Question 1
Michelle and Tim are passionate about motorbikes. In fact, they own a company called Motorbikes Pty Ltd. Michelle is a Director and Tim is the company secretary. They buy and sell motorbikes and repair them.
John wishes to sell his motorbike. John approaches Tim and Tim agrees to purchase John’s motorbike for $5,000. Tim and Michelle both sign the contract to purchase John’s motorbike.
Two days later, Michelle thinks they have paid too much for John’s motorbike and wants to get out of the contract.
Is Motorbikes Pty Ltd bound by the contract? Provide reasons for your answer. You must cite relevant Australian case law and the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth). Do not discuss contract law.
Question 2
Gerard and Sylvia love cakes and have recently decided to buy a cake shop from George.
Gerard and Sylvia register a company “Cakes Pty Ltd” with the Australian Securities and Investments Commission. Gerard is listed as a Director and his mum, Sarita, is listed as the company secretary.
On the day of signing the contract to buy the cake shop from George, Gerard stamps the contract with the Cakes Pty Ltd company seal and signs as a witness. The other witness is Sylvia.
A few days pass and George thinks he should have not sold his cake shop. He now wants it back.
Is George bound by the contract? Provide reasons for your answer. You must cite relevant Australian case law and the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth). Do not discuss contract law.
Issue
Whether Motorbikes Pty Ltd is liable in terms of the contract signed with the John
Law
Section 127 of the Corporation Act 2001 states the regulations related to execution of the document. According to clause 1 of the section, organization can execute the documents deprived of fixing the common seal on the document if such document is affixed by the signatures of the two directors of the organization or by the director and the company secretary. It must be noted that, in case company executes the document in this manner, then it is possible for the third party to rely on the assumption stated under subsection 129(5) in context of dealing with the company.
As defined by section 129(5), third party can make the assumption that the contract has been duly attested by the corporation if such document is signed in the similar manner as stated under subsection 127(1). In terms of creating the expectations, a individual may also make the assumption that any person who signs the contract.
It is necessary to understand that, while executing the contract on the basis of the organization, an individual cannot put their signature on the document or fixed the common seal in the capacity of two different authorities. However, there is an exception to this rule which states that person signs the contract if he or she is the sole director or sole secretary of the company (Hatcher, 2016).
Recently, in case of Knight Frank Australia Pty Ltd v Paley Properties Pty Ltd [2014] SASCFC 103, Full Court of the South Australia considered the issue related to the valid execution of the contract. In this case, contract was signed by the single director and without the common seal of the company, which means, director execute the contract under section 127(1) of the Act. Court stated that contract is not valid and cannot be enforced (Winter, no date).
Application
In this case, contract is signed by the Tim and Michael on behalf the organization with the John for purchasing the motor bike from the John. Contract is executed with the John under section 127(1), as this contract is signed by the director and company secretary of the organization. Organization can execute the contracts without fixing the common seal on the contract if such document is affixed by the signatures of the two directors of the organization or by the director and the company secretary of the company.
It must be noted that, in case company executes the document in this manner, then it is possible for the third arty to rely on the assumption stated under subsection 129(5) in context of dealing with the company, which states, third party can make the assumption that that the contract has been proven by the company if such document is signed in the similar manner as stated under subsection 127(1).
Therefore, it is clear that contract signed by Michal and Tim is duly attested, and there is valid contract between the parties.
Contract is duly attested between the parties, and Motorbikes Pty Ltd is liable in terms of the contract signed with the John.
Issue
Whether third party that is George is liable towards the Cakes Pty Ltd in context of contract signed between them
Law
Section 127(2 of the Act states that, organization with the common seal can execute the document if such seal is fixed to the document and this fixing is witnessed by the two directors of the organization or by the director and the company secretary of the company. It must be noted that, in case company executes the document in this manner, then it is possible for the third party to rely on the assumption stated under subsection 129(6) in context of dealing with the company.
As defined by section 129(6), third party can make the assumption that that the contract has been duly attested by the organization if such contract is fixed by the common seal in the similar manner as stated under subsection 127(2). This assumption further states that common seal fixed by the company must be witnessed in the manner as stated under section 127.
