Reflection on Therapeutic Relationship with Patients and Critical Thinking

Information can be easily followed. Effective transition and a professional format are used. Advanced style of writing

Information can be followed. Satisfactory transitions and a structured format are used. Satisfactory style of writing

Information can be difficult to follow due to inadequate transitions and/or rambling format. Areas of development needed.

Information is not organized; logic is questionable; inadequate effort.

Poor organization, requirements not met

Not submitted = 0

Learning Plan is mostly incomplete.

Demonstrates reflective practice and analysis through connections made; explained very well; succinctly.

Demonstrates reflective practice and analysis with some thoughts and connections; some less detailed or less clear.

Demonstrates reflective practice and analysis on a few points; some questions of  logic; minimal detail; some lack of clarity

Level of demonstrated critical thinking and analysis is very week; details vague and unclear.

Lacks demonstrated critical reflective practice and analysis, detail and clarity.

Not submitted = 0

Addressed all elements completely with significant support. All facts are well supported by the evidence and the explanation is both concise and complete.

Addressed the elements but left out some details. Details are generally correct and supported by evidence with satisfactory explanations.

Addressed the questions but provided few details.  

Some details are questionable or lack support.

Did not address some of the questions. Detail and support generally lacking.

Questions poorly addressed in general. Detail and support is poor; lacking.

Not submitted = 0

Learning Goals are complete and connected to reflective component with all sections complete and detailed as per CNO QA guidelines.

Learning Goals are complete with all sections complete as per CNO QA guidelines. Some details or connections could be explained more in-depth

Learning Goals are mostly complete with some sections needing details. Connections to reflective work less clear.

Learning Goals are somewhat complete but detail is lacking.

Learning Plan is not complete.

Not submitted = 0

Clear and concise and contains no spelling, grammatical or mechanical errors. Minimum 3 professional journal sources, accurately cited and referenced. Additionally cites Professional sources (e.g. CNO) Citations match the reference list and vice-versa

No Deduction

Contains 1-4 combined spelling, grammatical or mechanical errors; or APA errors

Minimum 3 professional journal sources. Additionally cites Professional sources (e.g. CNO)

Deduction - 0.5

Contains numerous 5-12 combined spelling, grammatical and mechanical errors; APA errors.

Does not contain the required minimum 3 professional journal sources or other citations

Deduction – 1.0

Poor spelling, grammar or mechanics; over 12 APA errors throughout.

Citations and references do not match; does not contain the required minimum 3 professional journal sources or other citations.

Deduction -1.5

No attempt to correct spelling, grammar, mechanics; or use APA style; No attempt to cite and reference as per APA.

APA contract checklist not included

Deduction – 3.0