Table 4: Portraying the Method of Forecast – Autoregressive of order 1 model
Both of these above tables i.e. Table 3 and Table 4 primarily helps to depict the methods of forecast - ‘Random Walk Model’ and ‘Autoregressive of order 1 model’ respectively. These particular models can be used for forecasting the trends of the future regarding USD/ AUD. Moreover, the “Autoregressive of order 1 model” has a negative MAE, so this can affect the entire process of future forecasting regarding USD/ AUD. However, it can be said that the “Random walk model” is considered as the most accurate or appropriate model for forecasting the future as it has a positive effect and positive values regarding RMSE, MAE and MSE. In addition to these, during the period of calculating the variance between the actual prices and the forecasted prices, it has been noted that primarily the RWM has depicted the nearest prediction value that might be used for the generation of higher return from the investment. Opined to Cafaggi and Miller (2013), due to the spontaneous volatility, it has been found that the forecasted prices generally depict the entire trend that in turn raises the risk probability of the investors.
7. Risk Assessment and Implications for the Investment on Daily Basis
Particulars
|
Value ($)
|
Value of Portfolio
|
1000000
|
Average Return
|
-0.037383246
|
Standard Deviation
|
0.000405447
|
Level of Confidence
|
0.99
|
Calculations
|
|
Min Return with 99% probability
|
-0.038326457
|
Portfolio Value
|
961673.5430
|
Value at Risk
|
38326.4570
|
Percentage Risk
|
3.83%
|
Table 5: Evaluation of Investment Risk – The Parametric Method
The above table represents the calculation of parametric method by help of which the total amount of risk from the investment has been calculated and it is represented as $38326.4570. This particular type of method primarily implies that its implementation will result into 3.83 % of risk in terms of investment of around 1 million USD. Therefore, it can be said that the volatility of the financial market might increase the entire risk implications for the subsequent 90 days. Moreover, Philippon and Reshef (2013) stated that during the economic crisis, the forecasted prices might lose its friction and can also enhance the probability of risk regarding the entire portfolio.
![]()
Figure 5: Evaluation of Investment Risk – Historical Method
Moreover, the above graph implies that the particular method of historical simulation is very useful for analyzing the investment risk effectively. In addition to this, it has been found that the entire risk lies within the range of 0.08909734 to 0.091654614. This range effectively depicts that both the minimum and maximum return can be developed from the investment of an amount of 1 million USD. Additionally, it can also be said that the maximum risk lies within the range of -0.009408956 to 0.018153836 that might affect the entire investment risk of an amount of 1 million USD.
Conclusion
Therefore, it can be concluded that this particular study primarily helps in the process of evaluation of various kinds of investment strategies that can be used by the investors in order to make several decisions regarding investment. Moreover, it has been found that the Random Walk Model is considered as the accurate method for forecasting that might be used by the investors for making several decisions regarding investment. Additionally, it has been depicted that the entire risk evaluation could be organized through both historical and parametric simulation method. Finally, this study also depicts the present trend of USD/ AUD by using the hypothesis and harmonic method.
References
Gomes, S., Jacquinot, P., Mohr, M. and Pisani, M., 2013. Structural reforms and macroeconomic performance in the Euro Area countries: a model?based assessment. International Finance, 16(1), pp.23-44.
Okawa, Y. and Van Wincoop, E., 2012. Gravity in international finance.Journal of international Economics, 87(2), pp.205-215.
Mundy, K. and Menashy, F., 2014. Investing in private education for poverty alleviation: The case of the World Bank's International Finance Corporation.International Journal of Educational Development, 35, pp.16-24.
Tyson, J., Te Velde, D. and Griffiths-Jones, S., 2014. Current and Future Trends In International Finance To Developing Countries. London: ODI.
Kalinowski, T., 2012. Regulating international finance and the diversity of capitalism. Socio-Economic Review, p.mws023.
Isard, P., Razin, A. and Rose, A.K. eds., 2012. International finance and financial crises: essays in honor of Robert P. Flood, Jr. Springer Science & Business Media.
Chi?u, L., Eichengreen, B. and Mehl, A., 2014. History, gravity and international finance. Journal of International Money and Finance, 46, pp.104-129.
Dincer, N.N. and Eichengreen, B., 2012. The architecture and governance of financial supervision: Sources and implications. International Finance, 15(3), pp.309-325.
Gray, H.P. and Richard, S.C. eds., 2014. International finance in the new world order. Elsevier.
Shim, J.K. and Constas, M., 2016. Encyclopedic dictionary of international finance and banking. CRC Press.
Cafaggi, F. and Miller, G.P., 2013. The governance and regulation of international finance. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Philippon, T. and Reshef, A., 2013. An international look at the growth of modern finance. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 27(2), pp.73-96.