addresses performance measures that place more focus on claims and safety outcomes such as fatal injuries. It focuses on less emphasis on return to work performance making workers remain safe and healthy in every workplace. Besides, ACC WSMP system through experience rating help in shortening rating period to allow workers to be safe in their operations. The system improves safety performance by ensuring that workers work more closely as per alignment of business operations as opposed to comparing their operations to entire industry (Harris & Detke, 2013). Moreover, ACC WSMP system improves safety performance by including rating system that emphasizes transparency and responsiveness. The system measures performance that only focuses on putting more emphasis on claims and safety outcomes such as fatal injuries. It focuses less on return performance but improving wellbeing of individuals within the workplaces (Reif, Lopes, & Medeiros, 2018). The system is a new technique for improving safety performance for any business operation. It tends to define what seems to be good health and safety looks like, above, and beyond minimum compliance.
ACC WSMP is just a performance improvement system that is different from compliance audit products. Most businesses can use ACC system to assess safety performance as well as receive tailored recommendations on what they need to do to improve operations. It goes further step to offer business with tailored advice and guidance on different improvements that they can make to assist in ensuring every individual in the workplace receives home safety and safety (Yadav, Nikraz, & Chen, 2016). The system has improved safety performance since from the tie of its establishment New Zealand has reduced instances of serious workplace injury, fatality, and illness. Through this system, societal and economic cost of individuals being hurt and killed in workplaces in New Zealand has reduced with great percentage (Kheni, Gibb, & Dainty, 2013). The ACC WSMP system has contributed to the target of a government that focuses on reducing the workplace deaths and injury. The system measures safety performance adequately by ensuring that every health and safety measures a company adapts are examined at every level of management (Chen et al., 2018). The examination always starts with the senior-most management down to junior worker within the organizational setting.
Benefits of ACC WSMP system
For business operations, ACC system has aimed at improving productivity by creating the safer and healthier workplace. It focuses on proving the degree of business confidence concerning their performance. It boosts reputations of business stakeholders as the employer choice. The system improves safety by focusing on improving the health and safety of people in workplace. Through such targets, this system helps businesses to be assured of focusing their efforts and investments in the correct places (Sterud et al., 2018). For instance, for workers, the system helps in reducing the cases of workplace accidents and illness by offering the safer and healthier place of work. For authorities, this system of ACC WSMP helps in changing culture of New Zealand towards health and safety by reducing the costs of failure. It improves safety in such places by contributing to the more productive and efficient workplace to assist in driving the economy. Therefore, ACC WSMP system is able to measure safety performance adequately. The system offers resources and guidance in every organization that operates in business markets (Giles, 2011). It also offers onsite assessment along with advisory services that are vital in effectively measuring the safety performance. Moreover, ACC WSMP services offer online self-assessment to every stakeholder as a way of measuring safety performance. Through resources and guidance, this system offer performance requirements vital to good health and safety. It provides maturity scales that are used in measuring performance (Marciano & Romaniuc, 2015). The use of examples and case studies of best practices make ACC system to be effective in measuring safety performance of an organization.
Through onsite assessment together with advisory services, ACC WSMP is effective in measuring safety performance. It focuses on accrediting and training different private assessors to understand how to improve safety and health of workers. The system also focuses on how to improve how to assess behavior based onsite as a way of improving safety (Olson et al., 2016). It tailors guidance along with advice on where and technique to use in improving safety and health of people. Furthermore, the system measures health and safety performance making it be the efficient approach of measuring safety performance by deep involvement in dive assessment. Furthermore, online self-assessment by ACC WSMP system makes it vital in measuring safety performance. It helps in identifying different gaps that might arise in health and safety of workers (Glenn, 2011). It makes individuals within an organization to be aware of different issues that can have negative impact on safety. It also looks at inputs of different managers, workers, and contractors during the operation in ensuring that they work as per the laid down guideline that supports safety of individual (Ali & Blair, 2018). Furthermore, ACC WSMP system adequately measures safety by ensuring that it offers advice and guidance on different ways to improve and which part of operation to improve at any given moment. From the use of this system, it is clear that it allowed organizations in New Zealand to remain committed to reducing workplace injury and death toll by about twenty-five percent by the early days of 2020.
ACC system adequately measures safety performance as it operates in ensuring that there is a strong, consistent, and clearly understood work health and safety guidelines and expectations. These expectations are always adopted nationally to assist in creating positive behaviors of safety (van Eekeren, Wright, & ?okorilo, 2018). It measures safety performance by ensuring that change in behavior and attitude is in turn reflected in the reduction of fatalities and injuries. Enactment of the system as made it possible for WorkSafe in New Zealand has focused on issuing formal guidance towards offering support the Act and Regulation of safety. The system is vital in offering adequate measure of safety performance as it always is a range of data and guidance concerning any new reign (Calvillo & Burkett, 2011). It also provides different organizations with concise and easy to read and to understand publications that comprise of practical devices that will help businesses to get their house in order well in time for the new set regulations.
