country
$20 Bonus + 25% OFF
Securing Higher Grades Costing Your Pocket? Book Your Assignment at The Lowest Price Now!

Question :

Discuss about the Fanancial Analysis ?
 
 

Answer :

Introduction

Al Anwar Ceramic Tiles Company is a manufacturer of Ceramic Tiles in the Sultanate of Oman. Founded in 1998 and having its headquarters in Muscat, it has seen a fast growth and has been able to establish itself well. In the year 2015, the industry faced a challenging task and hence the gross revenue was on the lower side that is 27.4 million and a revenue decline of 4.6% as compared to the year 2015 was observed. Various other incomes declined and the net profit stands at 6.54 million (Bloomberg, 2015). The company is highly engaged in regular enhancement programs, global sourcing in an effective manner, employment of strategies that are appropriate to nature, etc.  all the factors has helped the company to lessen the down time and enhance the yield.

Dhofar Cattle Feed Company was founded in 1984 with the mission of producing the best quality animal feed. Over years, it has today grown to have an installed production capacity of 400,000 MT/Annum. Experienced professionals in quality standards and excellent sales and marketing abilities make it one of the best in this field. The performance of the segment of the poultry is badly impacted due to import that is low in terms of cost and the local manufacturers are not able to match the imported cost (Bloomberg, 2015). Despite the challenges, the company put a satisfactory performance and this can be cited due to the management of the company and internal control.

 

Vertical & Horizontal Analysis

A vertical analysis of the balance sheets of both the companies for the years 2015 and 2014 is conducted and the results are tabulated below:

 

Al Anwar Ceramic Tiles

Dhofar Cattle Feed  company

Current Assets

2015

 

2014

 

  2015

 

2014

 

Cash & Cash Equivalents

    0.45

2%

    1.92

10%

    0.52

3%

    0.44

3%

Short Term Investments

    8.59

39%

    5.00

25%

       -  

0%

       -  

0%

Receivables

    8.81

40%

    8.34

41%

    7.77

41%

    8.10

47%

Inventories

    3.95

18%

    4.80

24%

  10.81

57%

    8.66

50%

Prepaid Expenses

       -  

0%

    0.11

1%

       -  

 

       -  

 

TOTAL

  21.80

100%

  20.17

100%

  19.10

100%

  17.20

100%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non Current Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Plant & Equipment

20.5

82%

21.77

77%

23.9

48%

24.79

48%

Long Term Investments

4.65

18%

6.44

23%

25.74

51%

26.92

52%

Intangibles

0

0%

0

0%

0.34

1%

0

0%

Other Long Term Assets

0

0%

0

0%

0.28

1%

0.22

0%

TOTAL

25.15

100%

28.21

100%

50.26

100%

51.93

100%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Less: Current Liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Trade Payables

3.53

81%

2.18

43%

5.49

24%

7.88

34%

Short Term Debt

0

0%

0

0%

15.75

69%

14.21

62%

Capital Leases

0

0%

0

0%

1.66

7%

1.16

5%

Accrued Expenses

0

0%

1.61

32%

0

0%

0

0%

Other Current Liabilities

0.85

19%

1.31

26%

0.05

0%

0.05

0%

TOTAL

4.38

100%

5.1

100%

22.95

100%

23.3

100%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-Current Liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deferred Income Tax

0.41

36%

0.38

26%

0

0%

0

0%

Other Long Term Liabilities

0.72

64%

1.08

74%

5.77

100%

5.13

100%

TOTAL

1.13

100%

1.46

100%

5.77

100%

5.13

100%

It can be seen that Receivables constitute a majority portion in Al Anwar whereas inventory constitutes a major portion of current assets in Dhofar Cattle Feed Company.  The Plant & Equipment is the major portion in Al Anwar whereas Long Term Investments are major in the Current Assets division for Dhofar. Trade Payables occupies a major portion in Current Liabilities section in Al Anwar whereas Short Term Debt occupies a major position in Dhofar.

