a)This question relates to the time value of money and deferred annuities.
i)If the fund to which she contributes earns 4.8% per annum, compounded monthly (after tax), how much will he have at age 63? Will she have achieved her targeted sum? What is the surplus or the shortfall?
ii)Using the entire fund balance, Ruth then wishes to commence a monthly pension payable by the fund starting one month after her 63rd birthday, and ending on her 87th birthday, after which she expects that the fund will be fully expended. If the fund continues to earn the above return of 4.8% per annum, compounded monthly, how much monthly pension will Ruth receive, if the fund balance reduces to zero as planned after the last pension payment on her 87th birthday?
b)This question relates to loan repayments and loan terms.
i)The effective annual interest rate on the above loan (show as a percentage, correct to 3 decimal places).
ii)The amount of the monthly repayment (consisting of interest and principal repayment components) if the same amount is to be paid every month over the 25 year period of the loan.
iii)The amount of $Y, if - instead of the above – the Federal Bank agrees that James and Mary will repay the loan by paying the bank $3,000 per month for the first 12 months, then $3,500 a month for the next 12 months, and after that $Y per month for the balance of the 25 year term.
iv)How long (in years and months) would it take to repay the loan if, alternatively, James and Mary decide to repay $4,400 per month, with the first repayment again being at the end of the first month after taking the loan, and continuing until the loan was repaid. [HINT: The final repayment is likely to be less than $4,400, and will be paid one month after the final full installment of $4,400 is paid.)
iv)Calculate the internal rate of return (IRR) for each project.
v)Calculate the exact crossover point (an interest rate, expressed as a percentage correct to two places of decimals) of the respective net present values (NPVs) for the above projects.
vi)Having regard to the above calculations, state – with reasons - which of investments P and Q you would prefer.
This question relates to capital budgeting.
Bayside Ferries Ltd is considering the purchase in September, 2018 of two new small hydrofoils costing $480,000 each, which it will fully finance with a fixed interest loan of 9% per annum, with interest paid monthly and the principal repaid at the end of 4 years. The hydrofoils will be used in the company’s passenger transport business.
The two new hydrofoils will replace three existing steam ferries and will permit the company to reduce its energy and labour costs by a total of $160,000 a year, over the next 4 years. [Assume these savings are realized at the end of each year.]
The new hydrofoils may be depreciated for tax purposes by the straight-line method to zero over the next 4 years. The company thinks that it can sell the hydrofoils at the end of 4 years for $75,000 each.
The three old ferries being replaced were bought two years ago for $300,000 each, with a then life expectancy of 6 years, and are being depreciated by the straight-line method to zero over 6 years. If the company proceeds with the above purchase, the old ferries will be sold in September, 2018 for $170,000 each.
This is not the first time that the company has considered this purchase and replacement. Twelve months ago, the company engaged Sea Travel Consultants, at a fee of $25,000 paid in advance, to conduct a feasibility study on savings strategies and Sea Travel made the above recommendations. At the time, Bayside Ferries Ltd did not proceed with the recommended strategy, but is now reconsidering the proposal.
Bayside Ferries Ltd further estimates that it will have to spend tax-deductible amounts of $30,000 in 2 years’ time and $40,000 in 3 years’ time overhauling the hydrofoils.
It will also require additions to current assets of $30,000 at the start of the hydrofoils project, which will be fully recoverable at the end of the fourth year after purchase
Bayside Ferries Ltd’s cost of capital is 11%. The tax rate is 30%. Tax is paid in the year in which earnings are received
(a)Calculate the net present value (NPV), that is, the net benefit or net loss in present value terms of the proposed purchase costs and the resultant incremental cash flows.
(b)Should the company purchase the new hydrofoils? State clearly why or why not.
Assume that Bradley Lane has a sole income from Fisher Ltd in which he owns 12% of the ordinary share capital. Currently, Bradley has no savings.
In August, 2018, Fisher Ltd reported net profits after tax of $800,000 for the last financial year, 2017-18 (1 July, 2017 to 30 June, 2018), and announced it expects net profits after tax for the current financial year, 2018-19, to be 20% higher than last financial year’s figure. The company has a dividend payout ratio of 70%, which it plans to continue, and will pay the annual dividend for 2017-18 in late-September, 2018, and the dividend for 2018-19 in late-September, 2019.
