DNA Double-Strand Break Repair Mechanisms and Genome Size in Eukaryotes

Similarities and Differences between HDR and NHEJ DNA Repair Mechanisms

Double-strand breaks of DNA are made during the meiosis process. This is a common event in eukaryotic cells.These common DNA strands are Non-homologous recombination and homologous recombination joining. Both these DNA strands respond to DNA damage. Non-homologous and Homologous recombination end-joining are used to repair the damage of the DNA. Similarities between these strands are they help to stabilise the DNA because the DNA in the living cell is more unstable (Rawat et al. 2018). In this case, when recombination takes place in the meiosis process both these strands are made and repaired. Other similarities are that during the rearrangements of the gene segments both these DNA strands are repaired. Both these chromosomes are an effective way of the repairing process. Both the DNA strands are located in the same cell genes. Both the non-homologous and homologous recombination end-joining is an important process of repairing the broken DNA or for the damaged one. These DNA strands have similarities in that both exchange the genes when synapses occurred. Non-homologous and homologous recombination end-joining maintain the cells. Both these DNA strands are present in the eukaryotic cells. Non-homologous and homologous recombination end-joining both the DNA strands can cause gene deletion. If both these strands have remained in an unrepaired position for a long time they can cause chromosome loss. Both these double-strand breaks are needed to maintain the chromosomes in the cell. Non-homologous and homologous recombination end-joining both these DNA strands leads to a crucial repairing process of damaged chromosomes. Both these DNA strands repair mechanism systems operate the eukaryotic cells and also examine the cells as well. Both these DNA strands can cause gene amplification in the cell (Ingram et al. 2019). One of the similarities is that they can be repaired by the single strand burning process.  Both these double-strand break repair systems repeated their process of repairing between the adjacent DNA in the cells. Both these strands have double ends and they repair the damage in the direct or the indirect process and are capable of repairing the broken DNA and their pathways are also quite similar.

Difference between two major double-strand break repair pathways:

Genome size is larger and more complicated than other prokaryotes. The fingers two represent the range and size of the genome. They have three domains: bacteria,  eukaryote, and archaic. Prokaryotes are smaller than eukaryotes with smaller larger bacteria and smaller size eukaryotes. The hymen DNA is not more than ten times the human genome. The orgasms are not complete and are not directly proportional. The program is the most ethical part of human orgasms. Some of the orgasms have more major than DNA in the human body (Her et al. 2018). The DNA has a larger number of eukaryotic cells in the human body. The Genome has a direct contract with the orgasms of the complexity of the eukaryote. Eukaryotes include taxi with genome cells in the human or the animal body. Some of the research says that the genome is smaller than some of the mammals. It creates a huge bond between the genome and the human orgasms of the eukaryote. That has some positive bond between it. There are genome sizes and the orgasms of complicity in eukaryote are displayed in the system. The research says the genome also displays the organism work. It says that there are some complications and that is the larger program of the human body. That considers the Genome size of measure of the biological complexity of the orgasm. There are large groups of the orgasms that are good on approximation in the size of the non-redundant genome and it's difficult to calculate. The relationship is always considered as the perfect relationship in the human body. A hypothesis of the positive connections excised between them because it creates more leaders and complicates orgasm in the human body. Genomes increase the function of the orgasm process. The increase happens from the Prokaryotes and the eukaryote from the uncalculated eukaryote. There is a positive relationship between genome size and the orgasm level. The leather numbers of the orgasms call junk DNA which functions as indenting at the human body. MGE plays a major role in justifying the eukaryote and it also increases the complicity (Vítor et al. 2020). DNA protects the numeric cells and creates a relation between genome size and orgasms. DNA repairs the disturbance systems because the genome cells cannot grow up without its limits. The Other side of the complicity orgasm suggests the genome cells maintain the orgasm level. The orgasm with the minimal genome is every group was made with the un-calculated residues which include the generic simplicity and it calls sell call. Cymbionce also transfers the host orgasm genome to a third place where they can function their program. In the biosphere, the orgasm and genome size is the most complicated in a eukaryote. This indicates the relation between genome cells or size and the orgasms of complexity in a eukaryote. The main reason for this relation is maintaining the hymens of the animal's body’s orgasms.      

