Can One Soldier Shed Light On America's War In Vietnam?

Can one soldier's experience shed light on America's war in Vietnam?

How does Philip Caupto's experience (from enlisting to training to deployment and throughout his time in the war) help us understand the experience of other soldiers in the conflict?

What problems might using one person's story to generalize about others pose?

Use of personal stories to understand the war

Yes. This is possible since a soldier is present during conduction of all the activities and missions in the war. The soldier uses first-hand information that he observed and experienced during the start and end of the war. He also experiences the aftermath effects and impacts of the war. He is, therefore, able to recount all the fresh details that happened during that time without bias and exaggeration of information.  

His stories and experiences are evident through the suffering he got and physical torture that he underwent during the war. In this case, it is possible for a single soldier to Shed Light on what transpired on America's war in Vietnam since he played a huge role and was physically present during that period. According to Caputo, he clearly states that the sole purpose of having to script this particular book is not presenting it as ahistorical material or just a simple historical accusation. He indicates that his main motive or objective of writing the book is to present the ideas and factual information based on his own personal experiences as an American soldier in Vietnam. 

 It is, therefore, evident that one soldier can shed massive light regarding America's war in Vietnam since he was a witness and gives reliable information exactly is it happened.

Over the years the history of the soldiers has been immensely absent from the core historiography of the war conflict. In this case, by taking into account the oral histories from the Vietnamese armed forces existing veterans, this particular book typically upholds a new background, literally shedding light on a continuous unevaluated aspect of past war. This dimension, therefore, offers the new voice to those army individuals who have been voiceless of a given time horizon.

The vast experiences of these former individuals soldiers like Caputo's deployment are explored and highly examined through accounts in detail form, at that cover two consecutive generations and also covers all the available services from the forces, for instance, the women army. Consequently, readers will be able to gain a lot of first-hand insight regarding the soldiers early personal and ground lives, for example, their probable military services, combat stories, and interrelationship experiences during the wartime.

 Readers will also be able to understand how life in the field became worse and quite unbearable for most soldiers during the war aftermath since they experienced internment in the given communist prison group camps. They also suffered a lot since their families were largely discriminated on political grounds and the availing dangers resulting from attempting to escape from the Vietnamese's camps either on air, water or land. The soldier's experiences also include becoming prisoners of war on a foreign land. Serious readers will be able to identify and understand how the Viet war veteran had no alternative but to flee their homeland. As matter of fact, they were finally able to succeed in restructuring their lives in the new home, states and diversified subcultures

 Incomplete reference to the book, Caputo experience helps individuals to understand encouraging people to comprehend and learn exactly the sufferings of a particular battle. His continued past experiences also help individuals to understand the shameful acts and ineptitude that portrayed the American job in that contention.  

Caputo's experiences and their portrayal of the soldiers' roles

A lot of Talk of War centers around the incongruity of blaming fellows – various young men - of homicide amidst a guerrilla war in which the foe was frequently unclear from the regular citizens in whose middle they regularly covered up.

 Conversely, Caputo was very reproachful of the manner by which his military and regular citizen bosses directed the war exertion, with the troopers and existing soldier Marines prepared to battle an ordinary warfare instead of a cutting-edge strife portrayed by the correct utilisation of guerrilla radicals commonly referred to as the  Viet Cong. Notwithstanding the attention on the inappropriate preparing of American young battalions and  military faculty for this specific or particular  war event , soldier Caputo was exceptionally disparaging of the accentuation he saw among his bosses largely called "body checks," essentially, the significance set by predominant few colleagues on the number of adversary warriors executed as opposed to on the achievement of emission targets.

Different researchers argue that A Rumour of War, as commonly know by a large mass of individuals involved part of several existing personal perceptions regarding the American war event as witnessed in Vietnam. These instances and situations contributed to this particular writing which would develop out of that exceedingly quarrelsome clash - writing that mirrored the frustration with war experienced by once-energetic youthful officers push into an altogether different sort of contention than those accomplished by their forefathers or predecessors.

According to the book when he leaves Vietnam in 1967, he feels irresolute about the war and influences us to comprehend the fighters enduring and jobs. He sees that the court-martial is unfair and hypocritical for trying the soldiers on something that they were taught to do. The court convicts all the present soldiers for accomplishing their duties and responsibilities without questioning their superiors or authority's

Moreover, He is against the American arrangement in Indochina, however, an individual and passionate association with the war has.