In late-September, 2019, Bradley wishes to spend $95,000, which will include the cost of a new car. How much can he consume in late-September, 2018 if the capital market offers an interest rate of 10% per year?
Solution
|
PAT |
Dividend Payout Percentage |
Dividend paid |
Dividend Income of Bradley |
Interest Income |
Closing Income |
2017-18 |
800000 |
70% |
560000 |
67200 |
6720 |
73920 |
2018-19 |
960000 |
70% |
672000 |
80640 |
15456 |
96096 |
Amount required at the end of September, 2019 = $95000
Amount that will be available = $ 96096
Amount that can be used = $ 1096
QUESTION 1 continued
Speedy Delivery Ltd, which operates a courier service, requires a new van. It has received two quotes. Van A will cost $70,000 now, has a three year life and will cost $7,000 a year to operate. Van B will cost $90,000 now, has a four year life and will cost $9,000 a year to operate. The relevant discount rate is 6 per cent per annum. Ignoring depreciation and taxes, calculate the AEC for each. Which van do you recommend that Speedy Delivery Ltd buy, and state why?
Solution
or
AEC= NPV/ Project Life
Van A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
|
Cost |
-$ 70,000.00 |
|
|
|
|
Inflows |
|
$ 7,000.00 |
$ 7,000.00 |
$ 7,000.00 |
|
DCF |
1.000 |
0.943 |
0.890 |
0.840 |
|
PV of Cash Flows |
-$ 70,000.00 |
$ 6,603.77 |
$ 6,229.98 |
$ 5,877.33 |
|
NPV |
-$ 51,288.92 |
|
|
|
|
EAC |
-$ 17,096.31 |
|
|
|
|
EAC= |
-$ 51,288.92/3 |
=-$17,096.31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Van B |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
Cost |
-$ 90,000.00 |
|
|
|
|
Inflows |
|
$ 9,000.00 |
$ 9,000.00 |
$ 9,000.00 |
$ 9,000.00 |
DCF |
1.000 |
0.943 |
0.890 |
0.840 |
0.792 |
PV of Cash Flows |
-$ 90,000.00 |
$ 8,490.57 |
$ 8,009.97 |
$ 7,556.57 |
$ 7,128.84 |
NPV |
-$ 58,814.05 |
|
|
|
|
EAC |
-$ 14,703.51 |
|
|
|
|
EAC= |
-$ 58,814.05/4 |
=-$14,703.51 |
Van B will be selected as it has less negative NPV
QUESTION 1 continued
Because of the drought, Farmers Bank Ltd has experienced large losses on its rural loan portfolio and is unable to meet its next two annual interest payments on its recent issue of unsecured notes. The notes are of $1,000 face value each, mature in September, 2023 and bear a yearly interest coupon payment of 13%.
The Bank paid the interest due this month (September, 2018), and following a meeting of creditors, arranged to defer payment of the next two interest coupons due in September, 2019 and September, 2020 respectively. Under the arrangement with creditors, the Bank will pay the remaining interest coupons (due in September, 2021, September, 2022 and September, 2023) on their due dates, and pay the two deferred coupons (without interest) along with the normal final interest payment and face value of the notes on the maturity date. Farmers Bank Ltd’s notes are now seen as risky, and require a 19% per annum return.
REQUIRED: Calculate the current value of each Farmers Bank unsecured note.
Solution:
Face Value |
1000 |
|
|
|
Interest Rate |
13% |
|
|
|
Required Rate |
19% |
|
|
|
|
Year |
Interest |
PVF @ 19% |
PV |
1 |
2019 |
|
0.840 |
$ - |
2 |
2020 |
|
0.706 |
$ - |
3 |
2021 |
$ 130.00 |
0.593 |
$ 77.14 |
4 |
2022 |
$ 130.00 |
0.499 |
$ 64.83 |
5 |
2023 |
$ 390.00 |
0.419 |
$ 163.43 |
5 |
2023 |
$ 1,000.00 |
0.419 |
$ 419.05 |
|
|
|
|
$ 724.45 |
|
|
|
|
|
Current Market Price of Unsecured Note |
|
$ 724.45 |
QUESTION 2
Ruth Bray is age 42 today and plans to retire on her 63rd birthday. With future inflation, Ruth estimates that she will require around $1,600,000 at age 63 to ensure that she will have a comfortable life in retirement. She is a single professional and believes that she can contribute $3,700 at the end of each month, starting in one month’s time and finishing on her 63rd birthday.
