Securing Higher Grades Costing Your Pocket? Book Your Assignment at The Lowest Price Now!
Maxwell West Student Reviews Student Reviews Student Reviews Student Reviews Student Reviews 4.8/5 hire me
Question: Describe about the Law and Justice?   Answer: Issue: The main issue in this case is whether the time is a relevant essence or not, and the validity of the contract is also in question. In this case both the parties are blaming each other but there was no concurrent proof in relation to that. The time for execution of the contract was changed without proper notification to the appropriate party. The performance from both the parties is stipulated in accordance with the specified time. If it has been changed with the free consent of the other party, then also there is no comprehensive evidence in front of the Ld. Court, for that reason making any decision in relation to that depending upon assumption would not be fair. Facts: De Jong, the plaintiff, was looking to purchase land from Carpenter, the defendant. By virtue of this, the solicitor of the defendant drafted a contract which stated that the sale will depend upon obtaining finance by the purchaser from a particular source before completion of 28 days. He retained a copy of this contract and sent a matching part of the contract to the solicitor of the purchaser. The solicitor of the defendant has been instructed by the defendant to introduce a new condition into the contract which provides completion within a certain period of time “of the essence of the contract”. This modification was duly made by the solicitor of the defendant in his copy only and the solicitor of the purchaser was neither notified nor aware of this modification. For that reason it was not recorded in the copy of the purchaser. Consequently, both of the solicitors were agree to amend the stipulated period of time in the finance passage from 28 to 14 days. But there was no conclusive evidence that the purchaser gave his free consent to it. Signed copies of the contracts were exchanged among them. But before completion from the part of the defendant as to the contract, plaintiff sought specific performance. Court’s decision: As per the observation made by the court and decision given by the court, it has been considered that the decision has given in favor of the defendant rather defendant has won the case. Legal Principals: Proper acceptance of the contract with free consent is a necessary element of every contract. Without the free consent of either part no agreement can be treated as a valid contract, in any contract if free consent from any of the party is not present then that would be a void contract . The legislations governing the contract laws in Australia, also specifies that any contract without the free consent of the parties is void and do not have any legal enforceability.   Identification made by the court: The court has observed that there is no conclusive evidence which can support the fact that the defendant has given his consent to the modification made in the contract. It shows that there is a possibility of lack of free consent from the part of the defendant. Any decision based upon any assumption is not possible for the end of justice, so it would not be a valid contract as no assumption or adjustment is permissible with the basic requirements of a valid contract and free consent is a basic requirement. 2.2: In this case Lora cannot enforce Belinda to buy the car in stipulated time, as the new terms which has been introduced by Lora, are inserted into the contract without the consent of Bellinda, even at the time of discussion Belinda knows that the car has fulfilled the criteria that is within 50,000 K.M but in actual it has run more than that, so like the previous discussed case, this contract is also not valid and not legally enforceable due to lack of free consent from Belinda.   3.1: In this case Lee is not guilty, as the two conditions which are to be complied are to stop the vehicle and to render assistance as is necessary. Here the word ‘necessary’ implies that if any person is injured or suffers any type of loss then the immediate assistance which is required for that person is to be rendered. But if things are alright and no assistance is needed or asked then the other party cannot do anything except stopping the vehicle. Here Lee has complied the first clause and the clause is not required as the person was helped by others and things were seems alright as well as under control. The general meaning of the word is required assistance. This words itself implies the requirement.   3.2: Generally Judges follows three rules of interpretation of statutes, those are Literal rule, Golden rule and mischief rule. Literal rule is the most common one, in this the actual grammatical meaning of the words used in the statutes are taken into consideration. In golden rule the inner meaning or the implied meaning of the provisions is considered. In case of mischief rule when there any conflict among legislations then the detection of the defect and finding out the remedy to solve the conflict is previewing within the scope of mischief rule. There is no difference among Statute, Legislation and Act, all of them are same and equal. 4.1 Here Bruce should file a suit for specific performance. Maud breaches the contract, in any kind of breach of contract there are three remedies, those are specific performance, damages and injunction. In this case Bruce can go for either specific performance or damages but considering the financial condition of Maud, Bruce should go for specific performance of the contract.   4.2: Under this circumstances Amy cannot claim the amount of $ 4,000, as this agreement has domestic elements and the courts have presumed that if any agreement has social or domestic elements then such an agreement will not be legally binding.   4.3: Fact: Ripley used to reside in a big house; he was a affluent and aged man. Ripley’s sister (Wakeling), is a married woman and reside in England, whom Ripley wrote a request to live with him in his house at Sydney. In addition to that request, he promised to leave them his belongings and Wakeling can reside in his house for free. For that reason, Wakelings departed from England, sell out her properties, and resigned from her job to migrate to Sydney. After a year, both the parties had a major deviation. In result, Ripley sold his assets and changed his will. Then Wakeling sued Ripley for breach of contract. Issue: Whether domestic or social elements can bind legally or not. Decision: It was held by the Ld. court that the situation which arose from the family members, consequence to a legally binding contract. Opinion with Reason : This decision was appropriate as migration has made depending upon the contract. 4.4: Subjective test depends upon the subject matter of case while in objective test the main object of the Act is taken into consideration. In case of determining the intention, generally objective test is followed by the courts. 5.1: 1. The main argument from the defendant was that the advertisement was a general one for every one, so it is not possible to enter into a contract with the entire world. 2. The court held that its may be for the entire world but if any one comes forward and fulfills the specified conditions then with that person the company enters into a contract. 3. The offer was made to the world at large. Any person by performing specified conditions can enter into that contract. By giving a subsequent advertisement for withdrawal the offer it can be withdrawn. Generally in invitation to treat there no specific condition to be fulfilled and it does not contain any commercial affluence, for that reason it is not an invitation to treat. Subjective test is implemented depending upon the main subject matter of the case while in case of objective test the main object of the case or issue where from dispute arose is taken into account. Here the court has followed the subjective test for determing the main object of the advertisement. 5.2: There is no contract between Jene and the shop keeper, as there was merely an invitation to offer, here Jene has made the offer which is not accepted by the shopkeeper, so without acceptance there is no contract.   5.3: John and Tuan can file a suit against the advertiser, as it was an offer not invitation to offer, here any person who will fulfill the condition, that is to return the dog shall automatically enters into the contract with that person, and then the advertiser is bound to perform his obligation.   5.4: Bill cannot enforce Dave to sell the car as it was merely an invitation to offer not an actual offer, here Bill made the offer to Dave that was not accepted by Dave, and without acceptance there is no contract can be considered.   5.4: In postal rule of acceptance, it completes when the acceptance comes to the knowledge of the person who made the offer.   6.1: Here Kim can sue Huyen for damages as Huyen hide major information from Kim regarding the sold article.   6.2: Terry cannot sue Dave as terry wanted to leave the job which was not legal so the subsequent contract between Terry and Dave is a void contract.   6.3: The doctrine of promissory estoppel was attempted for greater utilization. The agreement between the parties denotes to accept payments in part of a debt in full settlement. The court has been reluctant to override cases like Foakes v Beer as it have formed portion of the common law for such a long period. Justice Arden in the case of Collier v P & MJ Wright Ltd, has acknowledged the principal that High Tees could be quench the right of a creditor in full settlement of a dept in such situation. 6.4: In this famous case an ex-wife tried to take benefit of the rule that had been acknowledged in the High Trees case, to compel her husband to pay maintenance to her. In this case the court held that there is no scope for application of promissory estoppels, it can be used as a defence but not as a cause of action.    In Lagione v Hateley case it was observed by the court that the rule of promissory estoppels can be used only as defence, no cause of action can be sought depending upon promissory estoppels. In present days promissory estoppel exists in a strict manner, it does not confirm any cause opf action but defence can be made depending upon this rule. It denotes that if the relying party changes his position due to the faith of the promise, will suffer from detriment, if it was allowed to depart from his enforcement of former contractual rights. 7.1 Parol Evidence Rule is considered as a law which restricts the party to a written agreement from disclosing any extrinsic proof.   7.2: The contract between Yvonne and Marcel and sale of tyre
OR

