Discuss About The Recognition Enforcement Of Foreign Arbitral?
The heart of the disagreement was whether or not a UAE real estate developer known as Meydan Group had authentically dismissed an agreement in which Banyan Tree, an associate hotel operator in Singapore, was intended to run a hotel put up by Meydan Group. A settlement clause in the deal offered referral of disagreements to the DIAC. The settlement verdict favored Banyan Tree, founded on the illegal dissolution of the agreement. Nonetheless, Meydan Group did not compensate the hotel operator as agreed, resulting in an application to the DIFC Court by Banyan Tree so as the arbitral award would be acknowledged and enforced. Meydan Group responded by submitting an application that challenged the judgment passed by the DIFC courts.
According to the Articles 42 and 43 of the DIFC Arbitration law No. 1 of 2008, the DIFC courts have the power to identify and impose any arbitral award regardless of where it comes from. This is also applicable in cases where the parties involved have no connection to the DIFC (Blanke & Corm-Bakhos, 2014). The law for that reason spurs the DIFC courts by allowing its judges to diagnose and put into effect any arbitral award, irrespective of the seat. Furthermore, Article 7(3) of the DIFC Arbitration law gives any Emirate a go-ahead to issue regulation essential for the conduct of its undertakings (Padley & Clutterham, 2016).
There exist some outstanding fear that in a follow-on prosecution action, it is possible for the Dubai Courts to depend on a public policy dispute to decline execution of a DIFC approved the award. This argument does not hold any merit since according to Article 7(3) (c) of the amended Judicial Authority Law, such an argument should not be awarded a public policy exemption (de Moura, 2015). It is therefore debatable that if the Dubai Courts had to depend on a public policy disagreement to decline implementation of a DIFC sanctioned award, it would imply that they have dishonored their commitments as articulated in Article 7(3) (c). Moreover, it is disputable that the revised Judicial Authority Law fails to offer a public policy exemption specifically for the reason that if it did, this would be a desecration of the rule of mutual confidence and acknowledgment of judgments, verdicts, and commands. It is worth noting that the Judicial Authority Law clearly restricted any ground for an alternative by the Dubai as well as DIFC Courts as a result of public policy. Thus inclining to a regime built on what can be referred to as mutual trust as well as recognition in the execution of rulings, resolutions, and commands arising from any other parallel court (Aljasmi, 2016).
The UAE public code should ensure that there is ratification of any award provided in UAE by the UAE courts prior to its enforcement. This is because failure to do so will lead to a prolonged and vexing process for the applicant, and as a result, there is a possibility that a domineering judge might give merit to the original decision. This would not be a favorable situation for any appellant, due to the fact that the party has already completed the court process and emerged victorious to what they presumed to be an absolute decision. To sum up, the petitioners in the Banyan Tree case may have been involved in a policy to by-pass the possibly provocative endorsement course in the Dubai courts.
Aljasmi, M. A. (2016). Challenging International Arbitration Awards in UAE Courts on Public Policy Ground (Doctoral dissertation, The British University in Dubai (BUiD)).
Blanke, G., & Corm-Bakhos, S. (2014). Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards in the UAE: Practice and Procedure. BCDR International Arbitration Review, 1(1), 3-27.
De Moura, K. Z. I. (2015). Critical analysis of the UAE Courts' reaction upon accession to the New York Convention (Doctoral dissertation, The British University in Dubai (BUiD)).
Padley, M., & Clutterham, C. (2016). Common Pitfalls of Arbitration in the United Arab Emirates: Interference and Enforcement. Journal of International Arbitration, 33(1), 83-98.
To export a reference to this article please select a referencing stye below:
My Assignment Help. (2018). Recognition Enforcement Of Foreign Arbitral. Retrieved from https://myassignmenthelp.com/free-samples/recognition-enforcement-of-foreign-arbitral.
"Recognition Enforcement Of Foreign Arbitral." My Assignment Help, 2018, https://myassignmenthelp.com/free-samples/recognition-enforcement-of-foreign-arbitral.