At the age of Bray will have $ 1,604,515.59 (Refer Appendix: Table 1).
There is a surplus of $ 4,515.59 as the required amount of funds at the age of 63 years is for only $ 1600000.
Monthly pension that Bray will receive will be = $ 26.44
Monthly Pension= Surplus/ Cumulative Factor of 288 terms i.e. 0.4%
= $4515.59/170.817
= $26.44
Workings:
Calculation of Number of terms=
No. of years = 87-63
= 24
No. of Months in each year = 24*12 = 288 Month
Calculation of monthly rate= 4.8/12
QUESTION 2 continued.
James and Mary Hall wish to borrow $750,000 to buy a home. The loan from the Federal Bank requires equal monthly repayments over 25 years, and carries an interest rate of 4.5% per annum, compounded monthly. The first repayment is due at the end of one month after the loan proceeds are received.
You are required to calculate:
Loan Amount |
|
750000 |
Loan Terms |
|
25 |
Interest p.a. |
|
4.50% |
Compounding |
|
Monthly |
|
|
|
Effective Annual Rate |
|
i=(1+(r/m))m−1 |
|
|
|
|
|
((1+(4.50/12))^12)-1 |
|
|
|
EAR= |
|
4.594% |
Refer Table 3
EMR= EAC/12 |
=4.594/12 |
0.383% |
Amount of Loan |
|
$ 750,000.00 |
Cumulative PVAF @ 0.383% for 300 terms (25 years * 12 Months |
300 Months |
178.196 |
Installment= Loan Amount/ PVAF |
$ 750000/4208.85 |
$ 4,208.85 |
Therefore, the amount of installment is $ 4208.85
QUESTION 2 continued.
Solution:
Refer Table 4
Opening Balance |
$ 750,000.00 |
Installment (1-12th ) |
$ 3,000.00 |
Installment (12-24th ) |
$ 3,500.00 |
25-300th |
$ Y |
Cumulative Factor @ 0383% from 25th to 300 term, taking 25th month is the first term. |
170.223 |
Therefore Y= |
$4,351.01 |
Solution:
Time take to repay the loan in installments of $ 4400 will be 23 years and 1 month (Refer Table 5) |
23.0833 years |
Therefore in terms of months and years, it will take 23 years and around 1 month.The answer is arrived by preparing the table at the discounting rate of 0.383%
At 277th month, the balance became zero.
Therefore, the total number of years= 277/12
= 23 years 1 mon
QUESTION 3
This question relates to alternative investment choice techniques
William Slater is considering the following cash flows for two mutually exclusive projects.
Year Cash Flows, Investment P ($) Cash Flows, Investment Q ($)
0 -60,000 -60,000
1 20,000 30,000
2 30,000 30,000
3 44,000 30,000
You are required to answer the following questions:
Total Cash Flows |
$ 94,000.00 |
Annual Cash Flows (20000+30000+44000)/3 |
$ 31,333.33 |
Project P |
|
Years |
Cash Flows |
0 |
-$ 60,000.00 |
1 |
$ 31,333.33 |
2 |
$ 31,333.33 |
3 |
$ 31,333.33 |
|
|
Years |
1.91 years |
Project Q |
|
Years |
Cash Flows |
0 |
-$ 60,000.00 |
1 |
$ 30,000.00 |
2 |
$ 30,000.00 |
3 |
$ 30,000.00 |
|
|
Years |
2 Years |
Decision: |
On the basis of payback period Project P will be selected under the assumption that project cash flows will occur evenly from year 1 to year 3. |
Project P |
|
|
Years |
Cash Flows |
Cumulative CF |
0 |
-$ 60,000.00 |
-$ 60,000.00 |
1 |
$ 20,000.00 |
-$ 40,000.00 |
2 |
$ 30,000.00 |
-$ 10,000.00 |
3 |
$ 44,000.00 |
$ 34,000.00 |
|
|
|
Years |
|
2.23 |
Project Q |
|
Years |
Cash Flows |
0 |
-$ 60,000.00 |
1 |
$ 30,000.00 |
2 |
$ 30,000.00 |
3 |
$ 30,000.00 |
|
|
Years |
2.00 |
Decision: |
On the basis of payback period Project Q will be selected under the assumption that project cash flows will occur at the end of each year from 1 to year 3. |
QUESTION 3 continued.
- The net present values of each project?
