System thinking is a mechanism to integration that is anchored on the notion that component portions of a given system shall serve differently when isolated from the environment or other portions of the system. It stands in contrast to reductionist and positivist thinking by setting out to perceive systems in a more holistic way. In consistent with philosophy of systems, system thinking circumvents an understanding of a system through the examination of connections and interactions between elements which constitute the system’s whole (Almeida et al. 2017).
Where one encounters situations that are complicated and messy, system thinking becomes of the magic solution in understanding the context systematically. This assists people to view the big picture-from where people might recognize multiple points of leverages addressable to support constructive change. It further assist people acknowledge the link between elements in the situation (Chakrabarty 2017). This acknowledgement allow individuals to support shared actions. The diagram below provides an illustration based on set of links that can effectively introduce people to system thinking and how to manage as well as facilitate system thinking:
System thinking allows individuals to make their comprehension or understanding of social systems explicitly and enhance them in the similar manner that individuals can utilize principles of engineering to establish explicit and enhance their understanding of mechanical systems. The approach of system thinking is substantially distinct from the traditional analytical forms (Chang et al. 2017).
Whereas traditional analysis emphasizes on the separating the individual pieces of what is under study; indeed the phrase “analysis” is derived from the root meaning ‘to break into constituent parts’, system thinking on the other hand, emphasizes on how the underlying thing under study interacts with the rest of the system’s constituents (Gregory and Miller 2014). This implies that rather than isolating smaller and smaller portions of the system under study, system thinking works through the expansion of view to consider larger and larger quantities of interactions as a matter is studied.
This system approach culminates in distinct conclusion than the ones produced by traditional analytical forms, particularly when subject of the study is dynamically sophisticated or has great deal of both external and internal feedbacks. The character of this approach makes it increasingly effective to solve the foremost challenging types of problems: those encompassing complex issues, and those which rely on great deal reliance on past or actions of other stakeholders, as well as the ones deriving from ineffective coordination amid stakeholders (Partridge et al. 2017).
The wicked problem is the major challenge for system thinking model: The action intended to get the solution to the underlying problem actually ends up being worse since the manner its unintended side effects alter system ends up exacerbating the same problem (Sun, Hyland and Cui 2014).
Various significant problems plaguing people today remain complex and involve multiple stakeholders, and are at minimum partially the outcome of previous actions which were undertaken to alleviate them. Dealing with these wicked problems remains notoriously challenging and the consequence of traditional conventional solutions remain often poor enough to establish discouragement regarding the prospects of ever efficient and effective in addressing them (Sahin et al. 2017).
One single most benefit of system thinking relies on its ability to deal efficiently with just such types of wicked problems as well as to raise the thinking of people to the degree at which people create the outcomes they need as individual along with organization even in such challenging contexts marked by sophisticated, huge quantity of interactions, besides the absence or inefficiencies of instantly obvious solutions.
System thinking and practice essentially ‘sees’ the world in a given manner, since how people ‘see’ things influences the manner in which people approach contexts or undertake particular chores. System thinking and practice allows people to learn about problems of system definition as well as meeting certain core concepts utilized in theories of system: boundary, positive and negative feedback and environment. The overacting question, therefore, is “does system thinking really solve challenges of sustainability?”
For many of us, it remain seldom to go through a single day before hearing the phrase “sustainability’” or “green” which have become “catch-all phrases” applicable to any sector. Nonetheless, the underlying notions as well as needs remain common. This draws this study to take into account and act beyond time, borders and individual’s needs. As it has been acknowledged that critical state of the environment, social and economic system is additionally reinforced by rising complexity, uncertainty and velocity, system thinking practices becomes an inevitable approach to sustainability.
As has been explicated above, system thinking remains a trans-disciplinary “framework for viewing inter-relationships instead of things, for viewing trends of change instead of static snapshots”. Systems thinkers will frame a challenge or problem in regards to behavior patterns over time, rather than emphasizing on a given event. Rather than microscopic, system thinkers strive for microscopic, viewing beyond the particulars to the situation of relationships whereby they are embedded. It is increasingly used by both practitioners and academics in equal measures to address sustainability challenges.
