Question 1
Whether the last reply of Michelle is an invitation to treat or an offer and whether it is legally binding for Michelle to hold the offer for one week?
Rule 1
The difference between an offer and an invitation to treat is important since a contract cannot be formed after acceptance of an invitation to treat as provided in the case of Fisher v Bell. In case of an invitation to treat, the intention of the party is to invite another person to make an offer rather than bind himself into the contractual obligation. Furthermore, an offer that is once rejected is no longer available for a person to accept and the counter-offer is also constituted as a rejected as held in the case of Hyde v Wrench. In the case of Goldsbrough, Mort and Co Ltd v Quinn, it was held that a promise which is made to keep an offer open for a specific amount of time is not enforceable; however, if consideration is paid, then such promise binding.
Application 1
In the given scenario, an offer was made by Jack to purchase the car of Michelle for $1,000; however, this offer was rejected by Michelle by stating that he will not sell his car below $1,500. This is a counter-offer made by Michelle which resulted in rejecting the original offer of Jack (). This is not an invitation to treat since Michelle did not ask Jack to make an offer for the car; instead, she gave him an offer for $1,500 (Fisher v Bell). Lastly, the promise made by Michelle to keep the offer open for one week is binding since consideration is paid (Goldsbrough, Mort and Co Ltd v Quinn).
Conclusion 1
In conclusion, the last reply of Michelle is an offer, and she is legally bound to keep the offer open for one week.
Issue 2
Whether the court is likely to uphold the exclusion clause of the Car Park that limits their liability to pay damages to Suzanne?
Rule 2
The exclusion clause is designed in order to limit or eliminate the liability of parties which arise in case they violate the terms of the contract. A person who wanted to rely on the exclusion clause has to ensure that such clause must be brought into the attention of another party before the contract is formed or during its formation as provided by the court in Thornton v Shoe Lane Parking Ltd. In case the terms are a part of a written contract, then they are enforceable on the parties despite the fact that they have read those terms or not as given in L'Estrange v F Graucob Ltd case. Furthermore, in the judgement of Baltic Shipping Company v Dillon, the court provided that if the exclusion clause is brought into the attention of the parties prior to the formation of a contract, then they are considered as valid. Furthermore, restrictions are given under the Australian Consumer Law that prevents parties from including exclusion terms into their contract. Thus, the exclusion clause is valid only if it is reasonable, obvious, clearly expressed, and business efficacy is present as given in BP Refinery (Westernport) Pty Ltd v Hastings Shire Council.
Application 2
In the given scenario, Car Park put a notice in front in which the exclusion clause was written which provided that it will not be responsible for loss or damages of the car. Suzanne’s car was stolen from the Car Park by a friend of the airport staff. As discussed in the case of Baltic Shipping Company v Dillon, the term was brought into the attention of Suzanne before the contract; thus, it is considered as valid. However, since the friend of the airport staff stole the vehicle, it is not reasonable to uphold the exclusion clause. As discussed in BP Refinery (Westernport) Pty Ltd v Hastings Shire Council, the exclusion clause is not reasonable and fair and it did not give business efficacy since Suzanne parked his car for its protection; thus, the court is less likely to eliminate the liability of the Car Park.
Conclusion 2
MyAssignmenthelp.com caters to thousands of students on a regular basis who need top quality homework help online. We aid students in completing their homework assignments without making holes in their pockets. Despite providing cheap homework help services, we never compromise with the quality of delivered help solutions. Our homework writers are instructed to use authentic and relevant references in writing to make the papers plagiarism-free. Hence, we have become the most authentic and effective homework writing service provider in USA.
Just share requirement and get customized Solution.
Orders
Overall Rating
Experts
Our writers make sure that all orders are submitted, prior to the deadline.
Using reliable plagiarism detection software, Turnitin.com.We only provide customized 100 percent original papers.
Feel free to contact our assignment writing services any time via phone, email or live chat. If you are unable to calculate word count online, ask our customer executives.
Our writers can provide you professional writing assistance on any subject at any level.
Our best price guarantee ensures that the features we offer cannot be matched by any of the competitors.
Get all your documents checked for plagiarism or duplicacy with us.
Get different kinds of essays typed in minutes with clicks.
Calculate your semester grades and cumulative GPa with our GPA Calculator.
Balance any chemical equation in minutes just by entering the formula.
Calculate the number of words and number of pages of all your academic documents.
Our Mission Client Satisfaction
Able to get my work done after few changes, which were done as per suggestion provided by us. Appreciate their positive approach for this
Australia
Amazing experience with you guys. I got 20/20. You are the best in the market i tried multiple sites but you guys gave best output.
Australia
good paper, thank you very much. i am looking forward to working with you. Recommended
Australia
thanks a lot thanks a lot thanks a lot thanks a lot thanks a lot thanks a lot thanks a lot
Australia