Project P |
|
|
|
|
Years |
Cash Flows |
PVF @ 8% |
NPV |
|
0 |
-$ 60,000.00 |
1.000 |
-$ 60,000.00 |
|
1 |
$ 20,000.00 |
0.926 |
$ 18,518.52 |
|
2 |
$ 30,000.00 |
0.857 |
$ 25,720.16 |
|
3 |
$ 44,000.00 |
0.794 |
$ 34,928.62 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 19,167.30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Project Q |
|
|
|
|
Years |
Cash Flows |
PVF @ 8% |
NPV |
|
0 |
-$ 60,000.00 |
1.000 |
-$ 60,000.00 |
|
1 |
$ 30,000.00 |
0.926 |
$ 27,777.78 |
|
2 |
$ 30,000.00 |
0.857 |
$ 25,720.16 |
|
3 |
$ 30,000.00 |
0.794 |
$ 23,814.97 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 17,312.91 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decision: |
On the basis of Net Present Value, Project P will be selected. |
- The present value (or profitability) indexes of each project?
Profitability Index= |
(NPV + Initial Investment)/ Initial Investment |
Or
Project P |
|
|
|
Years |
Cash Flows |
PVF @ 8% |
NPV |
0 |
-$ 60,000.00 |
1.000 |
-$ 60,000.00 |
1 |
$ 20,000.00 |
0.926 |
$ 18,518.52 |
2 |
$ 30,000.00 |
0.857 |
$ 25,720.16 |
3 |
$ 44,000.00 |
0.794 |
$ 34,928.62 |
|
|
|
|
|
NPV |
|
$ 19,167.30 |
Profitability Index= (19167.3+60000)/60000
= 1.32
Project Q |
|
|
|
Years |
Cash Flows |
PVF @ 8% |
NPV |
0 |
-$ 60,000.00 |
1.000 |
-$ 60,000.00 |
1 |
$ 30,000.00 |
0.926 |
$ 27,777.78 |
2 |
$ 30,000.00 |
0.857 |
$ 25,720.16 |
3 |
$ 30,000.00 |
0.794 |
$ 23,814.97 |
|
|
|
|
|
NPV |
|
$ 17,312.91 |
Profitability Index = (17312.91+60000)/60000
= 1.29
Decision: |
On the basis of Profitability Index, Project P will be selected. |
QUESTION 3 continued.
[NOTE: It is satisfactory if the approximate IRR is calculated for Investment P by trial and error, and stated as a percentage correct to the nearer whole number. The IRR for Investment Y, where the positive cash flows form an ordinary annuity, should be calculated as a percentage exactly, correct to 1 decimal place.]
Project P |
|
|
|
Years |
Cash Flows |
|
|
0 |
-$ 60,000.00 |
|
|
1 |
$ 20,000.00 |
|
|
2 |
$ 30,000.00 |
|
|
3 |
$ 44,000.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
IRR |
22.74% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Project Q |
|
|
|
Years |
Cash Flows |
|
|
0 |
-$ 60,000.00 |
|
|
1 |
$ 30,000.00 |
|
|
2 |
$ 30,000.00 |
|
|
3 |
$ 30,000.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
IRR |
23.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decision: |
On the basis of IRR, Project Q will be selected. |
Project P |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Year |
Cash Flows |
PVF @ 22% |
PV |
PVF @ 23% |
PV |
PVF @ 22.74% |
PV |
|
0 |
-60000 |
1.000 |
-60000.00 |
1.000 |
-60000.000 |
1.000 |
-60000.00 |
|
1 |
20000 |
0.820 |
16393.44 |
0.813 |
16260.163 |
0.815 |
16294.61 |
|
2 |
30000 |
0.672 |
20155.87 |
0.661 |
19829.467 |
0.664 |
19913.57 |
|
3 |
44000 |
0.551 |
24231.10 |
0.537 |
23644.892 |
0.541 |
23795.47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NPV |
|
|
600.962 |
|
-265.478 |
|
0.00 |
IRR= |
LDR+ |
NPV at LDR |
x (UDR-LDR) |
|
|
|
NPV at LDR- NPV at UDR |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.22 + |
600.962 |
*(.23-.22) |
|
|
|
335.484 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.22 + |
1.79132906 |
* 0.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
IRR = 23.79%
Project Q |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year |
Cash Flows |
PVF @ 24% |
PV |
PVF @ 23% |
PV |
PVF @ 23.375% |
PV |
0 |
-60000 |
1.000 |
-60000.00 |
1.000 |
-60000.000 |
1.000 |
-60000.00 |
1 |
30000 |
0.806 |
24193.55 |
0.813 |
24390.244 |
0.811 |
24316.11 |
2 |
30000 |
0.650 |
19510.93 |
0.661 |
19829.467 |
0.657 |
19709.11 |
3 |
30000 |
0.524 |
15734.62 |
0.537 |
16121.518 |
0.532 |
15974.96 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NPV |
|
|
-560.908 |
|
341.228 |
|
0.175 |
|
LDR+ |
NPV at LDR |
x (UDR-LDR) |
|
|
|
NPV at LDR- NPV at UDR |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.23 + |
560.908 |
*(.24-.23) |
|
|
|
902.136 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.23 + |
0.6217551 |
* 0.01 |
|
IRR = 23.62%