A horizontal analysis of the Income Statement and Balance Sheet figures reveals the below results:

 

Dhofar Cattle Feed Company

Particulars

2013

 

2014

 

2015

 

Revenue

29.52

100%

31.87

8%

43.87

49%

Cost of Revenue

25.55

100%

27.2

6%

34.56

35%

Gross Profit

3.97

100%

4.67

18%

9.31

135%

Total Operating Expenses

32.73

100%

34.87

7%

43.02

31%

Operating Income

-3.21

100%

-3

-7%

0.85

126%

Income before Taxes

-2.88

100%

-2.88

0%

1.24

143%

Net Income

-3

100%

-2.67

-11%

1.33

144%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current Assets

    13.24

100%

    17.20

30%

    19.10

44%

Non Current Assets

49.76

100%

51.93

4%

50.26

1%

Total Assets

    63.00

100%

    69.13

10%

    69.36

10%

Current Liabilities

16.83

100%

23.3

38%

22.95

36%

Non Current Liabilities

2.48

100%

5.13

107%

5.77

133%

Total Liabilities

19.31

100%

28.43

47%

28.72

49%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stockholders’ Equity

43.69

100%

40.7

-7%

40.63

-7%

It can thus be seen that the initial loss-making company has turned profitable in the year 2015. As the total assets have increased by 10%, the total liabilities have increased by 49% and there is also a drop in the stockholder's equity by 7%.

 

Al Anwar Ceramic Tiles

Particulars

2013

 

2014

 

2015

 

Revenue

  26.41

100%

    28.78

9%

27.44

4%

Cost of Revenue

  13.19

100%

    13.90

5%

14.43

9%

Gross Profit

  13.22

100%

    14.88

13%

    13.01

-2%

Total Operating Expenses

  18.29

100%

    19.83

8%

20.45

12%

Operating Income

    8.12

100%

      8.95

10%

6.99

-14%

Income before Taxes

    8.95

100%

    11.05

23%

7.42

-17%

Net Income

    7.89

100%

      9.77

24%

6.54

-17%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current Assets

  15.92

100%

    20.17

27%

    21.80

37%

Non-Current Assets

  28.26

100%

    28.21

0%

25.15

-11%

Total Assets

  44.18

100%

    48.38

10%

    46.95

6%

Current Liabilities

    5.98

100%

      5.10

-15%

4.38

-27%

Non-Current Liabilities

    1.14

100%

      1.46

28%

1.13

-1%

Total Liabilities

    7.12

100%

      6.56

-8%

5.51

-23%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stockholders’ Equity

  37.05

100%

    41.46

12%

41.44

12%

According to the figures, there is a 24% increase in the net income for the year 2014 but 17% drops in the same for the year 2015.

Current Assets have seen a good increase while current liabilities have dropped and the shareholders’ equity has also increased by 12% which is a good sign.

Cost-volume-profit analysis

A cost-volume-profit analysis of both the companies reveals the following:

In the case of Al-Anwar, as the sales have increased, the cost of revenue has fallen for the year 2014 leading to a good gross profit margin. But for the year 2015, the sales has fallen still the costs of revenue which comprise of direct costs has risen sharply implying the increased prices of direct materials, labor and overheads. The result is a negative gross profit (Deegan, 2011).

In the case of Dhofar, the increase in costs of revenue is lower than the increase in revenue for the year 2014 and it continues to remain the same for the next year also. This indicates that the trend of price rise is directly proportional to the increase in revenue (Melville, 2013).

On comparison, it can be said that Al Anwar seems to be hit badly by the increasing costs whereas Dhofar has been able to manage and retain its cost-volume-profit ratios.

 

Investment Appraisal Techniques & Analysis

In the case of Al-Anwar, it can be said that 1OMR invested in 2013 has depreciated by more than 50% as on date. Thus the NPV and Pay Back period is currently negative and long term investors have definitely lost money on this stock (Parrino et. al, 2012).

In the case of Dhofar, let us assume 1OMR invested in 2013 has remained at almost the same rate, which helps us infer that the stock has seen some ups and downs but has not led to any huge profits or losses. The NPV and payback periods can vary from a year to more (Williams, 2012).

Analysis of Profitability and financial performance

Al Anwar is a loss making the company and even the current year’s quarterly financial figures are not very impressive.

Dhofar has also not been able to produce great results for the three-quarters of the current year 2016, but on a consolidation of the full years’ profits, there could be some recovery and improvement noticed in comparison to the prior year (Graham & Smart, 2012).

