Learn smart - Learn online. Upto 88% off on courses for a limited time. View Courses

Securing Higher Grades Costing Your Pocket? Book Your Assignment at The Lowest Price Now!
Add File

Error goes here

Files Missing!

Please upload all relevant files for quick & complete assistance.

Guaranteed Higher Grade!

MAENGINE3RMG Risk Management In Engineering

tag 0 Download 8 Pages / 1,809 Words tag 04-11-2020



  • Explain the concepts of risk as a social construct, risk perception, risk communication, risk acceptability and risk
  • Apply a variety of risk treatment techniques including: mitigation, avoiding, transferring, sharing and
  • Apply risk tolerability in the context of
  • Apply the concept of the hierarchy of risk
  • Quantify risks using a variety of risk assessment
  • Work professionally, collaboratively and productively in a team


1. Identify and  describe  in  detail  four engineering failures chosen  from  following categories (maximum one failure per category):
  • Large and localised (e.g. Granville train accident 1977).
  • Medium and localised (e.g. Thredbo landslide 1997, deaths during the construction of the Sydney Harbour bridge 1922-1932, Childers backpackers hostel fire 2000, Sydney Bowlers Club fire 1994, Dreamworld accident 2016).
  • Small and localised (e.g. Hoyts theatre retractable seat accident 1997, Soccer goal post collapse 2003, Lend Lease/UTS crane fire 2012).
  • Large and widespread (e.g. Esso Longford gas explosion 1998, CSR-James Hardie asbestos contamination of both commercial and domestic premises Australia 1948-2013).
  • Medium and widespread (e.g. magnets in children’s toys 2010, blinds, curtains and window fitting childhood strangulations 2010, Orica soil contamination 1990-2013, Mt Isa lead levels in children 2007-2013, Queensland CSG contamination 2013).
  • Small and widespread (e.g. Sydney water cryptosporidium and giardia contamination 1998; bunk beds childhood falls 2005; Backyard trampoline non-compliance 2003-2013).
2. Whatever failure you choose, it must be an engineering failure for which you can readily obtain information. You are required to provide a brief background to the failure and why you believe your example qualifies as an engineering failure (as distinct from a non-engineering failure). You may choose each individual failure from different engineering disciplines.
3. Place yourself in the seat of an engineer who was causally involved in each failure and answer the following questions for each failure:
  • How would you have done things differently?
  • What should have been the barriers that prevented the failure occurring?
  • What lessons were learnt from this failure?
  • What were changes and/or improvements to Law, Codes, Standards, work practices and technology that flowed from this failure?
4. For each failure:
  • Define the Inherent
  • Describe in detail the causal chain (i.e. show causality from the root cause(s) to the failure event) and provide a causal diagram for each failure .
  • Conduct a risk assessment to quantitatively verify the magnitude of the risk exposure in terms of deaths/injuries/damages/costs using a recognised
  • Would the pre-failure mitigation have passed the HSE Tolerability of Risk (ToR) test (i.e. you need to demonstrate the consequences of the failure in terms of deaths/injuries/damages/costs to confirm whether they were/weren’t 10x or greater than the sacrifice/investment entailed with the implementation of any pre-accident countermeasures).
5. The report must include a variety of material that supports the discussion and all content must be fully referenced.
6. Marks will be awarded for reports that demonstrate a high level of professionalism and well thought- out technical content
7. Marks will also be awarded for reports that show logical and robust methodological argument that supports the discussion
8. Marks will be deducted for reports that are unfocused and do not effectively address the allocated topic or provide added value discussion
9. You should use the IEEE template provided on UTSOnline


Engineers have an important role in society. They are responsible for designing, building or creating something based on a specification or guideline to meet a particular need. What they develop must function without failure, for its intended lifetime. Engineers are responsible for ensuring that the product of their work meets its intended purpose and level of performance, and avoiding failure, especially a catastrophic failure that can result in damage to property, environment, and even loss of life. Engineering is about managing risks. It is technically impossible to remove risk altogether and lowering risk commonly involves a substantial cost. Engineering as a profession progresses through both its successes and its failures. As a profession we need to learn from failures. Many of the examples used in this subject were disasters. One might be led to conclude that this subject is all about avoidance of large-scale failures. This is not the case: whenever a well-known failure was used as an example, its use is a matter of convenience. The assumption is that the failure doesn’t need to be described in detail for you to understand the principles involved. By analysing failures engineers can learn what not to do, and how to reduce the chance of failure. This may seem paradoxical but is widely accepted. Failure often can spur on innovation. In engineering it is important to review failures, and mistakes. It is harder to learn from success, but you should always learn from failure. This is not the best practice in some engineering projects where failure results in human and property damage, however when a failure does occur it is very important to analyze it and learn from it.

