$20 Bonus + 25% OFF
Securing Higher Grades Costing Your Pocket? Book Your Assignment at The Lowest Price Now!

Taxation Law And Fringe Benefit Tax

tag 0 Download9 Pages / 2,056 Words tag Add in library Click this icon and make it bookmark in your library to refer it later. GOT IT


Discuss about the Taxation Law And Fringe Benefit Tax.



The central issue in the present case is to offer an advice to employee Charlie and employer Shine Homes Pty Ltd (Shiny Homes) for the fringe benefits consequences for the given events for the income year 2017.


Fringe benefits are the non- cashable benefits (for personal use) which are extended on the part of the employer to their employee during their employment with the company. These types of benefits result fringe benefit tax liability on the employer. The various fringe benefits are highlighted in the Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 (Cth) “FBTAA86.” The various relevant fringe benefits and their respective FBT computation is discussed below.

Car Fringe Benefit

When an employer has provided car to the employee for his/her own personal usage, then it is termed as car fringe benefit. Tax Ruling TR 96/26 indicates the various aspects related to the Car Fringe Benefit and the computation of the Fringe Benefit Tax (FBT) liability on the part of employer (CCH, 2013). The necessary steps related to the computation of fringe benefit tax liability are highlighted below.

  • Total duration of utilization of private use of car in the assessment year

It is essential to find the actual date on which the car is available for the personal usage of employee.  According to section 7 of FBTAA86, the private usage of car is assumed in any of the following two circumstances (Woellner, 2014).

  • Actual car use for personal work by the employee
  • The date on which the car has been offered to employee for personal utilization. In this case, the date on which car is offered would be taken into consideration irrespective of the fact that whether the employee has started using car for personal purposes or not.

Additionally, there are certain implicit situations which also hint towards private usage. For instance, the parking of the car owned by the employer at the employee’s residence garage on aa regular basis automatically implies that the said employee has the authorization for personal use of car irrespective of an actual permission being extended. As per Section 7, FBTAA, the assumption of car being available for use in personal purposes can also be made when the residence is used as office (Gilders et. al., 2016). Also, on account of previous rulings, the use of car provided by the employer by employee for commutation between home and work amount to personal use of car which leads to FBT liability on employer (CCH, 2013).


Also, it is crucial to highlight the deductions in private usage. The private usage availability is hampered only when the car is in the workshop to undergo serious repairs which are typically caused when there is some accident leading to vehicle being damaged badly. It is noteworthy that regular services along with trivial maintenance issues do not provide any deduction in private use (Sadiq et. al., 2016).

  • Determination of the taxable amount of FBT related to extension of car fringe benefit

There are two methods which the employer may use in order to determine the taxable fringe benefit. These are outlined below.

  • Statutory Formula Method – This method involves determination of taxable value on the basis of the statutory rate multiplied with the car’s base value as highlighted in section 9, FBTAA. The complete formula is as indicated below (Deutsch et. al., 2016).

Car Fringe Benefit Taxable Value = (Base value of car * Applicable statutory percentage *(Days of private purpose/365)) – Employee Contribution 

The discussion about the various inputs mentioned in the above formula is carried out below.

  • The car base value is often assumed to be price at which the car is bought. However, there are certain other costs which are included such as accessories cost which are not related to business, delivery charger paid to the dealer and GST applicable on the same. Further, according to Section 9 FBTAA, the expense on registration and stamp duty is not included in the base value. Although on account of general wear and tear the value of the car diminishes but instead of annual depreciation, a one third base value reduction is possible to claim after four years have elapsed with no depreciation charged (Sadiq et. al., 2016).
  • Before May, 2011, the statutory percentage was determined taking into consideration the distances travelled in the consideration year. However, post May 11, 2011, the statutory percentage is independent of the distance travelled and instead levied at a flat rate of 90% in accordance with section 9, FBTAA (Barkoczy, 2017).
  • The private usage days have already been discussed in the previous section but computation of these is done between April 1 and March 31 as FBT year is separate from tax year. Also, these days are then divided by 365 to estimate the yearly duration of private car use (CCH, 2013).
  • It may so happen that certain operating costs related to fuel, repair may be paid by the employee and in such cases a deduction needs to be made for the same as per Section 9, FBTAA (Gilders et. al., 2016).

