The assignment helps in analyzing the various kinds of motivational factors that will help in gaining productive performance of the employees in the organization. The motivational approaches have to be undertaken in different organizations to analyze differences for improvement of performance. Proper evaluation is required to be done, as this will help in analyzing role of the managers in different organizations. The differences in the performance have to be identified that has been caused due to the motivational factors.
The main aim and purpose of the assignment is to analyze the potential issues that have been faced by different kind of organizations. The various motivational factors along with theories need to be analyzed such that it helps in formulation of the managerial type of interventions. The different developments that have been undertaken by different officials have to be identified with different motivational theories.
The structure of the assignment includes evaluation of different kind of theories along with strategies that will be implemented in different kind of organizations. The different motivational theories and concepts is required to be discussed that will help in improving the performance of employees.
Impact of motivation on dynamic performance and evaluation of different effects faced by managers in organizations
In this competitive era, there are different organizations in the entire world that are competitive in nature. There is different kind of challenges that is faced by the organizations due to competition in the market (Gagné et al. 2015). The different kind of factors has to be analyzed by the managers and employees of the organization in such a manner that will help them in improving their performance and solve issues with different motivational approaches. The performance has to be checked by the managers in such a manner that issues can be identified and solved with adopting different theories of motivation. The motivational factors have to be identified and applied in the organizations, as this will help in increasing the profitability and productivity of the entire organization.
The central issue in different organizations is relating to the different issues in the motivational factors faced by different organizations. It has been identified that there are different organizations wherein the employees are less motivated and they are not appreciated for the work that is performed by them. It has been noticed that the employees who are not motivated to that extent are the ones who have low productivity in the organization and this affects the entire productivity of the organization. This is one of the major issues that are faced by the employees that motivational factors are not provided in an adequate manner.
Furthermore, there are employees along with organizations wherein they are motivated to such an extent wherein they are creative with their performance. They are self-motivated as well who performs the task in an effective manner and they help in gaining huge productivity in the organization. These employees are productive in nature and deliver high quality tasks in the organization. These kinds of employees in the organization are motivated with different techniques of motivational approaches. The different useful tactics has been used by organizations in such a manner that this helps the employees in performing well in the entire organization.
The companies design different kind of incentives, compensation programs along with bonuses that will help them in performing well in the future. The rewards and recognition approach will help the company in gaining competitive advantage in the entire competitive market in such a manner that this will help employees to feel motivated and perform their tasks in an effective manner. Petrou, Demerouti and Schaufeli (2015) commented that human resource department plays a major role in the organizations, as this will motivate the employees in a positive manner. The main purpose of the human resource management has to apply different motivational aspects in such a manner that this will motivate employees to perform better.
Pinder (2014) commented that employees in the organizations need to be self motivated along with self directed as this will help them in motivating employees to perform better and generate productivity. The main aim and duty of the Human Resource department is to recruit employees in the organization. Furthermore, the training and development has to be analyzed in such a manner that this will help the employees to analyze their own skills and talents to perform tasks. However, Leroy et al. (2015) commented that there are different kind of monetary and non-monetary rewards that can be adopted by companies that will motivate employees with different incentives and bonuses.
There are different theories on motivational approach that can be applied by different organizations in such a manner that this will help in analysis of different factors to improve performance of company along with employees working in the organization (Lazaroiu 2015). Firstly, the Maslow’s hierarchy theory of motivation has to be applied by different companies in such a manner that it will focus on the requirements of the employees. The different requirements of Maslow’s hierarchy needs are as follows:
Physiological needs wherein basic amount of salary provided to employees in organization
Self esteem needs wherein acknowledgment at office that includes high status with different responsibilities
Social needs include job Security and insurance along with health
Security needs is wherein diverse teams, departments, supervisors and subordinates
Self actualization needs wherein advancement and training of employees, growth of the employees in performing their tasks in an effective manner
According to the respective theory, the needs of the individuals have to be analyzed in an effective manner. The needs are required to be identified, as this will help in generating huge productivity with their creative nature towards the performance of the jobs. Proper satisfaction and self-actualization is required to be adopted by the employees, as this will help in gaining motivational support to employees (Elliot, Dweck and Yeager 2017). Furthermore, the physiological needs have to be analyzed in order to generate productivity and this will help in gaining operational excellence (Lang 2017).
Different companies as this can apply the Equity Theory in such a manner that will treat all the employees in an effective manner. The main motive of the theory is to motivate the different employees according to the performance. The higher officials in the organizations need to create motivating along with proper working environment, as this will help in providing equal opportunities to the employees (Akkermans et al. 2016). The different appreciations can be provided to the employees in different organizations, as this will help them in performing better in different organizations.
