EPM5710 : Project Procurement Management

According to the laboratory facilities requirement that GovMed, the Government Research Organization has right now, there are two delivery contract models that can be put into use for the construction of the laboratories they need. These can be listed with their contract models as below:

Design-Bid-Build: The delivery contact model of design with belt are commonly termed as the conventional method or heartbeat is a process in which the owner, which in this case is GovMed, contracts with the different entities for acquiring the actual design and the construction that is required for the project which is the designing and developing of the Laboratories. In this process there are three phases applied to the entire construction delivery contract(Nicholas and Steyn 2017). These are the design phase, the tendering phase, and the construction phase. In the design phase GovMed would like to retain the architect who is skilled in Consulting for the Engineering infrastructural Works to design and producer documents for bidding. This bidding documents would also include the drawings and technical specifications for the Constructions which can be referred by different general constructors for the progression of the project. The next phase is the bid or tender phase, in which anybody who is qualified me participate and select the general contractors bidding. Once these bids are received, the main architect reviews them and clarifies any inconsistencies that define from the end of the bidders. Further the architect indulges in ensuring that all the documents and order and investigate the qualifications of the contractor. If any inconsistencies are found the key architect in abandon the project completely(Maharjan and Shrestha 2017). The final phase of this delivery contract is the construction of the project that the contractor gets after having approval of the construction drawing and all the technical specification which are not allowed to be altered. The architect also accesses the Agent of the owner while the construction phase is going on to evaluation if the progress of the word recounts to the request from the outworker that has been presented to him or her. If any issue is found in the construction process that may seem to be not synchronizing with initial documents, the project can be halted.

CM Multi Prime: There are several project delivery methods within the field of construction management that happened to deal with contractual obligations. Although a construction manager or a CM of multiple Prime is similar to a construction manager at risk both of them are very separate project delivery systems(Kristensenet al. 2015). The multi Prime CM is adopted by the owners of construction that are not staffed with too much work force to support and manage the construction work all by themselves and has to hire an agency CM for performing all the management of construction work for the form(Carpenter and Bausman 2016). However it is find that probably most of the organizations that use this project delivery method are mostly the public sectors. Therefore in this case where GovMed is a public government organization it is a probable choice for the construction work to follow this delivery method. This project delivery method ensure the providers are the owner of the organization are assured with the flexibility to select any contractor that suits several factors of the construction project rather than only depending on the price. Videos of this agency CM during the design development and the transition from design to construction this project delivery method appears more seamless which is why it becomes much more appropriate.

2. Advantages and disadvantages of these contract models and the most suitable one of them

Design-Bid-Build:The advantages of this Project Delivery Method can be as listed as follows:

• Better interest of the owner is paid heed to the most.
• Bids are placed on the documents that are prepared by the design team. These bids are placed by different contractor aiming for the project. This is done with the ‘cheaper is better deal’ in mind (Nikou, Asmar and Bingham 2014). It is often found that the addenda placed during the bid is often consisting of missed items, are incomplete or incorrect.
• This process provides the owners a huge variety of suitable options to choose from and identify the potential contractors, which is also fair to the potential bidders.
• The owners are realized to establish reasonable prices for their project.
• Selection of the architect and the contractor to uses effective competition improve the efficiency and quality for owners (Naoum and Egbu 2015).

The disadvantages of this Project Delivery Method can be as listed as follows:

• If the entire project is made to redo for reducing the budget and similar purposes, the entire design team can be disintegrated and any probable cost during the design phase can increase.
• The project redesign model can have a disputed expense if the key architect do not pay much attention to the revamped model after cost revision redesign process(Reynolds et al.2018).
• Since this project development method suggests the tagline of “the cheaper the better”, there is a high chance that lowest bidding sub-contractors may be taken into consideration without looking at their design models or feasibility of plan (Sanzet al.2017).
• Very little effort is put to find the alternatives at such low bidding post design process by the general contractors.
• Maintaining cost and quality product at the same time becomes much more complicated during the construction is in progress, which has often seen to raise conflicts between the architect and the contractor.

CM Multi Prime:The advantages of this Project Delivery Method can be as listed as follows:

• This process retains the control of design to the owners.
• The contractors are involved much earlier in this project delivery method process(Chen et al.2015).
• This project delivery method amalgamates faster delivery process with the lowest bidding.

The disadvantages of this Project Delivery Method can be as listed as follows:

• The owner becomes the sole responsible person for the gaps, changes or overlaps in the scope of the project.
• Sub-contractor involvement is very low in this project delivery method.
• The CM’s lack of proper oversight can be exposed in this project delivery method.

Therefore, analyzing both the Project Delivery Methods, it can be concluded that the CM Multi Prime is a better option between the two, since it has better options of maintaining quality at lower prices which is pretty underrated process of the former project delivery method.

3. Contract clauses that should be tightened to ensure the requirements for project cost, timeline and delivery performance

The clauses that should be tightened to ensure the requirements for project cost, timeline and delivery performance for GovMeds laboratories are as listed as below:

• Payment and related documents to be submitted for the payment procedure
• Frequency of the contractor’s payment
• Proper and clearly defined terms within the contract
• Scope of work description in the planning documents(Ogunsanmi 2016)
• Defining “reasonably inferable” within the scope of work
• Convenience clause should be terminated
• Change orders and payment hold clauses
• Liquidation damages clauses
• Proper discrimination of time and cost

4. Risk registers and how these are mitigated in the contract