The Ratios based on 2015 figures are tabulated below:

Ratio

Al Anwar

Dhofar Cattle Feed

P/E Ratio

13.59

91.91

Gross Margin

41.20%

19.59%

Operating Margin

16.88%

-0.70%

Net Profit Margin

16.44%

0.32%

Revenue/Share

0.08

0.56

Book Value/Share

0.13

0.49

Return on Equity

9.56%

0.30%

Return on Assets

8.40%

0.20%

Return on Investment

9.29%

0.31%

Quick Ratio

3.93

0.53

Current Ratio

5.15

0.96

Debt Equity Ratio

0.00%

15.38%

Asset Turnover

0.51

0.62

Inventory Turnover

3.19

3.21

Dividend Yield

11.70%

2.20%

Dividend Growth

24.56%

-33.51%

 The financial performance of Al Anwar for the year 2015 has been better than that of Dhofar according to the ratios. Also, it would be pertinent to note that Al Anwar is a completely debt free company, whereas Dhofar is having short and long term liabilities and debts.

Apart from this, the return on equity, assets, and investment is better in the case of Al Anwar. The Dividend yield ratios and dividend growth have also proved to be good. Hence, these are the factors that an investor consider while investing in a company. The current and quick is very high that indicates the company will be able to discharge the obligation and at the same time it needs to be noted that the company has surplus cash and can be utilized or invested elsewhere to generate better returns  (Davies & Crawford, 2012).

Business Performance using financial & non-financial measures

The financial measures are the ratios and figures calculated. The non-financial measures include the SWOT Analysis and Balanced Scorecard approach.

The increasing technological problems, price changes and increasing rates of interests seem to be affecting Dhofar. Its peer players in this industry are seemingly performing better than Dhofar (Freedman, 2013).

 


Al Anwar is having a reasonable performance when it comes to peer comparison, though it has been hit by the global recession and general increase in price levels, it is still able to maintain its dividends and profits (Freedman, 2013).

  • SWOT Analysis of Al-Anwar

Strength

·         Profitability

·         Sales network and distribution

Weakness

·         Productivity in future

·         More investments in R&D

Opportunities

·         Venture capital

Threats

·         Higher increment in the rate of interest

Comparison of both companies

At the current stage, both the companies are presumably in deep waters. It is difficult to recommend the purchase of any share. The ratios are better for Al Anwar though at a decreasing trend in comparison to the prior two years.

Whereas the share price appreciation has not taken place for Al-Anwar and from this angle Dhofar is a relatively safer bet as it will not lead to capital deterioration.

Hence this could be the time to wait for Al Anwar’s share price to show some steady and improved performance. Investment in Dhofar is not being recommended as the company is running in losses. Therefore, as per the given scenario, the performance of Al Anwar needs to be analyzed for a certain time frame and then a decision needs to be taken into consideration 9 Horngren, 2013).

Which is better?

From different angles, different companies are looking better. Hence to trademark any one company, Al Anwar can be said to be a better company than Dhofar though this in not the right time to invest in the shares of Al Anwar. As per the scenario and the analysis, it can be said that the company Al Anwar is a better bet and the performances indicates that. The computed ratio project that the ROE, ROA, and the liquidity are better as compared to Dhofar.  However, there are some deficiencies and the industry is going through a tough time (Needles & Powers, 2013). Hence, it is difficult to ascertain whether it is the bottom. Therefore, Al Anwar should be on the radar list and must be kept under consideration.

 

Conclusion

The financial analysis for Al Anwar has cited the dip in revenues and profitability of the company from the last three years. Apart from this, analysts are of the stand to hold the position on this share. The financial analyst's review has predicted the median estimates for the next one year to see a 47% increase in the share price from its current rate. The reality of the same can be predicted through the quarterly results. In the case of Dhofar, the revenues have grown with time (Spiceland et. al, 2011). Thus it is a safer bet in comparison to Al Anwar. It can be concluded that in the changing times as technology has advanced, investors are better informed and make real-time decisions about capital appreciation and dividend yields. Hence to survive in the competitive markets, efficiency in all areas of internal controls and cost controls can help the company achieve the desired profits and also keep investors happy.