Utilizing a single individual's own experiences and stories and presenting them to represent every person's experiences in social causes problematic issues.it destroys the entire group's public image of goodwill and also lowers the identity levels and reputation of the whole society. It also makes others suffer as a result of one person's mistakes. Various societies or nation can make war as a result of one person's mistakes. Therefore this leads to increased communal conflicts lowers the peaceful coexistence and harmonious relationship between people.

 It also minimizes the spirit of assisting the less fortunate or inferior group due to wrong information regarding one person that has been used to generalize the whole nation. We realize that each individual is not quite the same as some other in incalculable ways, yet when we experience others, we frequently depend on speculations to portray them. "It's a characteristic inclination," says therapist Deborah Tannen.

We should see the world in examples with the end goal to comprehend it; we wouldn't have the capacity to manage the everyday invasion of individuals and articles on the off chance that we couldn't foresee a great deal about them and feel that we know who and what they are. Be that as it may, this characteristic and valuable capacity to see examples of likeness has tragic outcomes. It is hostile to lessen a person to a class, and it is likewise deceptive.

The problems of using one person's story to generalize others

Various researchers utilize the expression "single person experiences to generalize others to portray the excessively short-sighted and false recognitions we shape about people, gatherings, or nations.

I've generally felt that it is difficult to connect legitimately with a place or a man without drawing in with the majority of the narratives of that put and that individual. The outcome of the usage of single story is this: It limits people of their pride. It also contributes to equivalent human kind problematic.It accentuates the manner in which we are distinctive instead of how we are comparative.

The single story regarding one individual experiences makes inappropriate generalizations are deemed to be extremely false and highly inadequate. They contribute immensely to the undue influence of one's personal story to the man generalized one.

Various discourse gives a structure to talk about generalizations, bias, and segregation with your understudies. A generalization is a conviction around an individual dependent on the genuine or envisioned qualities of a gathering to which that individual has a place. Generalizations can lead us to pass judgment on an individual or gathering contrarily. Indeed, even generalizations that appear to depict a gathering emphatically decrease people to classes and tell an inadequate or incorrect "single story." Partiality happens when we frame a sentiment around an individual or a gathering dependent on a contrary generalizationAt the point when a partiality drives us to treat an individual or gathering adversely, separation happens.

It is vital to consider the relationship investigated in this exercise between the ways that we think about others and the manners in which that we treat others. Examining the associations between stereotyping, bias, and separation will give a vital structure to investigating in future exercises the manners in which that individuals make "in" gatherings and "out" gatherings, both in our regular day to day existences and since forever. It is quite evident that that utilizing a single person experience to generalize others is very problematic.it can cause unnecessary chaos and fright or discouragement in the existing people in the entire society.

References:

Allison, William Thomas. My Lai: An American Atrocity in the Vietnam War. JHU Press, 2012.

Caputo, Philip. A Rumor of War: The Classic Vietnam Memoir. Picador USA, 2017.

Du Preez, Max. A rumor of spring: South Africa after 20 years of democracy. Penguin Random House South Africa, 2013.

Dunn, Capt JC. The War The Infantry Knew, 1914-1919: A Chronicle Of Service In France And Belgium. Pickle Partners Publishing, 2016.

Figley, Charles R. Stress Disorders Among Vietnam Veterans: Theory, Research. Routledge, 2014.

Hall, Mitchell. The Vietnam War. Routledge, 2018.

Hart, BH Liddell. A History of the Second World War. Pan Macmillan, 2015.

Jung, C.G., 2014. Flying saucers: A modern myth of things seen in the sky. Psychology Press.

Kalshoven, Frits, and Liesbeth Zegveld. Constraints on the waging of war: an introduction to international humanitarian law. Cambridge University Press, 2011.

Kieran, David. "‘It'a different time. It's different era. It's different place': the Legacy of Vietnam and Contemporary Memoirs of the Wars in Iraq and Afghanistan." War & Society31, no. 1 (2012): 64-83.

McGuire, Judith Brockenbrough. Diary of a Southern Refugee during the War. University Press of Kentucky, 2013.

Moss, George Donelson. Vietnam: An American Ordeal. Routledge, 2016.