Nevertheless, similar to any novel problem-solving approaches, system thinking approach has certain criticisms. Assumption against system thinking is that it is more of too fundamentalist “characterizing a fundamentally technocratic perception of business problems”. Its reliance on models as well as being deprived of actual solutions is a major threat to system thinking legitimacy in the corporate boardrooms as well as management education. Nevertheless, system thinking is successful when it builds from first diagnosing the problem to figure out how to fix the problem and succeed to implement the solution with the already known outcomes for sustainability challenges.
Applying System Thinking to Shifting to more Renewable Sources of Energy
Shifting to more renewable sources of energy is a wicked problem that can be solved through system. System thinking can be used to promote renewable energy along with sustainability. The systems analysis as well as thinking is perceived as a hub for integrating between society, environment as well as technology. A system approach to energy policy design as well as implementation is appropriate when shifting to the renewables sources of energy.
Via a system thinking approach, this shift advances from problem diagnoses before effective implementation. For example, system thinking has allowed the policymakers to acknowledge that the landscape in the energy sector is changing. Accordingly, it has recommended an active planning of these changes as a significant approach to capture the potential of renewable technologies as well as promotion of efficiency.
The system thinking has helped acknowledge the requirements for a sustainable energy path: it needs less fossil or more renewable technologies and enhanced resource and energy efficiency. It further needs lower carbon intensity and convergence of energy use per capita. It also needs effective and efficient markets capable of delivering reliable services and security of energy supply. Diagnoses has also uncover that sustainable energy path needs better integration of natural and human system to ensure lower impacts on the health and environment.
Evolving from the diagnoses of the needs above, a system thinking has subsequently helped in designing policies that effective transform the energy sector by facilitating the achievement of the sustainable energy path already mentioned (Willsteed et al. 2017). Once this is done, the system thinking allows for the creation of innovative mechanism that promote sustainable energy systems. For example, examples of these mechanisms include electricity certificate systems, trading emission, standardization like biofuels, flexible mechanisms like Kyoto Protocol, well-functioning electricity market, research programs including pilot plants, municipal eco-energy programme, local and regional energy offices and voluntary activity with the industry.
System approach also diagnoses the environmental degradation economic manifestation and highlight their underlying causes as market failures and policy. This will help the problem by ensuring that these failures are prevented. For example, ensuring multiple and superior utilization of a resource rather and recycling, no loss of unique sites and habitats, and non-use of renewable resource as extractive resource and getting rid of waste and inefficiency coupled with scarcity (Sahin et al. 2017).
The system thinking approach also enables the effective search for synergies. This is done by acknowledging the need for collaborative approach among market restructuring, technological challenge and sustainable development. These three components have shared aspects that must be done. There is a need to have effective resource management, multiple utilization of resources, structural changes in exchange flows between human and natural systems alongside having effective energy, climate as well as development technology (Meadows, Sweeney and Mehers 2016).
Under technological challenges, the system thinking allows for effective conversion processes as well as performance, application, resource management and improved efficiency. Under market restructuring, the optimization of applications in competitive markets, project structure along with finance, risk management as well as institutions are part of critical synergies. Under the sustainable development, the system recommends biodiversity, socio-economic development in rural regions, economic robustness of local as well as global systems as well as climate change mitigation as well as adaptation (Mälkki and Alanne 2017). The analysis of synergies searching is effective since it reveals that energy system transformation is insufficient and hence recommends the need for reinvention of infrastructure systems and cities along with rural areas.
The reinvention of rural areas recommended by system thinking approach remains key in the development pf bioenergy as well as achievement of sustainable development. The system thinking suggest that rural areas’ reinvention requires enhanced resource efficiency as well as integrated approach to forestry and agriculture with the role of food production and energy (Oncel 2017). System thinking approach also approach sustainable energy solutions via a motivated framework beyond their corresponding technical performance, economic efficiency as well as environmental benefits to make it more appealing in the context of both regional development as well as multiple benefits to the society (Kumanyika, Parker and Sim 2010). It further suggests the need to promote energy transactions to get rid of market failures.
The system thinking approach gives effective environmental impacts assessment of energy systems. It acknowledges that this major shift to renewable energy for instance, from biomass requires novel tools for restricting the environmental impact of intensive systems of harvesting. It takes into account any decision made relating to forest energy supply that subsequently has a prominent effect on energy systems (Iychettira, Hakvoort and Linares 2017).
