Class of brain cells that found in the brain cells of monkeys. A group of Italian neuroscientists has discovered this from the cells of monkey in 1992. Later, the researchers presumed that the neuro-cells can be found even in the brain cells of human beings. Moreover, they have opined that the evolution of human language came from the evolution of human mirror cells. Moreover, it is stated that the mirror neurons are the key reasons for the development of human empathy and emotion (Alexandrov, 2009). However, I have observed that the human sensory targets are the results of the feedback of human experiences which opposes the inner link between human neurons and mirror neurons of the monkeys. I have understood that the mirror neurons help the monkeys to imitate others actions. I will enfold this study that the interesting factors of mirror neurons and its relativity with the actions of the human beings. Moreover, this study will unfold the role of memory motor system and its simulation to achieve proper understanding. I have known that a human sensory-motor system works more efficiently than the mirror neurons (DeSalle & Tattersall, 2012).
I have found this study interesting because it will unfold the motor responses of the sporting events in the case of understanding any serious issue. The mirror neuron is found interesting due to its capability to understand and imitate any actions and understand the consequences more easily. However, I have experienced several people try to imitate or copy others actions. It is arguable that whether this attitude is out of observational experiences or out of the effect of the existence of mirror neurons. I have found that the information that is gathered area stored mostly in the motor system. However, the motor system does not store any meaningless information. I have found it interesting that the motor theorists state that our observation of the information is completely based on the grounding of the motor system (Biggs, 2012). On the contrary, the cognitive theorists claim that observed information is not completely based on the grounding the motor system; instead, it is the grasping of the overall concept of the information. Thus, I think the language capability is not by the born capability of the individuals. However, individuals learn from their experiences and aim to imitate the acts of others. I think trying or imitating to spell the unknown words are not as difficult as the sensory-motor saves the words and the actions that are gathered. The ability to speak or imitate others acts do not impact in the perceived contribution. However, I think it is more interesting than the actions contribute more to the external environment. For example, I have the ability to move to move my eyes round and round. I think hearing effects a lot to make the ability to shift the content position of the ear (Coleman, 2012). Thus, I presume that most of these habits are due to sensing the listening observations. I found it interesting that my ears are messed with auditory target speech. Due to this reason, the feedback is disrupted with the timing sent by the brain.
The sensory grounding speeches generally observe the motor speech behavior. I think this is significant because the difficulty in learning and speaking it has the courage to develop language that can be recognized easily. I personally trust that sensory problems in the grounding speech can be justified with a larger framework based on outlining the key solutions (Weyhenmeyer & Gallman, 2007). I have observed that the frameworks can be divided into two parts. The first one signifies the hierarchical order of neuroscience and the next one concentrates on the two different sensory information system.
I speculate that a more flexible behavior is required for high-level circuits which can be understood by dropping the grief without holding this. I think the entire concept is based on the concepts based on the experiences. Moreover, recognizing the basic experiences can be beneficial to understand the invariant features. I speculate the fact the visual system must be more authentic to reach and grasps that are required. The object of recognition is required to do the systems in some different ways. I presume the fact that dorsal stream works as the trajectory movement effortlessly. Thus, the capabilities to develop to produce complex and adaptable movements are registered as the perceptual registrations. Moreover, this impact on the environment that generally guides and evaluates to store the actions and reactions of the past history (DeSalle & Tattersall, 2012). This generally evaluates the current state of mind and past stage of mind. I have speculated the fact that the stream of consciousness is affected by the external environments and resting of human brains is nothing but obtaining the desired level of information and thinking. I speculate that the main part which is necessary for the transmission of the nervous impulse is the motor of the neuron. It is mainly part of the action process of the total nervous system. Thought it is a very little part but it has one of the pivotal roles to play in the system. I think if it is considered independently then it is one of the negligible parts but if it is considered in the total system then it plays one of the major parts of the system. The monometer network is the understanding. I speculate that there should be good coordination between the motor and the non-mortar part for the holistic maintenance of the system (Miller & Levine, 2010).
I speculate that the Mirror neuron theory helps to carry in differentiating the minute details of the reflex arc of the neuron. It helps in understanding between the grasp and the flick for which the motor neuron is responsible. I speculate that the minute details of the action are sensed by the brain through its neural network. It can be explained by the motor neuron theory (Partridge, 2009).
References
Alexandrov, A. (2009). Neuroscience. Philadelphia, Pa.: Saunders.
Biggs, A. (2012). Biology. New York: Glencoe/McGraw-Hill.
Coleman, A. (2012). Neuroscience. Delhi: Research World.
Cook, R. (2016). Brain. New York: G.P. Putman's Sons.
DeSalle, R., & Tattersall, I. (2012). The brain. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Miller, K., & Levine, J. (2010). Biology. Boston, MA: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Partridge, K. (2009). The brain. New York: H.W. Wilson Co.
Weyhenmeyer, J., & Gallman, E. (2007). Neuroscience. Philadelphia: Mosby.
