The present learning provides a critical analysis of the article named “Half a Defence of Positive Accounting Research” and written and edited by the author, Paul V Dunmore that fundamentally investigates the optimistic approach to the research of accounting. The present section represents the synopsis of the editorial, questions on research, hypothetical structure of the writing along with the consequence and the restriction of the learning and finally the reasoning from the study. The current examination illuminates in extensive detail the optimistic accounting in a broader intellect of a platform of research that fundamentally intends at the developing of a variety of causal designs of human performances in the background of accounting. Yet again, the current study also looks into detail about the ontology along with the epistemology of the program of research and study.
The underlying principle of statistical theory testing is said to be lower and the same is apparently corresponding to the Popper’s production criterion. The universal disputes takes account of casual production of different hypothetical models that wishes to be examined, unwarranted dependence on the underlying principle of theory testing, be deficient of interest in miscellaneous numerical values of diverse considerations, inadequate repetition to guarantee assurance in accepted annotations and the employment of theories for the inspection of the qualitative information rather than designs. The assignment has thus a motive of providing a concise general idea of the article provided. Additionally, the education would have a crucial aim on recognition of the study proposals along with clarification of its value and the modus operandi through which it has drawn closer from the re-examination of literature. To finish off, the theoretical assembly attached with the proposition and inadequacy of the article has been demonstrated briefly.
Summary of the article
The article on “Half a Defence of Positive Accounting Research” significantly assesses the ontology and the epistemology of optimistic study. This piece of writing also takes into description the manner of the present exercise of book-keeping research does not meet up the desires indispensable for functioning of the variety of range of the research program efficiently and successfully (Uno & Bartelmus, 2013). The current examination shed light on comprehensively the constructive accounting in a widespread intelligence of a investigation stand up that essentially intends at the budding and growing of the numerous fundamental illustrations of human performance in the background of accounting (Yee & Khin, 2015). The existing study also investigates miscellaneous reasons of human performance in outsized as well as complicated organizations in which the straight face to face communications are unavoidably replaced with by unfriendly procedures of attainment of information required for judgment making processes.
In accumulation to this, the piece of writing also considers extensive intellectual projects that has both ontological and epistemological hypothesis and becomes aware of the deficiencies connected to the accounting research i.e. positive in nature and that fundamentally put a stop to the equivalent from building constructive contributions to broad schemes and plans. The editorial under contemplation also presents a scientific study plan where logical enquiries are initiated for firm imposition and establishment of the investigation theory (Rogers & Van Buskirk, 2013). Subsequently, the editorial gives further details about the illustrative occurrences of the positive research in the accounting system provided in the study. From then on, the existing paper also explicates in details the perceptions of the technical ontology and the epistemology and implements the misrepresentation and the theory testing and gives explanation about, how assumptions are erroneous. Thereafter, the qualitative optimistic study reflects the reason that to all intents and purposes become conversant with the expansion of initial understanding of definite specific occurrence before making efforts of quantitative capacity. Another purpose of the qualitative optimistic study is to observe theories (Smith, 2014). Subsequently, the underlying principle as well as limitations of statistical proposition is examined and the consequence on the positive study curriculum is also analysing in detailed format. In addition, the learning also clarifies illustratively the needs of a flourishing optimistic research program that fundamentally includes susceptible models tested severely, logical modelling, attentiveness on dimension and duplication (Setyorini & Ishak, 2012). Based on the conclusions of the learning, the current paper ultimately presents the convincing conclusions and the proposals for undergoing the quantitative constructive study.
The investigation questions placed in the active article examines the following ones:
- To scrutinize whether the optimistic research program is a broader theory than the constructive accounting hypothesis
- The coverage to which optimistic research in book-keeping can lend a hand in the accomplishing dissimilar scientific goals
- The behaviour in which the Kuhn’s design of the common science can release or set free the optimistic accounting in achievement of its possibility (Miller & Power, 2013)
- The technique aspects of both the ontology and epistemology guesses can have an effect on the specific program of research
As a result, the research problems outlined for the study are:
- How optimistic research in book-keeping can help in achievement of a variety of the scientific aims and goals?
- How the hypothesizing, testing as well as monitoring within a specific theory as projected by Kuhn can facilitate in energizing positive accounting?
- How both the ontology as well as epistemology characteristics can have an effect on particular program of research?
The current segments demonstrate the hypothetical structure of the study on the optimistic accounting theory. This fundamentally explicates in specifications, the structure or else the configuration that can support the whole theoretical thoughts as well as ideas of the current research teaching (Jones & Aiken, 2015). As such, the hypothetical structure elucidates the base of the research difficulty of the current learning and authenticates diverse theories as well as information that are pertinent for the area under consideration (Bhaskar, 2013). The hypothetical structure of the present piece of writing refers to the justifications regarding the methodical ontology and epistemology concerned in the constructive accounting. The conception of book-keeping deals with the proceeds, income, costs, loss and depreciation and many others. On the other hand, the viewpoint of ontology reflects the piece of evidence that there are fundamental assumptions on the subject of the continuation of realism that basically keep up a correspondence to the idea of realism assumption in viewpoint (Jones, 2015). The presumptions based on the suppositions of ontology can be considered to be deficient in case if one tries to comprehend the implications along with the roles of accounting in business as well as humanity in fine points. On the other hand, it can be inferred that an optimistic ontology and epistemology can possibly turn out to be accurate but are not illogical or else unsound (Bonin, 2013). Optimistic research in field of the communal sciences has to presuppose approaches that can turn a variety of interpretations into well-substantiated causal perceptions.