ACC WSMP system ensure worker participation and reasonably practicable
The new system focuses on existing requirements for engagement of workers and their participation in work health and safety. By ensuring the involvement of workers, this system is able to follow and efficiently measure safety performance in an organization. The changes that the system aimed at improving the flexibility of worker participation provision with the aim that innovation is not stifled. Under the new system, every individual has the mandate of engaging with their workers on matters concerning work safety that affect their operations (Wilson, Kvizhinadze, Pega, Nair, & Blakely, 2017). It also offers great opportunities for workers to participate in improving safety and health of individuals. ACC system focuses on controlling run, nature, dissemination, and noteworthiness of peril. It centers on wiping out danger either by the presentation of inalienably more secure procedures or by not any more conducting a specified action (Ben-Shahar & Logue, 2012). Therefore ACC WSMP adequately measures safety performance as it can provide information on the process as well as current status of the strategies, processes, and operations utilized by the organization to control dangers to safety and health.
The system helps different companies to understand step by step instructions to allot obligations regarding both their dynamic and receptive observing of execution at particular levels on the administration chain. The system ensures that safety performance is measured adequately by ensuring that performance standards are in place (Paul et al., 2013). It examines who does what and when does it performs it and to what effect in operations. The system ensures that potential for change in operations from one state to another over duration like during the initial design phase is obtained by indicating that the system as designed has failed or is flawed. However, ACC WSMP system effectively measures safety performance as it monitors the progress of operations with the plans being aligned with the particular timescales for different achievements (Fiscor, 2016). It plans the frequency into which operational measures are recorded such as health and safety findings to ensure that specific planned milestones are attained during operations.
From the above discussion, it is evident that Accident Compensation Commission (ACC) Workplace Safety Management Practice (WSMP) system is widely used in New Zealand to assess the eligibility of organizations to apply for discounts to their levy payments. It is also essential in promoting health together with safety management systems in managing hazards and risks in marketplaces. ACC WSMP system adequately helps in measuring safety performance of different organizations effectively by simplifying base levy pricing. It simplified the section of the levy of business by concentrating at the risk profile as illustrated by most business activities around marketplaces. It is evident that ACC WSMP system has been able to balance the risk of workers funding their claims and charges of administration. With the adequacy in measuring the safety performance, it is necessary for the New Zealand government to embrace the plan of introducing ACC WSMP system as it will help to improve safety performance in early days of 2020 effectively. Then, ACC WSMP system can continue to help in achieves system development together with training where necessary for the function of facilitating entry into aiming at attaining safe operational plan in operation of businesses.
Adams, E. M. (2016). Human rights at work: Physical standards for employment and human rights law. Applied Physiology, Nutrition & Metabolism, 41, S63–S73. https://doi.org/10.1139/apnm-2015-0552
Agnew, J., Hyten, C., & Sevin, B. (2017). Lone Worker Safety. Professional Safety, 62(1), 22–24. Retrieved from https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=aph&AN=120683001&site=ehost-live
Ali, R., & Blair, E. (2018). SAFETY TRAINING REVISITED: Effective Design & Delivery. Professional Safety, 63(6), 57–60. Retrieved from https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=aph&AN=129895236&site=ehost-live
Bendickson, N. J., Hammer, B., & Ross, P. E. (2018). Drive Excellence: Auditing Fleet Safety Process to Manage Risk. Professional Safety, 63(2), 30–35. Retrieved from https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=aph&AN=127648299&site=ehost-live
Ben-Shahar, O., & Logue, K. D. (2012). Outsourcing Regulation: How Insurance Reduces Moral Hazard. Michigan Law Review, 111(2), 197–248. Retrieved from https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=aph&AN=84470086&site=ehost-live
Calvillo, J., & Burkett, D. (2011). Improving Chemical Compliance and Lowering Risk. Professional Safety, 56(1), 60–61. Retrieved from https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=aph&AN=58107307&site=ehost-live
Camplin, J. C. (2011). Aligning Safety & Social Responsibility. Professional Safety, 56(5), 46–55. Retrieved from https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=aph&AN=60588200&site=ehost-live
Chen, Z., Chen, T., Qu, Z., Yang, Z., Ji, X., Zhou, Y., & Zhang, H. (2018). Use of evidential reasoning and AHP to assess regional industrial safety. PLoS ONE, 13(5), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197125
Cheng, E. W. L., Kelly, S., & Ryan, N. (2015). Use of safety management practices for improving project performance. International Journal of Injury Control & Safety Promotion, 22(1), 33–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457300.2013.844715
Fiscor, S. (2016). The 1970s: The Great Mining Buildout. Engineering & Mining Journal (00958948), 217(9), 134–164. Retrieved from https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=aph&AN=118460560&site=ehost-live