Operating Cost Method

The basic approach of this method is to determine the taxable value by computing the operating costs that have been spent in the given FBT year and multiply by a suitable percentage (Woellner, 2014).  The choice of percentage is essentially driven by the private use extent. Hence, higher is the personal use, higher would be the percentage value and higher would be the taxable value of the fringe benefit extended to the employee as per Section 10, FBTAA. The formula used in this method is outlined below (Gilders et. al., 2016).

Car Fringe Benefit Taxable Value = (Cumulative operating costs * Percentage) – Employee contribution

In the above two methods, it is the taxpayer who has the choice to decide on the method leading to lesser FBT payable. With regards to the operating cost method, it has to be specified at the commencement of private usage that this method would be used. The statutory formula method primarily is the one which is commonly in use (Barkoczy, 2017).

FBT payable computation in relation to the car fringe benefit

The above computed taxable value of the fringe benefit is then used to compute the FBT payable at the end of the employer as illustrated below (Sadiq et. al., 2016).

FBT payable by the employer = Car Fringe Benefit Taxable Value * Rate of FBT * Gross up factor

The fringe benefit tax rate tends to alter from year to year but for the current computations, the rate applied would be 49% applicable for the year ending on March 31, 2017. In relation to the gross up factor, two options exist based on the underlying good type. Goods that tend to levied GST have a higher gross up factor in comparison with those which are not levied GST. Since a car cost attracts GST, hence the higher gross up factor of 2.1463 would be used (Barkoczy, 2017).


Expense Related Fringe Benefit

The above fringe benefit when the employer tends to bear expenses which would be considered as private for the employee and should ideally be borne by the employee. This may involve several benefits such as payment of expenses like children fee. The applicable provisions in this relation are outlined in Section 20 FBTAA. According to this section, the computation of the FBT payable by the employer on account of this is highlighted below (Gilders et. al., 2016).

FBT payable by the employer = Expense borne by employer * Rate of FBT * Gross up factor

Again the value of gross of factor would essentially be driven by the presence or absence of GST on the underlying goods.

Car Parking Fringe Benefit

The car parking fringe benefits are extended when certain conditions outlined in the tax ruling TR96/26 are satisfied  These include that duration of car parking must be for atleast four hours and lie between morning 7 am and evening 7 am. Also, the parking benefits are extended to car controlled by the employee on account of the employment. Further, it is also necessary that this place of car parking must be in close proximity of the employment primary place. Also, section 39A, FBTAA levies additional two conditions for the realisation of the car parking benefits. One condition is that the venue of car parking must lie within a radius of 1km in respect of the employer’s car park provided (CCH, 2013). Also, the lowest fee for parking must exceed the annual threshold value which amounts to $ 8.48 for the FBT year ending on March 31, 2017 as per TD 2016/17 (Barkoczy, 2017). While based on the extent and type of data available, various methods can be used to compute the car parking fringe benefits, but the one relevant to the given situation is the market value approach based on which the following formula is valid (Woellner, 2014).

Car Parking Fringe Benefit Taxable Value = Car parking market value –Contribution from employee

FBT payable by the employer = Car Parking Fringe Benefit Taxable Value * Rate of FBT * Gross up factor



Car Fringe Benefit

The car owned by company was parked at Charlie’s own garage and hence, it can be said that Charlie can utilize the car.  It is apparent from this fact that employer Shine Homes Pty Ltd has provided car to its employee Charlie for personal utilization. Hence, the fringe benefits liability would be applicable on the part of Shine Homes Pty Ltd. The computation of car fringe benefits tax liability is highlighted below:

Date at which car (Sedan) has provided to Charlie = September 1, 2016

Value of car = $70,000

The total number of days on which the car has been used by Charlie i.e. from September 1, 2016 to March 31, 2017 = 212 days

Deduction in private usage would be made for the 2 week spent in workshop in February but not for 2 days during Christmas as the former was major repair and latter was regular service.

Annual private usage during FBT year ending on March 31, 2017 = 212 – 14 = 198 days

Taxable value as per statutory formula method = = 70000*0.20*(198/365) = $ 7,594.52

The same also needs to be determined in accordance with the operating cost method so as to allow the employer to choose the better option.

Operating cost borne by company during private usage = 5500*7 (Petrol & Repairs) + 240*(7/12) (Registration)+ 960*(7/12) (Insurance) = $ 39,200

Taxable value as per operating cost method = 39200*0.3 (Extent of private use) = $ 11,760

The statutory method is the better method as it results in lower FBT related tax outflow for the company,

FBT payable by the employer (Car Fringe Benefit) = 7594.52*0.49*2.1463 = $ 7,987.06

Expense Related Fringe Benefit

The employer has spent the money on the following two.