In terms of making the assumptions related to the execution of the document by the company, an individual can make the assumption that any person who signs the document and states next to their signature that they are the sole directors of the organization and the sole secretary of the organization. In case execution clause states in incorrect manner than the executed document must be signed by the two directors of the company or by the director and the company secretary of the company. The constituent is compromised of the sole director/sole secretary who signs the contract then the risk is that the presumptions cannot be relied on. The document signed by the company must be executed in context of the section 127 of the Act, unless it clearly states that such document is signed by the sole director or sole secretary of the company.
In case sole director or sole secretary of the organization held liable for the incorrect execution clause, and in case they are not held liable then there is possibility that document is not enforceable in nature.
In case law Hewlett-Packard Australia Pty Ltd v Exceed Pty Ltd [2004] FCA 135, court consider the issue in which document was executed without the common seal of the company. In this case, Court held that the document was considered as the deed if it was executed by the common seal of the company. Court further stated that, this document was executed by the company; even such document was not fixed by the common seal of the company but it is executed in terms of the section 127 of the Act.
Application
In the present case, Gerard and Sylvia purchased the cake shop from the George, and in this context they registered the company which named as “Cakes Pty Ltd” in Australia. In this company, Gerard is listed as the director of the organization and his mum Sarita is listed as the company secretary of the organization.
On the day at which contract is signed between the parties for purchasing the cake shop, and in this context contract is fixed by the common seal of the company and also witnessed by the Gerard as the director and Sylvia. After few days, George believes that he must not sell his cake sho and wants to get it back.
In this case, contract between the parties is executed in terms of the section 127(2 of the Act which states that organization with the common seal can execute the document if such seal is fixed to the document and this fixing is witnessed by the two directors of the organization or by the director and the company secretary of the company. In this case also, contract is fixed with the common seal and signed by the director of the company (Lavan, no date).
It must be noted that, in case company executes the document in this manner, then it is possible for the third party to rely on the assumption stated under subsection 129(6) in context of dealing with the company. As defined by section 129(6), third party can make the assumption that that the document has been duly attested by the company if such document is fixed by the common seal of the company in the similar manner as stated under subsection 127(2). This assumption further states that common seal fixed by the company must be witnessed in the manner as stated under section 127.
In this case, contract is only signed by the director of the company and not by the company secretary of the company and this is the reason because of which it can be state that contract is not executed in the manner stated by section 127. Facts of this case are similar to the case law, Hewlett-Packard Australia Pty Ltd v Exceed Pty Ltd [2004] FCA 135, court consider the issue in which document was executed without the common seal of the company. Court further stated that, this document was executed by the company; even such document was not fixed by the common seal of the company but it is executed in terms of the section 127 of the Act.
Therefore, it is clear from the above facts, that contract between the parties is not executed in the manner which is stated under section 127 of the Act, and this is the only reason because of which this contract is not valid, which means, contract is not enforceable and George can get back his cake shop
Contract between the parties is not executed in the manner which is stated under section 127 of the Act, which means, contract is not enforceable and George can get back his cake shop.
Corporation Act 2001- Section 127
Corporation Act 2001- Section 129
Hatcher, S. (2016. Australia: Executing documents on behalf of a company. Available at https://www.mondaq.com/australia/x/550522/Contract+Law/Executing+documents+on+behalf+of+a+company. Accessed on 29th September 2018.
Hewlett-Packard Australia Pty Ltd v Exceed Pty Ltd [2004] FCA 135.
Knight Frank Australia Pty Ltd v Paley Properties Pty Ltd [2014] SASCFC 103
Lavan. Consequences of defective execution clauses. Available at https://www.lavan.com.au/advice/property_leasing/consequences_of_defective_execution_clauses. Accessed on 29th September 2018.
Winter, J. Putting pen to paper – execution under section 127. Available at https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=cf057ecb-0d7e-4ec2-be21-c833666e0173. Accessed on 29th September 2018.
To export a reference to this article please select a referencing stye below:
My Assignment Help. (2020). Law Of Business Association. Retrieved from https://myassignmenthelp.com/free-samples/lst2lba-law-of-business-association/case-studies-on-corporation-act.html.
"Law Of Business Association." My Assignment Help, 2020, https://myassignmenthelp.com/free-samples/lst2lba-law-of-business-association/case-studies-on-corporation-act.html.