The goal of system thinking approach is to develop particular tools essential in both planning and decision making which integrate data from environmental databases into the scientific knowledge of consequences of environmental intensive energy harvesting. The system thinking does this by bringing all the stakeholder on board including the forest research institutes to solve the wicked problem (Lai and McCulloch 2017).
The system thinking approach is also relevant in understanding the systems shifts as well as system interactions. It recognizes that efficient along with sustainable energy solutions require an understanding of interactions between community, several infrastructure systems as well as natural environment. The skirmishes relating to water use and river management, will emerge as the utilization of novel renewable energy sources rises. Energy systems remain likely to emerge differently in diverse countries. System thinking approach avails the useful understanding of technological path for the industries when grabbing market opportunities in diverse nations (Holmstedt, Brandt and Robèrt 2017).
In conclusion, from the above discussion, it can be categorically stated that systems thinking is essential in developing solutions to challenges of sustainability. This has been clearly been demonstrated by picking the wicked problem relating to the enormous shift to renewable sources of energy. It has been shown that unlike a traditional approaches, a system thinking is effective in advancing this shift by building its implementation from problems diagnoses and then move further to implement the scheme which aligns to sustainability in the best way possible.
Almeida, C.M.V.B., Agostinho, F., Huisingh, D. and Giannetti, B.F., 2017. Cleaner Production towards a sustainable transition. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142, pp.1-7.
Chakrabarty, D., 2017. The politics of climate change is more than the politics of capitalism. Theory, Culture & Society, p.0263276417690236.
Chang, R.D., Zuo, J., Zhao, Z.Y., Zillante, G., Gan, X.L. and Soebarto, V., 2017. Evolving theories of sustainability and firms: History, future directions and implications for renewable energy research. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 72, pp.48-56.
Gregory, A. and Miller, S., 2014. Using Systems Thinking to Educate for Sustainability in a Business School. Systems, 2(3), pp.313-327.
Holmstedt, L., Brandt, N. and Robèrt, K.H., 2017. Can Stockholm Royal Seaport be part of the puzzle towards global sustainability?–From local to global sustainability using the same set of criteria. Journal of Cleaner Production, 140, pp.72-80.
Iychettira, K.K., Hakvoort, R.A. and Linares, P., 2017. Towards a comprehensive policy for electricity from renewable energy: An approach for policy design. Energy Policy, 106, pp.169-182.
Kumanyika, S., Parker, L. and Sim, L., 2010. Defining the problem: the importance of taking a systems perspective.
Lai, C.S. and McCulloch, M.D., 2017. Levelized cost of electricity for solar photovoltaic and electrical energy storage. Applied Energy, 190, pp.191-203.
Mälkki, H. and Alanne, K., 2017. An overview of life cycle assessment (LCA) and research-based teaching in renewable and sustainable energy education. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 69, pp.218-231.
Meadows, D., Sweeney, L.B. and Mehers, G.M., 2016. The Climate Change Playbook: 22 Systems Thinking Games for More Effective Communication about Climate Change. Chelsea Green Publishing.
Oncel, S.S., 2017. Green energy engineering: Opening a green way for the future. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142, pp.3095-3100.
Partridge, T., Thomas, M., Harthorn, B.H., Pidgeon, N., Hasell, A., Stevenson, L. and Enders, C., 2017. Seeing futures now: Emergent US and UK views on shale development, climate change and energy systems. Global Environmental Change, 42, pp.1-12.
Sahin, O., Siems, R., Richards, R.G., Helfer, F. and Stewart, R.A., 2017. Examining the potential for energy-positive bulk-water infrastructure to provide long-term urban water security: A systems approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 143, pp.557-566.
Sahin, O., Stewart, R.A., Giurco, D. and Porter, M.G., 2017. Renewable hydropower generation as a co-benefit of balanced urban water portfolio management and flood risk mitigation. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 68, pp.1076-1087.
Sun, D., Hyland, P. and Cui, H., 2014. A designed framework for delivering systems thinking skills to small business managers. Systems, 2(3), pp.297-312.
Willsteed, E., Gill, A.B., Birchenough, S.N. and Jude, S., 2017. Assessing the cumulative environmental effects of marine renewable energy developments: Establishing common ground. Science of The Total Environment, 577, pp.19-32.