Giles, A. C. (2011). Railway Accidents and NineteenthCentury Legislation: “Misconduct, Want of Caution or Causes Beyond their Control?” Labour History Review (Maney Publishing), 76(2), 121–142. https://doi.org/10.1179/174581811X13063237706916
Glenn, D. D. (2011). Job Safety Analysis Its Role Today. Professional Safety, 56(3), 48–57. Retrieved from https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=aph&AN=59256684&site=ehost-live
Harris, D. D., & Detke, L. A. (2013). The Role of Flooring as a Design Element Affecting Patient and Healthcare Worker Safety. Health Environments Research & Design Journal (HERD) (Vendome Group LLC), 6(3), 95–119. Retrieved from https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=aph&AN=88804070&site=ehost-live
Hudon, A., Hunt, M., & Ehrmann Feldman, D. (2018). Physiotherapy for injured workers in Canada: are insurers’ and clinics’ policies threatening good quality and equity of care? Results of a qualitative study. BMC Health Services Research, 18(1), N.PAG. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3491-1
Jacobs, M. M., Malloy, T. F., Tickner, J. A., & Edwards, S. (2016). Alternatives Assessment Frameworks: Research Needs for the Informed Substitution of Hazardous Chemicals. Environmental Health Perspectives, 124(3), 265–280. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1409581
Keenan, J. (2018). Safety Excellence Through VPP. Professional Safety, 63(4), 17–19. Retrieved from https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=aph&AN=128783042&site=ehost-live
Kheni, N. A., Gibb, A. G. F., & Dainty, A. R. J. (2013). Health and Safety Management within Small- and Medium-Sized Enterprises (SMEs) in Developing Countries: Study of Contextual Influences. Journal of Construction Engineering & Management, 136(10), 1104–1115. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000218
Leka, S., Jain, A., Iavicoli, S., & Di Tecco, C. (2015). An Evaluation of the Policy Context on Psychosocial Risks and Mental Health in the Workplace in the European Union: Achievements, Challenges, and the Future. BioMed Research International, 2015, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/213089
Marciano, A., & Romaniuc, R. (2015). Accident costs, resource allocation and individual rationality: Blum, Kalven and Calabresi. European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 22(6), 1084–1114. https://doi.org/10.1080/09672567.2015.10845
Martin, L. F., & Wachter, J. K. (2018). Art & Science of Mindfulness in the Practice of Safety. Professional Safety, 63(8), 30–35. Retrieved from https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=aph&AN=131049639&site=ehost-live
Olson, R., Thompson, S. V., Elliot, D. L., Hess, J. A., Rhoten, K. L., Parker, K. N., … Marino, M. (2016). Safety and Health Support for Home Care Workers: The COMPASS Randomized Controlled Trial. American Journal of Public Health, 106(10), 1823–1832. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2016.303327
Paul, C., Derrett, S., McAllister, S., Herbison, P., Beaver, C., & Sullivan, M. (2013). Socioeconomic outcomes following spinal cord injury and the role of no-fault compensation: longitudinal study. Spinal Cord, 51(12), 919–925. https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.2013.110
Petersen, S. R., Anderson, G. S., Tipton, M. J., Docherty, D., Graham, T. E., Sharkey, B. J., & Taylor, N. A. S. (2016). Towards best practice in physical and physiological employment standards. Applied Physiology, Nutrition & Metabolism, 41, S47–S62. https://doi.org/10.1139/apnm-2016-0003
Reif, R. H., Lopes, D. S., & Medeiros, S. M. (2018). Machine Shop Safety: A Look at the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution Program. (Cover story). Professional Safety, 63(4), 30–35. Retrieved from https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=aph&AN=128783047&site=ehost-live
Sterud, T., Tynes, T., Mehlum, I. S., Veiersted, K. B., Bergbom, B., Airila, A., … Flyvholm, M.-A. (2018). A systematic review of working conditions and occupational health among immigrants in Europe and Canada. BMC Public Health, 18(1), N.PAG. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5703-3
Susca, P. T. (2018). Using Processes to Prevent & Predict Risk. Professional Safety, 63(8), 18–21. Retrieved from https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=aph&AN=131049634&site=ehost-live
Turner, A., & McIvor, A. (2017). “Bottom dog men”: Disability, Social Welfare and Advocacy in the Scottish Coalfields in the Interwar Years, 1918-1939. Scottish Historical Review, 96(2), 187–213. https://doi.org/10.3366/shr.2017.0335
van Eekeren, R., Wright, S., & ?okorilo, O. (2018). Early Cost Safety Analysis of Runway Events. International Journal for Traffic & Transport Engineering, 8(3), 261–270. https://doi.org/10.7708/ijtte.2018.8(3).01
Volokh, A. (2018). Medical Malpractice as Workers’ Comp: Overcoming State Constitutional Barriers to Tort Reform. Emory Law Journal, 67(5), 975–1042. Retrieved from https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=aph&AN=129880516&site=ehost-live
Wilson, N., Kvizhinadze, G., Pega, F., Nair, N., & Blakely, T. (2017). Home modification to reduce falls at a health district level: Modeling health gain, health inequalities and health costs. PLoS ONE, 12(9), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0184538
Yadav, D. K., Nikraz, H., & Chen, Y. (2016). A study of influences of the workers’ compensation and injury management regulations on aviation safety at a workplace. International Journal of Injury Control & Safety Promotion, 23(1), 99–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457300.2014.992350
Zardo, P., & Collie, A. (2014). Measuring use of research evidence in public health policy: a policy content analysis. BMC Public Health, 14(1), 771–790. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-14-496