My Assignment Help (2020) Law Of Business Association [Online]. Available from: https://myassignmenthelp.com/free-samples/lst2lba-law-of-business-association/case-studies-on-corporation-act.html
[Accessed 27 January 2021].
My Assignment Help. 'Law Of Business Association' (My Assignment Help, 2020) <https://myassignmenthelp.com/free-samples/lst2lba-law-of-business-association/case-studies-on-corporation-act.html> accessed 27 January 2021.
My Assignment Help. Law Of Business Association [Internet]. My Assignment Help. 2020 [cited 27 January 2021]. Available from: https://myassignmenthelp.com/free-samples/lst2lba-law-of-business-association/case-studies-on-corporation-act.html.
MyAssignmenthelp.com is the best place where students of Aus can avail plagiarism-free economics assignment help services. We have assembled a team of 5000+ experts who boast of extensive academic knowledge in their respective fields and years of experience in assignment help. They write unique solutions, rewrite pre-written economic papers, and reference the resources as per the guidelines. We also provide a free Turnitin report to prove the plagiarism-free assignment solutions.
Answer: The primary purpose of this paper is to analyse the applicability of a ruling made in the High Court on the Northern Territory Supreme Court in the case of Kakavas v Crown Melbourne Ltd [2013] HCA. The paper also reviews situations where the ruling made by the high court can be overruled. In doing so the paper throws light upon the role of High Court in the development of law in Australia. In this case it had been ruled by the co...
Read MoreAnswer: Does a partnership between Todd and Zac exist? Issue The question whether a partnership between Todd and Zac exist depends on whether the engagement was procedurally entered. Rule According to the Australian partnership Act[1], a partnership exists when persons come together to do business with a purpose of getting a monetary gain[2]. The coming together can be express through formal document or implied through conduct or actions...
Read MoreAnswer: New Luggage Handling Fees At Muscat Airport The aviation law refers to the branch of the law that concerns travelling in air and flights. The aviation law associates the business concerns and the legal concerns. The aviation law solves all the legal matters related to the functions of airport and aircraft operations. It covers the aircraft direction-finding, maintenance of aircraft, managing the air traffic, responsibility related...
Read MoreAnswer: Summary of the total sales The total sales ranges from a minimum of $ 81,450 per day to a maximum of $ 294,840. The expected value of sales per day is $ 134,660, this value does vary with standard deviation of $ 25340. From the descriptive statistics the total sales is skewed to the right indicating that most of the sales per day are over the expected sales. Analysis of the sales data per month indicate that most of the sales are...
Read MoreAnswer Issue 1 The issue is whether Weitao has to pay the replacement fee as given under the contract? Rule 1 While forming a contract, the parties have the right to include an exclusion clause in the contract. Based on such clause, the party can eliminate his/her liability which is raised in case of breach of contractual terms. However, parties have to comply with the general rule of exclusion clause which provides that they must bring the...
Read MoreJust share requirement and get customized Solution.
Orders
Overall Rating
Experts
Our writers make sure that all orders are submitted, prior to the deadline.
Using reliable plagiarism detection software, Turnitin.com.We only provide customized 100 percent original papers.
Feel free to contact our assignment writing services any time via phone, email or live chat. If you are unable to calculate word count online, ask our customer executives.
Our writers can provide you professional writing assistance on any subject at any level.
Our best price guarantee ensures that the features we offer cannot be matched by any of the competitors.
Get all your documents checked for plagiarism or duplicacy with us.
Get different kinds of essays typed in minutes with clicks.
Calculate your semester grades and cumulative GPa with our GPA Calculator.
Balance any chemical equation in minutes just by entering the formula.
Calculate the number of words and number of pages of all your academic documents.
Our Mission Client Satisfaction
Thanks for doing it on time...great work...fingers crossed for the grades...i hope i get good grades...its a great website to do assignments and all the exams
Australia
Satisfied with the writing style. The writer responded immediately for the revisions which were requested.
Australia
did not have time to start on my assignment and randomly googled for people to do it for me. To my surprise, i found myassignmenthelp and they did it for me just on time for my submission with even time to spare. My first time, but definitely not my ...
Australia
Thank you, thank you, thank you very much. It is one of the most beautiful and highest levels of the solution that I have seen in my life. In all honesty, the expert is very distinguished and he was at the heart of the solution to answer all the poin...
Australia