  • Hiring a car in the week of marriage for Charlie ($1,000)
  • Paying for honeymoon accommodation ($ 3,000)

It is apparent that the above are expense of personal type which ought to be spent by Charlie himself. Hence, the payment of these constitutes a expense related fringe benefit for which the company would have to pay FBT. The computation in this regards is highlighted below.

FBT payable by the employer (Expense Related Fringe Benefit) = (3000+1000)*0.49* 2.1463 = $ 4,206.75

Car Parking Fringe Benefit

Based on the given facts, it is apparent that the employer is provided car park by a third party to the employee Charlie who uses the company owned car for private purposes. Also considering the $ 200 weekly charge, it is evident that the rate per day is significantly higher than the applicable value which is acting as the threshold for the FBT year ending on March 31, 2017.

Considering the weekly parking charges of $ 200, the benefit has been extended for 28 weeks leading to a taxable value of $ 5,600.

FBT payable by the employer (Car Parking Fringe Benefit) = 5600 * 0.49 * 2.1463= $ 5,889.45


In line with the discussion of relevant law and the computations performed, it is apparent that total FBT liability to the tune of $ 18,083. 26 (i.e. 5889.45+ 4206.75 + 7987.06) is payable by the employer while Charlie has no tax liability arising on account of the events highlighted.



Statutes & Tax Rulings

Fringe Benefit Tax Assessment Act, 1986 (Cth)

TR 96/26

TD 2016/17


Barkoczy, S. (2017), Foundation of Taxation Law 2017 (9thedition), North Ryde: CCH Publications

CCH (2013), Australian Master Tax Guide 2013 (51st edition), Sydney: Wolters Kluwer

Deutsch, R., Freizer, M., Fullerton, I., Hanley, P., and Snape, T. (2016), Australian tax handbook (8th edition), Pymont: Thomson Reuters,

Gilders, F., Taylor, J., Walpole, M., Burton, M. and Ciro, T. (2016), Understanding taxation law 2016 (9th edition), Sydney: LexisNexis/Butterworths.

Sadiq, K, Coleman, C, Hanegbi, R, Jogarajan, S, Krever, R, Obst, W, and Ting, A (2016) , Principles of Taxation Law 2016 (8th edition), Pymont: Thomson Reuters

Woellner, R (2014), Australian taxation law 2014 (7th edition), North Ryde: CCH Australia


Cite This Work

To export a reference to this article please select a referencing stye below:

My Assignment Help. (2019). Taxation Law And Fringe Benefit Tax. Retrieved from

"Taxation Law And Fringe Benefit Tax." My Assignment Help, 2019,

My Assignment Help (2019) Taxation Law And Fringe Benefit Tax [Online]. Available from:
[Accessed 25 May 2020].

My Assignment Help. 'Taxation Law And Fringe Benefit Tax' (My Assignment Help, 2019) <> accessed 25 May 2020.

My Assignment Help. Taxation Law And Fringe Benefit Tax [Internet]. My Assignment Help. 2019 [cited 25 May 2020]. Available from: has been satisfying students' needs over a decade now. With years of experience in providing assignment help, we are capable of understanding students' requirements better and fulfill them perfectly. To meet the students' needs, we have appointed 3000+ experts, who cover more than 100 subjects while assignment help. Some of our popular services include corporate finance assignment help, MATLAB assignment help, database assignment help, operating system assignment help and web development assignment help.

Latest Tax Samples

LAW300 Environmental Law (8)

Download : 0 | Pages : 7
  • Course Code: LAW300
  • University: Charles Sturt University
  • Country: Australia

Question: Introduction A receipts that a taxpayer receives from the employment and from giving any personal services is subjected to taxation on income for the employee. As defined in “sec 6-5, ITA Act 1997” ordinary income refers income on the bass of ordinary concepts. The commissioner in “CT v Scoot (1935)” held that interpretation of income must be made on the basis of the ordinary concepts (Barkoczy 2014). A ...

Read More arrow

HI6028 Taxation Theory, Practice And Law T3

Download : 0 | Pages : 10
  • Course Code: HI6028
  • University: Holmes Institute
  • Country: Australia

Answers: Question 1 Provisions related with partnership firm Statement showing the computation of the net income of the partnership for the year ended 30June 2017 Particulars Amount ($) Total sales (cash and credit)                                   &nbs...