My Assignment Help (2018) Recognition Enforcement Of Foreign Arbitral [Online]. Available from: https://myassignmenthelp.com/free-samples/recognition-enforcement-of-foreign-arbitral
[Accessed 20 January 2021].
My Assignment Help. 'Recognition Enforcement Of Foreign Arbitral' (My Assignment Help, 2018) <https://myassignmenthelp.com/free-samples/recognition-enforcement-of-foreign-arbitral> accessed 20 January 2021.
My Assignment Help. Recognition Enforcement Of Foreign Arbitral [Internet]. My Assignment Help. 2018 [cited 20 January 2021]. Available from: https://myassignmenthelp.com/free-samples/recognition-enforcement-of-foreign-arbitral.
At MyAssignmenthelp.com, we understand that when students get stuck with tough assignments, they look for affordable services. To assist students with complex assignments, we have built a team of skilled cheap essay writers. MyAssignmenthelp.com has become one stop solution for all students who often look for answers related to their search similar to do my essay at the cheap rate or who can write my essay at affordable prices. Students prefer hiring us as we have the best provisions to render services related to do my essay online at a reasonable rate.
Answer: Issue The key issue is whether Cliff and Mary can hold Susan liable for the loss suffered by them? Rule The tort of negligence is referred to the civil wrong in which a person suffered a loss due to the failure of another person to take proper care. The innocent party has the right to file a claim against another person in order to demand damages and held him liable for damages. In order to claim damages for negligence, the parties ...
Read MoreAnswer: Legal structure China Australia Legislative system The legal system of China is based on the socialist system and certain civil law model can be observed in this country. According to the statement of People’s Republic of China, China follows the socialist legal system. The apex legal provision in China is the constitution. The present version of the constitution has been adopted in the year 1982 a...
Read MoreAnswer: Introduction: The ordinary income represents the income under the ordinary concepts and hence it is considered taxable under “section 6-5 of the ITAA 1997”. The taxation official in “Scott v CT (1935)” held that income should be ascertained in compliance with the normal perceptions and use of mankind (Woellner et al. 2016). “Section 6-5” states that gains originating from performing o...
Read MoreAnswers: 1.Introduction: Those relationships which are protected by the equity is defined as the fiduciary relationship, and it arise in those situations when one undertaking act in the interest of another undertaking in such manner as it confers the discretion on first undertaking, and this discretion directly affects the economic interest of another undertaking. Fiduciary relationship give rise to the duties in which one person owns the fid...
Read MoreAnswer: 1.J v Attorney This case relates to judicial review done pursuant to the legislative provisions of the Intellectual Disability (Compulsory Care and Rehabilitation) Act 2003. In the case, J was an individual suffering from intellectual disability who was under the care of supervised as well as secure care and who was diagnosed to not stand trial due to his disabilities. Four separate proceedings were initiated by J’s mother who i...
Read MoreJust share requirement and get customized Solution.
Orders
Overall Rating
Experts
Our writers make sure that all orders are submitted, prior to the deadline.
Using reliable plagiarism detection software, Turnitin.com.We only provide customized 100 percent original papers.
Feel free to contact our assignment writing services any time via phone, email or live chat. If you are unable to calculate word count online, ask our customer executives.
Our writers can provide you professional writing assistance on any subject at any level.
Our best price guarantee ensures that the features we offer cannot be matched by any of the competitors.
Get all your documents checked for plagiarism or duplicacy with us.
Get different kinds of essays typed in minutes with clicks.
Calculate your semester grades and cumulative GPa with our GPA Calculator.
Balance any chemical equation in minutes just by entering the formula.
Calculate the number of words and number of pages of all your academic documents.
Our Mission Client Satisfaction
Im certain very pleased with the work done.All my requirements were very in detail meet. Thank you
Australia
You wont believe who just got 93% on the first assignment i asked you guys to do for me. Keep up the good work guys. I'm definitely going to tell my friends
Australia
The outcome was very good and satisfactory.I am planning to submit more assignments in near future.
Australia
Work delivered as requested, ahead of the deadline. Fully referenced, could not have asked for more. Thanks guys & gals!
Australia