Get Instant Help From 5000+ Experts For

Writing: Get your essay and assignment written from scratch by PhD expert

Rewriting: Paraphrase or rewrite your friend's essay with similar meaning at reduced cost

Editing:Proofread your work by experts and improve grade at Lowest cost

And Improve Your Grades
Phone no. Missing!

Enter phone no. to receive critical updates and urgent messages !

Attach file

Error goes here

Files Missing!

Please upload all relevant files for quick & complete assistance.

Guaranteed Higher Grade!
Free Quote
Comparative Analysis of Stakeholder Contributions in UK and US Healthcare Systems


In order to achieve full marks, you must submit your work before the deadline. Work that is submitted late – up to five working days after the published submission deadline - will be accepted and marked. However, the element of the module’s assessment to which the work contributes will be capped with a maximum mark of 40%.

Work cannot be submitted if the period of 5 working days after the deadline has passed (unless there is an approved extension). Failure to submit within the relevant period will mean that you have failed the assessment.

Knowledge and Understanding

Critically review key sources of information to underpin comparative analysis.

Intellectual, practical, affective and transferrable skills

Applying comparative research methodologies.

Assignment Question

You work for the World Health Organisation, as a Health Systems Analyst and have been asked to write a report on the following -

Using comparative methodology, compare and contrast the contributions of ONE stakeholder in the United Kingdom’s and United States of America’s healthcare systems.

Choose One stakeholder from the following -
  • Government
  • Private Sector
Assignment Guidance

The ARU generic report writing structure is recommended, please see guides on the VLE for further information.

In writing your report you are expected to use theoretical perspectives, you have studied during the course or from your research, and make reference to national evidence.

It is expected that you will use 8-10 independently researched academic sources from the ARU library

Assignment submissions will be marked with reference to the below criteria, as summarised in Table 1, based on ARU Level 6 generic grading criteria.

  1. Application of comparative methodology theory to healthcare systems analysis. (40 marks)
  2. Evidence of critical and comparative analysis of the role of a stakeholder specific to a health issue in the UK and USA (50 marks)
  3. Demonstration of academic skills (10 marks)

sales chat
sales chat