Comparing And Contrasting Knowledge As Possession And Practice Views In Knowledge Management Essay.

Definition and meanings of knowledge as possession and knowledge as practice

Compare and contrast the knowledge as a possession view and knowledge as a practice view.

The purpose of this report is to compare and contrast the knowledge as a possession view and knowledge as a practice view. For a total discussion, this report provides a fair definition of the first two views. In addition, the meaning of these views is added according to the relation management and innovative concepts. Further, the report identifies two seekers' seekers and disadvantages. Eventually, the report will link two views to a search supply chain, and discussions will be expanded with examples of various issues. Based on the total discussion and comparison, the main points for the report will be provided.

There are two views in Knowledge Management Research: Knowledge-taking and the study of knowledge. In the past, it is believed that knowledge can be used as a source, by which it can be easily acquired and reversed, easily acquired, accumulated, and transferred from one location to another. Still, it can be problematic if it is necessary to use knowledge for Tesco, it is beneficial to the Tesco and it is necessary to apply in the supply chain to the side of the existing strength. In contrast, knowledge based knowledge systems emphasize knowledge and debate is a social and Tesco organizational activity (Shashi & Singh, 2015). Knowing is understood as a semantic creation process, where knowledge of people in specific social contexts is ambiguous and dynamic, depending on specific meaning and meaning, because individuals and references change. Therefore, improvements and innovations depend on the understanding and validity of a person's social and political interests and knowledge; And on how the activities, individuals and references merge (Dotson, 2018). The supply chain material is primarily focused on source dependence. This power is considered to be a more widely used source than others; the assets of the suppliers in the exchange of the suppliers are given to the property or the negotiators. The supply of Tesco organization has been recognized in relation to the performance of the chain and the impact of power-base as well as the connection between power-centralization, agency and information sharing (Hugos, 2018). However, it is also necessary to explore the process of power, meaning and system dimensions. These are based on the socially and politically assisted nature of society, including the right to work. Here, by selecting or excluding others from the decision of power, the Tesco’s organizational symbol and decision making process can be used by validating the selected activities that influence the integration of knowledge. Still, although some studies have considered different power dimensions, there is no clear insight into the deployment of many dimensions of power in some supply chain (Kozlenkova, Hult, Lund, Mena & Kekec, 2015).

Relation to management and innovation concepts

Pull out the artistry of practicing practice and suggests that Tesco’s organizational knowledge is created through a common dance between knowledge and knowledge. The clear, silent, individual and group knowledge are different, each task cannot do to others. Only clear knowledge is inadequate and lack of clear knowledge, knowledge about crime was closed loop. A person who is part of the known things about a specific area, a part of the knowledge is in the possession of the Tesco’s organization and is drawn into his actions, just as a person finds himself acquiring knowledge on his or her actions. Knowing is done as part of action or practice, and using knowledge as a tool, communicates with the social and physical world. Knowing is dynamic, solid and relational. Knowledge and knowledge interaction can lead to new knowledge and new methods of learning the Tesco’s organization (Tachizawa & Wong, 2015). Focusing on the functionality of action, action and practice rather than knowledge, action, facts, facts, processes and temperament, rather than knowledge, is designed and revised for practical knowledge. People are engaged in institutional methods, reproduce the knowledge that are created in the practice, and redistribute knowledge from time to time and references (Laihonen, 2015). This approach to practice reveals the identity and mutual constitution by portraying others, illustrating the drawings, and indicating that there is a continuous social success that is formed and reconstituted in the creation of employment. Moreover, the SCI on SCP has a positive effect on SCP on SCP and has a positive impact on SCP, so supporting supply labor integration has a positive effect on the supply chain and information sharing positively impacts supply chain performance (Banerjee & Mishra, 2017).

Editing knowledge from organizations or individuals is considered to be serious in the dynamic and uncertain commercial environment for the organization's success. Likewise, the acquisition of knowledge in the supply chain seems to be a good advantage for the ongoing complex tasks, where demand is hard to compute, and therefore the competitive advantage is increased. Regardless of the data, the knowledge, knowledge and knowledge sharing chain of supply chain critical are lacking in the study of how to acquire knowledge. One of these approaches is called Knowledge Management (Gligor, 2016). From this perspective, see the information about the people who make and receive and share, transfer, and store information. This means that people can get some things that knowledge is more an object. According to other knowledge perspectives, firstly, as a process and as a part of the people, The list of aspects that distinguish the KM's vision of a demonstration-based approach; 1) Knowledge is included in human activities and none of them 2) Mute and clear knowledge can be completely separated from each other, 3) Develop knowledge from practice, activity and experience, 4) Build social and cultural knowledge - build it There is an influence on social and cultural context with its. The 'name' is not clearly used for this perspective, but sometimes it is known as a knowledgeable learning or learning or firstly based knowledge. Due to this concept, organizational knowledge is thought of as being the "ongoing and established work of institutional members as they engage the world" explaining what people are doing every day to complete their work. "The most sustainable supply chain management research is experimental and research in the area A little attention was given to reflect on how it is done Present research has failed in relation to the proposed research, broad correlation, changes and engagement ideas. This gap is examined examining how the sustainable supply can help current challenges in chain management, a serious proposal for chain management and chain research (Flynn, Koufteros & Lu, 2016). Analyze-based area The procedure for activating and working research, as a related method for the development of knowledge in the field, in which the research project includes review of previous research studies and insights in which action research was applied, special emphasis was placed on finding links to durability of durable supply chain management and linking action and action research (Deshmukh & Mohan, 2016).

