Discussing The Benefits And Limitations Of Low Energy Transfer Lightweight Roofing System

Discuss about the Low energy transfer lightweight roofing system.

Systems

Low energy roofing system (transfer lightweight) comprises of a structural element where it concerns roofing homes with roofs that are low in energy absorption hence making the house less hot. Houses in hot areas make it uncomfortable for individuals to live inside. Several individuals tend to require homes and other buildings that are subjected to cold roofing strategy (Baniassadi et al., 2018). A cool roof is that having designed with capabilities of reflecting more sunlight and engross less heat than a standard roof. Cool roofs are made of a vastly reflective type of dye, a sheet casing, or greatly reflective tiles or grits. Nearly any sort of building can gain assistance from a cool roof, but also the consideration of the area climate and other issues before deciding installation of cool roofs. However, in severe cold environments, roofs aspect two important encounters; absorbent of heat appropriately, and controlling dampness trying to discharge from the living space.  The colder the weather and the longer the wintertime, the more noticeable freezing issues can become.  Deficits and poor building performs that are overlooked in an added forgiving climate convert very obvious in some places. A simple understanding of one’s roof system and the contests faced can assist in identifying the problem sources.

Fig 1. Theoretical load perception

Gombarick and others (2018) suggested that system (roof skylight) is the maximum sensitive part of the general building envelope that intercedes transparent and opaque qualities of a building structure. Transparent basics represent around ninety percent level and are amongst the most advanced rudiments influencing both daylighting eminence and thermal conditions; while opaque modules, such as mullion and sash assemblages, constitute nearly 10%. Irrespective of one’s location, these qualities will be under the influence of solar radioactivity that influences behavior that maximizes or minimalize interior load. Therefore, the features of light and heat that intermingle in a roof skylight scheme and how these issues behave ecologically should be deliberated and hence appropriately understood.

The system is advantage in sense that is compatible with all roofing structures available. It is easy to install them at all structural design thus no any time can look out of place.

There is probable leakage in systems where roofing is not watertight. In cold times the roofing cannot allow even small amount of energy to penetrate through the house.

The cost of installing skylights differs significantly depending on the type chosen, for instance, existing roofing material used, and the structure gradient and other necessities. Typically, this cost arrays in between $500-$3000.

Skylight Roofing System (SRS)

Just as putting on light-colored clothing can assist in keeping one cool on a hot day, cool roofs material premeditated to reflect more sunbeams and absorb less hotness than a standard roof. According to Svetozarevic (2017) in the country, standard or dark roofs tend to achieve temperatures of 150° degrees or extra in the summer sun whereas cool roof under the similar conditions could stop more than 50° degrees cooler and exclude energy and money by application of less air conditioning elements. The effect that roofs got on energy frequently overlooked, the influence of which can be substantial. In winter, inadequate or damaged roof protection permits heat to emit in the atmosphere readily. In midsummer, heat gained over the roof upsurges not only the cooling consignment but also the top cooling load and in case of buildings where the original cooling system is electrically enhanced the peak electrical plea (Hosseini and Akbari, 2016). A flat or low-slope roof gives excellent exposure to the sun’s glimmers when the building’s conserving loads and expenses are at maximum cost. Most flat and low-slope rooftop materials are black as they gladly absorb solar energy, counting the infrared sunlight portion. Roof high temperature from noon to late mid-afternoon are often sixty to hundred degrees upper than the ambient temperature. While some heat is discharged back to the air, much is conducted to the acclimatised space beneath the roof. The influence the roof has on energy utilization depends on the climate, the roof alignment, the width and insulation quality, roof’s surface reflectivity, and how little maintenance of the roof is enhanced (Epstein et al., 2017).

Though costs will differ greatly depending on position and local conditions, cool roof glazes on a low-slope roof tends costing around $0.75–$1.50 per square foot, whereas cool roof (single-ply) sheath costs fluctuate in between $1.50–$3.00 per square foot.

Cool roofs reduce the roof seeming temperature, thereby dropping the heat transferred into the building underneath thus aiding in the reduction of energy costs and also the maintenance costs associated with the structure (Middel et al., 2015).

Cooling roof disadvantages are that they contain limited application as they are only perfect for zones receiving large heat quantities and sunlight.

Green roofs mechanism tend considerations as the most viable solution to many urban subjects including urban heat isle mitigation, noise and air effluence reduction, stormwater administration and sustenance of biodiversity and are relatively often addressed as the best structure choice to increase the ecological sustainability in hot areas. Benefits are of those building enclosed by a green roof as a decrease in Land use influence. It is now quite vibrant that green roofs can be applied in heat emission reductions in hot zones all over the nation (Arkar, Domjan and Medved, 2018).