Failures have elements in common. The lessons that we learn from them can help engineers predict and avoid failures. A skill that all professional engineers need is the ability to predict and avoid failures no matter what their scale or magnitude from small or localised to large or widespread. Factors such as human error, decisions to reduce project duration or cost and failure to comply with existing Laws, Regulations, Codes and Standards have historically led to failures. Engineering Failures are typically the result of:

  • Human factors – both ethical and accidental failure;
  • Design flaws – typically a result of unprofessional or unethical behaviour;
  • Materials failure; and
  • Extreme

The report will consider any unethical practices that may have led to engineering failure. Engineering failures can be categorised based on the size of the impacted region, and the level of impact on the region. Size of impact:

  • Localised: This type of failure will only have an impact on the immediate area where the incident occurs; and
  • Widespread: Although the causing incident was localised it has effects distributed over a large geographical

Level of impact:

  • Small: Minor Injuries and property damage, may not result in loss of life;
  • Medium: Some loss of life, multiple serious injuries, or serious property damage; and
  • Large: Catastrophic failure, with extensive loss of life, and severe irreparable property damage.
The United Kingdom Health and Safety Executive (HSE) espoused a framework otherwise known as tolerability of risk (TOR). TOR is used for worst-case considerations, utility-based conditions that entail the societal unacceptability of risky situations, and technology-based cases that tend to ignore the tradeoffs between benefits and costs. The HSE includes principles that require risks to be reduced to as low as reasonably practical (ALARP). This allows the cost of reducing risks to be considered when determining whether to invest in a risk reducing activity. In general, project owners are required to invest proportionately higher levels of funds towards reducing higher risks, particularly for a risk with severe consequences.

It is expected that each of the six failures should be analysed to determine the costs that should have been invested in the project to prevent the failure, and the cost of the consequences of the failure with regards to death, injuries, damages and cost. For each of these failures, the costs that were incurred after the project failure shall be calculated. What it would have cost to put measures in place to avoid the failure shall also be calculated. The multiplier or ratio is used as a measure to confirm whether society should have invested more funds to prevent this failure1. The results should be consolidated into a summary table.

By analysing past failures, engineers can prevent future failures, both minor and catastrophic. It is often the catastrophic failure that receives professional and public attention, but as you will discover, catastrophic failures are comprised of multiple smaller errors in design, communication and/or judgement. Engineering is a constantly evolving discipline due to both advances in technology and the integration of lessons learnt through failures into laws, standards, work practices and technology.

Despite the wide variety in the size and impact of the failures in this Assessment Task, many of the lessons applicable to improving risk management are the same. First, all projects should include a risk management process and a thorough assessment of the risks. In each of the case studies, risks that contributed to the catastrophic failure could have been identified and mitigated through a risk management process. Second, independent reviews of design drawings and specifications greatly increase the chance of detecting human errors and failures to comply with existing codes, laws and regulation.

Human error will never be abolished, but safeguards can help mitigate the impact. Third, time, cost, quality and scope constraints can have significant negative impacts on the outcome of the project or product. While all projects operate within these constraints, the impacts of these constraints need to be part of the risk assessment.

Engineering failures are very subjective due to the perception and amplification of risks by society. Engineering failures are thought of more critically as there usually is no control over the incident from the people involved. One example is airplane travel: more people die on the roads annually, than by flying. However as there is no control over the plane by the passengers it is regarded as a much more serious failure.

Engineering failures typically involve a sequence of events that lead to the failure. There are documented failures that contained complex and/or multiple causal events such that if even a single causal event were prevented or removed the incident would not have occurred. The sequence of events is typically preventable by removing a single element from the sequence.

The cost of these fixes is often very small compared to the overall cost after the failure has occurred. Some risks are out of the control of engineers, and these must be managed in other ways. Although they all involve physical component failure or malfunction the cause of failures is commonly due to human interaction, either by cutting costs, pushing availability or having improper communication channels.

Download Sample Now

Earn back the money you have spent on the downloaded sample by uploading a unique assignment/study material/research material you have. After we assess the authenticity of the uploaded content, you will get 100% money back in your wallet within 7 days.

Unique Document

Under Evaluation

Get Money
into Your Wallet

Total 8 pages

Cite This Work

To export a reference to this article please select a referencing stye below:

My Assignment Help. (2020). Risk Management In Engineering. Retrieved from

My Assignment Help (2020) Risk Management In Engineering [Online]. Available from:
[Accessed 11 August 2022].

My Assignment Help. 'Risk Management In Engineering' (My Assignment Help, 2020) <> accessed 11 August 2022.

My Assignment Help. Risk Management In Engineering [Internet]. My Assignment Help. 2020 [cited 11 August 2022]. Available from:

We Can Help!

Get top notch assistance from our best tutors !
Excel in your academics & career in one easy click!


Other Samples

Content Removal Request

If you are the original writer of this content and no longer wish to have your work published on then please raise the content removal request.


5% Cashback

On APP - grab it while it lasts!

Download app now (or) Scan the QR code

*Offer eligible for first 3 orders ordered through app!

callback request mobile
Have any Query?