Read More arrow

LAW 303 Taxation Law

Download : 0 | Page : 1
  • Course Code: LAW303
  • University: Cornell University
  • Country: United States


Answer to A:



Answer to B:

Answer to C:

Answer to D:

Answer to E:

Answer to question 2:

Answer to question 3:



Barkoczy, S., 2016. Core tax legislation and study guide. OUP Catalogue.

Woellner, R., Barkoczy, S., Murphy, S., Evans, C. and Pinto, D., 2016. Australian Taxation Law 2016. OUP Catalogue.

Read More arrow

HI6028 Taxation Theory Practice And Law 2018

Download : 0 | Pages : 7

Answer: Introduction The fundamental problem to this instance is linked to estimate the net sum of earnings that is grossed by the partners all over the year of assessment and to conclude the dispersal of incomes amongst the partners. Rule: “Division 5 of the ITAA 1936” commence with the “section 90”, that explains partnership is not the separate legal company within the purview of genera law and do not pay taxe...

Read More arrow

HI6028 Taxation Theory Practice And Law

Download : 0 | Pages : 7

Answer: The objective of this case study is to appropriately treat the business receipts of the partnerships on the basis of the ordinary income and statutory income that is paid to the partners. Rule: There is a chief depiction that has been in the “sec-90, ITA Act 1936” that the partnership on making the net income is responsible for assessment of its taxable income given the partners are the resident taxpayers following t...

Read More arrow

Save Time & improve Grade

Just share Requriment and get customize Solution.

We will use e-mail only for:

arrow Communication regarding your orders

arrow To send you invoices, and other billing info

arrow To provide you with information of offers and other benefits




Overall Rating



Our Amazing Features


On Time Delivery

Our writers make sure that all orders are submitted, prior to the deadline.


Plagiarism Free Work

Using reliable plagiarism detection software, only provide customized 100 percent original papers.


24 X 7 Live Help

Feel free to contact our assignment writing services any time via phone, email or live chat.


Services For All Subjects

Our writers can provide you professional writing assistance on any subject at any level.


Best Price Guarantee

Our best price guarantee ensures that the features we offer cannot be matched by any of the competitors.

Our Experts

Assignment writing guide
student rating student rating student rating student rating student rating 4/5

248 Order Completed

100% Response Time

Lloyd Bernabe

MSc in Accounting

London, United Kingdom

Hire Me
Assignment writing guide
student rating student rating student rating student rating student rating 5/5

1265 Order Completed

97% Response Time

James Cook

Masters in Management

Wellington, New Zealand

Hire Me
Assignment writing guide
student rating student rating student rating student rating student rating 5/5

416 Order Completed

95% Response Time

Tyler Moore

MBA in Accounting

Washington, United States

Hire Me
Assignment writing guide
student rating student rating student rating student rating student rating 5/5

134 Order Completed

95% Response Time

Thomas Nelson

MS in Information Systems Technology with Specialization in Database Administration

New Jersey, United States

Hire Me

FREE Tools


Plagiarism Checker

Get all your documents checked for plagiarism or duplicacy with us.


Essay Typer

Get different kinds of essays typed in minutes with clicks.


GPA Calculator

Calculate your semester grades and cumulative GPa with our GPA Calculator.


Chemical Equation Balancer

Balance any chemical equation in minutes just by entering the formula.


Word Counter & Page Calculator

Calculate the number of words and number of pages of all your academic documents.

Refer Just 5 Friends to Earn More than $2000

Check your estimated earning as per your ability




Your Approx Earning

Live Review

Our Mission Client Satisfaction

The finished product of my assignment was impressive! No stone was left unturned from the required rubric. Easy to follow, original material, and thorough, not to mention, completed more than 24hrs before the requested time. THANKS TO MY MAH EXPERT! ...


User Id: 383727 - 25 May 2020


student rating student rating student rating student rating student rating

THANKS Very timely completion. The attitude of the experts is very good, and it is found that the job requirements are different at different times. The experts completed the new requirements in a short time.


User Id: 419166 - 25 May 2020


student rating student rating student rating student rating student rating

thanks for helpingto get good marks in all the work. i have got good marks. i hope u will provide good work in future


User Id: 365675 - 25 May 2020


student rating student rating student rating student rating student rating

Met the requirements for the assignment. I would definitely recommend this website.


User Id: 278516 - 25 May 2020


student rating student rating student rating student rating student rating
callback request mobile
Have any Query?