ENEM14016 Fluid Machinery

Scope of Project 1 by Task

Fail

Pass

Good

Very good

Excellent

BACKGROUND

(1)                Introduction to fluid power systems relating to hydraulic drill machines

(2)                Literature review on conventional hydraulic drill machines

(3)                Working principles of existing hydraulic drill machines

(4)                Develop a design based on your research and develop a set of assumptions for your proposed design

£

Insufficient evidence of literature review, data collection and not enough background knowledge in hydraulic drill machines, proposed design case is not clear

£

Acceptable evidence of literature review, data collection, enough evidence of background knowledge hydraulic drill machines and reasonably clear proposed design case  

£

Detailed evidence of reflection and reasoning about evaluation of literature review, data collection, enough evidence of background knowledge in hydraulic drill machines and quite clear proposed design case with assumptions

£

Detailed and clear evidence of reflection and reasoning about evaluation of literature review, data collection, solid evidence of background knowledge in hydraulic drill machines and very good proposed design case with assumptions

£

Strong and well presented evidence of reflection and reasoning about evaluation of literature review, data collection, solid evidence of background knowledge in hydraulic drill machines and very good proposed design case with assumptions and justification of selection made

DESIGN & CALCULATION

(5)                Design and analysis of a new or modified  hydraulic drill machines that gives better control: flow control, pressure control and directional control using sufficient minimum controlling devices and valves

(6)                Safety check of pipes and pressure cylinders (thick-walled or thin walled analysis)

(7)                Prepare an Excel calculation sheet to contain input data, standard equations, and creating plots to compare

(8)                Health and safety practices required for maintaining the system

£

Very poor design and analysis, control aspect is not clear, Excel sheet is not presented, no safety design check

£

Acceptable design and analysis showing better control strategy, Excel sheet is presented but no discussion provided, limited safety design check

£

Detailed evidence of design and analysis showing better control strategy, Excel sheet is presented but limited discussion provided, safety design check is ok

£

Detailed and strong evidence of design and analysis showing best control strategy, Excel sheet is well presented, safety design check is ok

£

Strong and well presented evidence of design and analysis showing best control strategy, Excel sheet is well presented, safety design check is accurate and excellent

ANALYSIS, COMPARISON & RESULTS

(9)                Use proper drafting tools to show changes in your new design

(10)             Draw necessary fluid circuit diagram

(11)             Apply SimScape and carry out analysis of your new design: piston positions, velocity, flow rate etc. vs time  

£

Insufficient or no evidence of comparison of performance data of new design and old design, no evidence of changes by drafting tools, no fluid circuit diagram presented, no Simscape studies

£

Acceptable evidence of comparison of performance data of new design and old design, limited evidence of changes by drafting tools, limited fluid circuit diagram presented (sketches), acceptable Simscape studies

£

Detailed evidence of comparison of performance data of new design and old design, evidence of changes by drafting tools is good, limited fluid circuit diagram presented accurately, good Simscape studies and plots

£

Strong and detailed evidence of comparison of performance data of new design and old design, evidence of changes by drafting tools is very good, detailed fluid circuit diagram presented accurately, very good Simscape studies and plots

£

Strong and well presented evidence of comparison of performance data of new design and old design, evidence of changes by drafting tools is excellent, detailed fluid circuit diagram presented fully and accurately, very good Simscape studies and plots with reasoning

REPORT

(12)             Preparation of a team report and submission

£

Report is not to an acceptable standard and presentation of the report is not professional

£

An acceptable standard of submitted project report and presentation of the report is good but not sufficiently professional

£

A good standard of submitted report and presentation of the report is good, presented  professionally with standard reference system

£

A high standard of submitted report and presentation of the report is very good, presented  professionally with standard reference system

£

A high standard of submitted report and presentation of the report is excellent (saleable to industry), presented  professionally with standard reference system