Importance of Homologous Recombination and Non-homologous Recombination in DNA Repair

Also, there are other reasons behind the statement at the fore of the relationship between the genome size and the organism complexity in eukaryotes. Organism complexity refers to the definition of the number of different cells in the body. It is obviously true that the genome size which is started from one to infinity gives the impact of the number of cells. /as it is already stated, with the growth of the body, the number of cells is increased accordingly. So, along with the increment of the number of cells, the genome size is also increased (Bader et al. 2020). The main reason behind it is the increasing size of the genome influences the enhancement of the human cells. If the genome does not play this role, the enhancement of the number of cells will stop. Then the eukaryotes can not make the growth in their body which may stop their lifecycle.  This is totally against the ecosystem as eukaryotes are one of the parts of it. If their life cycle stops, then the misbalance of the ecosystem also impacts other species. So, based on these explanations it can say that there is the most significant connection between the genome size and the organism complexity in the body of the eukaryotes.

Comparison of how transposition is achieved by a maize Ds element and yeast Ty1 element. 

 The maize Ac/Ds element is the first transposable element to be discovered by Barbara McClintock. 

In the process of transcription, enzyme is required which is RNA polymerase. RNA polymerase 2 is a major polymerase enzyme involved in the RNA pol 2 along with other proteins known as the transcription factors required for the initiation of transcription. Because there are many transcription factors involved in eukaryotic transcription. Once RNA polymerase has initiated transcription it shifts into an elongation phase. And finally when the RNA polymerase reaches the end of the gene termination of transcription is carried out by termination factors (Piotto et al. 2018). The promoter binds transcription factors that control the initiation of transcription. It can be short or sometimes too long, the longer promoter helps to create the more available space for proteins to bind.  It interacts between the activators and transcription factors and helps them to occur. In some eukaryotic genes, some regions help in increasing or enhancing transcription. These regions are also called enhancers which are not at all close to the genes they increase. Eukaryotic cells also have the ability to prevent transcription such as prokaryotic cells do. Transcriptional repressors sometimes bind promoter or enhancer regions and they also block transcription. The repressors also respond to external stimuli to prevent the binding of activating transcription factors like the transcriptional activators.

Impact of Genome Size on Organism Complexity in Eukaryotes

Discussion with examples:

Eukaryotic cells also alternatively process RNA processing to monitor cells count. Eukaryotes are the earliest known microfossils resembling eukaryotic organisms. It also contains organelles, mitochondria, a Golgi apparatus, endoplasmic reticulum and lysosomes (Kalasova et al. 2020). During the molecule's eukaryotic translation change the amino acid sequence is replicated as aspartic acid then results in inGUU as Valine.RNA molecule can be circulated capping, splicing and addition of a poly-A tail to an RNA molecule which can exit from the nucleus. The main two eukaryotic cells regulate RNA processing and transcription which takes place in the cytoplasm. The various level factors can affect genetic makeup, exposure to low-level substances, other environmental influences and age factors. Both the entrance and expressiveness can vary for people with the gene. Also, the RNA plays very vital role in the body as it is able to give the entire support to the DNA molecules. It becomes the causes of growth of the body as well. So, it is one of the most important part in the body which should be nourished.

Nuclear sequences in RNA single where to start protein synthesis: the beginning and ending occur through differences in the transferral elongation rhythm explained above. The site at which protein combination begins on the RNA is exceptionally critical, as long as it sets the reading body for the entire distance of the message. A mistake of one nucleotide either way at this phase would cause every following codon in the massage to be rhythmic so that a defective protein with a mix-up orders of amino acids consequence. The transferral of an RNA starts with the codon AUG, and an exceptional RNA is required to initiate translation (Tian et al. 2019). This initiator RNA every time takes the amino acid methionine so that all the newly constructed proteins have methionine as the earliest amino acid at their N-terminal end, that ending of a protein that is manufactured first. This methionine is normally separated later by a particular protease. The initiator RNA has a nucleus order marked from that of the RNA that generally brings methionine. In eukaryotes, the initiator RNA is initially filled into the tiny ribosomal distinct unit along with supplementary proteins called eukaryotic initiation elements. All the aminoacyl RNAs in the cell, at most the methionine, impose initiator RNA is effective in strongly binding the small ribosomal distinct unit without the absolute ribosome attendance. At this place, the initiation elements separate from the small ribosomal distinct unit to construct a way for the sizable ribosomal distinct unit to gather with it and absolute the ribosome.                        

