Iron triangle is a popular term, being used widely in the contemporary times in order to describe the internal relationship in between the federal bureaucracy, interest group and congressional committee. The relationship in between these three actors may happen at the time, when there is a close proximity in between them. It is imperative to note in this context that in the context of politics of United States, the iron triangle basically comprises of a policy making relationship in between the political parties, which is the key of ensuring political stability in the business environment. According to the classical assumption of iron triangle, bureaucratic agencies act as the political entities with the intension of creating their own base of power. By supporting this view, it can be said that the power of an agency is being used by its constituency and not by the customers. The constituents can be defined as the members, who are politically active. These members share common interest and goals. According to the requirements of consumers, the desired products or services are being provided by the governmental bureaucracy. This is considered as the mission statement or goal of the agencies, which are politically active.

The cordial alliances in between the agency and constituency is one of the most critical factors as it may lead to bureaucratic dysfunction which  is utterly a great threat towards maintaining political stability. Congressional Committee is one of the most significant components of iron triangle which provides the Federal Bureaucracy with appropriated economic and political support and thus strengthens its functionality. In addition, Congressional Committee Congressional Committee also constructs healthy legal and regulatory framework, which is very much needed in terms paving the way for interest groups to accomplish their fundamental goal.

Federal Bureaucracy is another major component of iron triangle, which supports the congressional committee with the scope to choose the policy properly and thus enable them to execute the policy. At the same time, Federal Bureaucracy also supports in delivering appropriate regulation and thus gives special privileges to the interest group. Interest Group is also a crucial component of iron triangle. The interest groups play a pivotal role in terms of providing electoral support and monetary support to the congressional committee. In addition to that, the interest groups also develop lobby with that of the congress and thereby provide federal bureaucracy with appropriate congressional support.

The strength of relationship in between federal bureaucracy, interest group and congressional committee is incredibly rigid. Thus, it is imperative to break it. This is the reason, for which it is being termed as iron triangle. This is mutually beneficial for all of the parties, who are internally connected in the triangle. This is the symbolic relationship, which is very much needed in order to maintain political stability. As per the poetical assumptions, iron triangle plays a major role in terms of demonstrating the party, who is working properly in order to promote governmental wellbeing. This is also being called as sub government. Initially, iron triangle develops a close relationship in between government, federal bureaucratic agencies and interest groups. The fundamental aim behind forming such relationship is to maintain political stability.

This is basically a policy making model, which can have a firm impact on generating positive vive in the political environment. Iron triangle plays a major role in making effective policy.  It is true that, iron triangle is mutually beneficial for all the parties, who are associated n the triangle. Here, the congressional committee passes relevant laws for the interest group, which provides monetary support to the congressional committee in return. At same time, congressional committee also provides ample support to the interest group in order to satisfy their fundamental goals and objectives. At the same time, it has also been observed that the congressional committee plays a major role in terms of supporting the bureaucracy to run their internal functionality with utmost efficiency by taken effective decision related to finance and control.  

As a response to this activity of congressional committee, bureaucracy implements effective regulatory framework and thereby pave the way for both the congressional committee and interest groups to satisfy their fundamental groups. This is the way, through which bureaucracy gets ample support from the interest group and thus influence financial competency at the core level of congress. However, there are certain issues, which can be seen in the iron triangle. The parties such as federal bureaucracy, interest group and congressional committee who are internally connected can be regarded as the constituents of other. These parties are absolutely opposite to that of the consumers. The consumers are being considered as the African people. The time, when both the federal agencies and the members of congressional committee go for accomplishing their individual goals and objectives, then it becomes difficult for the African people to satisfy their own mutual interest. At the same time, the iron triangle can have negative impact on the legislation. It is being expected that, the relationship in between federal bureaucracy, interest group and congressional committee would act as a watchdog over the bureaucracy. This is the reason, for which the governmental bureaucracy may perceive difficulty in the way of running their internal functionality. At the same time, any kind of inequality in the group can also hamper the relationship, which may pose great threat towards maintaining political stability.

Iron triangle, in its simples form is also regarded as the system of congressional committee, which plays a major role in terms of maintaining stability in the political environment. All the parties in the iron triangle is an imperative factor and being affected directly by the regulations, framed by congressional committee. For instance, the relationship in between Boeing Corporation as interest group, Defense Department as bureaucratic agency and Armed Service Committee as house committee is defined as defense iron committee.  Together, these groups frame mutually dependent relationship which is the fundamental factor for domestic policy making.