Literature Review: Building the Foundation for Your Oracy Essay

Assignment Requirements

ObjectivesThis assignment aims to assess your ability toapply the concepts and theoretical frameworks introduced in this course to generate a research proposal on an oracy-related topicdiscuss the implications of the proposed topicfor the field of oracy and oracy teaching and/or assessment 2.OverviewThe assignment should be written in no more thanexcluding references, tables, figures,and appendices. The topicchosen for the proposalcould be related to one of the topics covered in thisoracy course or pertinent to other oracy-based topics not discussed in the course. For example, the topics could includeinvestigating oracy in particular contexts, assessing and teaching oracy, investigating spoken texts, technologyand oracy, gender and oracy, children/infants and oracy, politicians and oracy, etc. Note that this is NOT a full-blown study, so donotcollect or present data analyses, although short samples of spoken texts etc. that could help explain the methodology of the study would befine to be used. Your assignment should include the following main sections:(i)Title and student’s full name (required)(ii)Introduction(10 marks)(iii)Literaturereview (iv)Research questions(RQs(iv)Methodology)(v)Implications andclosing remarks(vi)References(5 marks)3.Detailed description ofeachsection(i)IntroductionIn this section, you should?introduce the topicyou have chosen. -state the features or concepts you will focus on in your researchand explain why you have

chosen the particular topic and featuresor the significance of your study (why are you doing this?).-state the aims clearly.(ii)LiteraturereviewIn this section, you shoulduse a minimum of10 referencesto:?explain theories and key concepts.?review research studies which have examined related orsimilartopics.?highlight the theoretical framework(s) you will use for your analysis and presentation of findings.(iii)Research questions-articulate clearandrelevantresearch questions resulting from the gapsidentified in the review of the literature (at least