The sequencing of thousands of isolates has revealed extensive genome diversity in many species because of bacterial infection. There are many different natures of diversity they have which will be discussed below:

In the first diversity, the speciality which they have is they have thecore genome in their bacterial species. In this section, the clusters have twenty accessions in the rate of their genome in the bacterial species. All the clusters have made the sequence from one to nineteen based on their genotypes (Scully et al. 2019). The first type of genotype which they have placed at the first position is the most active genome in their body. Then, in the sequence of the genotypes, the less to lesser active genotypes have made the list of their genome. In all these genotypes, the most effective genotypes help the bacterial sequence to make the activity in their body. In all the isolates, most of them have faced the issue because of this genome which is the core of their body. It is true that without the core genome their body starts to fry up and they may lose their power of actions. So, it is the most important part of their body to become more active and get freshness in their cells. Also, it is known by everyone that after a particular period, the bacterial species will lose their strength and they become dead. So, they become dead and they will lose their strength to give effect to any human body. Mostly, on the dead bodies and other collapsed places, the bacterial species make their living place which gives a negative impact and tries to heal. This is all because of the issue and nature of the core genome. On the other hand, the core genome is the most significant reason behind the negative effects of bacteria in the human body. As the number of good bacteria is lesser than the number of deadly bacteria, the core genome gives more strength in their body to make them powerful. It gives more strength in their body to give more impacts and effects on the human cells.

The other diversity which can be found in the bacterial species is the non-core genome. This plays a less significant role in their body. It also may affect dryness in their cells and also it gives so many negative impacts as well. The entire process runs through the horizontal transfer which is the main cause behind the bad effects of this genome (Gao et al. 2018). As an example of the human body, there are so many genes that are the main cause behind old age and other human body functions which decrease the time of living people. At the time when the human cells start to grow, this type of genes also starts to grow in the body. It becomes the reason behind so many deadly diseases as it causes the minimisation of human immunity. After the number of nineteenth genes in the bacterial isolation, the non-core genome starts to reveal. As same as the human body, the bacterial species have a particular time to change their genes and their impacts. In this sequence, the non-core genome plays the most vital role to give the energy to make the process faster. In the process of giving more activity in their body by the core genome, the non-core genome just plays the opposite role of the core genome. They are the main reason behind the non-effectiveness of the core genome and it runs from so many ages. Also, this is true that the non-core genome is beneficial for other species as it decreases the lifetime of bacteria. There are so many reasons behind this statement (Trenner et al. 2019). It is true that there are so many bacteria which give so many negative impacts on the human body. The number of effective bacteria is lesser than the non-effective bacteria. So, if their life becomes less because of the effects of the non-core genome, it will be beneficial for the human body. They become less strong day by day to give effects on the human cells which make the humans safe from the deadly effects of the bacteria species.

8F. CRISPR Prime Editing: Generally, it is a type of gene editing technique that is mainly used to perform targeted small insertions, deletions and base swapping in an effective and proper manner. Moreover, this method has ability to identify the target nucleotide sequence. For case, it can encode new genetic information. The following below picture reflects the key components of CRISPR Prime Editing such as:  

The prime editingneeds the attendance of a Casendonuclease as well as a single guide RNA (sg). But, as the basis of prime editing is to edit sequences without producing a double-stranded spoil, both components are slightly modified. Instead to traditional Cas9, this technique exploits Cas9 nickase—a version of Cas9 that nicks the DNA in preference to producing double-strand breaks—fused to a reverse transcriptase. This Cas9 fusion is known as a prime editor (PE). There are currently 3 iterations of high editors. PE1 changed into the primary version evolved that proven insertions, deletions, and base transversions at modest modifying efficiencies. In efforts to enhance modifying efficiencies, PE2 contained further changes that caused advanced binding and thermo balance. The maximum current versions, PE3 and PE3b, encompass the capability to fix the mismatch sequences that arise with prime enhancing.

The guide RNA, known prime altering guide RNA (pegRNA), is considerably bigger than standard sgRNAs generally utilized for CRISPR quality altering (>100nt versus 20nt). The pegRNA is a sgRNA with a groundwork restricting arrangement (PBS) and the layout containing the ideal RNA succession added at the 3' end. It is actually quite significant that right now, pegRNAs are made utilizing plasmids and in-vitro record. Together, they structure the PE:pegRNA complex, which is utilized to intervene genome altering inside the phone.

On the other hand it should also be noted down that; CRISPR Prime Editing provides a number of advantages/benefits over pervious gene editing technologies. For example, CRISPR edits heavily depends on non-homologous end joining. Moreover, it familiarizes single standard DNA breaks instead of double. In the same way, this technique provides balancing strengths as well as weaknesses for making targeted transition mutations. Apart from this, it is also provide more tractability as well as editing precision. Another main advantage of this technique is that it permits all kinds of substitutions prime system considering 3 different DNA binding events.

