There is no penalty for submitting below the time limit, but students should be aware that there is a risk they may not maximise their potential mark.
Assignments should be presented appropriately in line with the restrictions stated above; if an assignment exceeds the time limit this will be taken in account in the marks given using the assessment criteria shown.
Assessment Task
You will be provided with ONE international tourist destination country to work together on. Group members must work on a specific part of the presentation and build from the activities and tasks scheduled in the seminars. The use of maps and figures of the appointed tourist destination country is mandatory.
The presentation must include the following insights
World Economic Forum (WEF);
Collaboration tools for online group working
There are many applications which enable you to share documents and collaborate on projects in real time. Maximise the tools available to you in order to keep organised as a group.
Microsoft One Drive (Access via Portal App 'my files')
You have access to Microsoft 365 applications such as Word, PowerPoint and Excel through your university account as well as cloud storage space on One Drive to save the documents you create. You can set up shared folders for group projects and collaborate on documents in real time by using the 'edit in browser' function.
This free online project management and collaboration tool will help you organise tasks, track progress and work together to get things done. It can be very useful for dividing and keeping track of tasks on a group project.
If you can't meet in person, you can arrange a video meeting on google hangouts. (This application requires you to have or set up a Google account).
This assessment will enable students to demonstrate in full or in part the learning outcomes identified in the unit descriptors.
Late Submissions
Students are reminded that:
The University’s Extenuating Circumstances procedure is in place if there are genuine circumstances that may prevent a student submitting an assessment. If students are not 'fit to study’, they can either request an extension to the submission deadline of 5 working days or they can request to submit the assessment at the next opportunity (Defer). In both instances students must submit an EC application with relevant evidence. If accepted by the EC Panel there will be no academic penalty for late submission or non-submission dependent on what is requested. Students are reminded that EC covers only short term issues (20 working days) and that if they experience longer term matters that impact on learning then they must contact the Student Hub for advice.
Academic Misconduct
Any submission must be students’ own work and, where facts or ideas have been used from other sources, these sources must be appropriately referenced. The University’s Academic Handbook includes the definitions of all practices that will be deemed to constitute academic misconduct. Students should check this link before submitting their work.
Ethics Policy
The work being carried out by students must be in compliance with the Ethics Policy. Where there is an ethical issue, as specified within the Ethics Policy, then students will need an ethics release or an ethical approval prior to the start of the project.
Grade marking
The University uses a letter grade scale for the marking of assessments. Unless students have been specifically informed otherwise their marked assignment will be awarded a letter grade. More detailed information on grade marking and the grade scale can be found on the portal and in the Student Handbook.
Students not initially in a group should inform the Module leader by Week 7
The Module leader will be responsible for reallocating any group members or allocating anyone not in a group which will be completed Week
As part of the process of working as a group it is necessary to:
Each student must adhere to the following:
If the group is not functioning effectively students should:
At the end of the assessment each member of the group will be: Given a formative group grade, and final peer assessed individual grade.
If individual grades are allocated the evidence used to make these judgements will be: Compelling evidence at presentation and submitted written work that contribution is significantly above/below the other group member and/or;
Prior notification and evidence of non-engagement and contribution from specified group member.
Nature of peer assessment undertaken: Observation followed by anonymous feedback. All students will undertake this role.