If someone looks for the core context of the 'Elements of Style' under the Rules of Stunk, it's about omitting 'needless words' through revised writing.
Now, below is a detailed context of Strunk's take on guiding the American Vocabulary -
The primary thing that Strunk emphasises is - The act of writing is strong when it's concise.
For the same reason that a painting should not have unnecessary lines and a machine should not have unnecessary parts, a sentence should not contain any unnecessary words, and a paragraph should not contain any needless sentences.
Hence, to include these suggestions in a guideline, William Strunk divides his rules into
Among these, the first two sections focus on the accuracy of sentences, precise and to-the-point writing, and most importantly reduction of lengthy phrases.
One of the most influential books on 'writing' is The Elements of Style, as authored by Strunk & White.
The main demands of the simple English style are intended to be covered in a condensed amount of time.
By focusing on a few key points, the use of guidelines and compositional principles that are most frequently disregarded (in Chapters II and III), it seeks to make the role of the instructor and student easier.
The section numbers can be used as references when editing a manuscript.
The book only covers a small portion of the subject of English style, but the author's experience has shown that once students have learned the fundamentals, they benefit most from individualised instruction focused on the issues in their own work.
Each instructor also has his or her own body of theory that they prefer to that provided by any textbook.
Strunk focused on the 'development of effective writing and composition'.
If you follow the initial 1918 version, it urged writers to "omit unnecessary words," "use the active voice," and "appropriately employ parallelism."
The "Introduction" essay, which White adapted from his magazine article about Strunk, and the last chapter, "An Approach to Style," a more comprehensive and directive manual for writing in English, are all included in the 1959 edition.
And all of these directions are for the next generation who must write in the context of simple yet engaging content in American literature.
Though Strunk's guideline was accepted majorly by the Colleges of America, it still received significant criticism.
In 'The Land of the Free and The Elements of Style,' according to Geoffrey Pullum, there is far more to be said against The Elements of Style. He states that the 'Elements of Style' is a useless manual for English usage and has had a negative impact on grammar instruction in America.
Moreover, Pullum does not believe the problem is minor. The Elements of Style actually and irreparably have the possibility to hurt the creative sentiments of people.
Pullum further says that Strunk's this particular set of guidelines promotes the waste of valuable resources, including the time and money spent by English departments and publishers, as well as by teachers, students, and copy editors.
Pullum is not an advocate for the group that White once derisively referred to as "the modern liberal of the English Department, the anything-goes fellow."
However, Pullum takes issue with the time wasted in attempting to dispel students' misconceptions about English grammar. He also believes that this is a linguistic issue with particularly significant practical significance.
So, linguists shouldn't be afraid to denounce all the wrongdoing caused by this opinionated, well-respected, mistake-filled, time-wasting book zombie.
Yes, the book still matters if you take "Strunk & White" as the title. However, if you consider it to be the names of two distinct individuals, then the original author and his revisionist are still important.
Strunk advises against using a big word when a simple one will serve. Instead, always omit a word if it's possible to do so. Also, one must never employ the passive while the action is available. Never use a foreign expression, a term from a specific field of study, or jargon when you can think of a regular English translation.
Yes, our experts can. You see, Rule 3 states the following:
A comma separates the phrase or subordinate clause from the sentence's main clause.
To learn more on the same, you can chat with us.
Your work will be clearer, cleaner, and more succinct if unnecessary words are left out, or a simple word is used in place of one of these phrases. Additionally, it inspires confidence in the reader about your ability to convey your ideas.
MS in Computer Sci...
I boast excellent observation and analysis skills. I am excellently thorough with the subject knowing all the aspects, a...
400 Completed Orders
42 Student Reviews
I took a MBA degre...
Along with an in-depth knowledge in marketing I am also skilled in composing assignments especially case studies with pr...
300 Completed Orders
51 Student Reviews
Msc in Nursing fro...
I am in this field for 15 years, which helps me come up with unique topics and cases for students’ papers. I have comp...
400 Completed Orders
125 Student Reviews
Masters in Account...
I am thorough with the changing financial scenario in US and the factors behind it. I am also updated with the changing ...
250 Completed Orders
34 Student Reviews
MS in Statistics...
I am skilled in creative writing to craft any kind of assignment especially essays, thesis and dissertations of any kind...
360 Completed Orders
45 Student Reviews
MS in Biology...
I am skilled to do research to find proper content for research papers, thesis and dissertation. I give only verified co...
200 Completed Orders
56 Student Reviews
M.sc in Electronic...
Allotting responsibilities and giving directions on achieving the targets within the team. Excellent research and creati...
350 Completed Orders
45 Student Reviews