Stratified Random Sampling Works With types and Examples

Is Discount A Marketing Tactic?

One of the most important marketing tactics is discount. This is an excellent practice to attract customers and potential clients to buy a good or service, not a novel methodology or business plan. This method aims to persuade or encourage clients to make purchases while promoting the idea of saving money. Businesses use this method to boost customer traffic, eliminate obsolete inventory, and boost sales.

Hire Experts

Introduction of Stratified Sampling

Before choosing the study sample, the researcher can use stratified sampling to divide the target population into standardized subgroups or strata. When a researcher works with a big group and can't get data from every person, they typically employ this strategy. The researcher divides the population into smaller groups using the naturally occurring divisors, like age, gender, geographic region, and levels of education, to mention a few.

Click To Connect

Examples of Stratified Sampling from a homogeneous subgroup

Investigating women's educational achievement is a good illustration of stratified sampling. The approach enables the study, which examines the level of education among women in a community, to distinguish between several demographic groupings based on race, gender, religion, and income level. The objective is to maintain group homogeneity such that no subgroup will be excluded from the final sample. Another illustration is the study on calculating the COVID-19 prevalence in Maryland, United States, using stratified random sampling and the viability of doing so. The population for this study was divided or stratified according to the counties of Maryland. Individuals then represented the strata of each county. According to the study, stratified sampling is reliable for determining COVID-19 prevalence. The stratification sample must be corrected for misclassification mistakes to reduce under- or overestimating COVID cases.

How to select a sample in stratified sampling

Similar to other probability sampling procedures, researchers should begin by providing a detailed description of the population from which their sample will be drawn.

The initial stage is to decide which factors will be used for stratification. The characteristics picked by the researcher to form their groupings. Since each member of the population can only belong to one subgroup, the classification of each subject in each subgroup must be explicit and unambiguous.
Stratification according to various characteristics comes next: To stratify by multiple distinct features simultaneously, the researcher must be able to assign each subject to a certain subgroup. To get the total number of subgroups in this situation, the researcher should multiply the numbers of strata for each attribute. For instance, if a researcher stratified by race and gender identity using four groups for the former and three for the latter, the total number of groups would be 4 x 3 = 12.
The following stage is to divide the population into strata. During the research, each member of the population is listed and given a stratum. The researcher must ensure that all strata are mutually exclusive for each stratum to include the entire population (i.e., there is no overlap between them).
The researcher then decides the size of each stratum's sample. Participants first decide whether they want a disproportionate or proportional sample before continuing. Next, a decision is taken regarding the size of the entire sample. This should be large enough for a researcher to draw statistical conclusions about each subgroup.
Finally, a sample is randomly selected from each stratum by the researcher. Then, they take samples from within each stratum using a different probability sampling technique, such as purely random or systematic sampling. The researcher can create a typical sample of that subgroup using these approaches' intrinsic randomization, provided they are used correctly.

How Stratified Random Sampling Works in the homogeneous subgroup?

The word "strata," which refers to groupings, is where the phrase "stratified" came from. As a result, stratified random sampling strongly emphasizes classifying the diverse data. Each group's variables have similar traits in common. A sample or data set is chosen for study by each of these groups. A researcher might use a more realistic strategy to study a large population. An analysis is needed before sampling to divide the population into relevant strata, and one strategy used by researchers to select a small sample is stratified random sampling. Since stratification frequently lowers sampling error and increases accuracy, estimates generated inside strata are more accurate than those from random sampling. Choosing a future stratum that optimizes variance among strata while limiting variation in the parameters under study is generally desirable. Stratified random sampling performs best with a heterogeneous population that can be divided into segments using additional data. The primary objective of this methodology is to guarantee that the various types of items produced by the population are represented in the overall sample. This combination makes sure that the sample accurately depicts the total population. Portfolio managers have historically used this sample methodology as a standard probability sampling technique when building client portfolios. The required returns are produced by replicating multiple indices, including the stock and bond market indexes. It is a typical strategy for auditing and vouching as well. This technique is often used for vouching and verification when an auditor, frequently a Certified Public Accountant (CPA), audits the company's financial accounts. This approach satisfies their criteria well because auditors can separate the data into several categories or subgroups based on cash amounts. By using this technique, the sample size can be decreased without compromising the sample's reliability.

Order Now

Advantages of Stratified Random Sampling

Using a specified example will often yield better precision than a basic irregular example if the layers are selected such that delegates of a comparable layer are as similar as they can be about the new trademark. The level of precision increased as the layer separation increased. One significant drawback of stratified sampling is the challenge of choosing the right layers, for instance. The third drawback is that it is harder to organize and evaluate the results than with a straightforward irregular test. For the following reasons, this sampling approach is very successful: It develops populations that are the same. It is simple to select a sample with various properties due to subgrouping. Because of this, samples from each stratum or subgroup fairly represent the entire population. It makes fair analysis easier and produces reliable, accurate results, ultimately saving time and money. It uses samples with distinctive data to give each category a reasonable amount of weight for an objective interpretation. When samples are chosen randomly from all the categories or groups with various features, the results are typically effective and significant. Studying the entire population is time-consuming and wasteful. The researcher can save time and money by employing this method to choose a very small, highly concentrated sample. Finally, it simplifies comparative research. It separates the entire population into many strata based on its characteristics. As a result, the information from these groups can also be contrasted and examined separately.

Disadvantages of Stratified Random Sampling

Without a doubt, using this random sampling technique makes research and analysis simpler. However, it could have errors and inconsistencies. The following are some limitations on its applicability: Its range is constrained. This method is worthless because there aren't comprehensive statistics on all the population's various traits and demographics. As a result, not all study types can be employed with it. It makes picking a stratum challenging as well. The development of categories or groups is a significant problem. Making decisions on what should be considered and excluded is another challenge.

Additionally, the method is susceptible to bias and does not apply to small populations. Sampling is unnecessary if the population is small, say, less than 100 people. The analysis alternatively can consider the total population. Additionally, the researcher's selection of groups which occasionally may not be appropriate, greatly impacts this process. A person's perspective and abilities are also unique, which could impact the sample.