NET PRESENT VALUE METHOD

PROJECT A

Present Value of Inflow = Cash Inflow* Annuity Factor of 10%,5 years

                                                                = 40,000 * 3.791

                                                                 = Rs.1,51,640

Less: Present Value of Outflow = Rs.1,00,000

Net Present Value                          = Rs. 51,640

PROJECT B

Present Value of Inflow = Cash Inflow* Annuity Factor of 10%, 5 years

Cash in Flow

D.Factor (10%,5 years)

60,000

0.909

30,000

0.826

20,000

0.751

50,000

0.683

50,000

0.621

Present Value of Inflow

Present Value of Outflow

Net Present Value

 

INTERNAL RATE OF RETURN METHOD

PROJECT A

IRR              =Cash Inflow* P.V of Annuity Factor = Outflow

                     = 40,000*P.V of A.F = 1,00,000

                     = P.V of A.F = 2.5

                     TRIAL AND ERROR METHOD

                     27% =2.5827

                     29%=2.483

                     X=2.5

 

                     29-27     =   2.483-2.5827

                     X-27            2.5-2.5827

                     =>  X=28.66%

IRR

 

Cash in Flow

D.Factor (30%,5 years)

60,000

0.769

30,000

0.592

20,000

0.455

50,000

0.35

50,000

0.269

Cash in Flow

D.Factor (33%,5 years)

60,000

0.752

30,000

0.565

20,000

0.425

50,000

0.32

50,000

0.24

                     30% =1,03,950

                     33%=98,570

                     X=1,00,000

                     33-30     =   98,570-1,03,950

                     X-30            1,00,000-1,03,950

                     =>  X=32.20.%

PROFITABILITY INDEX METHOD

PROJECT A

PI             = PV of Inflow/PV of Outflow

                = 1,51,640/1,00,000

                =1.5164

 

PROJECT B

PI             = PV of Inflow/PV of Outflow

                = 1,59,540/1,00,000

                =1.5954

 

Project B is recommended because of the above-shown calculations.

In the Net present value method, the cash inflow is Rs.51640 in Project A whereas the cash inflow is Rs. 59540 in project B.We can see that the cash inflow is more in project B so Project B is recommended.

In the Interest rate of return method, the rate in case of project B exceeds project A which shows that Project B will help us to have more cash inflow. The rate in case of project A is 28.66% whereas in the case of project B it is 32.20%. Hence, project B is recommended.

In Profitability method, the profitability index is more in the case of Project B. In the above calculations it has been shown that the cash inflow from project A is 1.5164 whereas in the case of project B it is 1.5954. Therefore, project B is recommended.

(c) The terms which are measured numerically are called financial factors whereas the one measured subjectively is called non-financial factor. Following are the non-financial factors-

(i) Corporate culture- The way a company performs its functions and carry out its operations shows its impact on capital investment. The change of way of communication or setting up of a new business building is some of the examples (Davies & Crawford, 2012).

(ii) The quality of products- There is a great impact of capital investment on the quality of the products. It is expected by the company to maintain a balance between the cost and the quality of the capital resources. This quality of the capital resources may have a negative or positive impact on the quality of the product that has been produced.

Calculations showing contribution per unit.

Particulars

Product A(per unit)

Product B(per unit)

 

 

 

Sale Price

20

15

Material

10

9

Direct wages

3

2

Variable expenses

3

2

Contribution p.u

4

2

`Calculation showing total contribution and total profit.

Particulars

Situation 1

Situation 2

Situation 3

 

A

B

A

B

A

B

No. of units

100

200

150

150

200

100

Sales price

2000

3000

3000

2250

4000

1500

Material

1000

1800

1500

1350

2000

900

Wages

300

400

450

300

600

200

Variable expenses

300

400

450

300

600

200

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Contribution

400

400

600

300

800

200

Total Contribution

800

900

1000

Fixed expenses

800

800

800

Total profit

0

100

200

The most profitable situation is when 200 units of A and 100 units of B is produced. The profit earned is more in situation 3 when compared to situation 1 and situation 2.

The variable expenses are those expenses which increase with the increase in the output. Material cost and labor are variable expenses. The fixed expenses remain the same irrespective of the number of units produced. The total contribution is the highest in situation 3 and so is the profit.

All the variable expenses are deducted from the sales value to get the total contribution. Then, fixed expenses are deducted from the contribution then we will get the profit (Libby et. al, 2011).

 

References

Bloomberg 2015,  Company Overview of Dhofar Cattle Feed Co. S.A.O.G, viewed 19 December 2016, https://www.bloomberg.com/research/stocks/private/snapshot.asp?privcapId=10360554

Bloomberg 2015, Company Overview of Al Anwar Ceramic Tiles Company SAOG, viewed 19 December 2016, https://www.bloomberg.com/research/stocks/private/snapshot.asp?privcapId=10360525

Davies, T. & Crawford, I 2012, Financial accounting, Harlow, England: Pearson.