CROSSOVER POINT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Project P |
|
|
|
IRR |
23% |
0% |
18.32% |
NPV |
0.00 |
34000 |
4893.17 |
Project Q |
|
|
|
IRR |
23% |
0% |
18.32% |
NPV |
0.00 |
30000 |
4893.23 |
Cross over point = 18.32%
Graphical presentation of cross over point
Solution:
The evaluation of two mutually exclusive projects i.e. Project P and Project Q, which are proposed to be undertaken by William Slater is done using various techniques of capital budgeting. Capital budgeting decisions require significant evaluation as they involve investment of large sums of funds and also they take some period of time to generate returns (Bennouna, Meredith & Marchant, 2010). The basic feature of projects that are mutually exclusive in nature is that only one of such projects can only be undertaken and not all the projects at a time due to limited availability of funds (Finance Management, 2018). In order to select the best suitable project, application of following capital budgeting techniques has been made:
Payback period: It is the length of time that will be taken by a project to recover its cost of initial outlay. When it is assumed that the cash flows in respect of all the projects will occur evenly, it is observed that project P is better than Q because P has a shorter payback period than Q. However, with the change in assumption that cash flows will occur only at the end of each year, the decision on the payback period basis changed. Now, project Q is found to be better than P due to Q’s shorter length of payback term.
Net Present Value: On the basis of NPV, Project P must be selected as it has higher NPV than that of Project Q as higher NPV shows higher profitability of the project (Management Study Guide, 2018).
Profitability Index: On the basis of Profitability Index, Project P will be selected because it has higher PI.
Internal Rate of Return: On the basis of IRR, Project Q will be selected as it has higher IRR and therefore it has the capacity to offer higher returns to the project owner (Management Study Guide, 2018).
QUESTION 4
This question relates to capital budgeting.
Bayside Ferries Ltd is considering the purchase in September, 2018 of two new small hydrofoils costing $480,000 each, which it will fully finance with a fixed interest loan of 9% per annum, with interest paid monthly and the principal repaid at the end of 4 years. The hydrofoils will be used in the company’s passenger transport business.
The two new hydrofoils will replace three existing steam ferries and will permit the company to reduce its energy and labour costs by a total of $160,000 a year, over the next 4 years. [Assume these savings are realized at the end of each year.]
The new hydrofoils may be depreciated for tax purposes by the straight-line method to zero over the next 4 years. The company thinks that it can sell the hydrofoils at the end of 4 years for $75,000 each.
The three old ferries being replaced were bought two years ago for $300,000 each, with a then life expectancy of 6 years, and are being depreciated by the straight-line method to zero over 6 years. If the company proceeds with the above purchase, the old ferries will be sold in September, 2018 for $170,000 each.
This is not the first time that the company has considered this purchase and replacement. Twelve months ago, the company engaged Sea Travel Consultants, at a fee of $25,000 paid in advance, to conduct a feasibility study on savings strategies and Sea Travel made the above recommendations. At the time, Bayside Ferries Ltd did not proceed with the recommended strategy, but is now reconsidering the proposal.
Bayside Ferries Ltd further estimates that it will have to spend tax-deductible amounts of $30,000 in 2 years’ time and $40,000 in 3 years’ time overhauling the hydrofoils.
It will also require additions to current assets of $30,000 at the start of the hydrofoils project, which will be fully recoverable at the end of the fourth year after purchase.
Bayside Ferries Ltd’s cost of capital is 11%. The tax rate is 30%. Tax is paid in the year in which earnings are received.