8E. Basically, DNA sequencing can be defined as a significant process of defining the order of nucleotides within a DNA molecule. Moreover, DNA sequencing is also called alaboratory technique and utilized for the purpose to determine theprecise sequence of bases in a DNA molecule. Furthermore, there are various types of specific methods have been developed to aid in the assembly of short read DNAsequences. For case, two most significant technique of DNAsequencing are listed as below such as:

• Maxam–Gilbert sequencing: It is also called chain termination technique which is mainly used for the purpose to determine the nucleotide sequence of DNA. On the other hand, it is also analyzed that, this is a major technique of DNA sequencing. This was proposed and developed by the Walter Gilbert as well asAllan Maxam in the year 1977. This method is generallyfounded on the nuclease-specific partial chemical modification of DNA. Along with this, it is also analyzed that, this is also called first widely utilized technique for the purpose of DNA sequencing. The main feature of this method is that it represent first generation of DNAsequencing. But, in the present time, this method is not utilized because of several limitations as well as introduction of next generationsequencing techniques.    
• Sanger sequencing: It is one of the best techniques of DNAsequencing by which ddNTPs (dideoxynucleotidephosphates) are combined or jointed by DNA polymerase during the time period of vitro DNA replication. This is most popular methods which was proposed and developed by Frederick Sanger in the year 1977. At the same time, it is also important to know that, this technique was mainly utilized in human Genome Project in order to determine sequences of relatively small fragments of human DNA. In the present time, this method is most widely used for the small scale trials or test. This method is also more effective for finishing regions that that cannot be simply sequenced by the next generation platform. In the same way, it can be said that, this is most common and popular techniques used now a days.  
  
  

 Reference list 

Andrade, Nadja S., et al. "Dipeptide repeat proteins inhibit homology-directed DNA double strand break repair in C9ORF72 ALS/FTD." Molecular neurodegeneration 15.1 (2020): 1-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13024-020-00365-9

Bader, Aldo S., et al. "The roles of RNA in DNA double-strand break repair." British journal of cancer 122.5 (2020): 613-623. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-019-0624-1

Baranes-Bachar, Keren, et al. "The ubiquitin E3/E4 ligase UBE4A adjusts protein ubiquitylation and accumulation at sites of DNA damage, facilitating double-strand break repair." Molecular cell 69.5 (2018): 866-878. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2018.02.002

Gao, Shengxian, et al. "An OB-fold complex controls the repair pathways for DNA double-strand breaks." Nature communications 9.1 (2018): 1-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-06407-7

Gong, Cheng, et al. "Quercetin suppresses DNA double-strand break repair and enhances the radiosensitivity of human ovarian cancer cells via p53-dependent endoplasmic reticulum stress pathway." OncoTargets and therapy 11 (2018): 17. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.2147%2FOTT.S147316

Her, Joonyoung, and Samuel F. Bunting. "How cells ensure correct repair of DNA double-strand breaks." Journal of Biological Chemistry 293.27 (2018): 10502-10511. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.TM118.000371

Ingram, S. P., et al. "Mechanistic modelling supports entwined rather than exclusively competitive DNA double-strand break repair pathway." Scientific reports 9.1 (2019): 1-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-42901-8

Kalasova, Ilona, et al. "Pathological mutations in PNKP trigger defects in DNA single-strand break repair but not DNA double-strand break repair." Nucleic acids research 48.12 (2020): 6672-6684. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkaa489

Piotto, Celeste, et al. "Functional validation of miRNAs targeting genes of DNA double-strand break repair to radiosensitize non-small lung cancer cells." Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)-Gene Regulatory Mechanisms 1861.12 (2018): 1102-1118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbagrm.2018.10.010

Rawat, Vipin, et al. "Bilirubin-induced oxidative stress leads to DNA damage in the cerebellum of hyperbilirubinemic neonatal mice and activates DNA double-strand break repair pathways in human cells." Oxidative medicine and cellular longevity 2018 (2018). DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/1801243

Sallmyr, Annahita, and Alan E. Tomkinson. "Repair of DNA double-strand breaks by mammalian alternative end-joining pathways." Journal of Biological Chemistry 293.27 (2018): 10536-10546. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.TM117.000375

Scully, Ralph, et al. "DNA double-strand break repair-pathway choice in somatic mammalian cells." Nature reviews Molecular cell biology 20.11 (2019): 698-714. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038%2Fs41580-019-0152-0

Tian, Xiao, et al. "SIRT6 is responsible for more efficient DNA double-strand break repair in long-lived species." Cell 177.3 (2019): 622-638. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2019.03.043

Trenner, Anika, and Alessandro A. Sartori. "Harnessing DNA double-strand break repair for cancer treatment." Frontiers in oncology 9 (2019): 1388. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2019.01388

Vítor, Alexandra C., et al. "Studying DNA double-strand break repair: an ever-growing toolbox." Frontiers in molecular biosciences 7 (2020): 24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmolb.2020.00024