At MyAssignmenthelp.com, we understand that when students get stuck with tough assignments, they look for affordable services. To assist students with complex assignments, we have built a team of skilled cheap essay writers. MyAssignmenthelp.com has become one stop solution for all students who often look for answers related to their search similar to do my essay at the cheap rate or who can write my essay at affordable prices. Students prefer hiring us as we have the best provisions to render services related to do my essay online at a reasonable rate.

Most Downloaded Sample Of Business Law

Corporation Law Assignment

Download : 249 | Pages : 13

Introduction The regulation and proper operation of any company or corporation is completely dependent on the nature and manner in which the directors and other office bearers of the company perform their functions. This is so, because even though a company has a separate legal entity and it has its independent existence distinct from its members, nevertheless the company operates through its directors and office bearers and as such it is very i...

Read More arrow Tags: Australia Arlington Management University of New South Wales 

Employment Law Assignment

Download : 216 | Pages : 7

Employment Law Explain the constitutional basis for the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) with reference to the Australian Constitution and discuss the relationship with Australian common law, with reference to the National Employment Standards. The Fair Work Act, 2009 is a labour welfare legislation aimed at improving the relations between employees and employers so that productive workplace relations can be formulated which would further help in pro...

Read More arrow Tags: Australia Arlington Management University of New South Wales 

Taxation Law Assignment

Download : 449 | Pages : 9

John was an architect and was employed by a small firm in the Melbourne CBD. He worked part-time. On his days off, he enjoyed designing and printing T-shirts. He started designing and printing T-shirts in August 2009, when his friend introduced him to the hobby. He printed T- shirts when he had the time and kept them for himself or gave them as gifts for family members for special occasions. As an architect, John had excellent design skills. Mo...

Read More arrow Tags: Australia Arlington Management University of New South Wales 

International Business Law Assignment

Download : 110 | Pages : 13

Question 1 The International business law is concerned with the rights of business with each other and with international organizations. Domestic law is within the state and it concern with the rights of business within the state(Bartone, 2010). The domestic and international business law is very differing in mainly two aspects first of all the law making process and the enforcement. International law is an ever expanding field that controls...

Read More arrow Tags: Australia Arlington Management University of New South Wales 

Capital Punishment Is A Good Measure To Ensure Less Financial Cost On Government, Public Safety And Deterrence Of Future Crimes.

Download : 258 | Pages : 10

  Introduction Capital punishment is punishing of a person by the state as a discipline for wrongdoing. Law violations that can bring about capital punishment are known as capital wrongdoings or capital offenses. It get utilized as a part of social orders all through history as an approach to rebuff wrongdoing and smother political dispute. In many spots that practice the death penalty today, capital punishment is saved as discipline for...

Read More arrow Tags: Australia Arlington Management University of New South Wales 
Next
Free plagiarism check online Free plagiarism check online on mobile
Have any Query?