Professional Ethics and Misconduct: Comparing and Contrasting Conduct Unbecoming a Regulated Immigra

Part I - Ethics and Professional Misconduct

INSTRUCTIONS For each of the following parts, please use the provided material(s) including the ICCRC Code of Professional Ethics. Part I Ethics and Professional Misconduct Please answer the following question Compare and contrast professional misconduct and conduct unbecoming a regulated immigration consultant.Part II See attached “Miller Decision” Please read the attached Miller decision and solve the following problem(s) 1. As an unpaid representative, which policy(s) did Ken Miller contravene and which section, if applicable? 2. With regard to raising concerns raised by the IRB Member, which policy(s) gave the Member the authority to proceed against Ken Miller and which section applied, if applicable? 3. What law or policy states that no person shall knowingly, directly or indirectly, represent or advise a person for consideration — or offer to do so — in connection with a proceeding or application [in an immigration matter]? _ 4. In your own words what did the Board determine in the Miller case? What sections of the Code of Professional Ethics did he contravene? Explain.