Deegan, C. M 2011, In Financial accounting theory, North Ryde, N.S.W: McGraw-Hill.

Freedman, L 2013,  Strategy,  Oxford University Press

Graham, J. & Smart, S 2012, Introduction to corporate finance, Australia: South-Western Cengage Learning.

Horngren, C 2013, Financial accounting,  Frenchs Forest, N.S.W: Pearson Australia Group.

Libby, R., Libby, P. & Short, D 2011, Financial accounting, New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

Melville, A 2013, International Financial Reporting – A Practical Guide, 4th edition, Pearson, Education Limited, UK

Needles, B.E. &  Powers, M 2013, Principles of Financial Accounting, Financial Accounting

Parrino, R., Kidwell, D. & Bates, T 2012, Fundamentals of corporate finance, Hoboken,

Series: Cengage Learning. NJ: Wiley

Spiceland, J., Thomas, W. & Herrmann, D 2011,  Financial accounting, New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin,University Press

Williams, J 2012,  Financial accounting, New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

Download Sample

Get 100% money back after download, simply upload your unique content* of similar no. of pages or more. We verify your content and once successfully verified 100% value credited to your wallet within 7 days.

Upload Unique Document

Document Under Evaluation

Get Credits into Your Wallet

*The content must not be available online or in our existing Database to qualify as unique.

Cite This Work

To export a reference to this article please select a referencing stye below:

My Assignment Help. (2018). Financial Analysis . Retrieved from https://myassignmenthelp.com/free-samples/financial-analysis.

"Financial Analysis ." My Assignment Help, 2018, https://myassignmenthelp.com/free-samples/financial-analysis.

My Assignment Help (2018) Financial Analysis [Online]. Available from: https://myassignmenthelp.com/free-samples/financial-analysis
[Accessed 11 August 2020].

My Assignment Help. 'Financial Analysis ' (My Assignment Help, 2018) <https://myassignmenthelp.com/free-samples/financial-analysis> accessed 11 August 2020.

My Assignment Help. Financial Analysis [Internet]. My Assignment Help. 2018 [cited 11 August 2020]. Available from: https://myassignmenthelp.com/free-samples/financial-analysis.


MyAssignmenthelp.com has become one of the leading assignment help provider in New York City and Boston. We provide top class auditing assignment help. Not only auditing, but we also cover more than 100 subjects and our writers deal with all types of assignments with utmost expertise. To make writing process faster and accurate, we have segmented our assignment experts' teams as per their expertise on writing different types of assignments. We guaranteed that students who buy our assignment online get solutions worth their investment.

Latest Finance Samples

INVE3000 Introduction To Derivative Securities

Download : 0 | Pages : 3

Answers: 2. a) The futures contract price on the stock would be only dependent on the risk free rate and the associated dividend yield with the stock, if the cost of carry and convenience yield sets off each other as shown below: Future Price: Spot Price (So)+ Funding Cost+ Storage Cost Involved (Cost of Carry) – Monetary Benefit Foregone (Dividends) – Convenience Yield Foregone. b) If the stock price falls from...

Read More arrow Tags: Australia Perth 34 Finance Curitn University 

BUS308 Credit And Lending Decisions

Download : 0 | Pages : 21
  • Course Code: BUS308
  • University: Murdoch University
  • Country: Australia

Answers: Introduction With the changes in economic, there are several Asset-based lending fit First National’s corporate image and tradition and their leading philosophy in the market have been taken into consideration. There are several factors which might negatively impact the business growth of the organization. This report is divided into two specific parts. First part is accompanied with the quantitative details and second part is ba...

Read More arrow Tags: Singapore 34 Credit and Lending Decisions Other 

AH531 Healthcare Financial Management

Download : 0 | Pages : 4
  • Course Code: AH531
  • University: Grantham University
  • Country: United States

Answer: 1. The primary contrast among, the method of accounting such as cash and accrual basis of accounting lies on when costs and incomes are perceived in a particular manner. The term cash basis of accounting represents incomes just when the money is received and for cost just when the money is paid out. On the other hand the accrual basis of accounting represents income when earned and for costs of products and enterprises when acquired. ...

Read More arrow Tags: United States Chicago 34 healthcare financial management Other 

BAVA320 Business Analysis And Valuation

Download : 0 | Pages : 4

Answers: Q1 (b.) extensive competition as there is competition in extreme amount which is involved with the grocery store chains. Q2 (c.) D,A,E,B,F,C This is the sequence which is followed for the analysis as firstly the competition dynamics will be identified and after that the strategies of the company will be considered. Once this is done the financial statements will be analysed and then the adjustments will be made to make the compari...

Read More arrow Tags: Australia Carnegie 34 Business Valuation and Analysis Other 

CO5109 Corporate Finance

Download : 0 | Pages : 12
  • Course Code: ITC205
  • University: James Cook University
  • Country: Australia

Answer: Purpose/Objective of the Report Board of the company is considering expansion of pharmaceutical operation into breeding, cultivating and manufacturing of cannabis for use and sale in Australia, because it is a major project large amount of investment required to be made by the company initially and cash flows will be received in later years and there is great amount of risk involved a wrong decision taken cannot be reversed financial ...

Read More arrow Tags: Australia Annerley 34 Corporate Finance Other 
Next
watch

Save Time & improve Grade

Just share Requriment and get customize Solution.

question
We will use e-mail only for:

arrow Communication regarding your orders

arrow To send you invoices, and other billing info

arrow To provide you with information of offers and other benefits

1,382,993

Orders

4.9/5

Overall Rating

5,085

Experts

Our Amazing Features

delivery

On Time Delivery

Our writers make sure that all orders are submitted, prior to the deadline.

work

Plagiarism Free Work

Using reliable plagiarism detection software, Turnitin.com.We only provide customized 100 percent original papers.

time

24 X 7 Live Help

Feel free to contact our assignment writing services any time via phone, email or live chat.

subject

Services For All Subjects

Our writers can provide you professional writing assistance on any subject at any level.

price

Best Price Guarantee

Our best price guarantee ensures that the features we offer cannot be matched by any of the competitors.

Our Experts

Assignment writing guide
student rating student rating student rating student rating student rating 5/5

2279 Order Completed

97% Response Time

Zachary Perez

PhD in Computer Science and Information System

Washington, United States

Hire Me
Assignment writing guide
student rating student rating student rating student rating student rating 5/5

2632 Order Completed

100% Response Time

Albert Ambrosio

MSc in Nursing

London, United Kingdom

Hire Me
Assignment writing guide
student rating student rating student rating student rating student rating 5/5

230 Order Completed

97% Response Time

Liya Han

Master Of Science in Geotechnical Engineering (MSc Geotec)

Singapore, Singapore

Hire Me
Assignment writing guide
student rating student rating student rating student rating student rating 5/5

416 Order Completed

95% Response Time

Tyler Moore

MBA in Accounting

Washington, United States

Hire Me

FREE Tools

plagiarism

Plagiarism Checker

Get all your documents checked for plagiarism or duplicacy with us.

essay

Essay Typer

Get different kinds of essays typed in minutes with clicks.

edit

GPA Calculator

Calculate your semester grades and cumulative GPa with our GPA Calculator.

referencing

Chemical Equation Balancer

Balance any chemical equation in minutes just by entering the formula.

calculator

Word Counter & Page Calculator

Calculate the number of words and number of pages of all your academic documents.

Refer Just 5 Friends to Earn More than $2000

Check your estimated earning as per your ability

1

1

1

Your Approx Earning

Live Review

Our Mission Client Satisfaction

Awesome work. Awesome response time. Very thorough & clear. Love the results I get with MAH!

flag

User Id: 383727 - 31 Jul 2020

Australia

student rating student rating student rating student rating student rating

Work was done in a timely manner took it through grammarly checked for plagiarism very well satisfied

flag

User Id: 463334 - 31 Jul 2020

Australia

student rating student rating student rating student rating student rating

Great work for the short notice given. Thank you for never disappointing and helping out.

flag

User Id: 194216 - 31 Jul 2020

Australia

student rating student rating student rating student rating student rating

I received a full point on the assignment. Thank you for all the help with the assignment.

flag

User Id: 411395 - 31 Jul 2020

Australia

student rating student rating student rating student rating student rating
callback request mobile
Have any Query?