To export a reference to this article please select a referencing stye below:
My Assignment Help. (2018). Systems Developing Solutions . Retrieved from https://myassignmenthelp.com/free-samples/systems-developing-solutions.
"Systems Developing Solutions ." My Assignment Help, 2018, https://myassignmenthelp.com/free-samples/systems-developing-solutions.
My Assignment Help (2018) Systems Developing Solutions [Online]. Available from: https://myassignmenthelp.com/free-samples/systems-developing-solutions
[Accessed 30 March 2020].
My Assignment Help. 'Systems Developing Solutions ' (My Assignment Help, 2018) <https://myassignmenthelp.com/free-samples/systems-developing-solutions> accessed 30 March 2020.
My Assignment Help. Systems Developing Solutions [Internet]. My Assignment Help. 2018 [cited 30 March 2020]. Available from: https://myassignmenthelp.com/free-samples/systems-developing-solutions.
For years, MyAssignmenthelp.com has been operating as one of the cheap assignment help providers in the USA. We are one of the best college paper writing services that keep service price minimal. We do not let the affordability of our service to hamper the standard of our work. We have separate teams of experts to provide report writing help . At MyAssigenmnthelp.com, we believe in earning credibility, so students can pay for assignments only after getting satisfied solutions. Tough assignments bother you? Trust us with your project. You will not regret paying us to write assignments for you.
Answer: Introduction Sexual harassment takes account of behaviours from glances and inappropriate comments, jokes majorly based on gender stereotypes to sexual assault and other acts of physical violence. The addition to the principle of human dignity in Catholic social teaching has been the notion of unity and solidarity. Moreover, the assurance of personal dignity positions on protections ensured by the society. According to Triana et al. (...Read More
Answer: The Post The Fitbit is an accessory health device which is quite popular with respect to the fact that, health and fitness has become a premium industry. The Fitbit business started back in 2009 and gained utmost popularity in those days. The business model of the firm aims to provide a differentiated product to the different customers with various health data in return which can be useful in measuring the overall health and fitness a...Read More
Answer: The selected product overview L’Or`eal S.A is a France based personal care company the headquarter of which is located in Clichy, Hauts –de –Seine. The company was founded by Eugene Schueller in the year 1909. The CEO of the company is Jean –Paul Agon and by the year 2017, the company has gathered revenues up to 4. 676 billion Euros. It has been considered as one of the largest brands in the c...Read More
Answer: Introduction: Price water house coopers is a professional services provider, which is a multinational company networked with firms in more than 158 nations. The services provided by the company include capital markets, audit and assurance, financial counseling, financial solutions, improved decision making, and many more services to private and public clients (pwc, 2019). Diversification strategy There are various types o...Read More
Answer: Introduction Communication can be defined as the exchange of information that takes place between a sender and a receiver (Habermas, 2015). With the emergence of technology, the process of sharing information has shifted from face- to- face interaction or paper work to the use of electronic media. Communication that takes place with the help of electronic media is known as electronic communication or e- communication. The term communi...Read More
Just share your requirements and get customized solutions on time.
Our writers make sure that all orders are submitted, prior to the deadline.
Using reliable plagiarism detection software, Turnitin.com.We only provide customized 100 percent original papers.
Feel free to contact our assignment writing services any time via phone, email or live chat.
Our writers can provide you professional writing assistance on any subject at any level.
Our best price guarantee ensures that the features we offer cannot be matched by any of the competitors.
Get all your documents checked for plagiarism or duplicacy with us.
Get different kinds of essays typed in minutes with clicks.
Calculate your semester grades and cumulative GPa with our GPA Calculator.
Balance any chemical equation in minutes just by entering the formula.
Calculate the number of words and number of pages of all your academic documents.
Our Mission Client Satisfaction
Awesome write up for my assignment!!! Worth the money paid!!! Will come back .....
I really appreciate how the editor understood what I really meant to say thus making me feel more confident in submitting my work. I am an extremely happy customer. I will definitely sen un update on my grade.
Excellent work. We got total of 68 marks and we are very satisfied with the score. We gave this assignment near to deadline which is 2 days before due date. The assignment was about 4000 words and they did it well and gave it before 8 hours of submis...
I can\'t complain, speedy service and got the assignment before the deadline and got full mark