Furthermore, the cognitive theory of motivation can be analyzed in such a manner that this will help the organization along with the employees for feeling motivated. Both extrinsic and intrinsic motivational factors are essential in nature in the organizations as this helps in increasing revenues and productivity of the entire organization. The different intrinsic motivational factors help the employees in the organization to motivate themselves such as self-appreciating and self-directed (Brown 2016). The intrinsic motivational factors can be applied to the theory Y employees who are the ones to perform the tasks on their own. They do not feel demotivated and they give their best in accordance to perform the task in an effective manner.
The different motivational factors that are intrinsic in nature are competence along with responsibility, achieving high productivity with their own capability. The Y approach employees are the ones who perform the task on time and help the company in being more productive. However, on the other hand there are extrinsic motivational factors that are generally from the external environment. The employees are performing in the organization needs to achieve proper rewards and recognition. These are the external kind of recognition that will help in promoting the employees who are performing well and can able to handle the different activities in the organization (Vandenabeele and Coursey 2015).
The extrinsic motivational factors will help in paying the employees incentives and other bonuses for their performance (Cerasoli, Nicklin and Ford 2014). This includes the different kind of other motivational activities that include the non-monetary rewards and bonuses that will help in motivating the employees. The monetary and non-monetary rewards are essential in nature, as this will help in understanding the different requirements of the employees and solve them accordingly (Caillier 2014).
Achievement is essential wherein payment to the employees in the organization accordance to the performance of the employees and this will help in monetary and non monetary rewards
Competence is essential as feedback as well as promotion provided to the employees as per their tasks performed by them
Responsibility is described as wherein proper condition of the organization is essential as this will help in rewarding the employees in an effective manner
Therefore, it can be concluded that motivational factors play an essential role in different companies, as this will increase productivity of the organization. As there is increase in productivity, this will help in employees to perform better in the organization. The different kind of motivational theories has to be adopted in such a manner that will help in understanding the requirements of the customers in an effective manner. The theories X and Y help in motivating the employees and this helps in generating huge revenues and profit in the future.
Akkermans, J., Akkermans, J., de Lange, A.H., de Lange, A.H., van der Heijden, B.I., van der Heijden, B.I., Kooij, D.T., Kooij, D.T., Jansen, P.G., Jansen, P.G. and Dikkers, J.S., 2016. What about time? Examining chronological and subjective age and their relation to work motivation. Career Development International, 21(4), pp.419-439.
Brown, H.R., 2016. T he Effects of Work Journals, Portfolios, and Cosmic Education on Intrinsic Motivation in an Upper Elementary Montessori Environment.
Caillier, J.G., 2014. Toward a better understanding of the relationship between transformational leadership, public service motivation, mission valence, and employee performance: A preliminary study. Public Personnel Management, 43(2), pp.218-239.
Cerasoli, C.P., Nicklin, J.M. and Ford, M.T., 2014. Intrinsic motivation and extrinsic incentives jointly predict performance: A 40-year meta-analysis. Psychological bulletin, 140(4), p.980.
Elliot, A.J., Dweck, C.S. and Yeager, D.S. eds., 2017. Handbook of Competence and Motivation: Theory and Application. Guilford Publications.
Gagné, M., Forest, J., Vansteenkiste, M., Crevier-Braud, L., Van den Broeck, A., Aspeli, A.K., Bellerose, J., Benabou, C., Chemolli, E., Güntert, S.T. and Halvari, H., 2015. The Multidimensional Work Motivation Scale: Validation evidence in seven languages and nine countries. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 24(2), pp.178-196.
Lang, G., 2017. Can Learning Journals Increase Metacognition, Motivation, and Learning? Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial in a Computer Information Systems Course. In Proceedings of the EDSIG Conference ISSN (Vol. 2473, p. 3857).
Lazaroiu, G., 2015. Employee Motivation and Job Performance. Linguistic and Philosophical Investigations, 14, p.97.
Leroy, H., Anseel, F., Gardner, W.L. and Sels, L., 2015. Authentic leadership, authentic followership, basic need satisfaction, and work role performance: A cross-level study. Journal of Management, 41(6), pp.1677-1697.
Petrou, P., Demerouti, E. and Schaufeli, W.B., 2015. Job crafting in changing organizations: Antecedents and implications for exhaustion and performance. Journal of occupational health psychology, 20(4), p.470.
Pinder, C.C., 2014. Work motivation in organizational behavior. Psychology Press.
Vandenabeele, W. and Coursey, D., 2015. Open Conference Systems Construct validity of public service motivation in four public sub-sectors: multi-group analyses with civil servants, teachers, police officers and nurses to assess the scope of the theory.