Advantages and disadvantages of knowledge as possession and knowledge as practice

Power: Power of resources to influence the results and the sources of institutional relationships for the production of prioritized behaviors and it is run by identifying beneficial (award power), penal (forced power), knowledge and skills (expert power), second (reference power) and others (legal power) who have the right to influence.

Commitment: Strength of the process to create awareness among individuals in the decision-making process and opening new processes and agendas such processes. It is implemented through inter-and inter-institutional relationships by reporting the relationships and jurisdiction of departments, as well as related agendas, criteria, participation and decision-making information streams. Using symbols to point out the support that the commitment creates legalization and support for systematic, action and consequences so that they never doubt it, highlight important issues and express their meanings.

Trust: By reflecting on the trust of the institution, the organization's mechanism reflects the strongest feeling engrossed in. It is working through the relative efficiency parameters, performance measurement mechanism and in-charge of the person. They create 'trust' about the aspect being measured, in which other dimensions are provided in conjunction with the context being followed (Sharma, 2015).

Providing knowledge in the SC domain, other processes like Knowledge Sharing, Knowledge Generation, Knowledge Transfer, have been given little attention. Despite the information, information, knowledge and knowledge sharing is important for the success of the chain of supply, a review of the material explains that it is impossible to study how to acquire knowledge of supply chain and participate in the supply chain before participating in the necessary tasks. Previous studies on the education of knowledge are mainly focused on information technology and artificial intelligence. As a theoretical contribution to knowledge, this paper focuses on acquiring knowledge through chain management. This supply is done to gain insight into the leak manager's knowledge editing operating system because it affects performance.

Conclusion

In the era of intense global trade, where the most difficult challenge is the management of relationships between physically challenged, yet unified working chain partners, companies need to take advantage of supply chain consolidation and benefits related to information sharing to improve their supply chain performance. The strategic relationship between supply chain partners, relationship between creating and maintaining long-term unity, should be understood by increasing the value of all the components of the supply chain as well as raising the value, reducing costs, increasing the party of multi-party processes in the party, improving the skills of the main capabilities, Quality of market services and the resulting increase sustainable competitive benefits will make it easier availability

References

Banerjee, M., & Mishra, M. (2017). Retail supply chain management practices in India: A business intelligence perspective. Journal Of Retailing And Consumer Services, 34, 248-259. doi: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2015.09.009

Dotson, K. (2018). Distinguishing Knowledge Possession and Knowledge Attribution: The Difference Metaphilosophy Makes. Philosophy And Phenomenological Research, 96(2), 475-482.

Deshmukh, A., & Mohan, A. (2016). Modeling Demand Chain Management (DCM) Processes for Indian Retailing. Journal Of Supply Chain Management Systems, 5(2). doi: 10.21863/jscms/2016.5.2.027

Flynn, B., Koufteros, X., & Lu, G. (2016). On Theory in Supply Chain Uncertainty and its Implications for Supply Chain Integration. Journal Of Supply Chain Management, 52(3), 3-27.

Gligor, D. (2016). The Role of Supply Chain Agility in Achieving Supply Chain Fit. Decision Sciences, 47(3), 524-553.

Hugos, M. (2018). Essentials of supply chain management. Hoboken: Wiley.

Laihonen, H. (2015). A managerial view of the knowledge flows of a health-care system. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 13(4), 475-485.

Kozlenkova, I., Hult, G., Lund, D., Mena, J., & Kekec, P. (2015). The Role of Marketing Channels in Supply Chain Management. Journal Of Retailing, 91(4), 586-609. doi: 10.1016/j.jretai.2015.03.003

Sharma, B. (2015). Regulatory Bodies Perceived Retailing Ethics. Journal Of Supply Chain Management Systems, 4(4). doi: 10.21863/jscms/2015.4.4.019

Shashi, S., & Singh, R. (2015). Modeling cold supply chain environment of organized farm products retailing in India. Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 3(3), 197-212. doi: 10.5267/j.uscm.2015.4.004

Tachizawa, E., & Wong, C. (2015). The Performance of Green Supply Chain Management Governance Mechanisms: A Supply Network and Complexity Perspective. Journal Of Supply Chain Management, 51(3), 18-32.

Wong, W., & Guo, Z. (2014). Fashion supply chain management using radio frequency identification (RFID) technologies. Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing