Peter requests your legal advice as to whether Craig has to proceed with the contract (that is, buy the car) in these circumstances? The entire matter has taken place in Canberra.
The issue is to check that whether Craig is liable for the purchase of a car as decided between him and Peter.
For a valid contract, some elements are prescribed under contract law that must be there in every valid contract. Offer is a basic factor of every contract, which needs to be accepted by the offeree. Before doing discussion on elements of a contract, another term of Contract Law is also necessary to discuss which is known as invitation to treat. This term often get misled with an offer. The issue is to check that whether Craig is liable for the purchase of a car as decided between him and Peter.
An invitation to treat is only an invites for the offers. In reply to an invitation to treat, the other person requires to make an offer. This is to understand that there is a huge difference between an invitation to treat and an offer. An offer can be accepted by offeree but not an invitation to treat. It was held in the case of Partridge v Crittenden (1968) 2 All ER 421
that an advertisement is considered as an invitation to treat. However, some exceptional circumstances are there in which an advertisement can be considered as an offer. In this context, the decision of the case of Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co  1 QB 256 is important to study. According to the decision given in this case, if an advertisement is of nature that only requires an action of another party to become a contract then in such situations, the advertisement will be termed as an offer and not the invitation to treat.
Offer: - In addition to a contract, the offer is also a mandatory term for an agreement. This is a willingness to enter into a contract that one party of the contract, shows to other. Until unless there is an offer, there will be no question of other elements of a contract. An offer can be written or oral (Find Law, 2018). As earlier stated, an offer must not be misunderstood with an invitation to treat. The communication of offer is also a requirement. An offer in a contract seems to be complete when the same communicates and informs properly to the offeree.
Acceptance: - As the name implies, acceptance is a consent to the offer made by the offeror. That person to whom it has made i.e. the offeree can accept an offer. Similar to an offer, an acceptance is also required to be communicated. It is the responsibility of offeree to inform the offeror about his/her acceptance. Acceptance can also be verbal or written. In some of the transactions, an act of offeree can be treated as acceptance. Such acceptance is known as acceptance by conduct (US Legal, 2018). For instance, if in the offer it is stated that offeree is required to deposit in consideration then as much amount then as soon as offeree will deposit the amount to the required account, acceptance will get complete. For the acceptance, it has been held in the case of Felthouse v Bindley  EWHC CP J35 that silence cannot be treated as acceptance. The certainty of acceptance is also important. It was decided in the case of Scammell and Nephew v Ouston  AC 251 that an acceptance must be certain and clear objectives of both the parties must reflect in the transactions. It means both the parties must not remain in any doubt.
Consideration: - Apart from the offer, an acceptance, consideration is also an important factor of a contract. If a contract, consideration must be there for both of the parties. It can be anything. However, but it should be something that has some values in the eye of law. It was given in the decision of the case of Chappell & Co Ltd v Nestle Co Ltd  UKHL 1 that consideration of a contract must be sufficient and the same is need not to be adequate. It means a contract cannot be held invalid only on the basis of the fact that consideration was not adequate. Further, the consideration of a contract must not be illegal. For instance, any illegal promise, or promise to do something illegal cannot be treated as valid consideration. In the case of Tweddle v Atkinson  EWHC QB J57 it has given that consideration in a contract must move from the promise.
The intention of the parties: - Both the parties to the contract must have the intention to create a legal relationship with each other. If two people agree to do certain things but do not have the intention to bind each other in a legal manner, then a contract cannot be assumed to be there. Court of appeal decided in the case of Jones v Padavatton  1 WLR 328 that intention to create legal relationship must also be there even in those cases where parties of an agreement have domestic relation with each other (E-Law Resources, 2018).
If all the aforesaid four elements exist in a transaction, then the transaction converts into a contract. As soon as a contract develops between the parties, parties get power to sue each other and to bind each other for the performance of the contract.
Every agreement that is developed with the minor will be considered as voidable at the part of the minor. In Australia, a minor is a person who has not attained the age of 18 years yet (Legal Commission of South Australia, 2018). It means if a person enters into a contract with such minor person, then he/she will have no right to as for the performance of the contract. However, there are some exceptions to this rule. A Minor can enter into a following kind of contracts:-
Apart from these two contracts, a minor has no capacity to be the part of a contract. Nevertheless, a minor can ratify the contract entered by him after attaining the age of 18. If a Minor do so then he/she will be liable in a contract as a mature person (Fletcher Law, 2018).
Moving towards other exception of the general rule that states “Contract with the Minors are not enforceable”, this is to state that parents of a minor can give consent in a contract. If parents of a minor person in a contract, ratify the same then the third party can sue a minor for the performance of a contract. However, in general, one should be careful while entering into any contract with Minor (Dundas Lawyers, 2016).
Apart from the right and benefits of minor in a contract, this is to state that if a minor take some benefits out of a contract then the refund he is entitled to take will reduce by the amount of such benefit (Latimer, 2011)
Misrepresentation: - This is a situation where either party of a contract makes a false representation about a term of a contract to the other party. Such representation can be in form of a statement. When a party makes some false statement about a subject matter of a contract or anything else, then such a statement is treated as a misstatement. A misrepresentation is a wider term that includes misstatements. Under Contract Law, there types of misrepresentations are defined. That are as follow:-
The kind of misrepresentation is important to decide because based on the same remedies are voidable under contract law. It was held in the case of Doyle v Olby  2 QB 158 that in a situation where fraudulent misrepresentation exists, the innocent party can rescind the contract.
Whereas on another side, in cases of negligent misrepresentation, the contract will be treated as the fraudulent misrepresentation was there and the innocent party can set aside the contract. In the case of innocent misrepresentation, an innocent party can rescind the contract or can ask for the damages but cannot ask both of them.
Importance of validity of a contract: - As earlier stated, a contract must be valid in order to make the parties liable. If not all the elements are there in a contract, parties cannot initiate any action in against of each other (Lewis and Owen, 2014). Further, if a minor is a party of a contract, then the third party can have no right in against of such minor and minor can held the contract voidable. It means, minor can enforce the contract but not the other person. Further, if any misstatement is there, then parties to the contract can rescind the same and another party cannot force to innocent party for the performance of the contract.
In the given case, the person named Peter has published the online advertisement to sell his car. In the advertisement, the car was represented as a 2017 model Aston Martin V8 Vantage and the sale value of the same was stated as $240000. It was an invitation to treat and not an offer. Applying the provisions of Partridge v Crittenden, being an advertisement, it was required to be considered as an invitation to treat. Therefore, in reply to this invitation, another party of the case Craig (17 years old person), shown his willingness to buy the car. He made an offer to Peter stating that I will buy this. It was not an acceptance of the case as acceptance can be given to offer but not to an invitation to treat. Assuming that Craig has asked the bank details of Peter. When Peter has provided the same to Craig, such an act would be considered as acceptance of the case. It means Craig has made an offer to Peter to buy the car as stated in the invitation to treat and by providing his bank details, Peter has accepted the offer of Craig.
The two basic elements of a contract i.e. offer and acceptance have completed in the case. Now, moving towards the third element i.e. consideration, this is to be stated that the same was also there. Peter was ready to sell his car for $200000. It was a legal consideration and was sufficient. The last element of a contract, which was required to be there, was the intention of the parties to build legal relationships. Peter and Craig both had the intention to bind each other, as it was a pure economic transaction. Craig has deposited the part of the consideration to Peter’s account.
Later on, in the case, it has been noted that the vehicle, Peter was intended to sell was not as represented. In the invitation to treat, it was stated that the vehicle is a 2017 model Aston Martin V8 Vantage, however, when Craig inspected the vehicle it was found a 2007 model. It was a misrepresentation from the side of Peter. When Craig has discussed the issue with Peter, it has come to know that Peter was also not aware of the fact that advertisement consisted such misstatement. Peter had full knowledge that the car is a 2007 model but a wrong intention was not there. However, Peter has also no ground to believe that the car is a 2017 model. It was a negligent misrepresentation. Craig found that the 2007 model was worth of half amount of a 2017 model of the same car. Peter has demanded the performance of the contract from Craig. He stated that he had no idea that advertisement consists of a misstatement and now Craig needs to pay rest of the amount of consideration.
Now, this is to state that Craig was a minor person. According to the provisions of Contract Law, he could not be a party to the contract. He was about to be Major as his 18th Birthday was on the way. However, at the time of entering into a contract with Peter, he was a minor. The contract made between Peter and Craig cannot be covered in any exceptional circumstances of the general rule. Therefore, this contract was not a valid one but was voidable at the end of Craig. If Craig wants then he can force Peter to sell his car. Nevertheless, Craig does not want this as Peter has made a negligent misstatement and the car was not of the quality as Craig wanted to buy. Craig cannot cancel the contract based on the fact that consideration was too high, as, under the Contract Law, consideration can be anything that has a certain value in the viewpoint of Law. $200000 was a valid consideration. According to the provisions of Chappell & Co Ltd v Nestle Co Ltd, the contract cannot be held void based on the amount of consideration.
Later on, in the case, Craig did some acts, which he was not required to do in order to take the advanced money back. He broke the car thinking that he would get the advanced money deposited by him out of the amount of insurance claim, that Peter will receive from insurance company. As a negligent misstatement was there, it was a voidable contract, which Craig could set aside. In addition to this, he was also a minor and hence could not be held responsible for the performance of the contact. If Craig would not have done such an act, he could set aside the contract and in addition to this, he could also asked for the refund of advanced money deposited by him into the bank account of Peter. Now, Craig has damaged the car of Peter. In such a situation he has two options, either to accept the contract or to held the same voidable.
The contract made between Peter and Craig was not a valid one. As nothing is mentioned about ratification of the contract, this is to assume that Craig has not ratified the contract. Craig has two reasons to rescind the contract. One is his minority and another one the existence of negligent misstatement. Further, in the case, Craig has made a loss to the car of Peter. In such a situation he still can held the contract rescind and claim the advanced money deposited by him, but the amount of refund will be reduced by the amount of such loss. Peter in any situation cannot force Craig to purchase the car.
Australian Contract Law. (2018) Capacity to contract. [online] Available from: https://www.australiancontractlaw.com/law/formation-capacity.html [Accessed on 25/09/2018]
Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co  1 QB 256
Chappell & Co Ltd v Nestle Co Ltd  UKHL 1
Cross, F., and Miller, R. (2008) The Legal Environment of Business: Text and Cases -- Ethical, Regulatory, Global, and E-Commerce Issues. Mason, OH: South-Western Cengage Learning.
Doyle v Olby  2 QB 158
Dundas Lawyers. (2016) Contracting with Minors – is it even possible? [online] Available from: https://www.dundaslawyers.com.au/contracting-with-minors-is-it-even-possible/#_ftn1 [Accessed on 25/09/2018]
E-Law Resources. (2018) Jones v Padavatton  1 WLR 328 Court of Appeal. [online] Available from: https://e-lawresources.co.uk/Jones-v-Padavatton.php [Accessed on 25/09/2018]
Felthouse v Bindley  EWHC CP J35
Find Law. (2018) What Contracts are Required to Be in Writing? [online] Available from: https://smallbusiness.findlaw.com/business-contracts-forms/what-contracts-are-required-to-be-in-writing.html [Accessed on 25/09/2018]
Fletcher Law. (2018) Risks of contracting with minors in the online world. [online] Available from: https://fletcherlaw.com.au/2017/01/risks-contracting-minors-online-world/ [Accessed on 25/09/2018]
Jones v Padavatton  1 WLR 328
Latimer, P. (2011) Australian Business Law 2012. Australia: CCH Australia Limited.
Legal Commission of South Australia. (2018) People under 18. [online] Available from: https://www.lawhandbook.sa.gov.au/ch10s02s03s01.php [Accessed on 25/09/2018]
Legal Match. (2018) Innocent Misrepresentation Laws. [online] Available from: https://www.legalmatch.com/law-library/article/innocent-misrepresentation.html [Accessed on 25/09/2018]
Lewis, J., R., and Owen, S. (2014) Law for the Construction Industry. Oxon: Routledge.
Partridge v Crittenden (1968) 2 All ER 421
Scammell and Nephew v Ouston  AC 251
Tweddle v Atkinson  EWHC QB J57
US Legal. (2018) Acceptance. [online] Available from: https://contracts.uslegal.com/elements-of-a-contract/acceptance/ [Accessed on 25/09/2018]
To export a reference to this article please select a referencing stye below:
My Assignment Help. (2019). Business Law. Retrieved from https://myassignmenthelp.com/free-samples/zbus8109-business-law.
"Business Law." My Assignment Help, 2019, https://myassignmenthelp.com/free-samples/zbus8109-business-law.
My Assignment Help (2019) Business Law [Online]. Available from: https://myassignmenthelp.com/free-samples/zbus8109-business-law
[Accessed 11 December 2019].
My Assignment Help. 'Business Law' (My Assignment Help, 2019) <https://myassignmenthelp.com/free-samples/zbus8109-business-law> accessed 11 December 2019.
My Assignment Help. Business Law [Internet]. My Assignment Help. 2019 [cited 11 December 2019]. Available from: https://myassignmenthelp.com/free-samples/zbus8109-business-law.
Planning to buy homework online but not sure whom to select. Well, you will not find a better homework help website than Myassignmenthelp.com globally. The reason is that we are committed to ease out the pressure on students and help them enjoy life a little more. We started providing homework help for the same reason and ensure that quality solutions are provided every time. We provide homework writer on all subjects from school to Grad levels. The solutions are multiple checked for rendering error-free and made grammatically and factually sound.
Answer: Introduction The ASIC v Narain  FCAFC 120 is a relevant case. This case has highlighted the role which directors play in a company and regulations which affects their operations. This report will analyse the principles given under the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (Act) in order to understand the key provisions which companies and directors have to comply with. The issues relating to misleading conduct was raised regarding fi...Read More
Answer: Introduction: In the present assignment, it needs to be seen if Mary has a remedy available to her under any Commonwealth legislation, other than the Fair Work Act against the conduct of the male staff, his immediate supervisor Andrew or the company. This issue arises due to the fact that the male coworkers of Mary had given her a birthday card, which had a nude woman serving drinks to men. Mary was deeply offended, as she had faced s...Read More
Answer: Part A Issue Whether the transfer of beach by the grandmother to Anne is a valid contract? Relevant Law Whenever any agreement is made by two persons by exchanging offers and acceptances, then, in order to convert such an agreement into contract, the requirements include a consideration, capacity and intention of the parties. These elements together constitute a contract that has the legal enforceability. (Latimer, 2016) A v...Read More
Answer: Introduction The doctrine of precedent is a principle of the judicial system which has been introduced so that the judicial structure becomes more efficient, certain and consistent with respect to the application of law. The doctrine is a fundamental constraint on the way in which judicial decisions are made in Australia. The primary idea behind the doctrine is that when the judges are deciding a case they have to give respect to the ...Read More
Answer: 1.Intel Corporation Intel Corporation is an America based multinational organisation which was founded in 1968; the company operates in semiconductors industry, and it manufactures products including integrated circuits, graphics chips, motherboard chipsets, processors and others (Intel, 2018). Currently, the company is the second largest semiconductor chip maker in the world, and it offers its products all across the globe. Due to th...Read More
Just share your requirements and get customized solutions on time.
Our writers make sure that all orders are submitted, prior to the deadline.
Using reliable plagiarism detection software, Turnitin.com.We only provide customized 100 percent original papers.
Feel free to contact our assignment writing services any time via phone, email or live chat.
Our writers can provide you professional writing assistance on any subject at any level.
Our best price guarantee ensures that the features we offer cannot be matched by any of the competitors.
Get all your documents checked for plagiarism or duplicacy with us.
Get different kinds of essays typed in minutes with clicks.
Calculate your semester grades and cumulative GPa with our GPA Calculator.
Balance any chemical equation in minutes just by entering the formula.
Calculate the number of words and number of pages of all your academic documents.
Our Mission Client Satisfaction
thanks for giving me quality work..................................................
I must say that I am very impressed with the assistance here. I received a verrrrrry high grade which I am very pleased. The expert followed instructions exactly to the specifications of the Professor. Very well done. I am very impressed!
They did an awesome job. I only had to go through and make minor, but that was no problem considering the quality of content I received.
This was just what I needed!! paper turned out great! I would recommend to anyone who is in a bind and needs a quick fix to catch on work!!!