[HINT: As shown in the text-book, it is recommended that for each year you calculate the tax effect first, then identify the cash flows, then calculate the overall net present value. Finally, make your recommendation.]
Opening Balance |
Interest @ 9% p.a. |
Total Interest |
Interest Per year |
480000 |
3600 |
172800 |
43200 |
480000 |
3600 |
172800 |
43200 |
|
|
345600 |
86400 |
Reduction in labor cost |
Per Year |
160000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
Depreciation on New Machine |
Cost |
480000 |
480000 |
|
|
Less Residual Value |
75000 |
75000 |
|
|
|
405000 |
405000 |
|
|
Useful life |
4 |
4 |
|
|
Depreciation per annum |
101250 |
101250 |
202500 |
Old Berries Cost |
300000 |
300000 |
300000 |
900000 |
Useful life |
6 |
6 |
6 |
|
Depreciation per year |
50000 |
50000 |
50000 |
150000 |
Depreciation for 2 years |
100000 |
100000 |
100000 |
300000 |
WDV at the end of 2nd year |
200000 |
200000 |
200000 |
600000 |
Initial Investment |
$ 960,000.00 |
Working Capital |
$ 30,000.00 |
Total Initial Outlay |
$ 990,000.00 |
Years |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
Total Initial Outlay |
-$ 990,000.00 |
|
|
|
|
Sale of Old Berries |
$ 483,000.00 |
|
|
|
|
Decrease In Labor Cost |
|
$ 160,000.00 |
$ 160,000.00 |
$ 160,000.00 |
$ 160,000.00 |
Incremental Depreciation |
|
-$ 52,500.00 |
-$ 52,500.00 |
-$ 52,500.00 |
-$ 52,500.00 |
Interest on loan |
|
-$ 86,400.00 |
-$ 86,400.00 |
-$ 86,400.00 |
-$ 86,400.00 |
Overhauling Expenditure |
|
$ - |
-$ 30,000.00 |
-$ 40,000.00 |
$ - |
Net Cash Flows |
|
$ 21,100.00 |
-$ 8,900.00 |
-$ 18,900.00 |
$ 21,100.00 |
Add Salvage Value |
|
|
|
|
$ 150,000.00 |
Less Tax |
|
-$ 6,330.00 |
$ 2,670.00 |
$ 5,670.00 |
-$ 51,330.00 |
Cash Flows After Tax |
|
$ 14,770.00 |
-$ 6,230.00 |
-$ 13,230.00 |
$ 119,770.00 |
Add Incremental Depreciation |
|
$ 52,500.00 |
$ 52,500.00 |
$ 52,500.00 |
$ 52,500.00 |
CFAT |
|
$ 67,270.00 |
$ 46,270.00 |
$ 39,270.00 |
$ 172,270.00 |
Less Working Capital Recovered |
|
|
|
|
-$ 30,000.00 |
Total Cash Flows |
-$ 507,000.00 |
$ 67,270.00 |
$ 46,270.00 |
$ 39,270.00 |
$ 142,270.00 |
PVF @ 11% |
1.000 |
0.901 |
0.812 |
0.731 |
0.659 |
PV |
-$ 507,000.00 |
$ 60,603.60 |
$ 37,553.77 |
$ 28,713.89 |
$ 93,717.66 |
NPV |
-$ 286,411.09 |
|
|
|
|
Bennouna, K., Meredith, G. G., & Marchant, T. (2010). Improved capital budgeting decision making: evidence from Canada. Management decision, 48(2), 225-247.
Finance Management. (2018). Why Net Present Value is the Best Measure for Investment Appraisal? Retrieved from: https://efinancemanagement.com/investment-decisions/why-net-present-value-is-the-best-measure-for-investment-appraisal
Management Study Guide. (2018). Problems With Using Internal Rate of Return (IRR) for Investment Decision Making. Retrieved from: https://www.managementstudyguide.com/problems-with-using-internal-rate-of-return.htm
Management Study Guide. (2018). What is Internal Rate of Return (IRR) ? Retrieved from: https://www.managementstudyguide.com/internal-rate-of-return.htm
To export a reference to this article please select a referencing stye below:
My Assignment Help. (2021). Financial Management. Retrieved from https://myassignmenthelp.com/free-samples/fin700-financial-management/best-measure-for-investment-appraisal.html.
"Financial Management." My Assignment Help, 2021, https://myassignmenthelp.com/free-samples/fin700-financial-management/best-measure-for-investment-appraisal.html.
