Religious studies vs theology
Being closely interrelated academic disciplines in the field of religion, theology and religious studies are usually put individuals in a particular dilemma since both of them consist of typical similarity in something to do with God. Basically religious studies focus on various distinct religious beliefs, places and several behavioural characteristics that are involved with religious concept. It is a significant dimension that deals with many cultural values making it have an inter cultural view of the discipline. It typically demonstrates a simplified explanation of religion and indicates important religious perspectives by enabling many historical accounts (Furseth & Repstad 2017).
Theology on the other hand, in contrast, and the comparison is different since it mostly mainly about God and deity. To many readers, it indicates a very biased field in comparison to religious studies that often understand distinct religious beliefs and behaviours apart from one particular religious view (Furseth & Repstad 2017). This is because religion often takes into consideration mostly on the Protestant and catholic dimensions rather that embracement of all international religions. In that case, religious studies work together with other sectors for example sociology, psychology, history, and various philosophical disciplines. In modern times many learning institutions are composed of theology and religious studies commonly having different approaches utilized by the existing learners. Theology requires learners to have faith while religious studies do not. Theology aims to deepen one's spirituality as it academically examines the religion of the individual (Furseth & Repstad 2017).
The danger of reductionisms
The danger of reductionism definition and detailed description aids in pinpointing the aims and the danger of reductionism. It aims at making the phenomena very meaningful by decreasing its complexity and make it easier (Erren et al 2010). The danger in this case by ensuring the existing phenomena is simplified to increase its meaningfulness, it may result in oversimplifying them.
Furseth, I., & Repstad, P. (2017). An introduction to the sociology of religion: Classical and contemporary perspectives. Routledge.
Erren, T. C., Falaturi, P., & Reiter, R. J. (2010). Research into the chronodisruption-cancer theory: the imperative for causal clarification and the danger of causal reductionism. Neuro endocrinology Letters, 31(1), 1-3.