Advantages

Most of the motives that stop structure owners from erecting a green roof lay in the notion that besides the initial prices, cost form upkeep of green roof during the life cycle of the building is quite high. Some researches have demonstrated that exhaustive or profound soil roof schemes contain higher life-cycle cost (LCC) than conservative practice, but this is not permanently true for broad green roof system that ought to cost less than a traditional roof. Low upkeep costs of a clay roof should also be taken into aspect because there is no replacement of the shingles needed during the strategy service life of the rooftop since the roof tiles have one hundred and fifty years lifespan. Replacement of lagging and waterproofing layer of a typical roof entails low energy and a very little procedure (Pearlmutter and Rosenfeld, 2008.). Therefore, bearing in mind the green roof benefits regarding relief and energy saving but also considering the maintenance operations required to let the green roof accomplish in years at best, as described the proper structural design of a first green roof is the most vital aspect in the case.

Green roof costing is probably higher than the conventional roofing. The charges of green roof fitting may be cheaper than first predictable. When equated to conventional, the preliminary cost is a bit extra expensive, but the savings in the extensive run make it an alluring option.

Green roofs are energy efficient as they reduce the heat flux through the roof and minimal energy for freezing or heating leading to significant cost reserves. Shading the external surface of the structure envelope has been shown to be more operational than interior insulation. In the summertime, the green roof shields the building from straight solar heating whereas, in winter, it reduces heat loss through added wadding on the structure roof.

Green roofs last longer as they cover the waterproofing sheath, protecting it from ultraviolet rays and extreme daily hotness fluctuations. This defence extends the lifetime of the waterproofing double as long as conservative roofing, meaning that films under green roofs last two times as long as those on out-dated roofs. According to Sadineni (2011) also it reduces the waste of materials from re-roofing.

Fitting a green roof can charge up to twofold as much as providing a conservative roof. Upkeep for intensive green roofs can be labour-intensive and costly. Broad roofs require less hosing and fertilizing, but as an acceptable minimum, they need annual inspections to eliminate unwanted plants (self-seeding).

Disadvantages

Frequent environmental factors affecting the thermal load, such as atmosphere temperature, radiant temperature, air rapidity, and humidity are considered more reliable aspects in condition evaluation. However, one has to comprehend the thermal load kinds that cause heat increases before stipulating the load capacity necessities where a study by Besir and Cuce (2018) recognized six types of heat gains, individually,

•    Conduction advances through the fabric.
•    Indirect solar expansions from the sun on the opaque material (for instance, walls and roof).
•    Straight solar gains from the sun over the crystalline structure (openings and skylight).
•    The aeriation gains from ventilation and air permeation (Gulati, Suddapalli and Srinivasan, 2016).
•    Interior gains from individuals and equipment in the area.
•    Inter-zone gains from adjacent zones.

The technology of thermal break has upgraded, resulting in stronger resources that can accept bigger triple-pane crystals thus reducing conductive hotness loss and refining performance. According to Chemisana (2015) enhancements in IGU technology with low-e glazes and thin flicks, high-efficiency bars or adjourned film glass aid in minimizing solar heat achievement and deduct the U-value of coating systems. The process of reducing glare tends automation by self-shading crystals, decreasing solar heat gain and accumulating comfort for individuals using the building. Inventive application of these options pooled together with the innovative design of the interior universe brings advance light into the building. Incorporating daylight controls further bounds energy custom. In environmental performance, solar-integrated roof shingles are a marked as a practical improvement over current technologies thus in the construction of massive constructions it advisable to apply the technology as it will reduce energy absorbing making the buildings hot. The research of Baniassadi, Heusinger and Sailor (2018) displays that the technology of shiny plastic-coated Powerhouse silts is in a position to convert thirteen per cent level of the solar energy into power (electricity).

Conclusion

In designing low energy transfer systems on roofs, engineers should have important considerations to consider. Climate is a significant concern when deciding whether to install flat energy roofs that will maximum reduce the energy absorbed in the atmosphere. Cool roofs attain the greatest cooling reserves in hot climates but can intensify energy charges in colder environments due to condensed beneficial wintertime heat advances (Costanzo and Marletta, 2016.).

Moisture Control is another aspect that must be considered in the system. In warm, humid locations, cool roof shells are more disposed to algae or mold development as compared to hot roofs. Some roof coverings include distinct chemicals preventing mold or algae progress for little years. In climates that are cold, shelters can gather moisture through compression, and it is likely that cool roofs might be more predisposed in moisture accumulation than cool roofs of the similar structure and design. Condensation can be avoided using proper design techniques. Decent roof preservation should be enhanced at all times and leaks can allow water to infiltrate the surface and drench the insulation, abolishing its thermal resistance. Wet insulation is nearly the equal of no insulation. Wet wadding also hurries the deterioration of other shingles apparatuses. It is vital for both energy efficacy, and the roof integrity has mechanisms of maintenance (Zirkelbach et al. 2017).

Costs

Engineers always required to enhance insulation capabilities when installing roofs. Importance of effective insulation system tends to negate the needs and requirements of mechanical systems hence reducing heating and cooling needs in our homesteads. When it is enhanced, it will reduce electric bills that are brought about by more improvised cooling systems installed in our homes.

The material engineers choose to be contingent heavily on the category of the house one has and the climate on is inhabiting. More specialists advise on everything from the further high technology solutions such as home foam wadding and cellulose insulation to more simple alternatives such as fiberglass or cotton striking. No matter material selected, leave-taking an air space amid the insulation and the roofing substantial generally turns been an active and encouraging idea. Though in severe dry climates, and with some metallic roofing, it may not be essential, an air universe will typically decrease the possibility of moistness getting confined in either the edifice or the insulation and causing mould to intensify. Re-roofing sustainably become part of my recommendation. Whether one is putting a roof on a new home based structure or re-roofing an existing dwelling, it is a golden chance to do things as sustainably as potential. The research of Lamnatou and Chemisana (2015) states that attired roofer should be in a position to advise the customer on the best roofing quantifiable materials for the house type and area climate, but it is a good impression having a grasp of the essentials before talking to an expert. For instance, if one is living near the coastline, he/she may need selecting roofing that will survive the salt spring and have less or no wind lift. Once an individual has gotten a solid understanding of the circumstances facing their roof, he/she will require consideration of both roofing materials and cover (Karachaliou et al., 2016).

References

Arkar, C., Domjan, S. and Medved, S., 2018. Heat transfer in a lightweight extensive green roof under water-freezing conditions. Energy and Buildings, 167, pp.187-199.

Baniassadi, A., Heusinger, J. and Sailor, D.J., 2018. Building energy savings potential of a hybrid roofing system involving high albedo, moisture retaining foam materials. Energy and Buildings, 169, pp.283-294.

Besir, A.B. and Cuce, E., 2018. Green roofs and facades: A comprehensive review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 82, pp.915-939.

Castleton, H.F., Stovin, V., Beck, S.B. and Davison, J.B., 2010. Green roofs; building energy savings and the potential for retrofit. Energy and buildings, 42(10), pp.1582-1591.

Costanzo, V., Evola, G. and Marletta, L., 2016. Energy savings in buildings or UHI mitigation? Comparison between green roofs and cool roofs. Energy and buildings, 114, pp.247-255.

Epstein, S.A., Lee, S.M., Katzenstein, A.S., Carreras-Sospedra, M., Zhang, X., Farina, S.C., Vahmani, P., Fine, P.M. and Ban-Weiss, G., 2017. Air-quality implications of widespread adoption of cool roofs on ozone and particulate matter in southern California. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(34), pp.8991-8996.

Gulati, R., Suddapalli, S. and Srinivasan, R.S., 2016, March. Energy Impacts of Roof Fasteners for Metal Deck Roofing Systems during Re-roofing and Re-Cover Scenarios. In Proceedings of the Roofing Consultants Institute (RCI) Conference, Orlando, FL, USA (Vol. 12).

Hosseini, M. and Akbari, H., 2016. Effect of cool roofs on commercial buildings energy use in cold climates. Energy and Buildings, 114, pp.143-155.

Karachaliou, P., Santamouris, M. and Pangalou, H., 2016. Experimental and numerical analysis of the energy performance of a large scale intensive green roof system installed on an office building in Athens. Energy and Buildings, 114, pp.256-264.

Lamnatou, C. and Chemisana, D., 2015. Evaluation of photovoltaic-green and other roofing systems by means of ReCiPe and multiple life cycle–based environmental indicators. Building and environment, 93, pp.376-384.

Livsey, R.D., Gombarick, J.C., Chihlas, P., Kalkanoglu, H.M., Blackburn, M.E., Steffes, S.W., Jacobs, G.F. and Noone, M.J., Certainteed Corp, 2018. Photovoltaic Roofing Elements And Photovoltaic Roofing Systems. U.S. Patent Application 15/683,401.

Lydon, G.P., Hofer, J., Svetozarevic, B., Nagy, Z. and Schlueter, A., 2017. Coupling energy systems with lightweight structures for a net plus energy building. Applied energy, 189, pp.310-326.

Middel, A., Chhetri, N. and Quay, R., 2015. Urban forestry and cool roofs: Assessment of heat mitigation strategies in Phoenix residential neighborhoods. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 14(1), pp.178-186.

Pearlmutter, D. and Rosenfeld, S., 2008. Performance analysis of a simple roof cooling system with irrigated soil and two shading alternatives. Energy and Buildings, 40(5), pp.855-864.

Sadineni, S.B., Madala, S. and Boehm, R.F., 2011. Passive building energy savings: A review of building envelope components. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15(8), pp.3617-3631.

Zirkelbach, D., Mehra, S.R., Sedlbauer, K.P., Künzel, H.M. and Stöckl, B., 2017. A hygrothermal green roof model to simulate moisture and energy performance of building components. Energy and Buildings, 145, pp.79-91.