My Assignment Help (2021) Financial Management [Online]. Available from: https://myassignmenthelp.com/free-samples/fin700-financial-management/best-measure-for-investment-appraisal.html
[Accessed 19 April 2021].
My Assignment Help. 'Financial Management' (My Assignment Help, 2021) <https://myassignmenthelp.com/free-samples/fin700-financial-management/best-measure-for-investment-appraisal.html> accessed 19 April 2021.
My Assignment Help. Financial Management [Internet]. My Assignment Help. 2021 [cited 19 April 2021]. Available from: https://myassignmenthelp.com/free-samples/fin700-financial-management/best-measure-for-investment-appraisal.html.
If you’re anxious about your papers, then MyAssignmenthelp.com can take away your anxiety. Our services have been crafted to suit the needs of every student with diverse homework requirements. So, if you ever wonder, “who can do my homework efficiently?” selecting us would be a great choice. Our services for primary homework help cater to different academic disciplines. Another remarkable thing about our services is its affordability. We promise to provide you with the best quality assignment assistance at a rather reasonable price. Thus, you can put your faith on our writers to do your assignment efficiently at a nominal price.
Answer: Introduction Asadullah, et al., (2016) it is a widely known phenomena that good leader requires discipline, foresight and coordination while on the other hand, great leaders come with an appended dose of strong positivity. Controlled strength although is admiring, it fails in inspiring or influencing teams and individuals in a way comparing to a positive force can. The focus of a positive leader is on relationships and not on roles. I...
Read MoreAnswer: Step 1-Competitive advantage Analyzing resource based model to explore the competitive advantage of Fit-bit: Fit-bit is being considered as the pioneer in the personal fitness activity. The company is extremely committed towards providing high quality of services among the fitness enthusiasts along with health conscious people. In between 2009 to 2014, the statistics of sale of the firm has been increased by 21.4 million (Fitbi...
Read MoreAnswer: Smart and Liveable city There are so many challenges in converting urban areas to the smart cities. Most of the countries are changing with the technologies. Still, so many things are not implemented in the urban areas because of few reasons, such as less understanding, lack of knowledge, cost effective, and less knowledge about the sustainable engineering (Giffinger & Gudrunace, 2010). I learnt about the ...
Read MoreAnswer: Introduction Competitive strategy defines the long term plan of the company in order to gain the competitive advantage in the industry. Competitive strategy plays a very important role when to create the defensive position in the market with the similar products (Evans, 2017). Before developing the competitive strategy, the company has to evaluate all strength, weakness, opportunity and threat in the industry. There are differen...
Read MoreAnswer: Operational Plan Template WesFarmers that was formerly known as “Western Australian Farmer’s Cooperative”, is an Australian firm dedicated to business in retail sector within the geographical domain of New Zealand and Australia and have its headquarter at Perth, Australia. The company produces chemicals, industrial products, coal mining, safety & industrial products and fertilisers. The company have upgraded its...
Read MoreJust share requirement and get customized Solution.
Orders
Overall Rating
Experts
Our writers make sure that all orders are submitted, prior to the deadline.
Using reliable plagiarism detection software, Turnitin.com.We only provide customized 100 percent original papers.
Feel free to contact our assignment writing services any time via phone, email or live chat. If you are unable to calculate word count online, ask our customer executives.
Our writers can provide you professional writing assistance on any subject at any level.
Our best price guarantee ensures that the features we offer cannot be matched by any of the competitors.
Get all your documents checked for plagiarism or duplicacy with us.
Get different kinds of essays typed in minutes with clicks.
Calculate your semester grades and cumulative GPa with our GPA Calculator.
Balance any chemical equation in minutes just by entering the formula.
Calculate the number of words and number of pages of all your academic documents.
Our Mission Client Satisfaction
THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR YOUR ASSISTANCE AND HELP DURING THESE TIMES! YOU ARE ALL AMAZING
Australia
happy with the work happy with the work happy with the work happy with happy with the work h the work happy with the work happy with the work happy with the work happy with the work happy with the work happy with the work happy with the work happy wi...
Australia
happy with the work ,happy with the work happy with the work happy with the work happy with the work happy with the work happy with the work happy with the work happy with the work happy with the work happy with the work happy with the work happy wit...
Australia
Written really well and answered the questions well. Straight to the point and citations are placed well. Well informated.
Australia