Significance and Limitation of the article
The existing article lend a hand in gaining profound understanding of the constructive accounting from the wider viewpoint of a investigation program that fundamentally has an intention to build up detailed causal relations of human activities in book-keeping set. This learning also helps to look into deep insight of the academic research scheme under technical research that can lend a hand in understanding the cause and effect associations in the world. The research also facilitates in accepting the scientific study program in both money matters as well as book-keeping that can be illustrated as the optimistic research (Deegan, 2013). The study demonstrates by means of different instances, the piece of information that the optimistic research plan is wider than the Positive book-keeping Theory.
The editorial also assists in achievement of the knowledge concerning different accounting hypothesis and the manner normal skill of Kuhn can be looked upon to be appropriate for the optimistic accounting research. Nevertheless, the most important outputs include statistically important results but fundamentally include uninterruptable coefficient connecting the dissimilar inference dimensions that are not measured to be dependable from one illustration to another (Gaffikin & Aitken, 2014). On the other hand, there are also definite restrictions of the study on the optimistic accounting investigation. The underlying principle behind the arithmetical hypothesis testing related to the Popper’s misrepresentation and deception determination is very feeble. The building of diverse informal theoretical models that are observed is a restraint of the preparation of the optimistic accounting study.
However, there are gaps amid the genuine practice of optimistic accounting research and what is essential for carrying an effectual involvement to the academic program that is offered in the learning. Additionally, the explanation of Kuhn that is illustrating to be appropriate also does not recommend point of view concerning the globe that unavoidably science proposes to look at and can be measured to be a non–practical person in nature (Modell, 2013). Furthermore in addition to this, the association between the conception of ontology of a specific assumption and the reason of reality can be well thought-out to be elusive in nature. Yet another restriction of the learning is that it acknowledged the information that the advancement rate of scientific venture is sluggish. So, in order to completely contribute to the scientific venture, accounting can also make very leisurely advancement and the current progress is also very deceptive in nature (Coad et al., 2016).
The present study has examined that the ontology and the epistemology characteristics of the optimistic research and has taken into reflection a wide variety of current practices of book-keeping that does not congregate the necessary criterion for functioning as a victorious research program. Based on the conclusions of the learning, it can be hereby concluded that dissimilar luxurious models branching from analytical marks cannot be experienced as they are not tractable or are not sufficiently developed. Consequently, as per the learning it can be hereby determined that there is a prerequisite for improved dimension that can be experienced meticulously. Additionally, the optimistic research program also requires incorporating opinion and shift the centre from theory testing as meaning of statistic depends on the specific example that might diverge and cannot be controlled in duplication. In addition, the research also gives the ending that there is requirement for data documentation for the details of different noteworthy concepts and extensive duplication to authenticate winding up from testing of particular theory, conformation of correctness of explorations and enumerations of restrictions of functioning of different research interpretations in optimistic accounting.
Bhaskar, R., 2013. A realist theory of science. Routledge.
Bonin, H., 2013. Generational accounting: theory and application. Springer Science & Business Media.
Coad, A., Coad, A., Jack, L., Jack, L., Kholeif, A. & Kholeif, A., 2016. Strong structuration theory in accounting research. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 29(7), pp.1138-1144..
Deegan, C., 2013. Financial accounting theory. McGraw-Hill Education Australia.
Gaffikin, M. & Aitken, M., 2014. The Development of Accounting Theory (RLE Accounting): Significant Contributors to Accounting Thought in the 20th Century. Routledge.
Jones, S. (Ed.)., 2015. The routledge companion to financial accounting theory. Routledge.
Jones, S., & Aiken, M., 2015. Evolution of early practice descriptive theory in accounting. The Routledge Companion to Financial Accounting Theory, p.91.
Miller, P. & Power, M., 2013. Accounting, organizing, and economizing: Connecting accounting research and organization theory. The Academy of Management Annals, 7(1), pp.557-605.
Modell, S., 2013. Making sense of social practice: theoretical pluralism in public sector accounting research: a comment. Financial Accountability & Management, 29(1), pp.99-110
Rogers, J.L. & Van Buskirk, A., 2013. Bundled forecasts in empirical accounting research. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 55(1), pp.43-65.
Setyorini, C.T. & Ishak, Z., 2012. Corporate social and environmental disclosure: A positive accounting theory view point. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 3(9).
Smith, M., 2014. Research methods in accounting. Sage.
Uno, K., & Bartelmus, P. (Eds.)., 2013. Environmental accounting in theory and practice (Vol. 11). Springer Science & Business Media.
Yee, C.M. & Khin, E.W.S., 2015. Positivist Research and its Influence in Management Accounting Research. Journal of Accounting Perspectives, 3(1).